Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: NPR — National Parasite Radio

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    3,668
    Thanks
    1,022
    Thanked 445 Times in 401 Posts
    Groans
    51
    Groaned 102 Times in 89 Posts

    Default NPR — National Parasite Radio

    Where else can parasites go to get more tax dollars than the parasite capital of the world?

    XXXXX

    The federal education industry, Public Television, Public Radio, the National Endowment for the Arts, the National Endowment for the Humanities, and on and on goes the list of parasite eateries. Not a one of them has any business getting tax dollars.

    https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...81#post2813781

    The enclosed informative article fails to mention the free advertising National Public Radio’s political agenda gets on FOX from



    And why in hell did FOX hire this guy after NPR dumped him?




    National Public Radio (“NPR”) has historically been criticized for liberal bias. Is it any wonder why, particularly when there’s a money trail from liberal organizations bankrolling an already taxpayer-funded news outlet?

    Ten liberal organizations, including the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation ($14,164,937), the Ford Foundation ($12,350,000), the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation ($7,000,000) the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation ($6,285,000), liberal billionaire George Soros’ Foundation to Promote Open Society ($2,900,000), the Ploughshares Fund ($550,000), Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors, Inc. ($218,000), The Rockefeller Foundation ($200,000), the Craig Newmark Foundation ($100,000) and the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, Inc. ($50,000) have contributed $43,817,937 to National Public Radio (NPR) between 2003-2019, according to Foundation Directory Online data. This raises major concerns over its liberal bias, especially given that NPR also receives federal funding.





    NPR has been criticized in the past for its liberal bias and left-leaning coverage. Recently, NPR was one of a string of media outlets that published stories hyping United Nations data that showed 100,000 migrant children being held in detention centers. One problem though: the stories were deleted after the data was revealed to have been from 2015, during former President Barack Obama’s (D) presidency. In September, NPR was also one of two taxpayer-funded outlets (the other being PBS), that interviewed Congressman Adam Schiff (D-CA) and failed to question his false “parody” of President Donald Trump’s July 25th phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.

    Perhaps one of the reasons for NPR’s liberal bias is because its donor organizations are also some of the largest liberal contributors to left-wing causes, including liberal media outlets.

    George Soros’ involvement in funding NPR is case in point. Liberal causes that Soros has bankrolled included spending $400 million to manipulate higher education and spending more than half a billion dollars underwriting other major liberal initiatives – “pro-abortion, pro-euthanasia, pro-gay marriage, pro-drug legalization, pro-union, pro-government-funded media and even attacks against the concept of free elections and voting for judges.”

    It was recently discovered that Soros’ Open Society Network bankrolled 22 liberal groups who sponsored the Global Climate Strike in September, contributing at least $24,854,592 to the groups collectively between 2000-2017.

    NPR was also under heavy scrutiny in 2011 for having received money from Soros’ Open Society Institute (OSI).

    Other organizations such as the Ford Foundation and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation are similarly notorious for bankrolling liberal causes, not least prominent among them -- abortion. Between 2010-2013, the Ford Foundation contributed $13,486,250 to Planned Parenthood. Former Planned Parenthood President Cecile Richards has sat on the Board of Trustees for the Ford Foundation for years. And from 2009 and before to 2018, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation contributed $81,009,329 to Planned Parenthood and its affiliates.

    In 2018, Craig Newmark, who owns the Craig Newmark Foundation, contributed $1 million to left-wing outlet Mother Jones. Craig Newmark has also contributed millions to other liberal journalism groups, including: ProPublica, Center for Investigative Reporting, Center for Public Integrity and Alternet.

    Another liberal organization known for funding left-wing causes such as abortion, population control, liberal media outlets and environmentalism, is the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation.

    The Knight Foundation also has a history of bankrolling liberal nonprofit media. It contributed $233 million to journalism between 2003-2018, and much of that supported liberal outlets including ProPublica, InsideClimate News (which was behind the ExxonMobil climate investigation) and Center for Investigative Reporting.

    The liberal Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors, the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, Inc., and The Rockefeller Foundation have also provided funding to liberal causes such as abortion and environmentalism.

    The Ploughshares Fund was noted by the Associated Press May 20, 2016 “as a group the [Barack Obama] White House recently identified as a key surrogate in selling the controversial Iran Nuclear deal” in 2015. Joe Cirincione, president of the Ploughshares Fund, previously worked for the Soros-funded Center for American Progress.

    Liberal Organizations Contributed $43,817,937 to NPR from 2003 to 2019
    By Joseph Vazquez
    December 12, 2019 11:10 AM EST

    https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/bu...37-npr-2003-19

    Tax dollars fund political causes of ever stripe.


