Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 49

Thread: Trump knew exactly what was going on

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    10,974
    Thanks
    77
    Thanked 3,890 Times in 2,625 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 577 Times in 547 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default Trump knew exactly what was going on

    Lev Parnas, the associate of Rudy Giuliani who has been indicted for campaign finance crimes, called out President Donald Trump directly in a new interview with MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow.

    The interview, which will air in full Wednesday night, came out the same week in which House investigators released several new troves of evidence — including texts, letters, and hand-written notes — that give a much more detailed look into the background dealings of Trump’s Ukraine scheme than we’ve seen before. Some of those texts indicate that Parnas was texting with someone who surveilled the U.S. ambassador to Ukraine. There’s even some indication, though it’s not clear how serious it was, that they may have been considering threats to her security or life. Trump eventually fired the ambassador, a goal Parnas, Rudy Giuliani, and some in Ukraine were seeking.

    “What do you think is main inaccuracy, or the main lie, that’s being told that you feel like you can correct?” Maddow asked Parnas, in a clip first aired on Ari Melber’s “The Beat.”

    “That the president didn’t know what was going on,” Parnas said. “President Trump knew exactly what was going on. He was aware of all of my movements. I wouldn’t do anything without the consent of Rudy Giuliani or the president.

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to floridafan For This Post:

    ThatOwlWoman (01-16-2020), Trumpet (01-16-2020)

  3. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    10,974
    Thanks
    77
    Thanked 3,890 Times in 2,625 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 577 Times in 547 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    As did Pompeo and the VP.

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to floridafan For This Post:

    Trumpet (01-16-2020)

  5. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    18,396
    Thanks
    171
    Thanked 8,593 Times in 5,882 Posts
    Groans
    3,010
    Groaned 1,762 Times in 1,640 Posts

    Default

    The whole Trump cabal was involved in pressuring a brand new Ukraine president. They worked together to get a long-time highly respected ambassador out of the way because they knew she would not play ball. Yovanovich had her reputation and career destroyed. Trump does what he wants and defies you to do anything about it.
    Last edited by Nordberg; 01-16-2020 at 12:23 PM.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Nordberg For This Post:

    ThatOwlWoman (01-16-2020)

  7. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    127,334
    Thanks
    36,164
    Thanked 20,843 Times in 16,234 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 18,558 Times in 17,176 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

  8. The Following User Groans At evince For This Awful Post:

    USFREEDOM911 (01-16-2020)

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to evince For This Post:

    ThatOwlWoman (01-16-2020)

  10. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    127,334
    Thanks
    36,164
    Thanked 20,843 Times in 16,234 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 18,558 Times in 17,176 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victoria_Toensing



    Victoria Ann Toensing (née Long; born October 16, 1941) is a conservative lawyer, Republican Party operative and partner with her husband, Joseph diGenova, in the Washington law firm diGenova & Toensing.[6][7] The couple reportedly have worked with Rudy Giuliani and Ukrainian interests in support of President Donald Trump.[8][9][7] Toensing and her husband frequently appear on Fox News and Fox Business Channel.[10]

  11. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    127,334
    Thanks
    36,164
    Thanked 20,843 Times in 16,234 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 18,558 Times in 17,176 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

  12. The Following User Groans At evince For This Awful Post:

    USFREEDOM911 (01-16-2020)

  13. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    74,508
    Thanks
    14,610
    Thanked 14,263 Times in 11,910 Posts
    Groans
    18,321
    Groaned 1,687 Times in 1,635 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by floridafan View Post
    Lev Parnas, the associate of Rudy Giuliani who has been indicted for campaign finance crimes, called out President Donald Trump directly in a new interview with MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow.

    The interview, which will air in full Wednesday night, came out the same week in which House investigators released several new troves of evidence — including texts, letters, and hand-written notes — that give a much more detailed look into the background dealings of Trump’s Ukraine scheme than we’ve seen before. Some of those texts indicate that Parnas was texting with someone who surveilled the U.S. ambassador to Ukraine. There’s even some indication, though it’s not clear how serious it was, that they may have been considering threats to her security or life. Trump eventually fired the ambassador, a goal Parnas, Rudy Giuliani, and some in Ukraine were seeking.

    “What do you think is main inaccuracy, or the main lie, that’s being told that you feel like you can correct?” Maddow asked Parnas, in a clip first aired on Ari Melber’s “The Beat.”

    “That the president didn’t know what was going on,” Parnas said. “President Trump knew exactly what was going on. He was aware of all of my movements. I wouldn’t do anything without the consent of Rudy Giuliani or the president.
    If it's important now, then it should have been important prior to them voting on the Articles of Impeachment.

