Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 37

Thread: GOP denies 200,000 Wisconites a vote in 2020 as pet judge decimates voter rolls

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    24,892
    Thanks
    4,196
    Thanked 15,334 Times in 9,321 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 2,825 Times in 2,563 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default GOP denies 200,000 Wisconites a vote in 2020 as pet judge decimates voter rolls

    County judge orders 200,000 names stricken from Wisconsin voter rolls


    A single county judge in Wisconsin has ordered the purge of over 200,000 names from the state’s voters rolls. More than 90% of those names are not in the county where the judge presides. In fact, the number of names the judge ordered stricken is over twice the whole population of his county.

    As reported by the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, Judge Paul Malloy acted on a request from just three voters who were backed by a conservative organization, while ignoring both the state election commissions and the League of Women Voters, nether of which were allowed to testify. The center of the case was a letter that the elections commissions sent out to voters it believe may have moved. However, that letter was sent only a month earlier, and the elections commission intended to give voters until 2021 to correct any information.

    But Malloy didn’t give the commission, or the voters, that chance. Instead, he ordered the names removed in advance of the nexts election. To get an idea of how big a deal that is, Donald Trump won the state of Wisconsin by just 23,000 votes. In fact, it’s that kind of margin that has Republicans out hunting for cases like this in which they can make it impossible for everyone to vote.

    In fact, Malloy seems to have done even more than the conservative group “Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty” asked. The original request was for an injunction requiring election officials to remove voters who had not responded in 30 days. Instead, Malloy issued a “writ of mandamus” ordering the purge and threatening any election commissioner who refused to cooperate.

    Trump took Michigan by 11,000 votes. It was one of three states where fewer than 80,000 votes — less than 0.08% of the votes cast — determined the outcome of the election. There’s nothing about this that was intended to be accidental or fair. The state was targeted not because of three local voters, but because a national conservative voter-purge organization, ERIC, targeted Wisconsin it as an easy mark. Malloy also wasn’t an accident. The case was filed in his court specifically because he was appointed by former Republican Governor Scott McCallum and had a record of conservative rulings.

    And this is just one of a series of similar assaults that are underway.


    https://www.dailykos.com/stories/201...in-voter-rolls


    there's just no way the upcoming election will valid, the GOP is laying waste to democracy and voting rights, right before our eyes

  2. The Following User Groans At reagansghost For This Awful Post:

    Earl (12-14-2019)

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to reagansghost For This Post:

    evince (12-15-2019)

  4. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    40,213
    Thanks
    14,475
    Thanked 23,679 Times in 16,485 Posts
    Groans
    23
    Groaned 585 Times in 561 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    DailyKos....LMAO!

  5. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Posts
    9,164
    Thanks
    3,635
    Thanked 6,593 Times in 4,192 Posts
    Groans
    130
    Groaned 1,203 Times in 1,060 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by reagansghost View Post
    County judge orders 200,000 names stricken from Wisconsin voter rolls


    A single county judge in Wisconsin has ordered the purge of over 200,000 names from the state’s voters rolls. More than 90% of those names are not in the county where the judge presides. In fact, the number of names the judge ordered stricken is over twice the whole population of his county.

    As reported by the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, Judge Paul Malloy acted on a request from just three voters who were backed by a conservative organization, while ignoring both the state election commissions and the League of Women Voters, nether of which were allowed to testify. The center of the case was a letter that the elections commissions sent out to voters it believe may have moved. However, that letter was sent only a month earlier, and the elections commission intended to give voters until 2021 to correct any information.

    But Malloy didn’t give the commission, or the voters, that chance. Instead, he ordered the names removed in advance of the nexts election. To get an idea of how big a deal that is, Donald Trump won the state of Wisconsin by just 23,000 votes. In fact, it’s that kind of margin that has Republicans out hunting for cases like this in which they can make it impossible for everyone to vote.

    In fact, Malloy seems to have done even more than the conservative group “Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty” asked. The original request was for an injunction requiring election officials to remove voters who had not responded in 30 days. Instead, Malloy issued a “writ of mandamus” ordering the purge and threatening any election commissioner who refused to cooperate.

    Trump took Michigan by 11,000 votes. It was one of three states where fewer than 80,000 votes — less than 0.08% of the votes cast — determined the outcome of the election. There’s nothing about this that was intended to be accidental or fair. The state was targeted not because of three local voters, but because a national conservative voter-purge organization, ERIC, targeted Wisconsin it as an easy mark. Malloy also wasn’t an accident. The case was filed in his court specifically because he was appointed by former Republican Governor Scott McCallum and had a record of conservative rulings.

    And this is just one of a series of similar assaults that are underway.


    https://www.dailykos.com/stories/201...in-voter-rolls


    there's just no way the upcoming election will valid, the GOP is laying waste to democracy and voting rights, right before our eyes
    How can this ruling stand? Obviously it will be appealed...at least I hope it will. The party of trump cannot win a legit election.
    BLUEXIT
    A Modest Proposal For Separating Blue States From Red

    Dear Red-State Trump Voter,
    Let’s face it, guys: We’re done.


    It is a tragedy that so much of the work that so many men and women toiled at for so long to make this a better country, and a better world, has been thrown away, leaving us all in such needless peril.

    This is why our separation in all but name is necessary.


    https://newrepublic.com/article/1409...mp-red-america

  6. The Following User Groans At Cinnabar For This Awful Post:

    Earl (12-14-2019)

  7. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    52,291
    Thanks
    77,752
    Thanked 23,568 Times in 17,849 Posts
    Groans
    38,677
    Groaned 3,238 Times in 3,042 Posts
    Blog Entries
    8

    Default

    President Trump has already won one legitimate election...one more to go.

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to Earl For This Post:

    RB 60 (12-14-2019)

  9. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    44,907
    Thanks
    9,713
    Thanked 7,400 Times in 5,849 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 6,396 Times in 6,143 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sailor View Post
    DailyKos....LMAO!
    You just keep a-rubbin'. This is serious talk.
    " First they came for the journalists...
    We don't know what happened after that . "

    Maria Ressa.

  10. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    44,907
    Thanks
    9,713
    Thanked 7,400 Times in 5,849 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 6,396 Times in 6,143 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by reagansghost View Post
    County judge orders 200,000 names stricken from Wisconsin voter rolls

    there's just no way the upcoming election will valid, the GOP is laying waste to democracy and voting rights, right before our eyes
    Using the democratic system against democracy has been the tyrants' game-plan for quite some time.
    " First they came for the journalists...
    We don't know what happened after that . "

    Maria Ressa.

  11. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    40,213
    Thanks
    14,475
    Thanked 23,679 Times in 16,485 Posts
    Groans
    23
    Groaned 585 Times in 561 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    ^


  12. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Living in rural America, "clinging to guns and religion"
    Posts
    43,021
    Thanks
    9,528
    Thanked 22,512 Times in 16,974 Posts
    Groans
    134
    Groaned 522 Times in 502 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sailor View Post
    DailyKos....LMAO!
    Yeah, they're as credible as The Flake News (only flakes read DailyKos)!!!!!
    Common sense is not a gift, it's a punishment because you have to deal with everyone who doesn't have it.

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to RB 60 For This Post:

    Sailor (12-14-2019)

  14. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Location
    Flyover Country
    Posts
    7,170
    Thanks
    4,088
    Thanked 3,986 Times in 2,762 Posts
    Groans
    316
    Groaned 178 Times in 173 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by reagansghost View Post
    County judge orders 200,000 names stricken from Wisconsin voter rolls


    A single county judge in Wisconsin has ordered the purge of over 200,000 names from the state’s voters rolls. More than 90% of those names are not in the county where the judge presides. In fact, the number of names the judge ordered stricken is over twice the whole population of his county.

    As reported by the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, Judge Paul Malloy acted on a request from just three voters who were backed by a conservative organization, while ignoring both the state election commissions and the League of Women Voters, nether of which were allowed to testify. The center of the case was a letter that the elections commissions sent out to voters it believe may have moved. However, that letter was sent only a month earlier, and the elections commission intended to give voters until 2021 to correct any information.

    But Malloy didn’t give the commission, or the voters, that chance. Instead, he ordered the names removed in advance of the nexts election. To get an idea of how big a deal that is, Donald Trump won the state of Wisconsin by just 23,000 votes. In fact, it’s that kind of margin that has Republicans out hunting for cases like this in which they can make it impossible for everyone to vote.

    In fact, Malloy seems to have done even more than the conservative group “Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty” asked. The original request was for an injunction requiring election officials to remove voters who had not responded in 30 days. Instead, Malloy issued a “writ of mandamus” ordering the purge and threatening any election commissioner who refused to cooperate.

    Trump took Michigan by 11,000 votes. It was one of three states where fewer than 80,000 votes — less than 0.08% of the votes cast — determined the outcome of the election. There’s nothing about this that was intended to be accidental or fair. The state was targeted not because of three local voters, but because a national conservative voter-purge organization, ERIC, targeted Wisconsin it as an easy mark. Malloy also wasn’t an accident. The case was filed in his court specifically because he was appointed by former Republican Governor Scott McCallum and had a record of conservative rulings.

    And this is just one of a series of similar assaults that are underway.


    https://www.dailykos.com/stories/201...in-voter-rolls


    there's just no way the upcoming election will valid, the GOP is laying waste to democracy and voting rights, right before our eyes
    Conveniently not mentioned in the misleading article... The state elections commission was in violation of state law. State law required them to purge those voters from the roles, and they (the elections commission) just decided not to. The judge basically ordered them to follow the law.

    I can see why reagansghost wouldn't like that, because he supports cheating.

  15. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Sirthinksalot For This Post:

    Grokmaster (12-14-2019), OG Yurt (12-14-2019), PostmodernProphet (12-14-2019), Sailor (12-14-2019), Stretch (12-14-2019)

  16. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    26,116
    Thanks
    694
    Thanked 5,043 Times in 3,907 Posts
    Groans
    85
    Groaned 1,697 Times in 1,555 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by reagansghost View Post
    County judge orders 200,000 names stricken from Wisconsin voter rolls


    A single county judge in Wisconsin has ordered the purge of over 200,000 names from the state’s voters rolls. More than 90% of those names are not in the county where the judge presides. In fact, the number of names the judge ordered stricken is over twice the whole population of his county.

    As reported by the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, Judge Paul Malloy acted on a request from just three voters who were backed by a conservative organization, while ignoring both the state election commissions and the League of Women Voters, nether of which were allowed to testify. The center of the case was a letter that the elections commissions sent out to voters it believe may have moved. However, that letter was sent only a month earlier, and the elections commission intended to give voters until 2021 to correct any information.

    But Malloy didn’t give the commission, or the voters, that chance. Instead, he ordered the names removed in advance of the nexts election. To get an idea of how big a deal that is, Donald Trump won the state of Wisconsin by just 23,000 votes. In fact, it’s that kind of margin that has Republicans out hunting for cases like this in which they can make it impossible for everyone to vote.

    In fact, Malloy seems to have done even more than the conservative group “Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty” asked. The original request was for an injunction requiring election officials to remove voters who had not responded in 30 days. Instead, Malloy issued a “writ of mandamus” ordering the purge and threatening any election commissioner who refused to cooperate.

    Trump took Michigan by 11,000 votes. It was one of three states where fewer than 80,000 votes — less than 0.08% of the votes cast — determined the outcome of the election. There’s nothing about this that was intended to be accidental or fair. The state was targeted not because of three local voters, but because a national conservative voter-purge organization, ERIC, targeted Wisconsin it as an easy mark. Malloy also wasn’t an accident. The case was filed in his court specifically because he was appointed by former Republican Governor Scott McCallum and had a record of conservative rulings.

    And this is just one of a series of similar assaults that are underway.


    https://www.dailykos.com/stories/201...in-voter-rolls


    there's just no way the upcoming election will valid, the GOP is laying waste to democracy and voting rights, right before our eyes
    It's sad that Republicans get away with cheating, but the fact that they need to cheat to win, and sometimes still lose, is a good sign.

  17. The Following User Groans At StoneByStone For This Awful Post:

    OG Yurt (12-14-2019)

  18. The Following User Says Thank You to StoneByStone For This Post:

    Trumpet (12-15-2019)

  19. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    14,055
    Thanks
    2,436
    Thanked 8,812 Times in 6,202 Posts
    Groans
    568
    Groaned 493 Times in 469 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sailor View Post
    DailyKos....LMAO!
    Liberals just hate when they can't cast votes for dead people.
    Every life matters

  20. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to countryboy For This Post:

    Sailor (12-14-2019), USFREEDOM911 (12-14-2019)

  21. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    24,892
    Thanks
    4,196
    Thanked 15,334 Times in 9,321 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 2,825 Times in 2,563 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sirthinksalot View Post
    Conveniently not mentioned in the misleading article... The state elections commission was in violation of state law. State law required them to purge those voters from the roles, and they (the elections commission) just decided not to. The judge basically ordered them to follow the law.

    I can see why reagansghost wouldn't like that, because he supports cheating.
    nice reading comprehension there scout

    At issue is a letter the state Elections Commission sent in October to about 234,000 voters who it believes may have moved. The letter asked the voters to update their voter registrations if they had moved or alert election officials if they were still at their same address.

    The commission planned to remove the letter's recipients from the voter rolls in 2021 if it hadn't heard from them. But Malloy's decision would kick them off the rolls much sooner, and well before the 2020 presidential election.



    https://www.jsonline.com/story/news/...st/4412776002/

    max fail stinksalot

  22. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    40,213
    Thanks
    14,475
    Thanked 23,679 Times in 16,485 Posts
    Groans
    23
    Groaned 585 Times in 561 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by reagansghost View Post
    nice reading comprehension there scout

    At issue is a letter the state Elections Commission sent in October to about 234,000 voters who it believes may have moved. The letter asked the voters to update their voter registrations if they had moved or alert election officials if they were still at their same address.

    The commission planned to remove the letter's recipients from the voter rolls in 2021 if it hadn't heard from them. But Malloy's decision would kick them off the rolls much sooner, and well before the 2020 presidential election.



    https://www.jsonline.com/story/news/...st/4412776002/

    max fail stinksalot
    You lose again RG. Poor dumb bastard:

    "In granting a writ of mandamus — essentially a court order that a government official or agency do its job — he said he was convinced the commission had a clear, positive, plain legal duty to purge the voter rolls within 30 days.

    "I don't want to see someone deactivated, but I don't write the law," said Malloy, who was appointed to the bench in 2002 by Republican Gov. Scott McCallum and has been re-elected by voters.

    He said the commission didn't like the policy so it set a new one without following a formal rule-making procedure that would have included notice to the public and a chance for input.

    "There's no basis for saying 12 to 24 months is a good time frame. It's not that difficult to do it sooner," he said near the end of a two-hour hearing. "If you don't like (it), you have to go back to the Legislature."

  23. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Posts
    30,578
    Thanks
    18,197
    Thanked 15,614 Times in 10,679 Posts
    Groans
    202
    Groaned 617 Times in 606 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by StoneByStone View Post
    It's sad that Republicans get away with cheating, but the fact that they need to cheat to win, and sometimes still lose, is a good sign.
    HORSE SHIT. THE JUDGE ORDERED THE FRAUDOCRAT ELECTION COMMISSION TO FOLLOW THE LAW....READ THE ENTIRE ARTICLE.


    IN ADDITION, VOTING RIGHTS ARE NOT AUTOMATIC...ONE MUST PROVE HIS/HER LEGAL VOTING STATUS..except in FRAUDOCRAT SHITHOLES LIKE FRAUDIFORNIA and NEW YORK, WHERE THE FRAUDOCRATS DON'T EVEN TRY TO HIDE THEIR EFFORTS TO ALLOWS ILLEGALS TO VOTE.
    TRUMP WILL TAKE FORTY STATES...UNLESS THE SAME IDIOTS WHO BROUGHT US THE 2020 DUNCE-O-CRAT IOWA CLUSTERFUCK CONTINUE THEIR SEDITIOUS ACTIVITIES...THEN HE WILL WIN EVEN MORE ..UNLESS THE RED CHINESE AND DNC COLLUDE, USE A PANDEMIC, AND THEN THE DEMOCRATS VIOLATE ARTICLE II OF THE CONSTITUTION, TO FACILLITATE MILLIONS OF ILLEGAL, UNVETTED, MAIL IN BALLOTS IN THE DARK OF NIGHT..


    De Oppresso Liber

  24. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Grokmaster For This Post:

    Sailor (12-14-2019), Sirthinksalot (12-14-2019), Stretch (12-14-2019)

  25. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    134,852
    Thanks
    13,246
    Thanked 40,785 Times in 32,151 Posts
    Groans
    3,661
    Groaned 2,865 Times in 2,752 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by reagansghost View Post
    More than 90% of those names are not in the county where the judge presides. In fact, the number of names the judge ordered stricken is over twice the whole population of his county.
    can you think of a better reason to purge their names than the fact they don't live where they are registered?......if they get the letter addressed to where they are supposed to live, they have a year (which was required by law) to notify the elections board that they still live there........problem solved.......
    Isaiah 6:5
    “Woe to me!” I cried. “I am ruined! For I am a man of unclean lips, and I live among a people of unclean lips, and my eyes have seen the King, the Lord Almighty.”

  26. The Following User Says Thank You to PostmodernProphet For This Post:

    Sirthinksalot (12-14-2019)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-28-2019, 10:36 AM
  2. Another Judge denies Manafort's motion to dismiss!!
    By Jarod in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 05-26-2018, 06:41 PM
  3. march for our lives expands voter rolls
    By evince in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 180
    Last Post: 03-28-2018, 06:44 AM
  4. Judge denies O.J. Simpson a new trial
    By StormX in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 11-27-2013, 08:52 AM
  5. Judge denies liberal cries
    By Big Money in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-20-2013, 05:19 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •