Page 5 of 32 FirstFirst 12345678915 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 75 of 479

Thread: Evolution vs Creationism---Is there a God? Or is it all just random chance?

  1. #61 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2019
    Location
    Upstate NY
    Posts
    463
    Thanks
    136
    Thanked 303 Times in 233 Posts
    Groans
    9
    Groaned 14 Times in 11 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ThatOwlWoman View Post
    Ah, so it IS a game!

    Along with the universe, you believe that your god also created morals? Morals -- and the human-created laws that back them up -- are changeable, as human history shows us. Just a look at the doings in the Old Testament tells us that. Human sacrifice (Abraham), public drunkenness (Noah), polygamy and adultery (Solomon and his 700 wives and 600 concubines), slavery (most of the actors in the OT) -- all things we now call immoral and forbid by law.
    There are no atheists in foxholes. You know, deep down inside, the difference between right and wrong. Only your rebellious nature has suppressed those ethics and morals for a very long time (talking to everyone, myself included here)
    dem·o·crat: one who subverts authority; unpleasant, destructive, hateful, vile, malicious, vicious, heinous, ugly, bad, nefarious, villainous, corrupt, malevolent, hideous, wicked, harm, pain, catastrophe, calamity, ill willed, a reviler; a defamer; a slanderer; a detractor; a carper; a calumniator; a muckraker; a vilifier; a disparager; a slanderer; a maligner; a detractor; a denigrator; a traducer; a vituperator; a castigator; a libeler; a defiler; a traitor; a debaser;

  2. #62 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2019
    Location
    Upstate NY
    Posts
    463
    Thanks
    136
    Thanked 303 Times in 233 Posts
    Groans
    9
    Groaned 14 Times in 11 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Celticguy View Post
    No doubt in my mind that sone sense of intellegent design is behind all this. Does it use sone sense of evolution as part of it ? Sure, why not ?
    But we cant have our cake and eat it too. It's all or nothing at this point.
    dem·o·crat: one who subverts authority; unpleasant, destructive, hateful, vile, malicious, vicious, heinous, ugly, bad, nefarious, villainous, corrupt, malevolent, hideous, wicked, harm, pain, catastrophe, calamity, ill willed, a reviler; a defamer; a slanderer; a detractor; a carper; a calumniator; a muckraker; a vilifier; a disparager; a slanderer; a maligner; a detractor; a denigrator; a traducer; a vituperator; a castigator; a libeler; a defiler; a traitor; a debaser;

  3. #63 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2019
    Location
    Upstate NY
    Posts
    463
    Thanks
    136
    Thanked 303 Times in 233 Posts
    Groans
    9
    Groaned 14 Times in 11 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cypress View Post
    Unfortunately, you do not speak for all of world Christianity. Some Christians view Satan as a metaphor. Particularly traditionally liberal Christian denominations.

    The view of Satan inherited by many fundamentalists are rooted in Medieval mythology and lore and not firmly rooted in actual scripture
    You should learn to take God at his word. By and large, there no allegory in the bible.

    And the view of Satan is NOT rooted in Medieval mythology (let me guess, you are Game of Thrones fan?)

    It's rooted in a much older book called the Bible. You are wrong on all accounts, my friend.

    p.s. no such thing as a liberal Christian.
    dem·o·crat: one who subverts authority; unpleasant, destructive, hateful, vile, malicious, vicious, heinous, ugly, bad, nefarious, villainous, corrupt, malevolent, hideous, wicked, harm, pain, catastrophe, calamity, ill willed, a reviler; a defamer; a slanderer; a detractor; a carper; a calumniator; a muckraker; a vilifier; a disparager; a slanderer; a maligner; a detractor; a denigrator; a traducer; a vituperator; a castigator; a libeler; a defiler; a traitor; a debaser;

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Iron-Merc For This Post:

    Mason Michaels (01-13-2020)

  5. #64 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2019
    Location
    Upstate NY
    Posts
    463
    Thanks
    136
    Thanked 303 Times in 233 Posts
    Groans
    9
    Groaned 14 Times in 11 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cypress View Post
    I believe the dumbing down of the Republican Party started when they rolled out the welcome mat for the racist Dixiecrats in the 1960s and 70s, and welcomed them with open arms
    Of course, this particular narration of the southern strategy is alive and well amongst the liberal democrats.

    Contrary to popular misconception, the parties never"switched" on racism. The Democrats just switched from overt racism to asubversive strategy of getting blacks as dependent as possible ongovernment to secure their votes. At the same time, they began a cynicalsmear campaign to label anyone who opposes their devious strategy asgreedy racists.

    Source:
    http://russp.us/racism.htm

    Let's do our best not to derail this thread with a democrat vs republican pissing match.
    dem·o·crat: one who subverts authority; unpleasant, destructive, hateful, vile, malicious, vicious, heinous, ugly, bad, nefarious, villainous, corrupt, malevolent, hideous, wicked, harm, pain, catastrophe, calamity, ill willed, a reviler; a defamer; a slanderer; a detractor; a carper; a calumniator; a muckraker; a vilifier; a disparager; a slanderer; a maligner; a detractor; a denigrator; a traducer; a vituperator; a castigator; a libeler; a defiler; a traitor; a debaser;

  6. #65 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Ravenhenge in the Northwoods
    Posts
    89,043
    Thanks
    146,920
    Thanked 83,386 Times in 53,267 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 4,661 Times in 4,380 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Iron-Merc View Post
    Trump wants to save unborn children from death at the hands of liberal abortionists? Obama want's to butcher them in mass? And Trump is the Satanist? LOL come again?
    I've seen some of your other posts. Thought maybe you actually wanted a civil and adult discussion this time. But then there was this. This outpouring of falsehood and crazy ends my conversations with you.
    "Conservatism is the blind and fear-filled worship of dead radicals." -- Mark Twain

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to ThatOwlWoman For This Post:

    christiefan915 (01-15-2020)

  8. #66 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    58,172
    Thanks
    35,729
    Thanked 50,676 Times in 27,321 Posts
    Groans
    22
    Groaned 2,977 Times in 2,694 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Iron-Merc View Post
    You should learn to take God at his word. By and large, there no allegory in the bible.

    And the view of Satan is NOT rooted in Medieval mythology (let me guess, you are Game of Thrones fan?)

    It's rooted in a much older book called the Bible. You are wrong on all accounts, my friend.

    p.s. no such thing as a liberal Christian.
    Your trolling is subpar and utterly tepid. But I am certain you thought this was clever when you typed it

  9. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Cypress For This Post:

    christiefan915 (01-15-2020), ThatOwlWoman (01-12-2020)

  10. #67 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2019
    Location
    Upstate NY
    Posts
    463
    Thanks
    136
    Thanked 303 Times in 233 Posts
    Groans
    9
    Groaned 14 Times in 11 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cypress View Post
    Your trolling is subpar and utterly tepid. But I am certain you thought this was clever when you typed it
    LOL Trolling? What are you talking about? This thread was created to have a frank and honest bipartisan discussion regarding the merits on evolution vs creationism. I am 100 percent serious.

    If you have nothing more of value to post, could you please just get lost?
    dem·o·crat: one who subverts authority; unpleasant, destructive, hateful, vile, malicious, vicious, heinous, ugly, bad, nefarious, villainous, corrupt, malevolent, hideous, wicked, harm, pain, catastrophe, calamity, ill willed, a reviler; a defamer; a slanderer; a detractor; a carper; a calumniator; a muckraker; a vilifier; a disparager; a slanderer; a maligner; a detractor; a denigrator; a traducer; a vituperator; a castigator; a libeler; a defiler; a traitor; a debaser;

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to Iron-Merc For This Post:

    MAGA MAN (01-13-2020)

  12. #68 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio
    Posts
    55,018
    Thanks
    15,249
    Thanked 19,001 Times in 13,040 Posts
    Groans
    307
    Groaned 1,147 Times in 1,092 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Iron-Merc View Post
    Charles Darwin was a creationist and became a believer and Christian on his death bed.
    That’s not only irrelevant it’s also an urban legend that isn’t true. The Lady Hope story was debunked by Darwin’s children shortly after his death. According to Darwin’s children, who were present when he died, not only did Darwin not renounce evolutionary theory, Lady Hope wasn’t even there. Nor was she present during his illness or any illness. In fact Darwin had never even met Lady Hope. In short, Lady Hope lied.

    Hell even the ICR debunks that urban legend as untrue. It didn’t happen.

    It’s irrelevant because Darwin didn’t formulate his famous theory in a vacuum. It was long known by geologist that the earth’s origin was far more ancient than had been believed and naturalist before Darwin had observed and noted how the geological record gave evidence of species changing over time. There were also peers to Darwin in his own time who made the same conclusion independently. Notably Alfred Wallace.

    What Darwin did was piece the evidence painstakingly together to provide a functional predictive model of speciation that he published in a scientific and literary masterpiece “On The Origins of Species”. That is why evolutionary theory is named after him.

    The point being that the principal of evolution was known before Darwin and the evidence that we’ve learned since then has supported Darwin’s observation and, more importantly, the theory has been updated and revised with these additional discoveries like the laws of genetics, nucleic acids (RNA/DNA), protein structures and synthesis. All of which could have easily have falsified evolutionary theory but haven’t. They have, in fact, provided stronger support and deeper understanding of evolutionary theory which has been correspondingly revised to account for this new knowledge.

    Darwin in his own time did not know what the physical mechanism of natural selection was and understood that it was a weakness in his theory. He just observed natural selection and how it functioned. We now know from later discovery that genetics and the biological properties of nucleic acids are the underlying mechanism of natural selection.

    Darwin did not know what this mechanism was in his time but had faith that it would be discovered. What is ironic is that even as Darwin wrote it that very discovery had already been made by a cloistered Austrian Monk. Ironic ehh?
    You're Never Alone With A Schizophrenic!

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to Mott the Hoople For This Post:

    domer76 (01-13-2020)

  14. #69 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio
    Posts
    55,018
    Thanks
    15,249
    Thanked 19,001 Times in 13,040 Posts
    Groans
    307
    Groaned 1,147 Times in 1,092 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Iron-Merc View Post
    LOL Trolling? What are you talking about? This thread was created to have a frank and honest bipartisan discussion regarding the merits on evolution vs creationism. I am 100 percent serious.

    If you have nothing more of value to post, could you please just get lost?
    Fair enough. I’ll put to you starkly. Creationism is as valid as any other human mythology or mysticism or philosophical/religious belief as an origins story. This does separate Creationism from Evolutionary theory as evolution has nothing to say about ultimate origins. Evolutionary theory is limited to modeling speciation.

    As science Creationism has no merit what so ever, and meets absolutely none of the tenets for being considered science. It’s not based on empirical observation. It doesn’t model natural phenomena ( quite the opposite it models supernatural phenomena). It makes no useful testable predictions that can be independently verified. It isn’t, in principle, falsifiable and it has not once published any peer reviewed research or discoveries.
    You're Never Alone With A Schizophrenic!

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to Mott the Hoople For This Post:

    Iron-Merc (01-13-2020)

  16. #70 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    135,291
    Thanks
    13,303
    Thanked 40,970 Times in 32,285 Posts
    Groans
    3,664
    Groaned 2,869 Times in 2,756 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mott the Hoople View Post
    It’s not based on empirical observation. It doesn’t model natural phenomena ( quite the opposite it models supernatural phenomena). It makes no useful testable predictions that can be independently verified. It isn’t, in principle, falsifiable and it has not once published any peer reviewed research or discoveries.
    it's not obvious from this whether you are talking about creationism or the theory that humans evolved from single cell organisms........please clarify......
    Isaiah 6:5
    “Woe to me!” I cried. “I am ruined! For I am a man of unclean lips, and I live among a people of unclean lips, and my eyes have seen the King, the Lord Almighty.”

  17. #71 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    49,428
    Thanks
    12,199
    Thanked 14,304 Times in 10,498 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,916 Times in 4,232 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Iron-Merc View Post
    There are no atheists in foxholes. You know, deep down inside, the difference between right and wrong. Only your rebellious nature has suppressed those ethics and morals for a very long time (talking to everyone, myself included here)
    You have the corner on what’s right and what’s wrong? Typical of the sheer arrogance of “Christians”.

  18. The Following User Groans At domer76 For This Awful Post:

    MAGA MAN (01-13-2020)

  19. #72 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    49,428
    Thanks
    12,199
    Thanked 14,304 Times in 10,498 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,916 Times in 4,232 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Iron-Merc View Post
    You should learn to take God at his word. By and large, there no allegory in the bible.

    And the view of Satan is NOT rooted in Medieval mythology (let me guess, you are Game of Thrones fan?)

    It's rooted in a much older book called the Bible. You are wrong on all accounts, my friend.

    p.s. no such thing as a liberal Christian.
    The Bible is the word of God.
    How do you know that?
    Because the Bible tells us so.
    Why believe the Bible?
    Because the Bible is infallible.
    How do you know that?
    (return to top)

  20. The Following User Groans At domer76 For This Awful Post:

    MAGA MAN (01-13-2020)

  21. #73 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    In my house
    Posts
    21,174
    Thanks
    3,418
    Thanked 7,931 Times in 5,908 Posts
    Groans
    9
    Groaned 444 Times in 424 Posts
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Iron-Merc View Post
    But we cant have our cake and eat it too. It's all or nothing at this point.
    Some see it that way, but i dont.
    "Those who vote decide nothing. Those who count the vote decide everything." Joseph Stalin
    The USA has lost WWIV to China with no other weapons but China Virus and some cash to buy democrats.

  22. #74 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    34,369
    Thanks
    3,504
    Thanked 11,629 Times in 9,297 Posts
    Groans
    632
    Groaned 1,405 Times in 1,371 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Creation and Evolution can
    Coexist!
    AM I, I AM's,AM I.
    What day is Michaelmas on?

  23. #75 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    73,743
    Thanks
    102,643
    Thanked 55,137 Times in 33,847 Posts
    Groans
    3,188
    Groaned 5,083 Times in 4,699 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ThatOwlWoman View Post
    What's the point of tempting man? Some kind of divine amusement?
    This has always been my question, why did an Omnipotent being need worship from flawed humans? Why does he compete with Satan? It’s never made sense to me.

Similar Threads

  1. Teaching Creationism is Child Abuse
    By signalmankenneth in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-26-2013, 11:32 PM
  2. Creationism Is Not Appropriate For Children
    By signalmankenneth in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-31-2012, 04:46 PM
  3. haven't eaten anything for ~41 hours, just by random chance
    By BRUTALITOPS in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 07-11-2012, 12:49 PM
  4. Replies: 81
    Last Post: 04-30-2012, 09:29 PM
  5. Evolution vs. Creationism
    By Dixie - In Memoriam in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 45
    Last Post: 03-23-2012, 02:52 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •