Saudade (01-22-2020)
Saudade (01-22-2020)
Flash (01-23-2020)
All politicians spend our money. We as voters have the duty to ponder what we want it spent on, then vote for the candidates most likely to follow our priorities. Education is not a priority for (R)s. Sure, they scream loudly when forced to admit that America's kids are falling behind other countries' students in the education realm. But their answer is to impose more testing ("No Child Left Behind") while doing nothing to make actual effective changes.
"Conservatism is the blind and fear-filled worship of dead radicals." -- Mark Twain
I do like standardized testing though. You need to do some sort of science to locate what needs fixing the most. I don't want morons doing Jesus tests
or stomping out science and passing on the kids only to lose jobs to Trump's Mubai based cheesy power tie factories.
How long until the Christians allege arithmetic is a culture war weapon against them? Probably next election cycle. Integers are satan's playground.
"Conservatism is the blind and fear-filled worship of dead radicals." -- Mark Twain
Money is obviously important but from the article, "Repeated increases in school funding in recent years have not slowed calls for more money".
To me this is the exact reason why our education doesn't change and improve. We stick with the status quo, ask for money and when then that doesn't work continue to ask for more money. Rinse, wash and repeat.
The government is a money factory with chutes and ladders and we pay them to direct it.
Denying that Dems want more total in and more out the edumacation chute and poor person chute, and Rs want less total in from the rich and more out the bomb bay door
and rich guy chute is just wrong. You prove it, you are an R and just said money doesn't work for ed for some magical mystical reason you haven't explained.. Money makes a better bomb same as it makes better ed with better books, better infrastructure and better teachers.
Explain why that should not be so.
The issue isn't so much the amount of money but its distribution, eh? Most school districts are very top-heavy on management and that's where a lot of educational dollars are flowing. In addition, wealthier locales obviously have better tax bases and therefore better funding for the local school districts. Shouldn't those districts receive less state funding so that more than be channeled to the lower-income areas where buildings are falling apart, textbooks are years out of date, and enrichment and early childhood programs are scarce?
(R)s' answer is to use taxpayer $$ for unaccredited religious and charter schools, thus robbing public schools of viability.
"Conservatism is the blind and fear-filled worship of dead radicals." -- Mark Twain
Micawber (01-23-2020)
In many states funding is related to the local property wealth and those schools receive less state funds because they are expected to use more local funding. In Texas some schools receive almost no state funds and even have to give some of their money to poorer districts. And poor/wealthy have everything to do with industry rather than large homes or a high income population. Some districts near me have relatively poor student populations but are funded almost entirely by industry property taxes.
and people of middle means move to the burbs to raise families and have safe good schools for their children, and the R answer to school massacres
is a gun solution to a gun problem, but I digress.
Just another reason why the burbs are now owned by the Ds, in addition to the urban, which was already theirs. The Rs only have Rural empty land.
We are going to crush in November. Crush it totally.
ThatOwlWoman (01-23-2020)
Bookmarks