Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 52

Thread: WSJ says McConnell can’t block witnesses!

  1. #31 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    57,638
    Thanks
    563
    Thanked 10,010 Times in 8,569 Posts
    Groans
    29
    Groaned 498 Times in 487 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Earl View Post
    Bolton is in the “selling book” mode.

    Put him under oath, if he is even called. What he says under oath and when selling a book are probably two different animals.

    Surely there were others in the meeting.

    The Trump lawyers have presented a compelling case that there is no compelling case for impeachment, no matter what Bolton says.

    The outcome is not in doubt.

    Anyone on the planet thinks there are 20 Republicans who will vote for impeachment?

    Failure ...again for the Democrats.
    What's going to be funny is when Trump wins in November and the House goes back to the Republicans just how quickly all these Democrats that pretend to be in lock step will turn on each other.

  2. #32 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    94,217
    Thanks
    9,841
    Thanked 33,910 Times in 21,670 Posts
    Groans
    290
    Groaned 5,696 Times in 5,198 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CFM View Post
    How about the gutless so called whistleblower? When is that lying POS going to have the guts to say who he is?
    It would be illegal to out him/her. I do not think he is a liar, so much evidence backs him up.
    4,487

    18 U.S. Code § 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
    44 U.S.C. 2202 - The United States shall reserve and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records; and such records shall be administered in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.


    LOCK HIM UP!

  3. #33 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    94,217
    Thanks
    9,841
    Thanked 33,910 Times in 21,670 Posts
    Groans
    290
    Groaned 5,696 Times in 5,198 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CFM View Post
    If that was the case, they would have called them during the impeachment inquiry.
    No because then you guys would be screaming that it was about to happen during an election.
    4,487

    18 U.S. Code § 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
    44 U.S.C. 2202 - The United States shall reserve and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records; and such records shall be administered in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.


    LOCK HIM UP!

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Jarod For This Post:

    Earl (01-29-2020)

  5. #34 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    73,794
    Thanks
    102,723
    Thanked 55,195 Times in 33,876 Posts
    Groans
    3,189
    Groaned 5,086 Times in 4,702 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darth Omar View Post
    Do Democrats have the votes to block Hunter Biden?!
    Oh, please put Hunter on the stand, it’s a bluff the Republicans are calling because it could blow up in their face, and they know it.

  6. The Following User Groans At Phantasmal For This Awful Post:

    Earl (01-29-2020)

  7. #35 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    52,507
    Thanks
    78,192
    Thanked 23,686 Times in 17,937 Posts
    Groans
    38,863
    Groaned 3,248 Times in 3,052 Posts
    Blog Entries
    8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CFM View Post
    What's going to be funny is when Trump wins in November and the House goes back to the Republicans just how quickly all these Democrats that pretend to be in lock step will turn on each other.
    Indeed.

    Middle Americans abhor the idea that a few radical Democrat Socialists in Congress can overturn an election where the American people elected President Trump.

  8. #36 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    94,217
    Thanks
    9,841
    Thanked 33,910 Times in 21,670 Posts
    Groans
    290
    Groaned 5,696 Times in 5,198 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Phantasmal View Post
    Oh, please put Hunter on the stand, it’s a bluff the Republicans are calling because it could blow up in their face, and they know it.
    Id love to see Hunter on the stand, they got nothing, that guy should be begging to testify.

    Heck lets put Ivanka on the stand also.
    4,487

    18 U.S. Code § 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
    44 U.S.C. 2202 - The United States shall reserve and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records; and such records shall be administered in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.


    LOCK HIM UP!

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to Jarod For This Post:

    Phantasmal (01-29-2020)

  10. #37 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    52,507
    Thanks
    78,192
    Thanked 23,686 Times in 17,937 Posts
    Groans
    38,863
    Groaned 3,248 Times in 3,052 Posts
    Blog Entries
    8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Phantasmal View Post
    Oh, please put Hunter on the stand, it’s a bluff the Republicans are calling because it could blow up in their face, and they know it.
    This isn’t what the House managers are saying.

    It would put old Uncle Joe at extreme risk.

  11. #38 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    49,883
    Thanks
    14,463
    Thanked 32,101 Times in 21,165 Posts
    Groans
    6
    Groaned 1,307 Times in 1,235 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Phantasmal View Post
    Oh, please put Hunter on the stand, it’s a bluff the Republicans are calling because it could blow up in their face, and they know it.
    Your opinion is duly noted lol.

    Will you be voting?
    Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to Darth Omar For This Post:

    Earl (01-29-2020)

  13. #39 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    94,217
    Thanks
    9,841
    Thanked 33,910 Times in 21,670 Posts
    Groans
    290
    Groaned 5,696 Times in 5,198 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    I hope they call Hunter and Ivanka.
    4,487

    18 U.S. Code § 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
    44 U.S.C. 2202 - The United States shall reserve and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records; and such records shall be administered in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.


    LOCK HIM UP!

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to Jarod For This Post:

    Phantasmal (01-29-2020)

  15. #40 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    73,794
    Thanks
    102,723
    Thanked 55,195 Times in 33,876 Posts
    Groans
    3,189
    Groaned 5,086 Times in 4,702 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darth Omar View Post
    Your opinion is duly noted lol.

    Will you be voting?
    Is this your sample of being witty?

  16. #41 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Gone to the mattresses
    Posts
    22,458
    Thanks
    1,135
    Thanked 11,622 Times in 8,086 Posts
    Groans
    874
    Groaned 639 Times in 618 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    I want Bolton, both Biden’s, Mulvaney, Rudy, the indicted Ukraine guys, Trump and anyone else...
    No you don’t

    Not if you want Biden as your nominee

    Now if you are a Bernie Bot you want Biden to testify

    Do you really want Hunter to testify that he only got the job because of who his daddy is?

    Remember it only takes a suspicion to launch an investigation. You taught us that. The bar is low to investigate. You taught us that.

  17. The Following User Says Thank You to canceled.2021.2 For This Post:

    Earl (01-29-2020)

  18. #42 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    52,507
    Thanks
    78,192
    Thanked 23,686 Times in 17,937 Posts
    Groans
    38,863
    Groaned 3,248 Times in 3,052 Posts
    Blog Entries
    8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darth Omar View Post
    Do Democrats have the votes to block Hunter Biden?!
    No, D.O., the Democrats do not have the votes to block Hunter, Joe, Pencil-Neck Shifty Schiff, el Sapo, the whistle blower...
    Last edited by Earl; 01-29-2020 at 09:24 AM.

  19. #43 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    12,526
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 8,341 Times in 5,714 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 374 Times in 355 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    The Wall Street Journal is reporting that Mitch McConnell does not have the Votes to block witnesses at this point
    I think we all want witnesses, matter of fact can't wait

    Hunter quid pro Joe, whistleblower, Schiff

    of course lets deposition them all in private first so we can match stories
    This just In::: Trump indicted for living in liberals heads and not paying RENT

    C̶N̶N̶ SNN.... Shithole News Network

    Trump Is Coming back to a White House Near you

  20. The Following User Says Thank You to Getin the ring For This Post:

    Earl (01-29-2020)

  21. #44 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    52,507
    Thanks
    78,192
    Thanked 23,686 Times in 17,937 Posts
    Groans
    38,863
    Groaned 3,248 Times in 3,052 Posts
    Blog Entries
    8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Phantasmal View Post
    Is this your sample of being witty?
    Is this an example of you being intelligent?

  22. #45 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Gone to the mattresses
    Posts
    22,458
    Thanks
    1,135
    Thanked 11,622 Times in 8,086 Posts
    Groans
    874
    Groaned 639 Times in 618 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    Simply untrue. There were thousands of people who should have been investigated over the first three years of Trumps presidency, it was not until Joe Biden declared and was beating Trump in the polling data that Trump decided he needed an investigation. Logic proves that Trumps interests were purely personal and not for the good of the nation.
    Logic?

    LOL

Similar Threads

  1. 72% want witnesses
    By evince in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 120
    Last Post: 01-29-2020, 07:46 PM
  2. So who wants witnesses
    By Wilhelm Zenz in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 163
    Last Post: 01-23-2020, 10:00 PM
  3. Voters are demanding that McConnell hold a real trial, with witnesses
    By floridafan in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 320
    Last Post: 12-31-2019, 07:21 AM
  4. McConnell does not have 51 Senators to vote for "no witnesses"
    By reagansghost in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12-20-2019, 09:24 PM
  5. Why won’t the retRumplicans call witnesses?
    By Jarod in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 12-17-2019, 09:56 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •