Page 1 of 6 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 78

Thread: Trump who wanted his 4th KID ABORTED, speaks at anti-choice rally, 1st pres to ever

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Posts
    14,413
    Thanks
    308
    Thanked 7,511 Times in 4,834 Posts
    Groans
    17
    Groaned 1,798 Times in 1,605 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default Trump who wanted his 4th KID ABORTED, speaks at anti-choice rally, 1st pres to ever

    Apparently, it's a first. No other REP president has. Remember, what he told STERN...




    Trump sets a new GOP standard in the abortion fight


    Three years into his presidency, the once-unapologetic womanizer has not only earned the trust of the anti-abortion community — he’s irrevocably changed its standards for future Republican leaders.




    President Donald Trump speaks at the 47th March For Life rally on Friday in Washington. | Mark Wilson/Getty Images
    By GABBY ORR
    01/24/2020 06:24 PM EST

    Two decades after Donald Trump described himself as “pro-choice in every respect,” abortion opponents now unanimously regard him as their greatest convert and champion.

    So it wasn’t a surprise to the thousands of March for Life participants gathered on the National Mall on Friday that Trump became the first president to personally address them. Three years into his presidency, the once-unapologetic womanizer has not only earned the trust of the anti-abortion community, he’s irrevocably changed its standards for future Republican leaders.

    In the post-Trump era, declaring oneself “pro-life” will no longer suffice. Wannabe presidents and GOP congressional candidates must now prove it.

    “Every year, I’ve listened to Republicans tell us how pro-life they are. But a couple of years ago, when they had the House and the Senate and the presidency, we didn’t defund Planned Parenthood,” said Lance Lohr, a resident of Lancaster County, Pa., who attended his 10th March for Life on Friday.

    “I go by people’s actions,” he continued, “and in Trump's case I believe he is pro-life because of what he’s done.”
    WK1 3/28-/4 _Cases 301k--Dead 18.1k Lethality 2.72%
    WK2 4/5-/13 _Cases 555k--Dead 22.1K Lethality 3.9%
    WK3 4/20-/21 Cases 774k -Dead 37.2K Lethality 4.8%
    WK4 4/22-/29 Cases 1M --Dead 58.8K Lethality 5.9%
    WK5 5/1-/8__ Cases 1.3M -Dead 75.7K Lethality 6.1%
    WK6 5/9-16__Cases 1.4M --Dead 85.8K Lethality 6.1%
    WK7 5/17-24_Cases 1.7M - Dead 97.6K Lethality 5.9%
    WK8 5/28 Cases 1.7M - DEAD 101.2K - Same

  2. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Location
    'Murica
    Posts
    3,641
    Thanks
    1,394
    Thanked 1,132 Times in 908 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 24 Times in 23 Posts

    Default

    When considering that PP is a political organization at this point, it shouldn't be receiving public funds. I say this even as someone who is pro-choice.

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to Saudade For This Post:

    Grokmaster (01-24-2020)

  4. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Posts
    30,639
    Thanks
    18,222
    Thanked 15,646 Times in 10,702 Posts
    Groans
    202
    Groaned 618 Times in 607 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    HE FACED THE OBVIOUS TRUTH ABOUT THE BEGINNING OF LIFE..as HAVE MOST AMERICANS, BY FAR.
    TRUMP WILL TAKE FORTY STATES...UNLESS THE SAME IDIOTS WHO BROUGHT US THE 2020 DUNCE-O-CRAT IOWA CLUSTERFUCK CONTINUE THEIR SEDITIOUS ACTIVITIES...THEN HE WILL WIN EVEN MORE ..UNLESS THE RED CHINESE AND DNC COLLUDE, USE A PANDEMIC, AND THEN THE DEMOCRATS VIOLATE ARTICLE II OF THE CONSTITUTION, TO FACILLITATE MILLIONS OF ILLEGAL, UNVETTED, MAIL IN BALLOTS IN THE DARK OF NIGHT..


    De Oppresso Liber

  5. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Posts
    14,413
    Thanks
    308
    Thanked 7,511 Times in 4,834 Posts
    Groans
    17
    Groaned 1,798 Times in 1,605 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Woko Haram View Post
    When considering that PP is a political organization at this point, it shouldn't be receiving public funds. I say this even as someone who is pro-choice.
    Take it up with their ACCOUNTANTS.

    As far back as 1916, when it was formed, it was considered by SOME to be political. Back when they SMUGGLED diaphragms into the US in the bottom of whiskey barrels and snuck 'pamphlets' into women's hands about how to have less than than 7, 8, 9...kids.
    WK1 3/28-/4 _Cases 301k--Dead 18.1k Lethality 2.72%
    WK2 4/5-/13 _Cases 555k--Dead 22.1K Lethality 3.9%
    WK3 4/20-/21 Cases 774k -Dead 37.2K Lethality 4.8%
    WK4 4/22-/29 Cases 1M --Dead 58.8K Lethality 5.9%
    WK5 5/1-/8__ Cases 1.3M -Dead 75.7K Lethality 6.1%
    WK6 5/9-16__Cases 1.4M --Dead 85.8K Lethality 6.1%
    WK7 5/17-24_Cases 1.7M - Dead 97.6K Lethality 5.9%
    WK8 5/28 Cases 1.7M - DEAD 101.2K - Same

  6. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    73,707
    Thanks
    102,521
    Thanked 55,089 Times in 33,816 Posts
    Groans
    3,186
    Groaned 5,080 Times in 4,696 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grokmaster View Post
    HE FACED THE OBVIOUS TRUTH ABOUT THE BEGINNING OF LIFE..as HAVE MOST AMERICANS, BY FAR.
    Nope, if he got someone pregnant right now he’d pay for an abortion, don’t kid yourself. He never wore a condom, he’s paid for many abortions.

  7. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Phantasmal For This Post:

    Centerleftfl (01-27-2020), christiefan915 (01-25-2020), Mason Michaels (01-25-2020), ThatOwlWoman (01-24-2020)

  8. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Location
    'Murica
    Posts
    3,641
    Thanks
    1,394
    Thanked 1,132 Times in 908 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 24 Times in 23 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Centerleftfl View Post
    Take it up with their ACCOUNTANTS.

    As far back as 1916, when it was formed, it was considered by SOME to be political. Back when they SMUGGLED diaphragms into the US in the bottom of whiskey barrels and snuck 'pamphlets' into women's hands about how to have less than than 7, 8, 9...kids.
    They literally have events to support Democratic candidates. That's not even remotely politically neutral.

    Ask yourself this: if there was a nonprofit organization for public health that routinely received funding from the GOP and advocated for GOP candidates, would you want them to also receive public funding? I wouldn't.

  9. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Posts
    14,413
    Thanks
    308
    Thanked 7,511 Times in 4,834 Posts
    Groans
    17
    Groaned 1,798 Times in 1,605 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Phantasmal View Post
    Nope, if he got someone pregnant right now he’d pay for an abortion, don’t kid yourself. He never wore a condom, he’s paid for many abortions.
    He absolutely refused to answer that question if he had. I have no idea why THAT time, he refused to lie. Maybe someone asked in some official capacity?

    (Of course he did, I wonder how many while he was married to any of the 3 wives)
    WK1 3/28-/4 _Cases 301k--Dead 18.1k Lethality 2.72%
    WK2 4/5-/13 _Cases 555k--Dead 22.1K Lethality 3.9%
    WK3 4/20-/21 Cases 774k -Dead 37.2K Lethality 4.8%
    WK4 4/22-/29 Cases 1M --Dead 58.8K Lethality 5.9%
    WK5 5/1-/8__ Cases 1.3M -Dead 75.7K Lethality 6.1%
    WK6 5/9-16__Cases 1.4M --Dead 85.8K Lethality 6.1%
    WK7 5/17-24_Cases 1.7M - Dead 97.6K Lethality 5.9%
    WK8 5/28 Cases 1.7M - DEAD 101.2K - Same

  10. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Centerleftfl For This Post:

    christiefan915 (01-25-2020), ThatOwlWoman (01-24-2020)

  11. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Posts
    14,413
    Thanks
    308
    Thanked 7,511 Times in 4,834 Posts
    Groans
    17
    Groaned 1,798 Times in 1,605 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Woko Haram View Post
    They literally have events to support Democratic candidates. That's not even remotely politically neutral.

    Ask yourself this: if there was a nonprofit organization for public health that routinely received funding from the GOP and advocated for GOP candidates, would you want them to also receive public funding? I wouldn't.
    Does NOT matter. You aren't paying attention. The FUNDS are carefully ACCOUNTED FOR--went through STATE AUDITS. Passed them all.

    We have some real ignorant people on this board. INTENTIONALLY IGNORANT.
    WK1 3/28-/4 _Cases 301k--Dead 18.1k Lethality 2.72%
    WK2 4/5-/13 _Cases 555k--Dead 22.1K Lethality 3.9%
    WK3 4/20-/21 Cases 774k -Dead 37.2K Lethality 4.8%
    WK4 4/22-/29 Cases 1M --Dead 58.8K Lethality 5.9%
    WK5 5/1-/8__ Cases 1.3M -Dead 75.7K Lethality 6.1%
    WK6 5/9-16__Cases 1.4M --Dead 85.8K Lethality 6.1%
    WK7 5/17-24_Cases 1.7M - Dead 97.6K Lethality 5.9%
    WK8 5/28 Cases 1.7M - DEAD 101.2K - Same

  12. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Posts
    14,413
    Thanks
    308
    Thanked 7,511 Times in 4,834 Posts
    Groans
    17
    Groaned 1,798 Times in 1,605 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grokmaster View Post
    HE FACED THE OBVIOUS TRUTH ABOUT THE BEGINNING OF LIFE..as HAVE MOST AMERICANS, BY FAR.
    And yet, well over 50% of AMERICANS want it kept LEGAL. Go figure!

    (Goes up to 100% when ANY woman NEEDS ONE).
    WK1 3/28-/4 _Cases 301k--Dead 18.1k Lethality 2.72%
    WK2 4/5-/13 _Cases 555k--Dead 22.1K Lethality 3.9%
    WK3 4/20-/21 Cases 774k -Dead 37.2K Lethality 4.8%
    WK4 4/22-/29 Cases 1M --Dead 58.8K Lethality 5.9%
    WK5 5/1-/8__ Cases 1.3M -Dead 75.7K Lethality 6.1%
    WK6 5/9-16__Cases 1.4M --Dead 85.8K Lethality 6.1%
    WK7 5/17-24_Cases 1.7M - Dead 97.6K Lethality 5.9%
    WK8 5/28 Cases 1.7M - DEAD 101.2K - Same

  13. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Location
    'Murica
    Posts
    3,641
    Thanks
    1,394
    Thanked 1,132 Times in 908 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 24 Times in 23 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Centerleftfl View Post
    Does NOT matter. You aren't paying attention. The FUNDS are carefully ACCOUNTED FOR--went through STATE AUDITS. Passed them all.

    We have some real ignorant people on this board. INTENTIONALLY IGNORANT.
    You can audit all you want. This is no different from why we don't allow churches to maintain tax exemption if they advocate for political candidates.

    Intentionally ignorant is when you apply one standard to the opposing party and not the same to your own.

  14. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    73,707
    Thanks
    102,521
    Thanked 55,089 Times in 33,816 Posts
    Groans
    3,186
    Groaned 5,080 Times in 4,696 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Woko Haram View Post
    You can audit all you want. This is no different from why we don't allow churches to maintain tax exemption if they advocate for political candidates.

    Intentionally ignorant is when you apply one standard to the opposing party and not the same to your own.
    They do and we do not penalize them.

  15. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Location
    'Murica
    Posts
    3,641
    Thanks
    1,394
    Thanked 1,132 Times in 908 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 24 Times in 23 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Phantasmal View Post
    They do and we do not penalize them.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johnson_Amendment

    We do actually penalize them. Now admittedly, we don't enforce this as consistently as we should. And yes, Trump did water it down a bit. That's one of the things he's done that I disagree with.

  16. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    73,707
    Thanks
    102,521
    Thanked 55,089 Times in 33,816 Posts
    Groans
    3,186
    Groaned 5,080 Times in 4,696 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Woko Haram View Post
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johnson_Amendment

    We do actually penalize them. Now admittedly, we don't enforce this as consistently as we should. And yes, Trump did water it down a bit. That's one of the things he's done that I disagree with.
    That’s sad there is only one thing.

  17. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Location
    'Murica
    Posts
    3,641
    Thanks
    1,394
    Thanked 1,132 Times in 908 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 24 Times in 23 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Phantasmal View Post
    That’s sad there is only one thing.
    I said "one of the things." I'm not completely aligned with Trump, just like I'm not opposed to everything about the Democrats.

  18. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    73,707
    Thanks
    102,521
    Thanked 55,089 Times in 33,816 Posts
    Groans
    3,186
    Groaned 5,080 Times in 4,696 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Woko Haram View Post
    I said "one of the things." I'm not completely aligned with Trump, just like I'm not opposed to everything about the Democrats.
    We’ll see

Similar Threads

  1. Pres. Trump signs bill giving vets' a choice in healthcare
    By Life is Golden in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-13-2017, 05:29 AM
  2. Brit at Las Vegas rally said he wanted to kill Trump
    By Legion Troll in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 06-22-2016, 03:16 AM
  3. Replies: 93
    Last Post: 05-27-2016, 02:41 PM
  4. Violent anti-choice rhetoric must end, or anti-abortion violence never wil
    By FUCK THE POLICE in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 80
    Last Post: 12-01-2015, 11:51 AM
  5. McCain Speaks At KKK Rally
    By Bonestorm in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 05-29-2009, 05:23 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •