Lol if the GOP wants to protect all children why do they try to cut funding for school lunch programs? Whydo they try to cut funding to child medical care? Why do they do nothing about school shootings?
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/half-a-...stration-rule/
https://www.americanprogress.org/iss...tens-children/
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics...n-guns/555737/
People like you think that's what others think. It's sad and shows how much of a bad faith actor you really are when it comes to this discussion.It's people like you that consider children a pox and demand the right to kill them even up to birth. And your side screams HELL NO should there be safeguards to protect school children.
Seeing how I'm the only one using sources the fact is no - not all zygotes will grow into fetuses. 1 in 4 pregnancies end in miscarriage. https://www.sciencealert.com/meta-an...rriage-biorxivYou really are fucked in the head. A severed hand will not grow into a fetus but a zygote will! That makes your argument so asinine as to be unbelievable.
Have you done any research on the reasons women get abortions? Or do you think all abortions are just for fun?So many lies
And there we have the standardized liberal talking points....all stemming from guilty feelings....
I didn't assume anything, I asked a question. But given you said:
It seems obvious you were talking to me. But you don't seem to care about my answer in your failed attempt to appeal to emotion.I understand you're not willing to answer the question...it was difficult, after all...
If you weren't so blind to anything other than what you read on your trash liberal web sites you might learn something. Can you name one bill in the House or Senate that is aimed at school lunch programs or children's health care?Lol if the GOP wants to protect all children why do they try to cut funding for school lunch programs? Whydo they try to cut funding to child medical care? Why do they do nothing about school shootings?
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/half-a-...stration-rule/
https://www.americanprogress.org/iss...tens-children/
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics...n-guns/555737/
Wrong? We, including me base our opinions on the actions and words of people like you!People like you think that's what others think. It's sad and shows how much of a bad faith actor you really are when it comes to this discussion.I know of no woman that would say what you just said. It shows that you are self centered and even resorts to comparing a miscarrage to abortion while abortion is voluntary a miscarrage is not and results in severe anguish to the mother!So I've indulged once or twice - you can't pin all the millions on me. And with miscarries being surprisingly common what does it actually mean for the 'life' being lost?
So that gives you justification to abort? LOLSeeing how I'm the only one using sources the fact is no - not all zygotes will grow into fetuses. 1 in 4 pregnancies end in miscarriage.
"the reasons most frequently cited were that having a child would interfere with a woman's education, work or ability to care for dependents (74%); that she could not afford a baby now (73%); and that she did not want to be a single mother or was having relationship problems (48%). Nearly four in 10 women said they had completed their childbearing, and almost one-third were not ready to have a child. Fewer than 1% said their parents' or partners' desire for them to have an abortion was the most important reason. Younger women often reported that they were unprepared for the transition to motherhood, while older women regularly cited their responsibility to dependents.'Have you done any research on the reasons women get abortions? Or do you think all abortions are just for fun?
https://www.guttmacher.org/journals/...e-perspectives
/shrugs....well certainly if her actions are not remarkable I would see no reason to charge her with neglect or manslaughter........maybe if you had cited an example of an overdose of drugs or something.....
then talk about a right to terminate, not a right to produce.....Simple logic yet you ignore the link and reality. You show up to work and your boss is threatening to harm you and other employees - do you stay at work? You're eating a meal and you being to feel sick - do you keep eating? You find out you're pregenent but after medical examination the baby will be non-viable due to deformity, do you continue to gestate?
you don't need an abortion to remove a dead baby.......does that confuse you?......Except when you dlete the link that shows a women was forced to wait to give birth to a dead baby instead of getting an abortion.
Isaiah 6:5
“Woe to me!” I cried. “I am ruined! For I am a man of unclean lips, and I live among a people of unclean lips, and my eyes have seen the King, the Lord Almighty.”
its sad the way you demmycunts lie.....from YOUR link.....
the "cut" (which actually wasn't a cut) was actually only an impact on the 4% of recipients who didn't actually meet the financial qualifications which had previously been in place........Because about 79.71
percent of households with children participating in SNAP have school aged
children, we estimate that about 545,500 households with school-aged children may no longer
participate in SNAP under the proposal. Their eligibility for school meals would vary based on
household income:
About 45 percent would no longer be asset eligible for SNAP but would still be eligible for
free school meals because their household income is 130 percent or less of the Federal
poverty level, the income threshold for free meals in NSLP and SBP.
The other 55 percent would no longer be income eligible for free school meals. However,
roughly 93 percent2
of these households, or about 51 percent of all affected households,
would be eligible for reduced price meals due to their household income of 185 percent or
less than the federal poverty level, the income threshold for reduced-price meals in NSLP
and SBP.
The remaining four percent of households with children would be eligible only for paid
school meals because their household income exceeds 185 percent of the federal poverty
level.
Households seeking free or reduced-price meals would need to submit an application to do so
Isaiah 6:5
“Woe to me!” I cried. “I am ruined! For I am a man of unclean lips, and I live among a people of unclean lips, and my eyes have seen the King, the Lord Almighty.”
Bookmarks