So who wants witnesses

[Southern Chicken]

HB = irrelevant

Hb relevancy=to be determine by senate vote

[Southern Chicken]

Then Bolton or Trump's lawyers can invoke executive privilege to the question, not the entire testimony.

Up to the courts to determine not you

[domer76]

Senate rules not judicial rules, idiot

Senate rules say new and additional evidence cannot be introduced?

So much for your 'fair and impartial' bullshit then. But, we knew that claim was horseshit from the beginning, didn't we?

[domer76]

Up to the courts to determine not you

That's why the Dems went ahead, dumbfuck. To avoid being held up for years. But you knew that delay was the main motive for the Trumptards anyway, didn't you?

[domer76]

Hb relevancy=to be determine by senate vote

Diversion, pure and simple. What part of Trump's abuse of power or obstruction of Congress was Biden a party to or a witness of?

[Southern Chicken]

Diversion, pure and simple. What part of Trump's abuse of power or obstruction of Congress was Biden a party to or a witness of?

Federal Rules of Evidence do not strictly apply in an impeachment*trial.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/o...eachment-trial

[Southern Chicken]

That's why the Dems went ahead, dumbfuck. To avoid being held up for years. But you knew that delay was the main motive for the Trumptards anyway, didn't you?

Then they shouldn't be upset over how it is adjudicated

[Adolf_Twitler]

Bolton is a Right-Wing radical. Even if he testified before Congress he would claim Executive Privilege on any question that would require a truthful answer that would hurt Donald Trump.

He cannot be trusted. He is just looking to feather his own nest with a book deal

He is already an asshole for not telling Congress what he knows and without even having to be asked.

Now he is just writing a book trying to capitalize on the position he had.

Just another typical hateful Republican with an ax to grind and looking out for No. 1.

[domer76]

Federal Rules of Evidence do not strictly apply in an impeachment*trial.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/o...eachment-trial

I didn't say they did. What I DID say is that Biden is not relevant to the impeachment charges. What part of that escapes you?

[domer76]

Then they shouldn't be upset over how it is adjudicated

You mean upset by obstruction? Well, of course they shouldn't be!

Moron

[Southern Chicken]

I didn't say they did. What I DID say is that Biden is not relevant to the impeachment charges. What part of that escapes you?

Your whole point being that it is a judgment called by the senate and not by your dumb azz

[Southern Chicken]

You mean upset by obstruction? Well, of course they shouldn't be!

Moron

Then what is your point, imbecile

[PoliTalker]

Hello Darth,

How is he wrong?

There are at least potential national security issues with Bolton testifying and Trump has the authority to block it/him with that annoying executive privilege thing. It’s ‘the problem’ with Bolton.

Trump’s opinion doesn’t matter and neither does ours: it’s up to senate democrats and how bad they want to hear from Bolton.

The poll numbers suggest they should put Hunter Biden on the stand. In addition to some others.

If the President wishes to actually invoke executive privilege he has to explain specifically explain why it applies in this case. This power cannot be used frivolously. It is for a distinct purpose.

It is not a matter of simply throwing the executive privilege card and declaring it hands-off. EP is subject to review. It needs to be verified that it is a legitimate use of the power.

[Micawber]

The trial is a sham. Trumptards are just sitting through it and will summarily break their oaths and acquit the Orange criminal.

Cheating is allowed. It's the new rule. Even when caught red handed. It's totally OK

[PoliTalker]

Hello Darth,

The trial will be whatever the majority of the Senate says it will be about.

It’s not the Schiff Show now.

And as Chairman Schiff pointed out, additional information and evidence continues to come out, and more will come out going forward. What Schiff didn't say was how silly the Republican Senate is going to appear down the road if such a volume of evidence comes out that it becomes irrefutable, and the Republican Senate back in January voted not to delve further into these very troubling allegations. If the Republican Senate runs a sham trial with no witnesses and no additional evidence, and Trump is later shown to be absolutely guilty beyond any doubt after evidence the Republicans refused to look at comes out, that is going to play very badly for any Republicans running for office in November.