There will be not be even ONE word of exoneration!

[Cinnabar]

If there is any lawyer or Senator of the corrupt GOP that actually presents any evidence that exonerates Trump list is here.

And for the benefit of the ignorant, "exonerate" means to present exculpatory evidence that negates the plethora of evidence and witnesses the Dems presented.

I guarantee there will be none!

[Grokmaster]

If there is any lawyer or Senator of the corrupt GOP that actually presents any evidence that exonerates Trump list is here.

And for the benefit of the ignorant, "exonerate" means to present exculpatory evidence that negates the plethora of evidence and witnesses the Dems presented.

I guarantee there will be none!

HERE WE GO WITH THE SAME OL' BULLSHIT LEFTIST LIESPEAK.

THE INNOCENT DO NOT HAVE TO BE "EXONERATED"; THE GUILTY MUST BE CONVICTED.

THE DEFENSE HAS ALREADY PROVEN THAT THE STALIN-O-CRATS HAVE ZERO FACTUAL EVIDENCE...JUST HEARSAY, AND THEIR OWN MADEUP BULLSHIT ABOUT WHAT PRES.TRUMP and PRES.ZELENSKY WERE "REALLY THINKING"...

GUESS WHAT AIN'T HAPPENING?

[countryboy]

If there is any lawyer or Senator of the corrupt GOP that actually presents any evidence that exonerates Trump list is here.

And for the benefit of the ignorant, "exonerate" means to present exculpatory evidence that negates the plethora of evidence and witnesses the Dems presented.

I guarantee there will be none!

Lol, the exculpatory evidence is the transcript you idiot, it's irrefutable. You lose again.

[Cinnabar]

HERE WE GO WITH THE SAME OL' BULLSHIT LEFTIST LIESPEAK.

THE INNOCENT DO NOT HAVE TO BE "EXONERATED"; THE GUILTY MUST BE CONVICTED.

THE DEFENSE HAS ALREADY PROVEN THAT THE STALIN-O-CRATS HAVE ZERO FACTUAL EVIDENCE...JUST HEARSAY, AND THEIR OWN MADEUP BULLSHIT ABOUT WHAT PRES.TRUMP and PRES.ZELENSKY WERE "REALLY THINKING"...

GUESS WHAT AIN'T HAPPENING?

NOT EVEN ONE fact that exonerates!!!!! List it here or get lost.

[Earl]

The president does not have to prove his innocence. The corrupt Democrats have to prove his guilt.

Too many unforced errors by the prosecution and the case is too weak.

Not guilty and full exoneration in the Senate.

Count on it.

[Cinnabar]

Lol, the exculpatory evidence is the transcript you idiot, it's irrefutable. You lose again.

There was no actual transcript turned over and you know that.
The White House’s version of the call is not the transcript.

Not even one piece of evidence of exoneration.

[Grokmaster]

NOT EVEN ONE fact that exonerates!!!!! List it here or get lost.

Uh the FACT that NOT ONE PROOF OF ANYTHING CLOSE TO AN ACTUAL CRIME, OR "IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE" HAS BEEN PRESENTED.

AS I SAID....THE PRESIDENT DOES NOT NEED TO BE "EXONERATED"; THE DUNCE-O-CRATS NEED TO PROVE THEIR CASE...AND HEARSAY AIN'T GONNA DO IT.

AMERICANS ARE ALREADY COMPLETELY TURNED OFF/SICK OF BY THE SCHIFF/SCHUMER SHAM SHOW....SEEN YOUR TV RATINGS....?


WHEN SCHIFF-FOR-BRAINS TRIED TO INSERT THE RUSSIA LIE...AGAIN....WHAT AN IDIOT.....


THINK "BLACK HOLE"....

[Earl]

If Darth Omar had been advising her, he would have told her weeks ago, as he did this forum, that censure might pass. This would have saved face, and avoided an embarrassing defeat in the Senate, as I believe will happen as early as next week.

She did indeed let the squad and the lunatics on the left of her party buffalo her.

[countryboy]

There was no actual transcript turned over and you know that.
The White House’s version of the call is not the transcript.

Not even one piece of evidence of exoneration.

Of course there was birdbrain, word for word.

[Earl]

I do believe that the president's lawyers have made a compelling case that the House's impeachment Articles were done in violation of the Constitution. A House committee had no authority to vote on the start of an impeachment inquiry. The lawyer cited a Supreme Court decision ruling that the "House" is the full House, not a committee.

The impeachment should be declared null and void and since the Democrats will never show an ounce of integrity, the Republicans should do so when they control the House...soon, hopefully.

[Cinnabar]

Of course there was birdbrain, word for word.

hahahahahahahaha

still no exoneration!!!

[Earl]

"I know of no Republican senator who has been threatened in any way by anyone in the administration."
— Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine

They just lost the only Senator who might have voted guilty.

Unforced errors, they always get you.

[Earl]

The exoneration will come when they vote...next week probably.

[Grokmaster]

" "NOT GUILTY" = "EXONERATED". PERIOD.


LEARN ENGLISH, AND SAVE YOUR SILLIASS "WORD GAMES" FOR YOUR FELLOW LEFTIDIOTS..

[anonymoose]

Not even one piece of evidence of exoneration.

And not one piece of evidence of guilt. Sounds vaguely familiar. Was that the Mueller "investigation"? Which by the way was about collusion which isn't even a crime.
Which by the way, there is no accusation of an actual crime in this impeachment.
Dims might have better luck getting a senate conviction of jaywalking if trump actually did it of course.