Truth Detector (01-17-2020)
Frank Apisa (01-17-2020)
This just In::: Trump indicted for living in liberals heads and not paying RENT
C̶N̶N̶ SNN.... Shithole News Network
Trump Is Coming back to a White House Near you
Truth Detector (01-17-2020)
Isaiah 6:5
“Woe to me!” I cried. “I am ruined! For I am a man of unclean lips, and I live among a people of unclean lips, and my eyes have seen the King, the Lord Almighty.”
Truth Detector (01-17-2020)
Huh??????????
Ummm...rather a general statement. Some ARE, Darth. Trump, for instance, is.Look, Frank, people aren’t idiots.
It is patently obvious all politicians are willing to stretch the truth in order to further their objectives.It’s patently obvious democrats were in a hurry to impeach Trump for purely partisan purposes. They have to be blithering idiots to buy the crap ‘oh, but Trump might commit more crimes if we don’t hurry’.
Trump on the other hand lies about damn near everything...for almost no reason other than that he is a liar.
Oh...you think she has halted?Only to watch Pelosi put a halt to the whole process after the Democrats got their Trump impeachment.
Okay.
Okay...thanks for sharing that. Now I'm interested in why the Republican senators are against doing it. Hell...The Leader has assured them that he has done nothing wrong. So...only exculpatory evidence is out there...and no damaging evidence.The hurry/not hurry bit is so easy to see through it’s pathetic. My ‘rationalization’ is that the Senate is by no means required to do what the House refused to do.
Right?
As I said...the Republican senators can make the Democrats look like goddam fools...by just bringing in people like John Bolton, Mick Mulveney, and Mike Duffy. They will all swear under oath that Trump is as pure as new-fallen snow.Which is call Bolton to testify. Or anyone else. If Democrats deemed the articles worthy of being passed, that implies they had all they needed and were ready for trial.
Right?
Yup...let's have it.Let’s have it.
ON HIS WORST DAY, JOE BIDEN IS A BETTER PRESIDENT THAN TRUMP WAS ON HIS BEST DAY!
Earl (01-17-2020)
Truth Detector (01-17-2020)
Truth Detector (01-17-2020)
jimmymccready
That is a good description of the Trump partisans. The articles are solid, and the indictments that are waiting for Trump when he leaves office are even more so.
My family, some who vote Trump, love me dearly and would despise your one-headed no-depth trolling hate for others not like you.
Hate the crimes, love the criminal, and eventually Trump will come into the criminal system where he and his followers can get the help they need.
Russian trolls and their supporters go on Ignore, automatically: no second chance.
I think Jonathan Turley answers that question best; great article to read in it's entirety:
When William Shakespeare wrote that “all the world is a stage” and “one man in his time plays many parts,” he could have probably had in mind Senator Charles Schumer. In 1999, the Democrat from New York famously opposed witnesses in the trial of President Clinton as nothing more than “political theater.” Now Schumer has declared that witnesses and a full trial are essential for President Trump, and that a trial without witnesses would be deemed the “most unfair impeachment trial in modern history.”
That does not include the Clinton case where Schumer sought to proceed to a summary vote without a trial. As the Senate now gears up for the third presidential impeachment in history, the fight has begun over the rules and scope of a trial. The Framers were silent on the expected procedures and evidence for a trial, beyond the requirement of a two-thirds vote to convict a president. The only direct precedent on these issues is derived from two very different trials, those of President Johnson and Clinton.
By sending a thin record to the Senate, the House could not have made things easier for Trump. Since the House did not take time to subpoena critical witnesses, such as former national security adviser John Bolton, or to compel testimony of other witnesses, the Senate could simply declare that it will try the case on the record supplied by the House, a record that Democrats insist is already conclusive and overwhelming. Moreover, in reviewing the past trials of Johnson and Clinton, Democrats may have to struggle with precedents of their own making. Indeed, Republicans could argue that a trial without witnesses is impeachment in Democratic style.
https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciar...eachment-trial
"When government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."
A lie doesn't become the truth, wrong doesn't become right, and evil doesn't become good just because it is accepted by a majority.
Author: Booker T. Washington
Darth Omar (01-17-2020)
"When government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."
A lie doesn't become the truth, wrong doesn't become right, and evil doesn't become good just because it is accepted by a majority.
Author: Booker T. Washington
"When government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."
A lie doesn't become the truth, wrong doesn't become right, and evil doesn't become good just because it is accepted by a majority.
Author: Booker T. Washington
Darth Omar (01-17-2020), Truth Detector (01-17-2020)
My expertise always trumps ha ha your enthusiasm. Trump will not be convicted in the GOP Senate, I agree, but he won't be found Innocent. The 'slap on the wrist' has cost him re-election. The material found will be used in the indictments when he steps down from office new January.
Russian trolls and their supporters go on Ignore, automatically: no second chance.
Bookmarks