WATERMARK, GREATEST OF THE TRINITY, ON CHIK-FIL-A
www.gunsbeerfreedom.blogspot.com
www.gunsbeerfreedom.blogspot.com
So by doing so, they are quite figuratively erasing the history of that flag in order to suit their own narrow insecurities.
So they are appropriating the flag and erasing its history, so they can feel fashionable?
FUCK THAT. I don't fucking buy that disingenuous shit for a second, and it's laughable that you do.
People who wave that stupid thing know exactly what they're doing.
Welcome to Gaslit Nation.
When I die, turn me into a brick and use me to cave in the skull of a fascist
When I die, turn me into a brick and use me to cave in the skull of a fascist
You're the one telling me that the people who wave that dumb thing are erasing history to suit their fragile insecurities.
Take me through how removing monuments and flags to traitors who lost a war and killed Americans "controls society"?I am not defending monuments and flags, I am defending the freedom to display them against those who would use Nazi like methods to control society.
What am I missing? What history am I missing from those flags? You're trying to say that the history of that flag should be erased in order to satisfy insecure trash.
So wouldn't you be the one seeking to control society by defending the erasing of history of that dumb flag?
When I die, turn me into a brick and use me to cave in the skull of a fascist
When I die, turn me into a brick and use me to cave in the skull of a fascist
Actually, that depends on the context. You can burn a rainbow flag without being charged with a hate crime if you follow whatever the local laws are for burning items and if you do it in a public space rather than somewhere else like a gay person's yard.
Technically, you can burn a cross in a public space with the right permits. Granted, getting permission from a local government to do that is very unlikely for obvious reasons.
Hate crimes are easier to determine when the action being done is on someone's private property or in other expressions of a personal threat.
It's why the KKK is still allowed to have rallies, but they aren't allowed to burn a cross in someone's yard.
I find it wholly unsurprising that the people who accuse us of wanting to erase history by tearing down Confederate flags and monuments have absolutely no problem erasing the history of the flag and monuments by disingenuously appropriating it to mean something else.
Isn't that always the case with Conservatives and BoThSiDeRiStS? Accuse others of doing the thing you're either deliberately or unknowingly doing yourself...
When I die, turn me into a brick and use me to cave in the skull of a fascist
Bookmarks