Evolution vs Creationism---Is there a God? Or is it all just random chance?

[Into the Night]

That is exactly the reply I would expect from someone who is in denial that there is a higher authority than man. Many things test us on our desire for something, why not the creator? All I can say is if I'm right you lose everything and I gain everything but if I'm wrong I lose nothing.

If you are wrong, you lost the time and possibly more than you want to lose, depending on how wrong you are. Yet, you have the ability to repent of that error, change your ways, advance in your knowledge between good and evil, and work to return to God, now the wiser.

[Into the Night]

So for Creationist it boils down to put up or shut up. Either provide us with a model that works or be ignored by science. The choice is yours.

Science has nothing to do with the Theory of Creation, the Theory of Evolution, or the Theory of Abiogenesis.

[Adolf_Twitler]

To think that the human race all started with Adam and Eve is to admit that our race started out as inbred idiots that had incest with Mom, Sis, Granny, and Auntie-roo!!

Brilliant!

[USFREEDOM911]

No. Satan actually has a purpose. If we are to know good, we must know evil. These two concepts are related. How can one know what is good without knowing what is evil?
It is the tempting by Satan that teaches man the difference, else we would never know the difference.

Spot on.

[USFREEDOM911]

Our punishment comes out of own choosing. We are free to choose. We are not free of the consequences of that choice.

A child learning undergoes the same thing. Mistakes will be made. The child learns from them. A parent is there so the child does not make an error so great as to destroy himself. Experience is the best teacher.

And sometimes the parent has to allow the child to make those errors or else, now is the child to understand.

[USFREEDOM911]

To think that the human race all started with Adam and Eve is to admit that our race started out as inbred idiots that had incest with Mom, Sis, Granny, and Auntie-roo!!

Brilliant!

This is just you lying; but while I can explain it to you, I can't make you understand.

[Cypress]

The Theory of Evolution is not science. It is a religion, like any other. It is based on an initial circular argument and has arguments extending from it...an excellent definition for any religion, speaking from philosophy.

Evolution by natural selection is on a par with general relativity and quantum mechanics as the most tested, most validated, and most broadly accepted scientific theories in the history of science. They are so thoroughly validated by testing that collectively they have attained the status of scientific tenets.

[Adolf_Twitler]

This is just you lying; but while I can explain it to you, I can't make you understand.

Splain LUCY!

[Into the Night]

Evolution by natural selection is on a par with general relativity and quantum mechanics as the most tested, most validated, and most broadly accepted scientific theories in the history of science.

The Theory of Natural Selection was a theory of science, until it was falsified by a thought experiment. The Theory of Evolution is not falsifiable. There is no way to test it except by going back in time to see what actually happened.

They are so thoroughly validated by testing that collectively they have attained the status of scientific tenets.

Nope. No test is available for the Theory of Evolution.

[ThatOwlWoman]

To think that the human race all started with Adam and Eve is to admit that our race started out as inbred idiots that had incest with Mom, Sis, Granny, and Auntie-roo!!

Brilliant!

LOL! Here, a gift for you.

[Cypress]

The Theory of Natural Selection was a theory of science, until it was falsified by a thought experiment. The Theory of Evolution is not falsifiable. There is no way to test it except by going back in time to see what actually happened.

Nope. No test is available for the Theory of Evolution.

Wrong on all counts .

The theory of evolution is falsifiable by genetics, mutations, contolled environmental setting, and the fossil record.

Every attempt to falsify evolution by natural selection through rigorous scientific testing has utterly failed.

The day we find chimpanzee fossils in Precambrian rock strata is the day we will have to throw out the theory of evolution by natural selection, and work on developing a new theory

[Cypress]

Wrong on all counts .

The theory of evolution is falsifiable by genetics, mutations, contolled environmental setting, and the fossil record.

Every attempt to falsify evolution by natural selection through rigorous scientific testing has utterly failed.

The day we find chimpanzee fossils in Precambrian rock strata is the day we will have to throw out the theory of evolution by natural selection, and work on developing a new theory

Even though conservatives cringe at being called the anti-science, anti-knowledge, anti-evolution, climate denier party - and they undoubtedly harbor some shame and humiliation at the vast number of science-denying ignoramuses in their party - it is threads like this that validate the Republican Party as a party of ignorance.

[evince]

its what happens when a party clings to ancient myths designed to sooth people who had NO WAY to figure out what reality was runs up against a time when we now have the tools designed to figure out what reality is


its called denial


denying new information because your brain is SET and too tired to incorporate incoming information


the Ole

don't bother me with the facts Ive already made up my mind


just like this Impeachment trial

[gfm7175]

I'm definitely a creationist at heart. I believe that God is real, Jesus is the son of God. Humans are chained to a lie because that is the desire of our enemy. Satan has made his kingdom here on earth and has great influence over the human race. As evidenced in the garden of Eden, he caused the fall of humanity, the turn away from God and this is how "death" entered into our vocabulary.

In reference to evolution, its still just a theory. For one there are no transition forms in the fossil record. For another 99% of all mutations are bad. Evolution is a mathematical impossibility when you sit down and look at the odds.

For example, if evolution were true, what is the deal with all the fraudulent fossils? Surely there would be no need to "fake" the missing links between species, yet this seems to be a re-occurring theme that evolutionists cannot escape from.

Please share you views on this, I am eager to gain in insight and knowledge and that is exactly what this thread is about. I don't want this to turn into a political pissing match. Let's not mock or demean, simply list your argument and your evidence and debate your points as you see fit.

Good luck and God speed!

The Theory of Evolution is an old one. The Theory of Abiogenesis is fairly old also. Almost as old as the Theory of Creation. None of it is science. I happen to believe in the Theory of Creation, just as you do.

Yup, same here. I am a Theory of Creation believer as well.

[gfm7175]

Evolution by natural selection is on a par with general relativity and quantum mechanics as the most tested, most validated, and most broadly accepted scientific theories in the history of science. They are so thoroughly validated by testing that collectively they have attained the status of scientific tenets.

The Theory of Natural Selection has been falsified. It is no longer a theory of science.