    I doubt that they're going to get another "bite at the apple".
    SEDITION: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.


  14. The Following User Says Thank You to USFREEDOM911 For This Post:

    Truth Detector (01-17-2020)

  15. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    10,974
    Thanks
    77
    Thanked 3,890 Times in 2,625 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 577 Times in 547 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by USFREEDOM911 View Post
    If it's important now, then it should have been important prior to them voting on the Articles of Impeachment.

    I doubt that they're going to get another "bite at the apple".
    This information was not known prior to the voting on the impeachment. Thats just why Nancy did the right thing to wait.

  16. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    6,837
    Thanks
    2,477
    Thanked 2,702 Times in 1,851 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 528 Times in 488 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Parnas is right, and Trump is a criminal.
    Russian trolls and their supporters go on Ignore, automatically: no second chance.


  17. The Following User Says Thank You to jimmymccready For This Post:

    ThatOwlWoman (01-16-2020)

  18. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    74,508
    Thanks
    14,610
    Thanked 14,263 Times in 11,910 Posts
    Groans
    18,321
    Groaned 1,687 Times in 1,635 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by floridafan View Post
    This information was not known prior to the voting on the impeachment. Thats just why Nancy did the right thing to wait.
    So they hurried their investigation, tried to jump the shark, failed, and now want to have a "mulligan".

    SEDITION: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.


  19. The Following User Says Thank You to USFREEDOM911 For This Post:

    Truth Detector (01-17-2020)

  20. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    3,737
    Thanks
    1,275
    Thanked 2,354 Times in 1,556 Posts
    Groans
    37
    Groaned 107 Times in 105 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by USFREEDOM911 View Post
    So they hurried their investigation, tried to jump the shark, failed, and now want to have a "mulligan".
    So you don't care if it's true that the POTUS has been lying through his teeth - it's inadmissible, right?

  21. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    10,974
    Thanks
    77
    Thanked 3,890 Times in 2,625 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 577 Times in 547 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by USFREEDOM911 View Post
    So they hurried their investigation, tried to jump the shark, failed, and now want to have a "mulligan".

    Just pretend whatever you want.

  22. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    18,396
    Thanks
    171
    Thanked 8,593 Times in 5,882 Posts
    Groans
    3,010
    Groaned 1,762 Times in 1,640 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by USFREEDOM911 View Post
    So they hurried their investigation, tried to jump the shark, failed, and now want to have a "mulligan".

    Now rightys are crying about hurrying. Before they cried about why it was taking so long. There is no mulligan. the House can offer a new impeachment if they feel the need.

  23. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    42,052
    Thanks
    1,041
    Thanked 3,617 Times in 2,816 Posts
    Groans
    1,008
    Groaned 1,328 Times in 1,225 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tranquillus in Exile View Post
    So you don't care if it's true that the POTUS has been lying through his teeth - it's inadmissible, right?
    I think this is the part where you acknowledge the argument about PROCESS!!!!!!! As in 'had the democrats followed the PROCESS, then they'd have had a much better case for impeachment'...............see how that works?
    The war on crime, war on drugs, war on terror, and now the war on opiods.............there's a reason they call it a war. So you idiots will easily accept the collateral damage of innocents

  24. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    46,571
    Thanks
    59,930
    Thanked 26,555 Times in 17,413 Posts
    Groans
    1,970
    Groaned 2,802 Times in 2,623 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SmarterthanYou View Post
    I think this is the part where you acknowledge the argument about PROCESS!!!!!!! As in 'had the democrats followed the PROCESS, then they'd have had a much better case for impeachment'...............see how that works?
    Lol, such a bogus argument. Usually, the DoJ does the investigation, that wasn’t the case because Barr is obstructing. The process was broken before it started, so naturally, the process is different.
    kag: to choke something down in disgust

    Keep America Gagging

  25. The Following User Says Thank You to Phantasmal For This Post:

    ThatOwlWoman (01-16-2020)

Similar Threads

  1. everyone already KNEW Trump put a hit out on Epstein
    By reagansghost in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 10-30-2019, 10:55 AM
  2. Clearly Trump knew this was coming.... Ghina!!!
    By Jarod in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 10-04-2019, 01:53 AM
  3. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 02-06-2019, 04:04 PM
  4. Cohen says trump knew about Trump tower meeting
    By evince in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 50
    Last Post: 07-27-2018, 05:29 PM
  5. Everyone knew Trump would win, and that the media was lying
    By TheDonald in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 11-13-2016, 11:01 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •