Members banned from this thread: evince, CharacterAssassin, Guno צְבִי and Adolf_Twitler


Page 3 of 12 FirstFirst 1234567 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 173

Thread: Harry and Meghan just can’t handle criticism

  1. #31 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Federal Way, WA
    Posts
    68,352
    Thanks
    18,375
    Thanked 18,674 Times in 14,047 Posts
    Groans
    628
    Groaned 1,136 Times in 1,080 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Havana Moon View Post
    For the first 18 months she was treated with kid gloves until people realised what a money grubbing, attention seeking, totally selfish avaricious bitch she really is.
    Eh, perhaps she simply learned to act like that on Suits?

  2. #32 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    48,965
    Thanks
    12,109
    Thanked 14,172 Times in 10,390 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,876 Times in 4,194 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Havana Moon View Post
    Nobody cares what a slimey cunt like you thinks about anything.
    Nope. My limey give-a-fuck is still missing!


  3. #33 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    108,120
    Thanks
    60,501
    Thanked 35,051 Times in 26,519 Posts
    Groans
    47,393
    Groaned 4,742 Times in 4,521 Posts
    Blog Entries
    61

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post
    Nope. My limey give-a-fuck is still missing!

    They are Krauts and Greeks mainly, actually the Greeks have the slang word malakas that describes you perfectly.

  4. #34 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    48,965
    Thanks
    12,109
    Thanked 14,172 Times in 10,390 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,876 Times in 4,194 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Havana Moon View Post
    They are Krauts and Greeks mainly, actually the Greeks have the slang word malakas that describes you perfectly.
    The Limey-Give-A-Fuck will never be found!


  5. #35 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    land-locked in Ocala,FL
    Posts
    27,321
    Thanks
    30,862
    Thanked 16,758 Times in 11,557 Posts
    Groans
    1,063
    Groaned 889 Times in 847 Posts

    Default

    Harry was an easy mark.
    She's a narcissist and control freak. First you isolate and separate someone from their friends, then their family.
    The signs were there prior to the marriage. Harry, you're not going to associate with your buddies anymore,
    you're not going hunting with your family anymore, you must stop smoking, you must lose weight, you must
    hold my hand publicly at all times, on and on.

    She vowed to take an active role in charitable causes and patronages in her new country of choice, but quickly
    tired of that because there wasn't enough fame and attention in doing all that work. Not to mention that
    there was no profit in doing "charitable" work for OTHERS!

    Along the way she's had talks with the Obamas and Hillary. She has now set her sights on developing a charitable
    foundation along those lines. So, now millionaires H & M will see some personal profit and notoriety derived from
    their "charity" business rather than from the heart for a country you claimed to embrace and wanted to serve.
    I'm sure things like t-shirts, hats, trinkets and other kitsch will appear in their brand.

    There's no reason they shouldn't pay for their own security, food, shelter and clothing. The Canadian public is
    in no mood to provide their security. Let these two independents pay their own way.
    She's got million$ and he's got million$. They want to be so independent? Drop the titles and simply go to work.

    Harry. Wise up. Her past dictates her future. She ditched her family, dumped two guys when they got used up.
    Now she's ditched YOUR family and homeland and she'll kick you to the curb when she's ready.
    Abortion rights dogma can obscure human reason & harden the human heart so much that the same person who feels
    empathy for animal suffering can lack compassion for unborn children who experience lethal violence and excruciating
    pain in abortion.

    Unborn animals are protected in their nesting places, humans are not. To abort something is to end something
    which has begun. To abort life is to end it.



  6. #36 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    20,801
    Thanks
    5,108
    Thanked 5,629 Times in 4,083 Posts
    Groans
    11
    Groaned 1,357 Times in 1,282 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Havana Moon View Post
    .


    Of course it's totally predictable that the woke Left will play the race card, that's what they always do in these situations.


    Harry and Meghan just can’t handle criticism


    ‘Is there any one of the royal family who wants to be king or queen? I don’t think so.’ Back in 2017, when Meghan Markle was ‘girlfriend’ and not yet ‘Duchess of Sussex,’ Prince Harry was already expressing doubts about his future role. In a lengthy interview with US magazine Newsweek Harry explained, ‘I sometimes still feel I am living in a goldfish bowl,’ and described longing to be ‘something other than Prince Harry.’

    Since the announcement of their resignation from the royal firm, much attention has focused on Meghan. To some (well, perhaps just Piers Morgan) she’s a ‘revolting human being’. To others, she’s the perfect role model for young women everywhere. Meghan may be villain or victim but Harry is rarely portrayed as anything other than her puppet. Either he’s being manipulated into making sure ‘what Meghan wants, Meghan gets,’ or he’s bravely suffering on her behalf. In reality, as his 2017 interview shows, Harry’s scepticism about his royal role is nothing new.

    Harry has changed his mind about one thing. Two years ago he moaned about being a Prince but was quick to add: ‘we will carry out our duties at the right time.’ Resigning as a senior royal, or, more accurately, going part time, means opting out of the ‘duties’. So, why the change of heart?

    For the woke commentariat, the answer is blindingly obvious. According to the Guardian, ‘abuse and neglect’ meted out by ‘the rightwing press’ has driven Harry and Meghan away. Afua Hirsch, writing in the New York Times, claims that many among Britain’s ‘communities of colour’ are ‘also thinking about moving.’ We’re given the impression that tabloid hacks regularly churn out racist diatribes for a nation swept up in a tide of Brexit-backed xenophobia.

    But even Hirsch’s attempt to frame their treatment as all about racism, only really manages to uncover a dodgy headline and a bizarre reference in the Mail to Meghan’s ‘exotic DNA’. Hirsch mainly falls back upon ‘double standards’ to prove her point. Apparently, when other royals guest edit or appear on the front cover of magazines they are ‘quietly praised’ whereas Meghan was taken to task for her involvement with Vogue. And that’s before we even start on Prince Andrew. Count the column inches, urge Meghan’s champions. They demand to know why so much more attention is given to Harry and Meghan than Prince Andrew, who was friends with a convicted paedophile.

    Certainly Harry and Meghan have received plenty of press attention. But press attention is fairly normal for the royals. Even before he became the rather pathetic figure he is today, Prince Andrew received his fair share. He was dubbed ‘Airmiles Andy’ because of his penchant for frequent and expensive business trips, preferably in a private jet or helicopter. This came after ‘Randy Andy’, the ‘playboy prince’ whose partying, drinking and presumed sexual conquests made for page after page of royal titillation. His relationship with Sarah Ferguson was subject to far more scrutiny, lurid headlines and long range paparazzi shots in one week than Harry and Meghan have experienced in a year.

    Harry and Meghan have not had an easy ride from the press but it’s hard to prove they have been subjected to a racist double standard. What they have received is criticism. They have been criticised for preaching about environmentalism while flying around the world in private jets. They’ve been criticised for extravagance; £50,000 engagement dresses are beyond the reach of most of us. They’ve been criticised for complaining that no one asked if they were okay, while travelling around some of the poorest countries on earth. They’ve been criticised for taking public money – £2.4 million for home improvements – while not giving the public a glimpse of baby Archie’s christening.

    Harry and Meghan may not like it but these are valid criticisms. But we live in strange times. Today, erstwhile republicans fawn over the royal couple, and those who would once have championed a free press now demand royal coverage is pre-approved and carefully curated by a Duke and Duchess that are beyond reproach.

    This narrative has taught Harry it’s acceptable for him to ditch the tiresome commitment he once had to fulfilling his duty, and allows the pair to see stepping back from the responsibilities of public life as an act of bravery. Harry and Meghan want to drop boring duties and avoid pesky royal correspondents, but keep access to Charles’s wallet, inherited wealth and the status of royalty. What they really seem to want is immunity from criticism – and no public figure, no matter their titles or source of income – has a right to that.
    reality check: https://app.sphttps://www.nytimes.co...m/content.html
    Last edited by Taichiliberal; 01-16-2020 at 04:37 PM.
    During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.

    George Orwell

  7. #37 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    41,958
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,035 Times in 13,845 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,042 Times in 2,838 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Havana Moon View Post
    Oh there is a need for royalty in the US, how else to explain the likes of Kim Karcrashian and her nightmarish family?
    You are comparing Kim Karcrashian and her nightmarish family to the Windsor family?

  8. #38 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Steeler Nation
    Posts
    64,532
    Thanks
    65,153
    Thanked 38,086 Times in 25,662 Posts
    Groans
    5,815
    Groaned 2,614 Times in 2,498 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Havana Moon View Post
    Trust Littlejohn to cut to the chase!

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/a...an-Markle.html
    I wonder why the Daily Mail is always so hostile about Americans.


    “What greater gift than the love of a cat.”
    ― Charles Dickens

  9. #39 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Steeler Nation
    Posts
    64,532
    Thanks
    65,153
    Thanked 38,086 Times in 25,662 Posts
    Groans
    5,815
    Groaned 2,614 Times in 2,498 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Havana Moon View Post
    She's trash and her half sister was totally right about her.


    My relationship with Markle peaked at the wedding and has been downhill ever since, but I'd hardly call her "trash."


    “What greater gift than the love of a cat.”
    ― Charles Dickens

  10. #40 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Steeler Nation
    Posts
    64,532
    Thanks
    65,153
    Thanked 38,086 Times in 25,662 Posts
    Groans
    5,815
    Groaned 2,614 Times in 2,498 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Havana Moon View Post
    For the first 18 months she was treated with kid gloves until people realised what a money grubbing, attention seeking, totally selfish avaricious bitch she really is.
    Really? It seems to me the British have no business making her the villain in this situation, given how some of the male royals have behaved over the decades. There's weakling Edward, giving up the throne for Mrs. Simpson. There's Charles and his pathetic mewling about wanting to be Camilla's tampon. There's Philip and his decades of boorish gaffes. There's Andrew and his relationships with underage girls.

    People like Littlejohn and the odious Piers Morgan need to remember some of their home-grown scandals instead of using Markle as their punching bag.


    “What greater gift than the love of a cat.”
    ― Charles Dickens

  11. #41 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Steeler Nation
    Posts
    64,532
    Thanks
    65,153
    Thanked 38,086 Times in 25,662 Posts
    Groans
    5,815
    Groaned 2,614 Times in 2,498 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Havana Moon View Post
    No, role models like Princess Anne are dutiful, hard working and unselfish.
    Dutiful and hard-working... she's also a selfish, pompous, entitled and humorless bitch, or so we've heard.


    “What greater gift than the love of a cat.”
    ― Charles Dickens

  12. #42 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    15,536
    Thanks
    1,378
    Thanked 3,981 Times in 3,024 Posts
    Groans
    130
    Groaned 841 Times in 781 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Havana Moon View Post
    They are Krauts and Greeks mainly, actually the Greeks have the slang word malakas that describes you perfectly.
    My personal read into the situation is that this was triggered by labour/remain getting massacred in the polls so Meghan wants to leave to be able to make it seem like Britain is a racist country.

    Her requirements for moving to America (i.e. Trump no longer be the president) seem to back this interpretation.

    In essence she couldnt give Brexiteers their victory but had to do this instead.
    is on twitter @realtsuke

    https://tsukesthoughts.wordpress.com/

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to tsuke For This Post:

    anonymoose (01-16-2020)

  14. #43 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    108,120
    Thanks
    60,501
    Thanked 35,051 Times in 26,519 Posts
    Groans
    47,393
    Groaned 4,742 Times in 4,521 Posts
    Blog Entries
    61

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by christiefan915 View Post
    Dutiful and hard-working... she's also a selfish, pompous, entitled and humorless bitch, or so we've heard.
    She certainly doesn't suffer fools gladly and has the same relationship to the tabloid Press that a dog has to a lamppost.

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukn...nstrative.html

  15. #44 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    108,120
    Thanks
    60,501
    Thanked 35,051 Times in 26,519 Posts
    Groans
    47,393
    Groaned 4,742 Times in 4,521 Posts
    Blog Entries
    61

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by christiefan915 View Post
    I wonder why the Daily Mail is always so hostile about Americans.
    Yeh so much so that they have a US edition on their website.

  16. #45 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    108,120
    Thanks
    60,501
    Thanked 35,051 Times in 26,519 Posts
    Groans
    47,393
    Groaned 4,742 Times in 4,521 Posts
    Blog Entries
    61

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by christiefan915 View Post
    Really? It seems to me the British have no business making her the villain in this situation, given how some of the male royals have behaved over the decades. There's weakling Edward, giving up the throne for Mrs. Simpson. There's Charles and his pathetic mewling about wanting to be Camilla's tampon. There's Philip and his decades of boorish gaffes. There's Andrew and his relationships with underage girls.

    People like Littlejohn and the odious Piers Morgan need to remember some of their home-grown scandals instead of using Markle as their punching bag.
    The British Press have been scathing about Randy Andy for a long time, why don't you know that? Wallis Simpson did the Royals a massive favour by getting rid of Edward the 8th, who was weak and an ardent admirer of Hitler.

Similar Threads

  1. Harry and Meghan: Newest royal baby could be an American
    By USFREEDOM911 in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-25-2019, 11:03 AM
  2. Meghan McCain gets cut off mid-tantrum:
    By Bourbon in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 02-11-2019, 04:58 PM
  3. Harry and Meghan are a racist's worst nightmare
    By Guno צְבִי in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 150
    Last Post: 05-22-2018, 03:05 PM
  4. Replies: 44
    Last Post: 02-14-2018, 02:03 PM
  5. Meghan McCain: My Beef With Ann Coulter
    By Damocles in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 03-18-2009, 08:53 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •