Democrats Would Not Impeach Without Good Reason

[Darth Omar]

Trump fans who think Democrats are 'out to get him' and would stoop to an unwarranted impeachment have lost it.

-No longer in touch with reality!

Well, they’ve already stooped to illegal surveillance, so there’s that.

[Earl]

Trump gave the Dems such an ass whipping in 2016 that its still hurting 3 years later. 2020 is going to be even worse.

Hillary was supposed to win by 12 points. Yes, a landslide victory.

[PoliTalker]

Hello Darth,

Well, they’ve already stooped to illegal surveillance, so there’s that.

The mistake you make is a common one.

You take one instance by one person and project it on an entire group, as if they all did it.

Foolish!

[Darth Omar]

Hello Darth,



The mistake you make is a common one.

You take one instance by one person and project it on an entire group, as if they all did it.

Foolish!

Actually, it was 3-4 people, at minimum lol.

The person/people who committed the ‘errors’ on the applications and the people who signed them [and thereby *swore* to their validity].

The known people are Andrew McCabe, James Comey and Rod Rosenstein since they effectively swore to the validity of the applications before they were presented to the FISC courts. Those are some pretty big names so they may wiggle out of it. We’re going to have to wait on Durham to see.

The IG found a total of 17 ‘errors’ in the FISA report. Nothing to see there?

[countryboy]

-Even for someone as audacious as Trump. They would not do it as a party without good reason.

-If you think they have, then you have lost touch with reality.

-Some would. Yes. I'll grant you that. But not as a party. The party would not do it until there was a valid and justifiable reason.

-The Democratic Party as a whole would not engage in a frivolous impeachment as a political stunt. They just would not go that far. They have scruples. They believe in the system, trust the system. They follow the Constitution. They do not wish to weaken the Constitution. They take this very seriously.

-If you look at some of them, and say they have been trying to do this since Trump was elected, you are correct. But it is a mistake to extrapolate that small subset into the whole party. Big mistake. Making that mistake is the precise point at which you left reality behind, if that's what you think is happening.

-Don't mind me. I am an independent voice. And I am right.

The trouble is, their "reasons" have nothing to do with anything President Trump did.

[countryboy]

Trump's ego forced Democrats' hand.

So you admit this has nothing to do with the Constitutional definition of impeachment. You're probably too fucking stupid to even realize what you just said.

[countryboy]

Hello Darth,



The mistake you make is a common one.

You take one instance by one person and project it on an entire group, as if they all did it.

Foolish!

These people are all interconnected. Do you think this some massive coincidence?

[Eagle_Eye]

-Even for someone as audacious as Trump. They would not do it as a party without good reason.

-If you think they have, then you have lost touch with reality.

-Some would. Yes. I'll grant you that. But not as a party. The party would not do it until there was a valid and justifiable reason.

-The Democratic Party as a whole would not engage in a frivolous impeachment as a political stunt. They just would not go that far. They have scruples. They believe in the system, trust the system. They follow the Constitution. They do not wish to weaken the Constitution. They take this very seriously.

-If you look at some of them, and say they have been trying to do this since Trump was elected, you are correct. But it is a mistake to extrapolate that small subset into the whole party. Big mistake. Making that mistake is the precise point at which you left reality behind, if that's what you think is happening.

-Don't mind me. I am an independent voice. And I am right.

We are talking about the same Democrat party that had people in the streets demonstrating when Trump won? The same party who has been talking impeachment before Trump even took office? That Democrat party?

[Irish]

-Even for someone as audacious as Trump. They would not do it as a party without good reason.

-If you think they have, then you have lost touch with reality.

-Some would. Yes. I'll grant you that. But not as a party. The party would not do it until there was a valid and justifiable reason.

-The Democratic Party as a whole would not engage in a frivolous impeachment as a political stunt. They just would not go that far. They have scruples. They believe in the system, trust the system. They follow the Constitution. They do not wish to weaken the Constitution. They take this very seriously.

-If you look at some of them, and say they have been trying to do this since Trump was elected, you are correct. But it is a mistake to extrapolate that small subset into the whole party. Big mistake. Making that mistake is the precise point at which you left reality behind, if that's what you think is happening.

-Don't mind me. I am an independent voice. And I am right.

Guess you don't know Pelosi and the Squad and Schifft! They are all about political theater and are propped up by the media.

Pelosi had a chance to take on the squad, and get her house in order. Instead she caved to them, and the far left of her party, and went with impeachment.

This was a BAD choice!

[PoliTalker]

Hello Darth,

Actually, it was 3-4 people, at minimum lol.

The person/people who committed the ‘errors’ on the applications and the people who signed them [and thereby *swore* to their validity].

The known people are Andrew McCabe, James Comey and Rod Rosenstein since they effectively swore to the validity of the applications before they were presented to the FISC courts. Those are some pretty big names so they may wiggle out of it. We’re going to have to wait on Durham to see.

The IG found a total of 17 ‘errors’ in the FISA report. Nothing to see there?

Ah, right you are. I stand corrected.

You take something that 3-4 people did and project it on half the nation, holding them all responsible.

By that standard, George Papadopoulos, Rick Gates and Paul Manafort represent all Republicans, eh?

Oh, wait a minute. They are all convicts.

[Earl]

The radical Democrat Socialist Democrat anarchists would impeach if President Trump wore different colored socks.

[Irish]

-Even for someone as audacious as Trump. They would not do it as a party without good reason.

-If you think they have, then you have lost touch with reality.

-Some would. Yes. I'll grant you that. But not as a party. The party would not do it until there was a valid and justifiable reason.

-The Democratic Party as a whole would not engage in a frivolous impeachment as a political stunt. They just would not go that far. They have scruples. They believe in the system, trust the system. They follow the Constitution. They do not wish to weaken the Constitution. They take this very seriously.

-If you look at some of them, and say they have been trying to do this since Trump was elected, you are correct. But it is a mistake to extrapolate that small subset into the whole party. Big mistake. Making that mistake is the precise point at which you left reality behind, if that's what you think is happening.

-Don't mind me. I am an independent voice. And I am right.

[PoliTalker]

The problem Republicans have is: they foolishly think Democrats are as bad as them.

Therefore, Republicans hold Democrats in extremely low regard.

[Earl]

“Therefore, Republicans hold Democrats in extremely low regard.,” as they should,

[PoliTalker]

I have to laugh every time I hear Republicans talk about what the voters wanted.

Hello?

Clinton won the popular vote.

It is rather obvious what VOTERS wanted.

Not Trump.