Page 24 of 30 FirstFirst ... 14202122232425262728 ... LastLast
Results 346 to 360 of 437

Thread: The Democrats witness dilemma

  1. #346 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    93,388
    Thanks
    6,096
    Thanked 26,637 Times in 21,222 Posts
    Groans
    2,214
    Groaned 2,203 Times in 2,099 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Adolf_Twitler View Post
    No idiot- none of that! You are out in the weeds here.

    What it comes down to is- do you believe a president should be able to use Financial aid approved by a nonpartisan approval in Congress, be used to extort other countries to help them win an American presidential election?

    YES OR NO! Those are the only two options available.
    no, there is a third option.....we can ignore the bullshit you pretend is fact and send you home to lick your wounds that haven't healed since 2016............when are you fucks going to realize that no sane person in this country believes the shit you make up......
    Isaiah 6:5
    “Woe to me!” I cried. “I am ruined! For I am a man of unclean lips, and I live among a people of unclean lips, and my eyes have seen the King, the Lord Almighty.”

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to PostmodernProphet For This Post:

    Earl (01-19-2020)

  3. #347 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    40,355
    Thanks
    9,253
    Thanked 10,417 Times in 7,833 Posts
    Groans
    42
    Groaned 4,293 Times in 3,629 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Frank Apisa View Post
    EXACTLY. The electoral victory was FAR from a landslide. It ranks in the lowest 20% of electoral victories.

    Both of former President Obama's electoral victories were greater...and both of former President Clinton's electoral victories were greater. And they both also won the popular vote.

    Trump is a chump...and so are many of his supporters. Especially the ones who think his inaugural crowds...and electoral victory were great.
    The RWers on this forum have real difficulty with the truth.

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to domer76 For This Post:

    Frank Apisa (01-19-2020)

  5. #348 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    40,355
    Thanks
    9,253
    Thanked 10,417 Times in 7,833 Posts
    Groans
    42
    Groaned 4,293 Times in 3,629 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PostmodernProphet View Post
    of course it does.....it means that what you are pretending is evidence is fake, worthless demmycunt blathering.......the type of stuff we've been hearing from you for the last three years.....,you can't just make shit up and pretend people have to believe it.......life doesn't work that way.......
    I've dealt with some stupid fucking lawyers through the years. You're in the top tier of stupid.


  6. The Following User Says Thank You to domer76 For This Post:

    Micawber (01-19-2020)

  7. #349 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    8,274
    Thanks
    372
    Thanked 3,039 Times in 2,191 Posts
    Groans
    168
    Groaned 603 Times in 570 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PostmodernProphet View Post
    no, there is a third option.....we can ignore the bullshit you pretend is fact and send you home to lick your wounds that haven't healed since 2016............when are you fucks going to realize that no sane person in this country believes the shit you make up......
    Gotcha! Just deny it when you are guilty of anything and pretend like it didn't happen- AND if anyone should ever accuse you of something- accuse them of picking on you- and Blame it all on them! In fact, go ahead and make it all out to be about them and get the focus off of yourself.

    DUDE, DO YOU REALLY THINK WE DO NOT KNOW DONALD TRUMP'S REPUBLICAN PLAYBOOK BY NOW?

    We see you coming miles away these days. You can deny- but you can't hide! PEEK-A-BOO! WE SEE YOU! LOL!

    Last edited by Adolf_Twitler; 01-18-2020 at 02:58 PM.

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to Adolf_Twitler For This Post:

    Frank Apisa (01-19-2020)

  9. #350 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Posts
    6,825
    Thanks
    263
    Thanked 2,409 Times in 1,651 Posts
    Groans
    29
    Groaned 1,233 Times in 1,137 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by christiefan915 View Post
    The fault is that the Burisma business was known by since 2014 and if Obama didn't care, Congress should have. Repubs controlled Congress the last two years of Obama's presidency and up to the 2018 mid terms. You can't absolve trump for sitting on this the entire time he's been president, or the republican Congress for their inaction from 2014-2018.
    So you are arguing that Biden's supposed crimes have been covered up by trump and the Republicans in Congress. Remember Republicans still control the Senate. Maybe the problem is there is no there, there. There is nothing to investigate with Biden.

    There is the accusation of a potential appearance of a conflict of interest that never became an actual appearance of a conflict of interest, which is to say, there is the accusations that there was no crime. trump has worse scandals weekly.

  10. #351 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Posts
    6,825
    Thanks
    263
    Thanked 2,409 Times in 1,651 Posts
    Groans
    29
    Groaned 1,233 Times in 1,137 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Earl View Post
    Yes, Warren is just a culture thief who lied to get ahead personally and politically... impeach Pocahontas!
    If we are going to impeach based on lying about ancestry, trump lied repeatedly about being Swedish. There is no Swedish ancestry in trump, and yet he said it repeatedly, he even put it in his book. Then when he realized no one cared his father was German, he has started lying and saying his father was born in Germany.

    Warren actually told the truth, way back when, she has some Native American in her ancestry.

  11. #352 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Posts
    6,825
    Thanks
    263
    Thanked 2,409 Times in 1,651 Posts
    Groans
    29
    Groaned 1,233 Times in 1,137 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CFM View Post
    I asked you, nigger.
    Wow, rough group... And rough side of the politics. If CFM were on my side, I would not be on his side.

  12. #353 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Posts
    6,825
    Thanks
    263
    Thanked 2,409 Times in 1,651 Posts
    Groans
    29
    Groaned 1,233 Times in 1,137 Posts

    Default

    How many people from the trump administration are in prison, and it is how early?

    What is difference between them and trump? They go to a real court, while trump has his Republican buddies to cover for him.

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to Walt For This Post:

    Micawber (01-19-2020)

  14. #354 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    9,976
    Thanks
    387
    Thanked 2,350 Times in 1,914 Posts
    Groans
    157
    Groaned 82 Times in 80 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Walt View Post
    I remember with Limbaugh, his high price lawyers got the evidence of his other attempts to get drugs ruled inadmissible, because it would prejudice the jury. Then he claimed it had never happened, because it was ruled inadmissible.

    It still happened. It is just the right wing judge who was hearing the case felt that having the jury find out what Limbaugh was doing would make them think he was guilty.
    Judges on the left and right protect the defendant's rights whether they have a high-price lawyer or public defender by refusing to admit such evidence.

    If a guy has been convicted of 5 rapes that cannot be admitted during the trial because it is not evidence he committed the current rape but it would prejudice the jury. It can be used during sentencing.

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to Flash For This Post:

    Earl (01-19-2020)

  16. #355 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Steeler Nation
    Posts
    52,955
    Thanks
    40,447
    Thanked 26,079 Times in 18,526 Posts
    Groans
    4,314
    Groaned 2,534 Times in 2,418 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Walt View Post
    So you are arguing that Biden's supposed crimes have been covered up by trump and the Republicans in Congress. Remember Republicans still control the Senate. Maybe the problem is there is no there, there. There is nothing to investigate with Biden.

    There is the accusation of a potential appearance of a conflict of interest that never became an actual appearance of a conflict of interest, which is to say, there is the accusations that there was no crime. trump has worse scandals weekly.
    Not at all. I'm saying there were no investigations because there was no crime. Once Joe decided to run for president, cons decided to reframe both Bidens as criminals. Previously they only slammed Hunter for dating his brother's widow. Also, cons tried to paint Joe as a pedophile once he decided to run. These slimeballs will do and say anything to bash the competition and the truth doesn't matter.
    #Not My President



    TRUMP: And you'll develop — you'll develop herd — like a herd mentality. It's going to be — it's going to be herd-developed, and that's going to happen. That will all happen.



  17. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to christiefan915 For This Post:

    Frank Apisa (01-19-2020), ThatOwlWoman (01-18-2020)

  18. #356 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    74,991
    Thanks
    15,268
    Thanked 14,432 Times in 12,044 Posts
    Groans
    18,546
    Groaned 1,699 Times in 1,647 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Walt View Post
    If Biden's son is called, you have to also call all the witnesses actually involved with the conspiracy. trump does NOT want that. he is doing everything in his power to block that from happening. That would mean months of listening to trump administration officials admit to illegal acts, OR go to jail for refusing to testify.

    But I agree, you would get to call Biden's son... Who would then testify to how he cleaned up Burisma to a point they could pass western due diligence processes. You forget that Biden has already had to sign on to testimony about cleaning up Burisma, and so you really are not going to get much more out of him.
    Incorrect, again.
    SEDITION: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.


  19. #357 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    40,355
    Thanks
    9,253
    Thanked 10,417 Times in 7,833 Posts
    Groans
    42
    Groaned 4,293 Times in 3,629 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flash View Post
    Judges on the left and right protect the defendant's rights whether they have a high-price lawyer or public defender by refusing to admit such evidence.

    If a guy has been convicted of 5 rapes that cannot be admitted during the trial because it is not evidence he committed the current rape but it would prejudice the jury. It can be used during sentencing.
    In today's legal system, it's not how much justice there is, it's how much justice you can afford.

  20. #358 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Posts
    2,294
    Thanks
    234
    Thanked 1,199 Times in 777 Posts
    Groans
    13
    Groaned 166 Times in 151 Posts

    Default

    The Democrats wish to call witnesses pertinent to the accusations.

    The Bidens are not in any way, shape, or form pertinent to the valid reasons for impeaching Trump.

    This is NOT a complicated thing.

    This is perfectly obvious to any sentient human being.

    Apparently the "sentient" qualification is a standard to which no contemporary Republican can rise.

  21. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to NiftyNiblick For This Post:

    domer76 (01-18-2020), Frank Apisa (01-19-2020), ThatOwlWoman (01-18-2020)

  22. #359 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    74,991
    Thanks
    15,268
    Thanked 14,432 Times in 12,044 Posts
    Groans
    18,546
    Groaned 1,699 Times in 1,647 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Walt View Post
    You are probably one third right, but definitely two thirds wrong. The Senate will fail to convict trump, that much is almost certainly correct.

    Republicans will NOT even try to "exonerate" trump. Bringing forward the witnesses that could either exonerate, or convict trump would just reinforce that he is guilty in the voters minds. And make no mistake about it, trump is quite guilty.

    trump will NOT win in a landslide. he might eke out a win, probably not in the popular vote, but maybe in the Electoral College. There is no way he gets a landslide.




    This is going to sound mean, but nobody cares. Not Democrats, not Republicans, nobody. Who cares how long people who will vote for Republicans all the time will remember something. They are going to vote for Republicans whatever the Democrats or Republicans do. They will do that until they die.

    What is a concern is what will people in battleground states think. They are overwhelmingly for impeachment, but not necessarily conviction. And there in lies the rub. Republicans have to look like they are taking this seriously, or they will lose all the battleground states. They also must keep this from getting anymore serious than it is, or they will lose all the battleground states.

    And then there is the dying thing. Republican voters will be Republican voters until they die... But that is going to happen sooner or later. Republicans are not making good inroads with the younger people.
    INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY
    SEDITION: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.


  23. The Following User Says Thank You to USFREEDOM911 For This Post:

    Earl (01-19-2020)

  24. #360 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    19,620
    Thanks
    16,725
    Thanked 10,319 Times in 7,072 Posts
    Groans
    385
    Groaned 384 Times in 361 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by christiefan915 View Post
    Go sleep it off, clearly you're having trouble following the thread.

    trump allowed foreign aid to the previous corrupt Ukraine president. trump did not call for the Bidens to be investigated until Joe started his campaign. trump is using Ukraine corruption as a cover for his scheme to bring down a political rival.

    Don't doubt me.
    His cover story for investigating corruption is ... investigating corruption.

    Joe Biden got caught getting his son a top job in the most corrupt country in the world, while he was Obama's pointman in Ukraine. Then got caught, in Jan 2018, bragging about threatening a Ukraine prosecutor, who was investigating his son, by withholding a Billion in Aid. Prosecutor Shokin should be called as a witness at the impeachment trial.

    And yes I doubt you. Yours is nothing but a fantasy lib fill-in-the-blanks scenario. Never is it Connect the Dots in libtard lalaland. Always full of holes. There is Zero evidence Zelensky was ever threatened. Call him as a witness, too.

    The Aid was approved on May 23, ... two days before Poroshenko was to leave office.
    Last edited by Bigdog; 01-19-2020 at 02:12 AM.
    I condemn the National Socialist German Workers Party, the Socialist Democrat Hate Whitey Party,... and Socialist Workers party heroes, Mao, Chavez, Mussolini, Pol Pot, Stalin, Castro and Kim Jung Un.

    Liberal Racist code: Orange is the New White

  25. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bigdog For This Post:

    Earl (01-19-2020), USFREEDOM911 (01-19-2020)

Similar Threads

  1. Trump’s job approval shows the Democrats’ dilemma in 2018
    By Grajonca in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 97
    Last Post: 01-15-2018, 05:39 PM
  2. When is a dilemma not a dilemma,
    By archives in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 01-15-2018, 03:37 PM
  3. Witness bombshell - Muller tried to use intimidation to help DEMOCRATS
    By Русский агент in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-30-2017, 12:37 PM
  4. I have a dilemma
    By Sun Devil in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 149
    Last Post: 03-15-2014, 06:21 PM
  5. My Dilemma
    By klaatu in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 06-11-2008, 12:18 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •