How Can McConnell and Graham Take Oaths Of Impartiality?

[Darth Omar]

He is talking about an oath, they are taking an oath to fulfill the duties of an impartial juror in a Senate trial, which the whole world knows is the last thing Mitch and Lindsey are going to do, they have even admitted such, so they are lying, and again the whole world knows it, even though it won't get as much as a whisper on Fox. Certainly pulls the rug out from beneath Lindsey the next time he goes into one of his phony moral outrages on TV

But that is fine, I'd expect nothing less from the likes of Mitch and Lindsey, plays right into Pelosi's aims, right from the jump the whole Senate "trial" has been exposed itself as a charade, this is just further evidence for public consumption

This whole escapade is a charade intended for public consumption lol.

[Callinectes]

Has any Senate Democrat said that they have made up their mind before the articles even hit the Senate? Has any Senate Democrat said that they would work closely with the impeachment managers to make sure they get the verdict they want?

Next

So you're on pins and needles over how the jackasses are gonna vote?

[Truth Detector]

Has any Senate Democrat said that they have made up their mind before the articles even hit the Senate?

Have ANY Democrats NOT made their minds up about Trump? You can't be this mentally retarded. Seriously.

Has any Senate Democrat said that they would work closely with the impeachment managers to make sure they get the verdict they want?

Impartial??? You really are too dishonest and stupid for words. These comments are before there is even a trial shit-for-brains:

Sen. Chuck Schumer of New York, called anew for fresh evidence and testimony from key White House officials for the Senate impeachment trial.

"What is President Trump hiding?" Schumer said Monday.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) declared in April that President Trump ought to be impeached over the findings of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report — even though the report absolved him of so-called “Russia collusion”

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) supported an impeachment inquiry in May, calling the president a “pathological liar” Sanders added that he wanted President Trump impeached — before an inquiry had been completed

Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ) has suggested that he will vote to remove Trump for allegedly violating his oath of office

Sen. Michael Bennet (D-CO), a lower tier candidate, has already suggested he will vote to remove Trump

Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA), who recently dropped out of the race, supports removing the president from office:
Trump is pressuring another foreign government to dig up dirt on a political opponent.
We need a new commander in chief—and we need to absolutely begin impeachment proceedings. He’s gotta go

Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY), an earlier dropout from the race, supported impeachment enthusiastically, leaving little doubt that she, like her colleagues, has already made up her mind to vote to remove Trump from office:
The House should begin impeachment hearings immediately.
Enough is enough.
We can’t let the president abuse his office for political gain without accountability.

I have to laugh at leftist asshats and the PHONY media bloviating about a FAIR trial. Morons.

https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/...n-impeachment/

[archives]

This whole escapade is a charade intended for public consumption lol.

Sure, at this point, what else it, has been since the Trump's lackeys in the House attempted to make it a circus for TV, as I said, Pelosi isn't after the verdict of a sham trial in Mitch's Senate, that isn't the jury she wants to convince of Trump's behavior, but rather public opinion, the one that will count next November

[Truth Detector]

Ah, no, they haven't said anything regarding their role as juror in a Senate impeachment trial nor how they intend to vote before they even heard all the evidence presented before them, Mitch and Lindsey have, and Mitch even went beyond, admitting he was working closely with the White House defense team

Yes they have you lying dunce:

Sen. Chuck Schumer of New York, called anew for fresh evidence and testimony from key White House officials for the Senate impeachment trial.

"What is President Trump hiding?" Schumer said Monday.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) declared in April that President Trump ought to be impeached over the findings of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report — even though the report absolved him of so-called “Russia collusion”

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) supported an impeachment inquiry in May, calling the president a “pathological liar” Sanders added that he wanted President Trump impeached — before an inquiry had been completed

Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ) has suggested that he will vote to remove Trump for allegedly violating his oath of office

Sen. Michael Bennet (D-CO), a lower tier candidate, has already suggested he will vote to remove Trump

Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA), who recently dropped out of the race, supports removing the president from office:
Trump is pressuring another foreign government to dig up dirt on a political opponent.
We need a new commander in chief—and we need to absolutely begin impeachment proceedings. He’s gotta go

Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY), an earlier dropout from the race, supported impeachment enthusiastically, leaving little doubt that she, like her colleagues, has already made up her mind to vote to remove Trump from office:
The House should begin impeachment hearings immediately.
Enough is enough.
We can’t let the president abuse his office for political gain without accountability.

I have to laugh at leftist asshats and the PHONY media bloviating about a FAIR trial. Morons.

https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/...n-impeachment/

[Truth Detector]

I'm a Cunt, the evidence against Trump is overwhelming.

The evidence is UNDERWHELMING you mentally retarded hack.

[PostmodernProphet]

Both have already made public statements of being partial.

What a crock if they are allowed to swear impartiality with no objections.

Justice Roberts, we are counting on you.

Reject both of them!

the same way Schumer and Harris can.......

[Truth Detector]

What you are missing is that no one expects the Senate to do anything other than what Mitch has pretty much said it will, put on a show trial, which is exactly what Pelosi is hoping. The jury she wants to win is public opinion not some shame Senate trial, and actions like today put it on the right path

All that didn't seem to bother Democrats making the same arguments and claims during Clinton's impeachment trial. And that was with a President who had actually been charged with crimes!

You low IQ, mentally disturbed hacks on the left really need to STFU.

[Truth Detector]

Sure, at this point, what else it, has been since the Trump's lackeys in the House attempted to make it a circus for TV, as I said, Pelosi isn't after the verdict of a sham trial in Mitch's Senate, that isn't the jury she wants to convince of Trump's behavior, but rather public opinion, the one that will count next November

Buy a mirror assclown; the charade and Clown Show has been of the Democrats making.

[archives]

Have ANY Democrats NOT made their minds up about Trump? You can't be this mentally retarded. Seriously.



Impartial??? You really are too dishonest and stupid for words. These comments are before there is even a trial shit-for-brains:

Sen. Chuck Schumer of New York, called anew for fresh evidence and testimony from key White House officials for the Senate impeachment trial.

"What is President Trump hiding?" Schumer said Monday.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) declared in April that President Trump ought to be impeached over the findings of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report — even though the report absolved him of so-called “Russia collusion”

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) supported an impeachment inquiry in May, calling the president a “pathological liar” Sanders added that he wanted President Trump impeached — before an inquiry had been completed

Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ) has suggested that he will vote to remove Trump for allegedly violating his oath of office

Sen. Michael Bennet (D-CO), a lower tier candidate, has already suggested he will vote to remove Trump

Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA), who recently dropped out of the race, supports removing the president from office:
Trump is pressuring another foreign government to dig up dirt on a political opponent.
We need a new commander in chief—and we need to absolutely begin impeachment proceedings. He’s gotta go

Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY), an earlier dropout from the race, supported impeachment enthusiastically, leaving little doubt that she, like her colleagues, has already made up her mind to vote to remove Trump from office:
The House should begin impeachment hearings immediately.
Enough is enough.
We can’t let the president abuse his office for political gain without accountability.

I have to laugh at leftist asshats and the PHONY media bloviating about a FAIR trial. Morons.

https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/...n-impeachment/

How desperate is "truthie" in that he had to resort to Brietfart?

Now show us where any of those quotes show the noted person directly saying that they have made up their mind on their Senate vote before the articles even hit the Senate? Or any of them said directly that they would work closely with the impeachment managers to make sure they get the verdict they want?

You got to do better than that "truthie"

Now time for the corny copy and paste, or maybe the personal crapola, I forgot which one comes first

[PostmodernProphet]

Has any Senate Democrat said that they have made up their mind before the articles even hit the Senate? Has any Senate Democrat said that they would work closely with the impeachment managers to make sure they get the verdict they want?

Next

all except two or three.......

[Southern Chicken]

Both have already made public statements of being partial.

What a crock if they are allowed to swear impartiality with no objections.

Justice Roberts, we are counting on you.

Reject both of them!

Lol, judges are not politicians. Robert's will have modest input in the trial. Roberts might have authority to make rulings, such as questions about whether evidence is relevant, but the rules allow the Senate to call for a vote to overrule him anyway.

[archives]

Buy a mirror assclown; the charade and Clown Show has been of the Democrats making.

Well that is not true either, it wasn't the Democrats during the inquiry who made it their goal to attack the process more so than any of the content, taking orders from Donald, they knew their job was to do their best to turn it into a reality TV show, now it is Mitch's turn to continue the design, which no doubt he will and make Pelosi happy

[archives]

Lol, judges are not politicians. Robert's will have modest input in the trial. Roberts might have authority to make rulings, such as questions about whether evidence is relevant, but the rules allow the Senate to call for a vote to overrule him anyway.

True, and judges are political, you really didn't think beer ball Bret was selected cause he was an outstanding jurist did you?

[archives]

all except two or three.......

Well "pp" show us, show us where a Senate Democrat said they knew exactly now how they will cast their vote in the Senate before the evidence is delivered. Show us where any Senate Democrat said that they would be working with the impeachment managers to get the verdict they wanted

If you can't, you are showing us that you are full of shit, your turn