MULVANEY, OMB FORCED under FOIA to release trove of DOCs WHILE Senate was trying case

[Centerleftfl]

they did argue they had no responsibility to tell the truth as a news station

that is arguing you have the right to lie

The problem is by the time the LAWYERS and corporations get through with it, WE regular folk don't recognize what the hell the original case was all about it. ESOTERIC bullshit (legalese) that circumvents common sense--every GD time.

(Isn't there a theory about the common man taught like in the first hours of law school?)

CORRECTION: REASONABLE PERSON (wonder if that was always 'person')

Reasonable person - Wikipedia

In law, a reasonable person, reasonable man, or the man on the Clapham omnibus is a hypothetical person of legal fiction crafted by the courts and communicated through case law and jury instructions. ... The "reasonable person" is used as a tool to standardize, teach law students, or explain the law to a jury.

[evince]

Never took law classes


so I don't know


but the founders trusted NON lawyers to write the laws of this nation

[Getin the ring]

Is THIS IT!!!!

[Centerleftfl]

Is THIS IT!!!!

Don't know, ask him! This isn't the face of man not worrying 'it'. (All these photos were THIS year)...

LSU 'celebration' 5 days ago....



Wide shot, same event....




LOOK AT IVANKA'S face behind him. (Whoa momma, not happy?)




2 days ago, he was READING HIS APPROVAL RATINGS out loud to FARMERS (really?) Too bad there isn't a shot of the farmers...




This is 3 days to CELEBRATE a gift to evangelicals to 'celebrate' new guidelines for school prayer. Happy people?




January 9th, this is WH photo op! Does anyone look happy to be here?

[TTQ64]

If Fox "news" didn't lie all day long no Americans would be believing any republican

Blacks have been telling "americans" about republicans for decades..........maybe yall should have listened.

[TTQ64]

The very ABBREVIATED version of a true story. (My best recollection). I have an acquaintance that was involved in a lawsuit against FOX. The simplified version, she was a FOX affiliate reporter who SUED FOX because she was made to rewrite a story about an additive into COWS MILK that had some serious health concerns. After 2 years of rewrites involving FOX, the FLORIDA LEGISLATURE and the DAIRY LOBBY (Fl--I don't know if it was wider) some 24-30 rewrites of the story, she was FIRED because she would not 'bow'.

The case was 'legally' reduced to wrongful termination and FOX paid her off. The 'lore' version of the story is that FOX was sued and won the right to lie. FOX's version is FOX was sued for wrongful termination and they paid for 'that'.

You decide.

www.snopes.com › Fact Checks › Business

Did Fox News Sue for the 'Right to Lie'? - Snopes.com


Oct 2, 2014 - The claim that Fox News legally won the “right to lie” has been repeated across the internet despite its being factually inaccurate on more than



CORRECTION: Wikipedia says she rewrote the story 80 times.

What about before 1996? Who was spreading lies then?

[Phantasmal]

Weird. I just sent him $$ 2 days ago (small). I'm watching that race.

I think McSally is in trouble. Who doesn’t love an astronaut!

[Centerleftfl]

they did argue they had no responsibility to tell the truth as a news station

that is arguing you have the right to lie

I was trying to give the broadest possible interpretation. Why the fuck I try to be 'fair' is even beyond me. Especially on THIS board.

[Centerleftfl]

What about before 1996? Who was spreading lies then?

It started in my humble opinion, but DEFINITIVELY in my media market, in about 88, when Rush came to my town at the time. I didn't know who he was till 89. He was fouling the radio airwaves and even had a 2 or 3 year gig on TV. By the time WE got his ass booted off the TV air in Jacksonville, he had 2 snuff companies and the NBC affilliate itself advertising on his 'show.

I don't know other STARS of the batshit Right on the air then. He was the lead liar and loudest FLAMETHROWER.

[Adolf_Twitler]

Before November, the truth will all be out there and available.

The Republicans already know the truth but they think Donald Trump is above the law, above the Constitution, and above the people.

Just remember that we are at war, a war we didn't start, but one we must face, as the Republicans declared war on the liberals many years ago.

They intend to lie, deny, corrupt, cheat, steal, kill, or whatever it takes to win- BECAUSE WHO CARES, THEY ARE JUST LIBERALS RIGHT?

[TTQ64]

It started in my humble opinion, but DEFINITIVELY in my media market, in about 88, when Rush came to my town at the time. I didn't know who he was till 89. He was fouling the radio airwaves and even had a 2 or 3 year gig on TV. By the time WE got his ass booted off the TV air in Jacksonville, he had 2 snuff companies and the NBC affilliate itself advertising on his 'show.

I don't know other STARS of the batshit Right on the air then. He was the lead liar and loudest FLAMETHROWER.

So you think white america wasn't listening to racism until after 1996?

[evince]

I was trying to give the broadest possible interpretation. Why the fuck I try to be 'fair' is even beyond me. Especially on THIS board.

keeping to the facts is just what liberals do

and to do that you have to be trying to be fair

FACTS STAND ABOVE ALL OPINIONS


unlike the republican party has been all my life


they place lies above facts


they used to be a honorable party


just not in my lifetime

[evince]

Before November, the truth will all be out there and available.

The Republicans already know the truth but they think Donald Trump is above the law, above the Constitution, and above the people.

Just remember that we are at war, a war we didn't start, but one we must face, as the Republicans declared war on the liberals many years ago.

They intend to lie, deny, corrupt, cheat, steal, kill, or whatever it takes to win- BECAUSE WHO CARES, THEY ARE JUST LIBERALS RIGHT?

because Putin has a gun to their heads after reading THEIR EMAILS

and Putins other hand is shoving rubles in their pockets