Page 5 of 9 FirstFirst 123456789 LastLast
Results 61 to 75 of 121

Thread: 72% want witnesses

  1. #61 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    life
    Posts
    52,794
    Thanks
    13,341
    Thanked 22,579 Times in 15,814 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,951 Times in 1,862 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Celticguy View Post
    Diane Feinstein wants to acquit and let the people decide in 9 months.
    lol..she retracted that in a twitter moment

  2. #62 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Posts
    7,405
    Thanks
    757
    Thanked 2,440 Times in 2,013 Posts
    Groans
    60
    Groaned 611 Times in 582 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Teflon Don View Post
    That isn’t their job
    A trial without witnesses isn't a trial!
    Tie Your 'roo down Mate

  3. #63 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Posts
    7,405
    Thanks
    757
    Thanked 2,440 Times in 2,013 Posts
    Groans
    60
    Groaned 611 Times in 582 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RB 60 View Post
    He was a nobody Republican for how long, now, all of a sudden, he's the second coming. Liberals
    Revised bullshit history as made up by RB
    Tie Your 'roo down Mate

  4. #64 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,815
    Thanks
    301
    Thanked 943 Times in 675 Posts
    Groans
    20
    Groaned 10 Times in 10 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Miss Margot Frank View Post
    Revised bullshit history as made up by RB
    Did the NY times revise history too?
    https://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/30/p...pointment.html

    Or maybe you dont know history.

  5. #65 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    73,389
    Thanks
    101,920
    Thanked 54,766 Times in 33,631 Posts
    Groans
    3,155
    Groaned 5,065 Times in 4,683 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Southern Chicken View Post
    Did the NY times revise history too?
    https://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/30/p...pointment.html

    Or maybe you dont know history.
    Ahhhh, dragging your little article around, isn’t that sweet.

  6. #66 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,815
    Thanks
    301
    Thanked 943 Times in 675 Posts
    Groans
    20
    Groaned 10 Times in 10 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Phantasmal View Post
    Ahhhh, dragging your little article around, isn’t that sweet.
    Is that a rebuttal? Or are you a play by play commentator?

  7. #67 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    57,638
    Thanks
    563
    Thanked 10,010 Times in 8,569 Posts
    Groans
    29
    Groaned 498 Times in 487 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Miss Margot Frank View Post
    A trial without witnesses isn't a trial!

    Why didn't the House call John Bolton when they were having their circle jerk inquiry?

  8. #68 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    73,389
    Thanks
    101,920
    Thanked 54,766 Times in 33,631 Posts
    Groans
    3,155
    Groaned 5,065 Times in 4,683 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Southern Chicken View Post
    Is that a rebuttal? Or are you a play by play commentator?
    It’s just a way of mocking you for dragging around this article as evidence trying to smear Bolton. We are well aware of Bolton’s history, but it doesn’t matter when there is other evidence and support witnesses. It’s like Cohen, very dishonest guy, but he had evidence to back his claims.

  9. #69 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Posts
    7,405
    Thanks
    757
    Thanked 2,440 Times in 2,013 Posts
    Groans
    60
    Groaned 611 Times in 582 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CFM View Post
    Why didn't the House call John Bolton when they were having their circle jerk inquiry?
    Saved the star for the main event
    Tie Your 'roo down Mate

  10. #70 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    57,638
    Thanks
    563
    Thanked 10,010 Times in 8,569 Posts
    Groans
    29
    Groaned 498 Times in 487 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Miss Margot Frank View Post
    Saved the star for the main event
    That's a strange way of saying they didn't do their job in the House.

    The star would be the so called whistleblower. Why don't Democrats want that coward to testify?

    How about Old Joe and No Experience Hunter?

    The Democrats can't claim to want witnesses then say you can only call those we want.

  11. #71 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,815
    Thanks
    301
    Thanked 943 Times in 675 Posts
    Groans
    20
    Groaned 10 Times in 10 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Phantasmal View Post
    It’s just a way of mocking you for dragging around this article as evidence trying to smear Bolton. We are well aware of Bolton’s history, but it doesn’t matter when there is other evidence and support witnesses. It’s like Cohen, very dishonest guy, but he had evidence to back his claims.
    Again smearing Bolton is what the Democrats did in the past. What testimony or evidence has Bolton produced for these HEARSAY witnesses?
    I am mocking you back.

  12. #72 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,815
    Thanks
    301
    Thanked 943 Times in 675 Posts
    Groans
    20
    Groaned 10 Times in 10 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CFM View Post
    That's a strange way of saying they didn't do their job in the House.

    The star would be the so called whistleblower. Why don't Democrats want that coward to testify?

    How about Old Joe and No Experience Hunter?

    The Democrats can't claim to want witnesses then say you can only call those we want.
    No trial I know allows only the prosecutors to determine all trial witnesses.

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to Southern Chicken For This Post:

    CFM (01-29-2020)

  14. #73 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    57,638
    Thanks
    563
    Thanked 10,010 Times in 8,569 Posts
    Groans
    29
    Groaned 498 Times in 487 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Southern Chicken View Post
    No trial I know allows only the prosecutors to determine all trial witnesses.
    That's what the left thinks should be done.

    The House didn't let the defense determine who they called during the impeachment inquiry.

  15. #74 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Posts
    7,405
    Thanks
    757
    Thanked 2,440 Times in 2,013 Posts
    Groans
    60
    Groaned 611 Times in 582 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CFM View Post
    That's a strange way of saying they didn't do their job in the House.

    The star would be the so called whistleblower. Why don't Democrats want that coward to testify?

    How about Old Joe and No Experience Hunter?

    The Democrats can't claim to want witnesses then say you can only call those we want.
    The Senate does the trial moron
    Tie Your 'roo down Mate

  16. #75 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    11,056
    Thanks
    4,929
    Thanked 3,685 Times in 2,733 Posts
    Groans
    6
    Groaned 707 Times in 647 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flash View Post
    They have to file a complaint so police can prosecute. We don't even know who those women are.
    Yes we do, liar!

Similar Threads

  1. So who wants witnesses
    By Wilhelm Zenz in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 163
    Last Post: 01-23-2020, 10:00 PM
  2. witnesses are now allowed to speak
    By evince in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 03-26-2019, 08:17 AM
  3. GOP lied about GPS witnesses being uncooperative
    By evince in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 60
    Last Post: 02-03-2018, 01:02 PM
  4. Coach faces witnesses
    By Guns Guns Guns in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-11-2012, 08:02 PM
  5. I'm joining the Jehovah's Witnesses
    By Augustine in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 06-04-2007, 09:23 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •