Pelosi Admits Dems Have Been Trying to Impeach Trump for Last “Two and a Half Years

[Darth Omar]

Breaking a law was NEVER a requirement for impeachment

No, but it’s helpful lol.

Nixon and Clinton both broke actual laws. The last president to be impeached without breaking an actual law was a Democrat. In 1868 Andrew Johnson was impeached for repeatedly vetoing Republican bills that would give rights to the slaves.

Some things never change.

[Darth Omar]

Well he's wrong. In all of American history, we've only had four impeachments, and one of them didn't even go through because the president quit. And how has the bar been lowered? Should Clinton not have been impeached for lying under oath?

First of all, Trump did break the law. Secondly, at some point in the future, we're going to have a Democrat president that attempts bribery. I would hope that president gets impeached too. However, because the Republicans are going to let Trump get away with this, cheating to win an election through bribery is going to be normalized. If President AOC or President Omar does this, their defenders will be able to say, well Trump did it and you were ok with that.

Democrats gave up on impeaching over Trump breaking a law lol.

It’s pretty obvious they want to impeach him and to hell with the consequences. I don’t think they even care about losing the House over it.

[StoneByStone]

Democrats gave up on impeaching over Trump breaking a law lol.

Which was stupid of them. One of the articles of impeachment should be bribery.

[Darth Omar]

Which was stupid of them. One of the articles of impeachment should be bribery.

Well, it takes evidence lol.

[Stretch]

your analysis is bogus. Impeachment is so weak sauce they can't even list a crime of extortion or bribery.

I ermind you once again I opposed the impeachment of Bill Clinton - he committed a crime of perjury
( impeachable) but it certainly was no high crime of Office.

Trump hasn't even committed a crime ( according to the Dems just passed Articles) -why would anyone support this nonsense?

"they can't even list a crime of extortion or bribery."

Heck, I haven't even seen any person list a crime...PERIOD.
I hear all the hate, accusations, emotional tantrums and name-calling but I've yet to hear someone in here or on TV name the exact crime(s).
They accuse abuse of power and obstruction of Congress, but have no factual reason for either.
All they have is an impeachment being issued which thankfully will be slapped down by the Senate and never be fulfilled.

[StoneByStone]

Well, it takes evidence lol.

Which we both know they have, but you have to say the card says moops.

[cancel2 2022]

Not a reputable source

Try again, with a reputable source known for practicing professional journalistic standards.

This scumbag never says that when Cynical Bastard or Loony Central use Raw Sewage.

[Darth Omar]

Which we both know they have, but you have to say the card says moops.

If the House judiciary committee thought they had evidence for a bribery charge [that would stand up in a senate trial] they’d run with it.

They are lawyers after all. So it’s abuse of power or nothing.

[Stretch]

Plus, hatred of a President or maladministration (perceived abuse of power or obstruction) are not Constitutional grounds for impeachment.
The outline and solution when there is disagreement between the legislature and executive branches is to send the matter to the judicial branch
so that THEY can make the decision.
Dems screwed this up royally and trashed the Constitution in the process.

Meanwhile Nadler napped during his "solemn" event...

[Stretch]

And another overpaid hypocrite watched golf...

[dukkha]

The president doesn't need to break the law to be impeached. However, I do disagree with the articles of impeachment. Trump committed bribery, which is a crime, and makes his abuse of power far worse.

read the text of the Constituiton -crimes are required for impeachment,
You say "bribery" -but the Article does not - no bribery charge

And no, Trump took away choice when he tried to rig another election. Trump should have been impeached for colluding with Russia, but Pelosi decided they'd be better off letting it go and beating him in 2020. But when it got out that he tried to rig the next election too, letting it go wasn't an option.

no Russian collusion per MUeller

[dukkha]

Here it is, in context.

"Last night, as Donald Trump wrapped up a long day of borderline-hysterical tweeting, the president came up with a new line of attack against House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. The California Democrat, Trump claimed, “just got duped in an interview to admitting that she has been working on impeaching me for ‘two and a half years.’ In other words, she lied. This was the Radical Left, Do Nothing Democrats plan all along, long before the Ukraine phone call.”

As is usually the case, the president wasn’t telling the truth.

[At Politico’s “Women Rule” summit], Anna Palmer asked Pelosi to react to the criticism that Democrats are racing through their impeachment inquiry of the president.

“It’s been going on for 22 months, two-and-a-half years actually,” Pelosi said initially. Then immediately made clear she was referring to the Mueller investigation.

“I think we are not moving with speed. Was it two and a half years ago they initiated the Mueller investigation? It’s not about speed. It’s about urgency. One of the charges against the president of the United States is that he was violating his oath of office by asking for government to interfere in our election undermining the integrity of our elections,” she said."


http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-s...m-about-pelosi

there is no difference in "context". Mueller was a bogus attempt by the FBI, championed by the Dems

[dukkha]

Democrats demanded it. Without Comey the liar and the shrill crying from the Democratic Party of the Jackass, there would have been no Russia HOAX. There would have been no Ukrainian HOAX.

bingo.Political pressure backed by media hype and Comey's bogus leaking caused Mueller

[dukkha]

“They knew what a scum bucket he was and he should have never been accepted as President in the first place.“

I hope the author of this gem is not an adult.

lol.. I didn't see that gem! scum bucket is not an impeachable offense either!

[dukkha]

Politicize it all you want. BUt the Democrats had nothing to do with the Special Council.

It was Rosenstein that requested the matter be investigated and appointed the Special Council- HE IS ALSO A REGISTERED REPUBLICAN!

complete disengenuous -Comey has manifest hatred for Trump. Horowitz showed the depths of depravity the Deep State descended to