The Damning IG Report & the Psychotic Attempt to Undo 2016

[dukkha]

Monday, December 9, had been much anticipated. Congressman Jerry Nadler, who has not been able to utter a sentence in the last three years that did not contain the word “impeachment,” gaveled to order his asinine Judiciary Committee hearings to consider the partisan recommendation of Adam Schiff’s Intelligence Committee that the president had abused his powers by asking about what must concern the endangered minority that takes former vice president Joe Biden’s run for the Democratic presidential nomination seriously.

Trump asked the Ukrainian president to find out whether Biden and his son were influence-peddling in Ukraine. Trump didn’t try to write the verdict of his inquiry; he asked a reasonable question.
The Democrats, if any of them retain their sanity despite the simulation of a lunatic asylum their party is conducting, would be at least as curious as the Republicans to hear the answer.
Last week Nadler had four constitutional experts before the committee, including three rabid Trump haters, one so overwrought that she couldn’t walk on the sidewalk in front of Washington’s Trump Hotel.

While this impeachment charade has bounced between the two most compulsively mendacious legislators in the Western world, Speaker Nancy Pelosi has been giving daily recitals of her “prayerful solemnity” at the dark majesty of the impeachment process that saddens her so deeply.
She has invoked her Roman Catholic faith (tempered in its fervor by enthusiasm for abortion and other doctrinal inconveniences from the theology of St. Teddy Kennedy and the Blessed Joe Biden) to say she “hates” no one and “prays for the president.”

This was enough to bring on what seemed to be out-of-body epiphanies with the susceptible pundits on cable television, such as Rachel Maddow and Larry O’Donnell of MSNBC: “The speaker stood there, in the Catholic faith she has practiced all her life,” etc. The result is nausea and amusement conjoined.

As a very young person, I remember when the time came that all sensible opinion required the end of the outrages of Senator Joseph R. McCarthy, and the time 20 years later when the Watergate controversy simply had to end.The coruscation of the present foolishness must be almost at hand.

The Democrats are rushing to an impeachment committal requiring adjudication by the Senate, though no statutory offense has been alleged against the president, and there is no evidence of any.
One hesitates to mind-read, especially such febrile and limited minds as these, but they presumably want to throw this stink bomb at the president to foul the air as the proportions of the previous administration’s misconduct in the Trump–Russia collusion scam ooze sluggishly into the light.

The inspector general of the Justice Department, Michael Horowitz, again gave birth to a mouse.
His report released Monday purported to believe that those who initiated the investigation of the president were not motivated by partisanship, though they all hated the subject of the investigation
Unfortunately, he did not offer an alternative motive for a staggering sequence of frauds and felonies committed by the Obama Justice Department and FBI. The following is a faithfully representative selection of the inspector general’s concerns...
https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/...nerals-report/

[dukkha]

Last week Nadler had four constitutional experts before the committee, including three rabid Trump haters,
one so overwrought that she couldn’t walk on the sidewalk in front of Washington’s Trump Hotel

[cancel2 2022]

Last week Nadler had four constitutional experts before the committee, including three rabid Trump haters,
one so overwrought that she couldn’t walk on the sidewalk in front of Washington’s Trump Hotel

You really should use quotes like this!

Last week Nadler had four constitutional experts before the committee, including three rabid Trump haters,
one so overwrought that she couldn't walk on the sidewalk in front of Washington's Trump Hotel

Here is one of those experts in all her magesterial splendour.

FB_IMG_1576112090482.jpg

[Darth Omar]

Last week Nadler had four constitutional experts before the committee, including three rabid Trump haters,
one so overwrought that she couldn’t walk on the sidewalk in front of Washington’s Trump Hotel

Well, you have to admire her candor lol.

How does such individual manage to be both highly educated and dumb all at once? Why would you admit such a thing—in that context and situation—if you felt that way? These people were supposed to be *objective* and serious minded doctors of jurisprudence and the poor woman can barely function as a normal person since she can’t even be on the same side of the street as Trump’s real estate.

What a farce.

[dukkha]

Well, you have to admire her candor lol.

How does such individual manage to be both highly educated and dumb all at once? Why would you admit such a thing—in that context and situation—if you felt that way? These people were supposed to be *objective* and serious minded doctors of jurisprudence and the poor woman can barely function as a normal person since she can’t even be on the same side of the street as Trump’s real estate.

What a farce.

serious question?
they live that way because there is an echo chamber for their TDS,,How did the Committee even find her?

She's some hanger on wanna be Lib lunatic who thinks "Impeach him now and we'll find out why later"
Seriously; if you want to see the liberal elitists whom infest the swamp -all 3 were examples of that

[dukkha]

You really should use quotes like this!




Here is one of those experts in all her magesterial splendour.

FB_IMG_1576112090482.jpg

OMG..look at that..

[dukkha]

The FBI omitted to tell the FISA court that Carter Page was an approved “operational contact” with another branch of government and had loyally supplied any information he had about Russian activities.

George Papadopoulos, another victim of the Comey-McCabe Keystone Kops smear operation, was cited in FISA applications, but not his repeated assertions that there was no evidence of any Trump involvement with Russia.

Carter Page was selectively and misleadingly cited to the court throughout the period when he was under surveillance.
His helpful reports of financial irregularities in the international soccer federation were misrepresented as evidence of Page’s untrustworthiness; he was shamefully traduced, as Horowitz demonstrates in great detail.

The FBI’s Validation Management Unit debunked Steele as, inter alia, “minimally corroborated,” but he continued to be reverently invoked in FISA court filings.
There were a number of confidential human sources who happened to be working loyally for the Trump campaign, but none of them were consulted or questioned, though they were proven FBI resources.

[Darth Omar]

serious question?
they live that way because there is an echo chamber for their TDS,,How did the Committee even find her?

She's some hanger on wanna be Lib lunatic who thinks "Impeach him now and we'll find out why later"
Seriously; if you want to see the liberal elitists whom infest the swamp -all 3 were examples of that

Yeah, The Bubble is an actual thing lol.

Jonathan Turley was the only serious mind in attendance and he didn’t have a problem with impeachment, per se. He was critical of Democrats not taking sufficient time to develop the evidence. He used the word ‘slipshod’ to describe it.

And Turley is NOT a Trump supporter. IOW, he was a perfect selection for the hearing. AND he was put there by Republicans.

So, Democrats are in the position of taking their ‘slipshod’ case against Trump to a Republican controlled Senate. And this makes it distinct from the previous two impeachment trials where the guilt of Nixon and Clinton were both established prior to the trials.

Democrats can jump and shout that Trump is guilty of pressuring Zelensky for political gain but that hasn’t been established. What they have is a *suspicion* of guilt. Maybe enough to establish probable cause—but that’s when you appoint a prosecutor [no! Not again lol!] or continue with hearings until the FACT of guilt can be established.

They haven’t done this. They can’t wait to do this because Trump may well get elected again and the whole point to this charade is to prevent that from happening. They know it, we know it, and they know we know it. The only ones that are oblivious to it are their lemmings who think Trump must be removed ‘before he steals another election’.

There are people that who really believe that and it’s a big part of why our politics are so dysfunctional.

[canceled.2021.2]

I can't wait until Durham

[Darth Omar]

I can't wait until Durham

That the House voted to impeach Trump could easily be forgotten about by Spring or Summer.

Because of Durham.

[PostmodernProphet]

That the House voted to impeach Trump could easily be forgotten about by Spring or Summer.
.

if Nancy fails to get the votes to impeach it will be remembered forever........

[canceled.2021.2]

That the House voted to impeach Trump could easily be forgotten about by Spring or Summer.

Because of Durham.

Supposedly Rudy has the goods on Biden's corruption and bribery. If that is the case then it is lights out for the democrat party

[Darth Omar]

if Nancy fails to get the votes to impeach it will be remembered forever........

That’s a stretch but it would be a very fitting end to a sorry chapter in our politics.

[Darth Omar]

Supposedly Rudy has the goods on Biden's corruption and bribery. If that is the case then it is lights out for the democrat party

They’re certainly after him like he has some goods lol.

[canceled.2021.2]

They’re certainly after him like he has some goods lol.

It is the democrat party modus operandi. They only attack those that they fear. When Nunes exposed the initial FISA Warrant abuses the dems were successful in getting him to recuse himself. They tried it again during the Ukraine hoax. Look at how they go after Jim Jordan? They tried to recycle the whole wrestling lies. And now Rudy.

The democrats know Biden is dirty.