Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 51

Thread: Dershowitz Distances Himself From Trump Legal Team

  1. #31 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    26,400
    Thanks
    41,694
    Thanked 11,815 Times in 9,108 Posts
    Groans
    25,651
    Groaned 1,697 Times in 1,590 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    The president has enough lawyers. Dershowitz is a learned advocate for defending the Constitution. He has already spoken to the attempt by the Democrats to shred that document. He is a liberal who actually believes that the Constitution protects all Americans, left and middle and right.

    He will make the Blue team look like children.

  2. The Following User Groans At Earl For This Awful Post:

    Nomad (01-19-2020)

  3. #32 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Location
    Southlake, Texas
    Posts
    853
    Thanks
    1,008
    Thanked 722 Times in 442 Posts
    Groans
    37
    Groaned 10 Times in 10 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by guno View Post
    And just where are you going to get more poorly educated crackas , trump tapped out that demographic
    Blexit
    Trump doesn't wear glasses because he already has 2020.

  4. #33 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Location
    Southlake, Texas
    Posts
    853
    Thanks
    1,008
    Thanked 722 Times in 442 Posts
    Groans
    37
    Groaned 10 Times in 10 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Dershowitz has integrity he sticks to his belief in the Constitution.
    Trump doesn't wear glasses because he already has 2020.

  5. #34 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    18,422
    Thanks
    5,930
    Thanked 8,211 Times in 5,428 Posts
    Groans
    1,705
    Groaned 1,348 Times in 1,243 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FastLane View Post
    Dershowitz has integrity he sticks to his belief in the Constitution.
    That doesn't mean his interpretation of it is flawless.

  6. #35 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    30,602
    Thanks
    9,704
    Thanked 17,974 Times in 12,367 Posts
    Groans
    216
    Groaned 1,340 Times in 1,267 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post
    Actually, whim of Congress. It's a dual process, idiot.
    try to get it correct.
    The Senate has no choice to take up impeachment - it must act on the Articles even if it's by the "whim"
    of the House- as usual you are wrong 2x here by claiming "the Senate" and now "Congress"

    since you are so fucking stoopid -i have to break it down for you -the capricious action is ONLY by the House
    The Senate can only folow the House's action (or no action) -it is never a "whim" for the Senate
    you haven't a clue what the TEXT, as written meant. That's obvious.
    the text is the text! ( again breaking it down to simplest explanation for your simple mind)
    there ARE NO FURTHER MEANINGS -that's why the Impeachment clause is ENUMERATED and SPECIFIC *duh*

    The meaning of the TEXT: "

    "those offences which proceed from the misconduct of public men, or in other words from the abuse or violation of some public trust. They are of a nature which may with peculiar propriety be denominated political, as they relate chiefly to injuries done immediately to the society itself.” (Federalist 65)
    JFC you are such a DUMBASS -
    trying to tell me the "meaning of the text is found in the Federalist papers" NO ITS NOT. full stop
    THE TEXT IS THE ONLY MEANING -CONTAINED IN ITSELF -this is a simple concept -surely even you can get this?

    Where does it state criminal offenses?
    read the text.

    Moron.
    gaddamed you are stoopid

  7. #36 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    40,355
    Thanks
    9,253
    Thanked 10,417 Times in 7,833 Posts
    Groans
    42
    Groaned 4,293 Times in 3,629 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dukkha View Post
    try to get it correct.
    The Senate has no choice to take up impeachment - it must act on the Articles even if it's by the "whim" o the House- as usual you are wrong 2x here by claiming "the Senate" and now "Congress"
    since you are so fucking stoopid -i have to break it down for you -the capricious action is ONLY by the House

    the text is the text ( again breaking it down to simplest explanation for your simple mind)
    there ARE NO FURTHER MEANING -that's why the Impeachment clause is ENUMERATED and SPECIFIC *duh*

    JFC you are such a DUMBASS -
    trying to tell me the "meaning of the text is found in the Federalist papers" NO ITS NOT. full stop
    THE TEXT IS THE ONLY MEANING -this is a simple concept -surely even you can get this?

    read the text.

    gaddamed you are stoopid


    I can't fix your ignorance and stupidity. I can only point it out. But, you do a fine job of demonstrating your ignorance all by your lonesome!


  8. #37 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    30,602
    Thanks
    9,704
    Thanked 17,974 Times in 12,367 Posts
    Groans
    216
    Groaned 1,340 Times in 1,267 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post


    I can't fix your ignorance and stupidity. I can only point it out. But, you do a fine job of demonstrating your ignorance all by your lonesome!

    fucking dolt. you got nothing- as usual. you can't refute my post at all

  9. #38 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    40,355
    Thanks
    9,253
    Thanked 10,417 Times in 7,833 Posts
    Groans
    42
    Groaned 4,293 Times in 3,629 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dukkha View Post
    fucking dolt. you got nothing- as usual. you can't refute my post at all


    I have with every post I make. That's because I've done my homework on the origin and meaning of "high crimes and misdemeanors". Obviously, you haven't.

    Willfully ignorant simpletons of your magnitude are proof that it's impossible to educate some people.

    :fofl2:

  10. #39 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    30,602
    Thanks
    9,704
    Thanked 17,974 Times in 12,367 Posts
    Groans
    216
    Groaned 1,340 Times in 1,267 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post


    I have with every post I make. That's because I've done my homework on the origin and meaning of "high crimes and misdemeanors". Obviously, you haven't.

    Willfully ignorant simpletons of your magnitude are proof that it's impossible to educate some people.

    :fofl2:
    ROFL.. you repeate the same trash that I debunk over and over and then claim some sort of victory.

    You are one of the most willfully stupid on the board, and clinging to the same failed "points"
    just shows how willfully stupid you remain

    That's because I've done my homework on the origin and meaning of "high crimes and misdemeanors". Obviously, you haven't.
    more stupidity. There is nothing useful about the"origins" because we have the enumerated text.
    ~~
    for implied powers, then yes you can look for original intent, so long as it doesn't conflict with the text.

    But for enumerated powers the meaning is SOLELY IN THE TEXT ITSELF. because NOTHING IS IMPLIED
    ~~
    Now go ahead and show some more stupidity -your forte'

  11. #40 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    40,355
    Thanks
    9,253
    Thanked 10,417 Times in 7,833 Posts
    Groans
    42
    Groaned 4,293 Times in 3,629 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dukkha View Post
    ROFL.. you repeate the same trash that I debunk over and over and then claim some sort of victory.

    You are one of the most willfully stupid on the board, and clinging to the same failed "points"
    just shows how willfully stupid you remain

    more stupidity. There is nothing useful about the"origins" because we have the enumerated text.
    ~~
    for implied powers, then yes you can look for original intent, so long as it doesn't conflict with the text.

    But for enumerated powers the meaning is SOLELY IN THE TEXT ITSELF. because NOTHING IS IMPLIED
    ~~
    Now go ahead and show some more stupidity -your forte'
    You have debunked NOTHING, moron. The only thing you've posted is "TEXT". Fucking laughable.

    Dukkha: Squawk! Text!

    Willfully ignorant fool.


  12. #41 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Posts
    6,825
    Thanks
    263
    Thanked 2,409 Times in 1,651 Posts
    Groans
    29
    Groaned 1,233 Times in 1,137 Posts

    Default

    I cannot say I blame Dershowitz for running from this. Everyone around trump has either gone to prison, or might go to prison soon. Giuliani has destroyed his career. In the end, the only person safe is trump himself. Everyone else has to go through the regular court system.

  13. #42 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Posts
    6,403
    Thanks
    2,686
    Thanked 4,699 Times in 2,955 Posts
    Groans
    94
    Groaned 974 Times in 853 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FastLane View Post
    Dershowitz has integrity he sticks to his belief in the Constitution.
    And the integrity of receiving massages at Jeffrey Epstein's residence...from an old Russian woman, while he had his underwear on...of course.
    BLUEXIT
    A Modest Proposal For Separating Blue States From Red

    Dear Red-State Trump Voter,
    Let’s face it, guys: We’re done.


    It is a tragedy that so much of the work that so many men and women toiled at for so long to make this a better country, and a better world, has been thrown away, leaving us all in such needless peril.

    This is why our separation in all but name is necessary.


    https://newrepublic.com/article/1409...mp-red-america

  14. #43 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    30,602
    Thanks
    9,704
    Thanked 17,974 Times in 12,367 Posts
    Groans
    216
    Groaned 1,340 Times in 1,267 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post
    You have debunked NOTHING, moron. The only thing you've posted is "TEXT". Fucking laughable.

    Dukkha: Squawk! Text!

    Willfully ignorant fool.

    ROFL..you can't even understand the TEXT is the sole authority, not Federalist papers, not English common law, not whatever you think is "interpreted"
    you can dance around it, but it is the only measure of impeachable offenses

  15. #44 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    40,355
    Thanks
    9,253
    Thanked 10,417 Times in 7,833 Posts
    Groans
    42
    Groaned 4,293 Times in 3,629 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dukkha View Post
    ROFL..you can't even understand the TEXT is the sole authority, not Federalist papers, not English common law, not whatever you think is "interpreted"
    you can dance around it, but it is the only measure of impeachable offenses
    The Federalist Paper I provided was for YOUR information, stupid fuck. I already did my homework. Obviously, you haven’t.

    Willfully ignorant clown.


  16. #45 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Federal Way, WA
    Posts
    62,729
    Thanks
    17,040
    Thanked 16,808 Times in 12,580 Posts
    Groans
    627
    Groaned 1,073 Times in 1,019 Posts

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-04-2018, 03:50 AM
  2. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-20-2018, 09:13 PM
  3. President Trump's Legal Team In Disarray
    By PoliTalker in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 03-27-2018, 03:46 PM
  4. Liberal legal scholar Alan Dershowitz: There is absolutely no case for obstruction
    By Русский агент in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 75
    Last Post: 12-05-2017, 12:57 PM
  5. Replies: 41
    Last Post: 11-28-2017, 08:40 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •