Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Was He Defending The First Amendment?

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    3,668
    Thanks
    1,022
    Thanked 445 Times in 401 Posts
    Groans
    51
    Groaned 102 Times in 89 Posts

    Default Was He Defending The First Amendment?




    Update: ‘Act of Domestic Terror’ — Suspect Held After Five Stabbed at Hanukkah Celebration in New York Suburb
    by Simon Kent
    29 Dec 2019

    https://www.breitbart.com/faith/2019...w-york-suburb/

    I do not know what the man’s motive is, but if I was his attorney his defense would be “My client was defending his First Amendment Rights.” If I was on the jury I would vote NOT GUILTY. Allow me to elaborate on my reasoning.

    There is a community of Hasidic Jews in New Square, New York.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monsey,_New_York


    Mrs. Clinton had swung through the Hasidic village of New Square, in Rockland County north of New York City, during her Senate campaign. And that campaign stop paid off on Nov. 7 with 1,400 votes for Clinton--about 100 times the dozen votes that her opponent, Republican Rick A. Lazio, received and far more than she received in other nearby Orthodox Jewish communities.

    Hasidic Clemency Case Entangles Hillary Clinton
    By NICK ANDERSON
    Feb. 24, 2001

    https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-...756-story.html

    Back up a bit further and you will learn that President Clinton gave tax dollars to Jews in New Square, an all-Hasidic village to teach children their religion. In fact, Hasidic Jews got 11,000,000 tax dollars for a non-existent yeshiva. Hillary Clinton got 99-plus percent of the Hasidic vote in her first run for the Senate. That amounted to $7,857 for every Jewish vote. Four of the Hasidic crooks went to prison. Make what you will out of Bill Clinton’s pardons.

    NOTE: It would have been poetic justice had a Brooklyn Jew, Bernie Sanders, beat Clinton for the nomination in 2016. Frankly, I never understood why television mouths gave so much coverage to Republican wannabes when Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders were funnier than Abbott & Costello.

    Some years ago I lived close to New Square; so I know a little bit about how Hasidic Jews behave towards outsiders. No one in our government ever stood up to them. No one in our government is standing up to Muslims. Apparently, the First Amendment only applies to Christians.

    Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, . . .

    Parenthetically, Hasidic Jews can be as violent as Muslims. A friend of my wife living in Rockland Country told her that New York City Jews are fleeing NYC; buying property in the New Square area, and expanding their influence. That would not mean much except for the:


    The New Square Hasidic Mafia
    January 04, 2014

    http://failedmessiah.typepad.com/fai...mafia-789.html

    The worst of it is that Hasidic Jews do not marry in a civil ceremony. The women then have children with their Jewish husbands. Since they are not legally married they can collect welfare support for the kids. I have not been able to verify the scam; so I am relying on my wife’s friend who is very well-informed about local politics.

    America has its own France right here. New Square is pretty close to being a Jewish enclave insofar as driving through New Square on PUBLIC STREETS on the Sabbath or on Jewish holidays, while Muslims are establishing “Sharia” enclaves throughout France for Muslims only.

    NOTE: Publicity is the last thing serial killers want. To this day Jack the Ripper’s identity is unknown. Conversely, politically motivated murderers crave all of the publicity they can get. Political motives matters not; coverage is always the true motive. Television is more than eager to provide 24-7 reportage.

    Before non-existent racism and antisemitism raise their ugly head in New Square reporting, random murder done by blacks is not a new phenomenon. One of the most brutal black killers did his murders in 1914. Black man, Julian Carlton, killed seven people by setting fire to Frank Lloyd Wright’s house. He used a hatchet to hack those who tried to escape the flames. Wright’s mistress and her two children were among the dead.



    Julian Carlton’s name and deed should be well-known because of Frank Lloyd Wright’s narrow escape. He was in Chicago at the time. In fact, Carlton is hardly known today. Note that Carlton did not need a gun:


    Mystery of the murders at Taliesin

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/wales/1110359.stm


    This link provides more background on Wright and the murders:

    https://www.history.com/news/the-mas...s-love-cottage

    Finally, Julian Carlton reportedly said he felt disrespected; a popular term in movies and TV shows used to justify violence. If Carlton actually coined the phrase it has become an excuse to overlook a multitude of sin when ‘disrespecting’ becomes psycho-babble for simple rejection.

    Touchy-feely freaks claim that no one has the Right to choose their friends and associates when it means hurting someone by rejecting them.

    There is another school of thought on that topic:

    You don't choose your friends, they choose you, and you either reject them or you accept them without reservations.” Arturo Pérez-Reverte

    Long before Perez-Reverte wrote his novel The Flanders Panel (no connection) I was taught: Choose your friends. Do not let them choose you.

    After all is said and done, individual mass murderers have a deep-seated need to associate themselves with government mass murders in modern times. If you start the clock in the early 20th century with the Ottoman Empire’s slaughter of Armenian Christians, Soviet Union genocide, Nazi Germany, and Communist China, it is not hard to understand a lack of conscience for killing a dozen or so for whatever reason when governments slaughtered close to 200,000,000 in just one century.
    Last edited by Flanders; 12-29-2019 at 05:15 PM.
    The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do. It is the freedom to refrain, withdraw and abstain which makes a totalitarian regime impossible. Eric Hoffer

  2. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    6,649
    Thanks
    2,024
    Thanked 2,146 Times in 1,528 Posts
    Groans
    19
    Groaned 429 Times in 408 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flanders View Post



    Update: ‘Act of Domestic Terror’ — Suspect Held After Five Stabbed at Hanukkah Celebration in New York Suburb
    by Simon Kent
    29 Dec 2019

    https://www.breitbart.com/faith/2019...w-york-suburb/

    I do not what the man’s motive is, but if I was his attorney his defense would be “My client was defending his First Amendment Rights.” If I was on the jury I would vote NOT GUILTY. Allow me to elaborate on my reasoning.

    There is a community of Hasidic Jews in New Square, New York.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monsey,_New_York


    Mrs. Clinton had swung through the Hasidic village of New Square, in Rockland County north of New York City, during her Senate campaign. And that campaign stop paid off on Nov. 7 with 1,400 votes for Clinton--about 100 times the dozen votes that her opponent, Republican Rick A. Lazio, received and far more than she received in other nearby Orthodox Jewish communities.

    Hasidic Clemency Case Entangles Hillary Clinton
    By NICK ANDERSON
    Feb. 24, 2001

    https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-...756-story.html

    Back up a bit further and you will learn that President Clinton gave tax dollars to Jews in New Square, an all-Hasidic village to teach children their religion. In fact, Hasidic Jews got 11,000,000 tax dollars for a non-existent yeshiva. Hillary Clinton got 99-plus percent of the Hasidic vote in her first run for the Senate. That amounted to $7,857 for every Jewish vote. Four of the Hasidic crooks went to prison. Make what you will out of Bill Clinton’s pardons.

    NOTE: It would have been poetic justice had a Brooklyn Jew, Bernie Sanders, beat Clinton for the nomination in 2016. Frankly, I never understood why television mouths gave so much coverage to Republican wannabes when Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders were funnier than Abbott & Costello.

    Some years ago I lived close to New Square; so I know a little bit about how Hasidic Jews behave towards outsiders. No one in our government ever stood up to them. No one in our government is standing up to Muslims. Apparently, the First Amendment only applies to Christians.

    Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, . . .

    Parenthetically, Hasidic Jews can be as violent as Muslims. A friend of my wife living in Rockland Country told her that New York City Jews are fleeing NYC; buying property in the New Square area, and expanding their influence. That would not mean much except for the:


    The New Square Hasidic Mafia
    January 04, 2014

    http://failedmessiah.typepad.com/fai...mafia-789.html

    The worst of it is that Hasidic Jews do not marry in a civil ceremony. The women then have children with their Jewish husbands. Since they are not legally married they can collect welfare support for the kids. I have not been able to verify the scam; so I am relying on my wife’s friend who is very well-informed about local politics.

    America has its own France right here. New Square is pretty close to being a Jewish enclave insofar as driving through New Square on PUBLIC STREETS on the Sabbath or on Jewish holidays, while Muslims are establishing “Sharia” enclaves throughout France for Muslims only.

    NOTE: Publicity is the last thing serial killers want. To this day Jack the Ripper’s identity is unknown. Conversely, politically motivated murderers crave all of the publicity they can get. Political motives matters not; coverage is always the true motive. Television is more than eager to provide 24-7 reportage.

    Before non-existent racism and antisemitism raise their ugly head in New Square reporting, random murder done by blacks is not a new phenomenon. One of the most brutal black killers did his murders in 1914. Black man, Julian Carlton, killed seven people by setting fire to Frank Lloyd Wright’s house. He used a hatchet to hack those who tried to escape the flames. Wright’s mistress and her two children were among the dead.



    Julian Carlton’s name and deed should be well-known because of Frank Lloyd Wright’s narrow escape. He was in Chicago at the time. In fact, Carlton is hardly known today. Note that Carlton did not need a gun:


    Mystery of the murders at Taliesin

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/wales/1110359.stm


    This link provides more background on Wright and the murders:

    https://www.history.com/news/the-mas...s-love-cottage

    Finally, Julian Carlton reportedly said he felt disrespected; a popular term in movies and TV shows used to justify violence. If Carlton actually coined the phrase it has become an excuse to overlook a multitude of sin when ‘disrespecting’ becomes psycho-babble for simple rejection.

    Touchy-feely freaks claim that no one has the Right to choose their friends and associates when it means hurting someone by rejecting them.

    There is another school of thought on that topic:

    You don't choose your friends, they choose you, and you either reject them or you accept them without reservations.” Arturo Pérez-Reverte

    Long before Perez-Reverte wrote his novel The Flanders Panel (no connection) I was taught: Choose your friends. Do not let them choose you.

    After all is said and done, individual mass murderers have a deep-seated need to associate themselves with government mass murders in modern times. If you start the clock in the early 20th century with the Ottoman Empire’s slaughter of Armenian Christians, Soviet Union genocide, Nazi Germany, and Communist China, it is not hard to understand a lack of conscience for killing a dozen or so for whatever reason when governments slaughtered close to 200,000,000 in just one century.
    Why do you support rounding up Jews and murdering them in camps?

  3. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    3,668
    Thanks
    1,022
    Thanked 445 Times in 401 Posts
    Groans
    51
    Groaned 102 Times in 89 Posts

    Default

    Here it comes:


    Federal prosecutors filed hate-crime charges
    Monday against accused Monsey stabber Grafton Thomas in the machete rampage that injured five Hanukkah celebrants inside a rabbi’s home.

    Swamp creatures wasted no time in jumping on an opportunity to take control of crimes committed in states —— not to mention another opportunity to abolish double jeopardy.


    Democrats love everything containing the word hate, while they despise freedom of speech:

    XXXXX

    Murder is murder. Codifying “Hate Crimes” is discriminatory in that it makes one victim more important than another in the eyes of the law. If ever the slippery slope argument was applicable it is in convicting an accused defendant based on motive alone. One unrelated remark defined as hate speech uttered by a defendant years before he was arrested can be used to prove he or she committed a hate crime.

    The logic used by liberals never cease to amaze me; never more than trying to pass “Hate Crime” legislation. Such philosophical legislation boggles the mind because it assigns a psychological motive to selected acts. The most outlandish example of defining a hate crime was the time President Clinton blamed Rush Limbaugh for the Oklahoma City Bombing.

    https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...58#post2925158

    Will wonders never cease? Suddenly Democrats are defending the First Amendment:


    Grafton, 37, is charged with five counts of obstructing the free exercise of religious beliefs by attempting to kill with a dangerous weapon and causing injuries, according to the Associated Press.


    Grafton Thomas charged with hate crimes in Monsey stabbing attack
    By Bruce Golding
    December 30, 2019 | 12:55pm

    https://nypost.com/2019/12/30/grafto...abbing-attack/


    NOTE:
    Democrats saw another opportunity when a good guy with a gun killed a bad guy with a gun in a Christian church in Texas. Now Democrats can attack the Second Amendment —— AGAIN. Naturally, the gun-grabbers would have been a lot happier had the bad guy used an assault rifle instead of a shotgun.
    The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do. It is the freedom to refrain, withdraw and abstain which makes a totalitarian regime impossible. Eric Hoffer

  4. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Posts
    2,734
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 98 Times in 94 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 41 Times in 39 Posts

    Default

    Update: ‘Act of Domestic Terror’ — Suspect Held After Five Stabbed at Hanukkah Celebration in New York Suburb
    by Simon Kent 29 Dec 2019 https://www.breitbart.com/faith/2019...w-york-suburb/
    I do not know what the man’s motive is, but if I was his attorney his defense would be “My client was defending his First Amendment Rights.” If I was on the jury I would vote NOT GUILTY. Allow me to elaborate on my reasoning.Apparently, the First Amendment only applies to Christians.
    Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, . .
    After all is said and done, individual mass murderers have a deep-seated need to associate themselves with government mass murders in modern times. If you start the clock in the early 20th century with the Ottoman Empire’s slaughter of Armenian Christians, Soviet Union genocide, Nazi Germany, and Communist China, it is not hard to understand a lack of conscience for killing a dozen or so for whatever reason when governments slaughtered close to 200,000,000 in just one century. [/B][/QUOTE]

    Sounds like a 1950 Byrd's KKK churchstate fiefdom of thieving US Constitution - old glory - old testament arsonists self defense of their First Amendment rites......as in those burning Bush's second coming of liberty & justice for all Christians thru 9/11.....

  5. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    3,668
    Thanks
    1,022
    Thanked 445 Times in 401 Posts
    Groans
    51
    Groaned 102 Times in 89 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flanders View Post
    There is a community of Hasidic Jews in New Square, New York.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monsey,_New_York


    Mrs. Clinton had swung through the Hasidic village of New Square, in Rockland County north of New York City, during her Senate campaign. And that campaign stop paid off on Nov. 7 with 1,400 votes for Clinton--about 100 times the dozen votes that her opponent, Republican Rick A. Lazio, received and far more than she received in other nearby Orthodox Jewish communities.

    Hasidic Clemency Case Entangles Hillary Clinton
    By NICK ANDERSON
    Feb. 24, 2001

    https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-...756-story.html

    Back up a bit further and you will learn that President Clinton gave tax dollars to Jews in New Square, an all-Hasidic village to teach children their religion. In fact, Hasidic Jews got 11,000,000 tax dollars for a non-existent yeshiva. Hillary Clinton got 99-plus percent of the Hasidic vote in her first run for the Senate. That amounted to $7,857 for every Jewish vote. Four of the Hasidic crooks went to prison. Make what you will out of Bill Clinton’s pardons.
    Blame this on the coronavirus or the Clintons or both:

    A friend of ours, I will call her Janet, lives in Rockland County near the village of New Square. We have been friends with Janet for 50 years —— she is coming up on 90 years old. In all those years Janet and my wife talked on the telephone every few weeks. The other day my wife was in tears when Janet told her what Democrat scum are doing to her.

    At age 89 it is not easy for Janet to go food shopping in the best of times; so she ordered food from Walmart because the coronavirus scam trapped her in her home. Now get this:




    Walmart refused to deliver anything in her area because she lives too close to New Square. Not only Walmart, but other suppliers refuse to deliver in Janet’s area.

    You will not hear Janet’s story reported on television the way all of those horror stories were reported daily when television mouths were pushing Obamacare.
    The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do. It is the freedom to refrain, withdraw and abstain which makes a totalitarian regime impossible. Eric Hoffer

Similar Threads

  1. So today we are defending Assad!
    By Jarod in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 04-10-2017, 08:21 AM
  2. Why aren't liberal Democrats defending this man.....
    By NOVA in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 08-23-2016, 07:41 PM
  3. Defending the Constitution?
    By ZappasGuitar in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 81
    Last Post: 03-06-2013, 02:20 PM
  4. Is this why the Obama Regime is defending Pennsylvania?
    By canceled.2021.1 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-30-2012, 09:26 AM
  5. 2nd Amendment incorporated against the states via the 14th Amendment
    By SmarterthanYou in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 04-20-2009, 03:31 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •