Did the NY times revise history too?
https://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/30/p...pointment.html
Or maybe you dont know history.
It’s just a way of mocking you for dragging around this article as evidence trying to smear Bolton. We are well aware of Bolton’s history, but it doesn’t matter when there is other evidence and support witnesses. It’s like Cohen, very dishonest guy, but he had evidence to back his claims.
That's a strange way of saying they didn't do their job in the House.
The star would be the so called whistleblower. Why don't Democrats want that coward to testify?
How about Old Joe and No Experience Hunter?
The Democrats can't claim to want witnesses then say you can only call those we want.
CFM (01-29-2020)
Bookmarks