The Democrats witness dilemma

[Darth Omar]

It’s clear that Democrats need witnesses in the Senate impeachment trial since it’s a slam dunk acquittal based on the articles Nancy solemnly/gleefully sent over to the Senate.

Which begs the question if they should have been sent to begin with—but Democrats wanted their Trump impeachment*, so yeah.

At any rate, that means the defense gets to call Hunter Biden, and others, since Democrats insist on the trial being ‘fair’. Do Democrats risk playing ‘dog catches car’ by putting Hunter Biden under oath? What confidence do they have that Hunter is clean besides reassuring themselves, back and forth, that Hunter is clean? The fact is, Hunter Biden is a Black Box—no one knows what’s inside it until it’s opened. And we all know his past is ‘checkered’, to be diplomatic about it.

Or how about the WB? For months, Democrats and their media minions have been lying about the WB protection law which *doesn’t* guarantee anonymity. If Democrats want Bolton to appear—so will the WB. Then we’ll get to find out if there was anything resembling a set-up going on between the WB and Adam Schiff.

Shifty may be a House manager but he’s also *a material witness* to how this whole thing started. Do Democrats really want a known liar under oath in a Senate trial? This won’t be the basement of the House where Democrats can tightly control everything.

This can get ugly, quick. But I fully expect Democrats to keep the pedal to the metal.

[jimmymccready]

It's a slam dunk acquittal if Jesus testified against Trump.

The Bidens, if called, will testify.

The trade off for Mitch is that he will have to call Bolton and Parnas and Pompeo and Nunes as well if he wants the Bidens.

[Darth Omar]

It's a slam dunk acquittal if Jesus testified against Trump.

The Bidens, if called, will testify.

The trade off for Mitch is that he will have to call Bolton and Parnas and Pompeo and Nunes as well if he wants the Bidens.

If they voted on the articles as they stand, Trump walks.

Witnesses are a gambit for Democrats. You can admit or not.

[Celticguy]

If they voted on the articles as they stand, Trump walks.

Witnesses are a gambit for Democrats. You can admit or not.

Dems dont want bidens even though they will already have synced their stories.
Im loving Rand Paul breaking bad on gop threatening to side with dems. They KNOW he is serious.
Dont close the book on dismiss just yet.

[jimmymccready]

If they voted on the articles as they stand, Trump walks.

Witnesses are a gambit for Democrats. You can admit or not.

Let me interrupt your confidence with my expertise. Witnesses are always a gamble, and the Bidens are not worth the bet for the GOP. But some of them will try it anyway.

[Into the Night]

Let me interrupt your confidence with my expertise. Witnesses are always a gamble, and the Bidens are not worth the bet for the GOP. But some of them will try it anyway.

The Democrats stand to lose a lot more by the calling of such a witness, dumbass.

[Rune]

If they voted on the articles as they stand, Trump walks.

Witnesses are a gambit for Democrats. You can admit or not.

Shut up you fucking moron.

[PostmodernProphet]

It's a slam dunk acquittal if Jesus testified against Trump.

if Jesus was going to testify would you let him swear to the oath "so help me God"?.....

[Into the Night]

if Jesus was going to testify would you let him swear to the oath "so help me God"?.....

Why not?

[PostmodernProphet]

Why not?

rather self-serving isn't it?......

[Into the Night]

rather self-serving isn't it?......

So?

[Eagle_Eye]

It's a slam dunk acquittal if Jesus testified against Trump.

The Bidens, if called, will testify.

The trade off for Mitch is that he will have to call Bolton and Parnas and Pompeo and Nunes as well if he wants the Bidens.

Just because your side is so partisan doesn't mean my side is. I believe in the system but when it comes to these articles of impeachment well put lipstick on a pig it's still a pig.

[jimmymccready]

Just because your side is so partisan doesn't mean my side is. I believe in the system but when it comes to these articles of impeachment well put lipstick on a pig it's still a pig.

That is a good description of the Trump partisans. The articles are solid, and the indictments that are waiting for Trump when he leaves office are even more so.

[Getin the ring]

That is a good description of the Trump partisans. The articles are solid, and the indictments that are waiting for Trump when he leaves office are even more so.

I feel so bad for those around you, mostly your family,

That you will harbor this hate inside you for 5 more years, and then cheer for the hacks to still chase trump even after he's served two terms and fixed the country

you're a tiny little troll, nothing more

[jimmymccready]

jimmymccready
That is a good description of the Trump partisans. The articles are solid, and the indictments that are waiting for Trump when he leaves office are even more so.

I feel so bad for those around you, mostly your family,

That you will harbor this hate inside you for 5 more years, and then cheer for the hacks to still chase trump even after he's served two terms and fixed the country

you're a tiny little troll, nothing more

My family, some who vote Trump, love me dearly and would despise your one-headed no-depth trolling hate for others not like you.

Hate the crimes, love the criminal, and eventually Trump will come into the criminal system where he and his followers can get the help they need.