Pelosi: Without new witnesses, Trump 'cannot be acquitted'

[volsrock]

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi told reporters the president will not be exonerated if the Senate acquits him by this weekend because the trial would not be a fair one.

“He will not be acquitted,” Pelosi said Thursday. “You cannot be acquitted if you don't have a trial. And you don't have a trial if you don't have witnesses and documentation.”

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/n...t-be-acquitted


Sorry Nanzi, witnesses and documentation was YOUR job not the job of the Senate.

[archives]

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi told reporters the president will not be exonerated if the Senate acquits him by this weekend because the trial would not be a fair one.

“He will not be acquitted,” Pelosi said Thursday. “You cannot be acquitted if you don't have a trial. And you don't have a trial if you don't have witnesses and documentation.”

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/n...t-be-acquitted


Sorry Nanzi, witnesses and documentation was YOUR job not the job of the Senate.

First off, Trump was always going to be acquitted, it was a gimme from the start, and Pelosi is right, it was a cover up, what was the last trial, real trial, the House didn't conduct a trial, where evidence, witnesses, and documentation was denied to the prosecutor

Mitch's shame played out just as predicted, unfortunately for him and Trump, America got to see it all unfold before them, Pelosi was never after the Senate, the jury she wanted was public opinion, and she got it

[volsrock]

First off, Trump was always going to be acquitted, it was a gimme from the start, and Pelosi is right, it was a cover up, what was the last trial, real trial, the House didn't conduct a trial, where evidence, witnesses, and documentation was denied to the prosecutor

Mitch's shame played out just as predicted, unfortunately for him and Trump, America got to see it all unfold before them, Pelosi was never after the Senate, the jury she wanted was public opinion, and she got it

Its a gimme people are acquitted when there is no evidence of a crime!

[Celticguy]

But Nan, your boy shitt had loads of witnesses and reams of documents. None of which changed the basic fact that asking a favor regarding corruption in the previous administration is not wrong.
You gambled and you lost. In this case you may well lose the ranch.

[Centerleftfl]

Perfectly logical.

20 years LAW AND ORDER ran? Guess they could do the next 20 using "JUST ORDER".

The sound could be reduced to HALF of ....

[Darth Omar]

First off, Trump was always going to be acquitted, it was a gimme from the start, and Pelosi is right, it was a cover up, what was the last trial, real trial, the House didn't conduct a trial, where evidence, witnesses, and documentation was denied to the prosecutor

Mitch's shame played out just as predicted, unfortunately for him and Trump, America got to see it all unfold before them, Pelosi was never after the Senate, the jury she wanted was public opinion, and she got it

If it’s obvious a president is going to be acquitted in the Senate that equals a ‘no vote’ on the articles of impeachment by the House.

That vote never should have occurred.