THE PETTY POS has had the NATIONAL ARCHIVES edit Women's MARCH photos...

[Centerleftfl]

The NATIONAL ARCHIVES!! Maybe they can EDIT the Constitution. How about the BILL of Rights. How about rewriting the surrender of Lee, instead the SOUTH WON. Obama wasn't President. Pick a piece of history edit.


National Archives exhibit blurs images critical of President Trump



The original, unaltered photo of the 2017 Women’s March in the District. An altered version appears in an exhibit at the National Archives. (Mario Tama/Getty Images)By Joe Heim



Jan. 17, 2020 at 6:54 p.m. EST

The large color photograph that greets visitors to a National Archives exhibit celebrating the centennial of women’s suffrage shows a massive crowd filling Pennsylvania Avenue NW for the Women’s March on Jan. 21, 2017, the day after President Trump’s inauguration.

The 49-by-69-inch photograph is a powerful display. Viewed from one perspective, it shows the 2017 march. Viewed from another angle, it shifts to show a 1913 black-and-white image of a women’s suffrage march also on Pennsylvania Avenue. The display links momentous demonstrations for women’s rights more than a century apart on the same stretch of pavement.


But a closer look reveals a different story.


The Archives acknowledged in a statement this week that it made multiple alterations to the photo of the 2017 Women’s March showcased at the museum, blurring signs held by marchers that were critical of Trump. Words on signs that referenced women’s anatomy were also blurred.


In the original version of the 2017 photograph, taken by Getty Images photographer Mario Tama, the street is packed with marchers carrying a variety of signs, with the Capitol in the background. In the Archives version, at least four of those signs are altered.

A placard that proclaims “God Hates Trump” has “Trump” blotted out so that it reads “God Hates.” A sign that reads “Trump & GOP — Hands Off Women” has the word Trump blurred out.


A sign in the original, unaltered photo of the 2017 Women’s March on Washington. (Mario Tama/Getty Images)An altered version of the sign as it appears in the photograph shown at the National Archives. (Salwan Georges/The Washington Post)

Signs with messages that referenced women’s anatomy — which were prevalent at the march — are also digitally altered. One that reads “If my vagina could shoot bullets, it’d be less REGULATED” has “vagina” blurred out. And another that says “This Pussy Grabs Back” has the word “Pussy” erased.

The Archives said the decision to obscure the words was made as the exhibit was being developed by agency managers and museum staff members. It said David S. Ferriero, the archivist of the United States who was appointed by President Barack Obama in 2009, participated in talks regarding the exhibit and supports the decision to edit the photo...

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local...nl_most&wpmm=1

[Centerleftfl]

My favorite. 1 day after the inauguration...

[dukkha]

The Archives said the decision to obscure the words was made as the exhibit was being developed by agency managers and museum staff members. It said David S. Ferriero, the archivist of the United States who was appointed by President Barack Obama in 2009, participated in talks regarding the exhibit and supports the decision to edit the photo...

WTF is wrong with you? Raw Sewage on your brain

[Centerleftfl]

WTF is wrong with you? Raw Sewage on your brain

The source. I'll help you out...

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local...nl_most&wpmm=1


Now. This is from the NATIONAL ARCHIVES, idiot. Think about it. Let me reiterate, SUPPOSE the National Archives decided NOT to publish the surrender of LEE because it was 'politically controversial'.

As a non-partisan, non-political federal agency, we blurred references to the President’s name on some posters, so as not to engage in current political controversy,” Archives spokeswoman Miriam Kleiman said in an emailed statement.

CLUE. BOTH events HAPPENED.

[Centerleftfl]

Have you forgotten he EDIT PHOTOS of CROWD SIZE at his inaugural the day before the MARCH.

PETTY PETTY PISSY THIN SKINNED POS.

[dukkha]

From the NATIONAL ARCHIVES IDIOT! Think about it! Let me reiterate, SUPPOSE the National Archives decided NOT to publish the surrender of LEE because it was 'politically controversial'.

As a non-partisan, non-political federal agency, we blurred references to the President’s name on some posters, so as not to engage in current political controversy,” Archives spokeswoman Miriam Kleiman said in an emailed statement.

CLUE. BOTH events HAPPENED.

at the direction of/consulation with:

David S. Ferriero, the archivist of the United States who was appointed by President Barack Obama in 2009, participated in talks regarding the exhibit and supports the decision to edit the photo...

you work yourself up into hysterical raw sewage posts , and can't see the basics
because of your TDS

[Centerleftfl]

at the direction of/consulation with: you work yourself up into hysterical raw sewage posts , and can't see the basics
because of your TDS

And guess who will found to right in the HISTORY BOOKS 100 (in his case, it'll take less than 25) 200 + years from (assuming we are still here). Carter, Clinton and Obama are more than comfortable with their place in history. I am more than comfortable with being on THEIR SIDE in their places in history.

[dukkha]

And guess who will found to right in the HISTORY BOOKS 100 (in his case, it'll take less than 25) 200 + years from (assuming we are still here). Carter, Clinton and Obama are more than comfortable with their place in history. I am more than comfortable with being on THEIR SIDE in their places in history.

your brain is hard wired to "sides" - partisan is stupid unless you are a politician who only cares about "sides"

I voted for all 3 of those -except i refused to vote to re-elect Obama because he destroyed Libya
and the Iran deal wasn't worth the paper it wasn't printed on.

I would mention to look for a 3rd party ( especially local elections), but you are too far gone with hyper-partisanship

[jimmymccready]

Trump is a POS.

Period.