Page 1 of 9 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 126

Thread: Let's see how many leftist will rationally answer this post

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    8,279
    Thanks
    87
    Thanked 2,182 Times in 1,821 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 610 Times in 560 Posts

    Default Let's see how many leftist will rationally answer this post

    How does Joe Biden manage to get a pass from Democrats and their boot licking media propaganda machine for being investigated for Ukrainian corruption?

    How can Democrats and their boot licking media propaganda machine claim investigating Joe Biden is a no-no just because he’s a candidate for the Presidency, when Donald J. Trump was being investigated by the Obama Justice Department and FBI even before and after he became a candidate for the Presidency and ever since he won the Presidency?

    Why are Democrats and their boot licking media propaganda machine saying they want witnesses to bolster their Impeach & Remove Trump scam, when the very same witnesses they claim they need they themselves didn’t bother to subpoena when they were building their laughable preposterous House case?

    Why do the Democrats and their boot licking media propaganda machine cry out to the Senate for “MORE WITNESSES” when all along they’ve been claiming they already have an open and shut undisputed lead pipe cinch proven case for removing Trump from office?

    Who on this forum is sooooo partisan, stupid and insane that they aren’t able to see through this Democrat and their boot licking media propaganda machine’s corrupt and criminal Kabuki Theater Show?
    "Government is force by definition and corruption by nature. The bigger the government, the greater the force and the greater the corruption."

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Robo For This Post:

    Truth Detector (01-29-2020)

  3. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    47,509
    Thanks
    17,005
    Thanked 13,151 Times in 10,077 Posts
    Groans
    452
    Groaned 2,450 Times in 2,265 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Joe Biden didn't have any dealings in Ukraine.

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Jack For This Post:

    Guno צְבִי (01-27-2020)

  5. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    8,279
    Thanks
    87
    Thanked 2,182 Times in 1,821 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 610 Times in 560 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack View Post
    Joe Biden didn't have any dealings in Ukraine.
    Then Quid-Pro-Quo Joe lied when he went on video claiming he got a Ukrainian prosecutor fired by bribing the Ukraine government by holding out on American taxpayers aid loot for Ukraine, right Jack?
    "Government is force by definition and corruption by nature. The bigger the government, the greater the force and the greater the corruption."

  6. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Robo For This Post:

    Daddyo (01-27-2020), Truth Detector (01-29-2020)

  7. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    47,509
    Thanks
    17,005
    Thanked 13,151 Times in 10,077 Posts
    Groans
    452
    Groaned 2,450 Times in 2,265 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Robo View Post
    Then Quid-Pro-Quo Joe lied when he went on video claiming he got a Ukrainian prosecutor fired by bribing the Ukraine government by holding out on American taxpayers aid loot for Ukraine, right Jack?
    The difference between 'then' and 'now', is that the Obama Administration went after 'corruption in Ukraine', something beneficial to the US and Taxpayer Money. Trump went after a 'Political Rival' for the benefit of Trump and his re-election, and had nothing to do with safeguarding Taxpayer Money. Trump used Taxpayer Money as an extortion tool. As Ukraine is being occupied by Russian Federation Forces, Trump deftly withholds vital Military Aid until Zelensky 'does him a Favor', namely, publicly state Ukraine is investigating the Bidens.

  8. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    41,958
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,036 Times in 13,846 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,042 Times in 2,838 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Robo View Post
    How does Joe Biden manage to get a pass from Democrats and their boot licking media propaganda machine for being investigated for Ukrainian corruption?

    How can Democrats and their boot licking media propaganda machine claim investigating Joe Biden is a no-no just because he’s a candidate for the Presidency, when Donald J. Trump was being investigated by the Obama Justice Department and FBI even before and after he became a candidate for the Presidency and ever since he won the Presidency?

    Why are Democrats and their boot licking media propaganda machine saying they want witnesses to bolster their Impeach & Remove Trump scam, when the very same witnesses they claim they need they themselves didn’t bother to subpoena when they were building their laughable preposterous House case?

    Why do the Democrats and their boot licking media propaganda machine cry out to the Senate for “MORE WITNESSES” when all along they’ve been claiming they already have an open and shut undisputed lead pipe cinch proven case for removing Trump from office?

    Who on this forum is sooooo partisan, stupid and insane that they aren’t able to see through this Democrat and their boot licking media propaganda machine’s corrupt and criminal Kabuki Theater Show?
    First, lets easily, for the umpteenth time, clarify the facts in the Biden accusations:

    https://www.factcheck.org/2019/09/tr...n-and-ukraine/
    https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-m...n-and-ukraine/
    factcheck.org/2019/09/trump-twists-facts-on-biden-and-ukraine/
    https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-m...whistleblower/
    news.yahoo.com/bolton-claims-trump-tied-ukraine-131544840.html

    The FBI was investigating Russian interference in the election that led them to the Trump campaign

    The witnesses were requested, most which followed orders from the White House to refuse, which they did, given that the McGhan subpoena has already been delayed in the Courts for over nine months now, waiting for the Courts to decide on subpoenas would have taken the hearings past the election if not longer

    Have you ever seen or even heard of a real trial where all witnesses were denied from testifying?

    Got anything else?

  9. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to archives For This Post:

    christiefan915 (01-31-2020), domer76 (01-29-2020)

  10. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    8,279
    Thanks
    87
    Thanked 2,182 Times in 1,821 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 610 Times in 560 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack View Post
    The difference between 'then' and 'now', is that the Obama Administration went after 'corruption in Ukraine', something beneficial to the US and Taxpayer Money.
    Funny Jack I don’t remember the Obama administration ever going after Quid-Pro-Quo Joe who brazenly presented himself on a public video as a bribery expert using the American’s taxpayer dollars in aid to Ukraine to get a Ukraine prosecutor fired for investigating a very corrupt Ukraine gas business where Quid-Pro-Quo Joe’s son was raking in millions setting on the board of that corrupt business selling favorable connections to his father’s Vise President title.

    I do remember though Jack Hillary Clinton and the DNC paying for the investigation of Donald J. Trump and the Obama justice Department, Intel agencies and FBI trying to frame Donald J. Trump for a crime even before he was a candidate for the Presidency.

    You’re right Jack there is a “difference” it’s just not the difference you and your rabid mad junkyard dog Democrats and their boot licking media propaganda machine make it out to be.

    Trump went after a 'Political Rival' for the benefit of Trump and his re-election, and had nothing to do with safeguarding Taxpayer Money.
    Actually Jack it’s not just the authority of every President, but it’s also the duty of every President to go after corruption wherever any taxpayer’s money is involved! Quid-Pro-Quo Joe being a candidate for Trump’s job is no immunity for looking the other way! It is in the interest of the American taxpayers to root out bleeping crooks like Quid-Pro-Quo Joe and his dope smoking Navy rejected son.

    Trump used Taxpayer Money as an extortion tool.
    There’s ZERO evidence of that!

    As Ukraine is being occupied by Russian Federation Forces, Trump deftly withholds vital Military Aid until Zelensky 'does him a Favor', namely, publicly state Ukraine is investigating the Bidens.
    Obama gave Ukraine blankets to fight the Russians, Trump gave the Ukraine Russian Tank killing rockets! Ask Zelensky who he prefers!
    "Government is force by definition and corruption by nature. The bigger the government, the greater the force and the greater the corruption."

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to Robo For This Post:

    Truth Detector (01-29-2020)

  12. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    41,958
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,036 Times in 13,846 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,042 Times in 2,838 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Robo View Post
    Funny Jack I don’t remember the Obama administration ever going after Quid-Pro-Quo Joe who brazenly presented himself on a public video as a bribery expert using the American’s taxpayer dollars in aid to Ukraine to get a Ukraine prosecutor fired for investigating a very corrupt Ukraine gas business where Quid-Pro-Quo Joe’s son was raking in millions setting on the board of that corrupt business selling favorable connections to his father’s Vise President title.

    I do remember though Jack Hillary Clinton and the DNC paying for the investigation of Donald J. Trump and the Obama justice Department, Intel agencies and FBI trying to frame Donald J. Trump for a crime even before he was a candidate for the Presidency.

    You’re right Jack there is a “difference” it’s just not the difference you and your rabid mad junkyard dog Democrats and their boot licking media propaganda machine make it out to be.



    Actually Jack it’s not just the authority of every President, but it’s also the duty of every President to go after corruption wherever any taxpayer’s money is involved! Quid-Pro-Quo Joe being a candidate for Trump’s job is no immunity for looking the other way! It is in the interest of the American taxpayers to root out bleeping crooks like Quid-Pro-Quo Joe and his dope smoking Navy rejected son.



    There’s ZERO evidence of that!



    Obama gave Ukraine blankets to fight the Russians, Trump gave the Ukraine Russian Tank killing rockets! Ask Zelensky who he prefers!
    There was no quid pro quo anywhere relevant to Biden

    Clinton hired a firm working for Republicans who hired a lawyer who hired an ex British agent who went to Russian sources, the Trump campaign eagerly met directly with Russians in Trump Tower anticipating help in their campaign, hopefully I don't have to explain the difference to you

    The question isn't what Trump gave the Ukraine after he was caught, irrelevant, rather if he leveraged this aid passed by Congress earlier for "favors" to advance his own personal political interests

    Nothing personal, but you are just echoing the talk radio, Humanity innuendos which have been debunked many times over

  13. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Location
    State of Bliss
    Posts
    31,007
    Thanks
    7,095
    Thanked 5,196 Times in 3,829 Posts
    Groans
    433
    Groaned 261 Times in 257 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack View Post
    Joe Biden didn't have any dealings in Ukraine.
    Yea, but other than that what's the reason.
    "There is no question former President Trump bears moral responsibility. His supporters stormed the Capitol because of the unhinged falsehoods he shouted into the world’s largest megaphone," McConnell wrote. "His behavior during and after the chaos was also unconscionable, from attacking Vice President Mike Pence during the riot to praising the criminals after it ended."



  14. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Location
    State of Bliss
    Posts
    31,007
    Thanks
    7,095
    Thanked 5,196 Times in 3,829 Posts
    Groans
    433
    Groaned 261 Times in 257 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Robo View Post
    Funny Jack I don’t remember the Obama administration ever going after Quid-Pro-Quo Joe who brazenly presented himself on a public video as a bribery expert using the American’s taxpayer dollars in aid to Ukraine to get a Ukraine prosecutor fired for investigating a very corrupt Ukraine gas business where Quid-Pro-Quo Joe’s son was raking in millions setting on the board of that corrupt business selling favorable connections to his father’s Vise President title.

    I do remember though Jack Hillary Clinton and the DNC paying for the investigation of Donald J. Trump and the Obama justice Department, Intel agencies and FBI trying to frame Donald J. Trump for a crime even before he was a candidate for the Presidency.

    You’re right Jack there is a “difference” it’s just not the difference you and your rabid mad junkyard dog Democrats and their boot licking media propaganda machine make it out to be.



    Actually Jack it’s not just the authority of every President, but it’s also the duty of every President to go after corruption wherever any taxpayer’s money is involved! Quid-Pro-Quo Joe being a candidate for Trump’s job is no immunity for looking the other way! It is in the interest of the American taxpayers to root out bleeping crooks like Quid-Pro-Quo Joe and his dope smoking Navy rejected son.



    There’s ZERO evidence of that!



    Obama gave Ukraine blankets to fight the Russians, Trump gave the Ukraine Russian Tank killing rockets! Ask Zelensky who he prefers!
    Po' robo, scraping bottom, can't hardly get anyone to argue against his shitty men made of straw no Mo'....strawman.gif
    "There is no question former President Trump bears moral responsibility. His supporters stormed the Capitol because of the unhinged falsehoods he shouted into the world’s largest megaphone," McConnell wrote. "His behavior during and after the chaos was also unconscionable, from attacking Vice President Mike Pence during the riot to praising the criminals after it ended."



  15. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Gone to the mattresses
    Posts
    22,458
    Thanks
    1,135
    Thanked 11,622 Times in 8,086 Posts
    Groans
    874
    Groaned 639 Times in 618 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack View Post
    Joe Biden didn't have any dealings in Ukraine.
    He didn’t?

    Oh his son did but you overlooked that

  16. The Following User Says Thank You to canceled.2021.2 For This Post:

    Truth Detector (01-29-2020)

  17. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    47,509
    Thanks
    17,005
    Thanked 13,151 Times in 10,077 Posts
    Groans
    452
    Groaned 2,450 Times in 2,265 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Robo View Post
    Funny Jack I don’t remember the Obama administration ever going after Quid-Pro-Quo Joe who brazenly presented himself on a public video as a bribery expert using the American’s taxpayer dollars in aid to Ukraine to get a Ukraine prosecutor fired for investigating a very corrupt Ukraine gas business where Quid-Pro-Quo Joe’s son was raking in millions setting on the board of that corrupt business selling favorable connections to his father’s Vise President title.

    I do remember though Jack Hillary Clinton and the DNC paying for the investigation of Donald J. Trump and the Obama justice Department, Intel agencies and FBI trying to frame Donald J. Trump for a crime even before he was a candidate for the Presidency.

    You’re right Jack there is a “difference” it’s just not the difference you and your rabid mad junkyard dog Democrats and their boot licking media propaganda machine make it out to be.



    Actually Jack it’s not just the authority of every President, but it’s also the duty of every President to go after corruption wherever any taxpayer’s money is involved! Quid-Pro-Quo Joe being a candidate for Trump’s job is no immunity for looking the other way! It is in the interest of the American taxpayers to root out bleeping crooks like Quid-Pro-Quo Joe and his dope smoking Navy rejected son.



    There’s ZERO evidence of that!



    Obama gave Ukraine blankets to fight the Russians, Trump gave the Ukraine Russian Tank killing rockets! Ask Zelensky who he prefers!
    You have your facts wrong.

  18. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    26,116
    Thanks
    694
    Thanked 5,043 Times in 3,907 Posts
    Groans
    85
    Groaned 1,697 Times in 1,555 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Robo View Post
    How does Joe Biden manage to get a pass from Democrats and their boot licking media propaganda machine for being investigated for Ukrainian corruption?

    How can Democrats and their boot licking media propaganda machine claim investigating Joe Biden is a no-no just because he’s a candidate for the Presidency, when Donald J. Trump was being investigated by the Obama Justice Department and FBI even before and after he became a candidate for the Presidency and ever since he won the Presidency?

    Why are Democrats and their boot licking media propaganda machine saying they want witnesses to bolster their Impeach & Remove Trump scam, when the very same witnesses they claim they need they themselves didn’t bother to subpoena when they were building their laughable preposterous House case?

    Why do the Democrats and their boot licking media propaganda machine cry out to the Senate for “MORE WITNESSES” when all along they’ve been claiming they already have an open and shut undisputed lead pipe cinch proven case for removing Trump from office?

    Who on this forum is sooooo partisan, stupid and insane that they aren’t able to see through this Democrat and their boot licking media propaganda machine’s corrupt and criminal Kabuki Theater Show?
    There's nothing wrong with investigating Biden or anyone else who may have something wrong. However, there is nothing wrong with Biden having a son who works at a private company in another country. And Trump didn't want a real investigation, because he knows the Bidens did nothing wrong. He only wanted the announcement of an investigation because he's afraid of losing his reelection. Basically, he illegally withheld funds in order to cheat in an election.

    The Democrats gave up subpoenaing people because Trump kept demanding that Republicans ignore the subpoenas. This is Obstruction, which is one of the things he was impeached for. However, recently John Bolton admitted he knew about Trump's crime, which makes it worth trying to get him again.

  19. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    57,638
    Thanks
    563
    Thanked 10,010 Times in 8,569 Posts
    Groans
    29
    Groaned 498 Times in 487 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack View Post
    Joe Biden didn't have any dealings in Ukraine.
    Videos show otherwise.

  20. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    57,638
    Thanks
    563
    Thanked 10,010 Times in 8,569 Posts
    Groans
    29
    Groaned 498 Times in 487 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bill View Post
    Po' robo, scraping bottom, can't hardly get anyone to argue against his shitty men made of straw no Mo'....strawman.gif
    There you go again claiming anything you can't refute as a strawman.

  21. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    53,510
    Thanks
    252
    Thanked 24,554 Times in 17,084 Posts
    Groans
    5,280
    Groaned 4,575 Times in 4,254 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Robo View Post
    How does Joe Biden manage to get a pass from Democrats and their boot licking media propaganda machine for being investigated for Ukrainian corruption?

    How can Democrats and their boot licking media propaganda machine claim investigating Joe Biden is a no-no just because he’s a candidate for the Presidency, when Donald J. Trump was being investigated by the Obama Justice Department and FBI even before and after he became a candidate for the Presidency and ever since he won the Presidency?

    Why are Democrats and their boot licking media propaganda machine saying they want witnesses to bolster their Impeach & Remove Trump scam, when the very same witnesses they claim they need they themselves didn’t bother to subpoena when they were building their laughable preposterous House case?

    Why do the Democrats and their boot licking media propaganda machine cry out to the Senate for “MORE WITNESSES” when all along they’ve been claiming they already have an open and shut undisputed lead pipe cinch proven case for removing Trump from office?

    Who on this forum is sooooo partisan, stupid and insane that they aren’t able to see through this Democrat and their boot licking media propaganda machine’s corrupt and criminal Kabuki Theater Show?
    You are getting worse and worse. Trump was not being investigated. The FBI was informed that Russia was interfering in the election so they did surveillance to find out. They bumped int Trump's people because they were involved.
    Do you really not know that trump prohibited everyone in the admin and outside to not respond to subpoenas or to supply documentation? Do you not know that? Mcgahn has been fighting a subpoena in court for almost a year.
    Biden is a red herring used to deflect those with misinformation leading them. That is you.

  22. The Following User Says Thank You to Nordberg For This Post:

    domer76 (01-29-2020)

Similar Threads

  1. Can any JPP leftist answer this one question?
    By canceled.2021.2 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 117
    Last Post: 10-07-2019, 02:24 PM
  2. Replies: 63
    Last Post: 09-03-2017, 02:06 PM
  3. APP - Let's rationally discuss criticism of Donald Trump
    By canceled.2021.1 in forum Above Plain Politics Forum
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 05-17-2017, 11:15 AM
  4. Answer A Phone Call, Answer A Few Questions, Get Fired...
    By Damocles in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 10-26-2013, 06:20 AM
  5. Things The Left Can't Rationally Explain.
    By Robo in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 04-20-2013, 04:19 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •