Originally Posted by
WalterWilson
Why Doesn't he Release the Documents and Allow Witnesses to Testify Under Oath?
Donald Supporters,
Can you help me out with something? I was wondering if you could explain to me why Donald and his staff steadfastly refused to release any and all relevant documents and refused to allow key witnesses to testify at Donald's impeachment hearings in the House and will now do the same for the Senate trial.
Isn't that kind of strange, considering, as we all know, how incredibly and amazingly innocent he is and how perfect his shake-down--as some would call it-- call to the Ukrainian leader was? Well, that's a strange sort of innocent, if you ask me. Shouldn't Donald, if he is incredibly and amazingly innocent and has done nothing wrong, want to prove his innocence by allowing complete transparency? Yet it's the furthest thing from transparency that could be imagined. Isn't that odd?
And isn't it peculiar that Moscow Mitch (as some cynical liberal-bastard critics might call him) has already said that an innocent verdict in the Senate is a foregone conclusion and that, by the way, he's working closely with the White House to coordinate a common defense strategy? And this despite that Mitch swore an oath to defend the Constitution and to be an impartial juror?
Well, that strikes me as strange. Really, really strange. How about you?
Bookmarks