    To compel a man to furnish funds for the propagation of ideas he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical. Thomas Jefferson

    Democrat parasites pretend they love the Constitution whenever it is politically expedient, but not a one of them is smart enough to pretend they love the governing philosophy the Founders gave us.

    Finally, Christian Bibles are a compendium of thoughts expressed by countless individuals that define Christianity. I put together individual thoughts that define a single moral and governing philosophy:


    In 1794, when Congress appropriated $15,000 for relief of French refugees who fled from insurrection in San Domingo to Baltimore and Philadelphia, James Madison stood on the floor of the House to object saying, "I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents." James Madison, 4 Annals of congress 179 (1794)

    Charity is no part of the legislative duty of the government. James Madison

    With respect to the two words ‘general welfare,’ I have always regarded them as qualified by the detail of powers connected with them. To take them in a literal and unlimited sense would be a metamorphosis of the Constitution into a character which there is a host of proofs was not contemplated by its creators. James Madison

    If Congress can do whatever in their discretion can be done by money, and will promote the general welfare, the government is no longer a limited one possessing enumerated powers, but an indefinite one subject to particular exceptions. James Madison, “Letter to Edmund Pendleton,”

    Government is instituted to protect property of every sort; as well that which lies in the various rights of individuals, as that which the term particularly expresses. This being the end of government, that alone is a just government, which impartially secures to every man, whatever is his own. According to this standard of merit, the praise of affording a just securing to property, should be sparingly bestowed on a government which, however scrupulously guarding the possessions of individuals, does not protect them in the enjoyment and communication of their opinions, in which they have an equal, and in the estimation of some, a more valuable property. James Madison

    Dependence begets subservience and venality, suffocates the germ of virtue, and prepares fit tools for the designs of ambition. Thomas Jefferson, Notes on the State of Virginia, Query 19, 1787

    When all government, domestic and foreign, in little as in great things, shall be drawn to Washington as the center of all power, it will render powerless the checks provided of one government on another and will become as venal and oppressive as the government from which we separated. Thomas Jefferson to Charles Hammond, 1821. The Writings of Thomas Jefferson, (Memorial Edition) Lipscomb and Bergh, editors, ME 15:332

    The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground. Thomas Jefferson, letter to E. Carrington, May 27, 1788

    To take from one, because it is thought that his own industry and that of his fathers has acquired too much, in order to spare to others, who, or whose fathers have not exercised equal industry and skill, is to violate arbitrarily the first principle of association, —the guarantee to every one of a free exercise of his industry, & the fruits acquired by it. Thomas Jefferson

    A wise and frugal government … shall restrain men from injuring one another, shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned. This is the sum of good government. Thomas Jefferson, First Inaugural Address, March 4, 1801

    Our tenet ever was that Congress had not unlimited powers to provide for the general welfare, but were restrained to those specifically enumerated, and that, as it was never meant that they should provide for that welfare but by the exercise of the enumerated powers, so it could not have been meant they should raise money for purposes which the enumeration did not place under their action; consequently, that the specification of powers is a limitation of the purposes for which they may raise money. Thomas Jefferson letter to Albert Gallatin, 1817

    Government big enough to supply everything you need is big enough to take everything you have ... The course of history shows that as a government grows, liberty decreases. Thomas Jefferson

    Were we directed from Washington when to sow and when to reap, we should soon want bread. Thomas Jefferson

    The two enemies of the people are criminals and government, so let us tie the second down with the chains of the constitution so the second will not become the legalized version of the first. Thomas Jefferson

    I think we have more machinery of government than is necessary, too many parasites living on the labor of the industrious. Thomas Jefferson, letter to William Ludlow, September 6, 1824

    If we can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people, under the pretence of taking care of them, they must become happy. Thomas Jefferson, letter to Thomas Cooper, Nov 29, 1802

    The multiplication of public offices, increase of expense beyond income, growth and entailment of a public debt, are indications soliciting the employment of the pruning knife. Thomas Jefferson, letter to Spencer Roane, March 9, 1821

    The same prudence which in private life would forbid our paying our own money for unexplained projects, forbids it in the dispensation of the public moneys. Thomas Jefferson, letter to Shelton Gilliam, June 19, 1808

    They are not to do anything they please to provide for the general welfare, but only to lay taxes for that purpose. To consider the latter phrase not as describing the purpose of the first, but as giving a distinct and independent power to do any act they please which may be good for the Union, would render all the preceding and subsequent enumerations of power completely useless. It would reduce the whole instrument to a single phrase, that of instituting a Congress with power to do whatever would be for the good of the United States; and as they sole judges of the good or evil, it would be also a power to do whatever evil they please...Certainly no such universal power was meant to be given them. It was intended to lace them up straightly within the enumerated powers and those without which, as means, these powers could not be carried into effect. Thomas Jefferson, Opinion on National Bank, 1791

    I place economy among the first and most important of republican virtues, and public debt as the greatest of the dangers to be feared. Thomas Jefferson

    It is incumbent on every generation to pay its own debts as it goes. A principle which if acted on will save one-half the wars of the world. Thomas Jefferson

    The principle of spending money to be paid by posterity under the name of funding is but swindling futurity on a large scale. Thomas Jefferson

    Taxation follows public debt, and in its train wretchedness and oppression. Thomas Jefferson

    The revenue creates pensioners, and the pensioners urge for more revenue. The people grow less steady, spirited, and virtuous, the seekers more numerous and more corrupt, and every day increases the circles of their dependents and expectants, until virtue, integrity, public spirit, simplicity, and frugality, become the objects of ridicule and scorn, and vanity, luxury, foppery, selfishness, meanness, and downright venality swallow up the whole society.” John Adams

    The moment the idea is admitted into society that property is not as sacred as the laws of God, and that there is not a force of law and public justice to protect it, anarchy and tyranny commence. If ‘Thou shalt not covet’ and ‘Thou shalt not steal’ were not commandments of Heaven, they must be made inviolable precepts in every society before it can be civilized or made free. John Adams, A Defense of the Constitutions of Government of the United States of America, 1787

    The Utopian schemes of re-distribution of the wealth...are as visionary and impractical as those which vest all property in the Crown. Samuel Adams

    In the main it will be found that a power over a man’s support (salary) is a power over his will. Alexander Hamilton

    I am for doing good to the poor, but I differ in opinion of the means. I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not making them easy in poverty, but leading or driving them out of it. In my youth I traveled much, and I observed in different countries, that the more public provisions were made for the poor, the less they provided for themselves, and of course became poorer. And, on the contrary, the less was done for them, the more they did for themselves, and became richer. Benjamin Franklin
    The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do. It is the freedom to refrain, withdraw and abstain which makes a totalitarian regime impossible. Eric Hoffer

  2. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    57,780
    Thanks
    35,460
    Thanked 50,280 Times in 27,091 Posts
    Groans
    22
    Groaned 2,975 Times in 2,692 Posts

    Default

    Almost every single conservative poster on this forum was a cheerleader for the Iraq War Disaster, and you all demanded that the American tax payer cough up trillions of dollars to pay for a war you desperately wanted and insisted we have.

    You do not have a leg to stand on to complain about the use of taxpayer money.

    Public support for the arts, science, and education is something you are just going to have to live with.


    If you decide you cannot live with it, I have a list of countries that do not offer public support for art, culture and education you can consider moving to:

    Somalia
    Angola
    Syria
    Bangledesh
    Pakistan
    Haiti

  3. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Cypress For This Post:

    Charoite (12-13-2019), christiefan915 (12-13-2019), Guno צְבִי (12-13-2019)

  4. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    3,668
    Thanks
    1,022
    Thanked 445 Times in 401 Posts
    Groans
    51
    Groaned 102 Times in 89 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cypress View Post
    Almost every single conservative poster on this forum was a cheerleader for the Iraq War Disaster, and you all demanded that the American tax payer cough up trillions of dollars to pay for a war you desperately wanted and insisted we have.
    To Cypress: Get real.

    A United Nations INTERNATIONAL COALITION in the Gulf War stopped Bush the Elder from going all the way to Bagdad. Had Bush toppled Saddam Hussein in 1990 there would have been no need to invade Iraq after 9-11-2001.

    Parenthetically, media mouths applauded Bush the Elder’s Desert Storm because the U.N. was in charge from start to finish. Desert Storm —— like Korea —— was a Peace Without Victory war. Total Victory was secondary. Total defeat in the Vietnam War was primary because the United Nations opposed victory.

    https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...10#post3148410


    Quote Originally Posted by Cypress View Post
    You do not have a leg to stand on to complain about the use of taxpayer money.

    Public support for the arts, science, and education is something you are just going to have to live with.


    If you decide you cannot live with it, I have a list of countries that do not offer public support for art, culture and education you can consider moving to:
    To Cypress: This country was doing fine before the XVI Amendment began funding the welfare state. Perhaps you should consider moving to a Communist country.

    NOTE: American parasites like you never moved to the Soviet Union so they could enjoy the benefits of Communist art, education and science. Unfortunately, I doubt if you will leave when the welfare state implodes!


    For the life of me, I cannot see how any politician can justify supporting government artists. That is what art was all about in the defunct Soviet Union, and I do not see any museums being voluntarily built to house the output of Communist-sponsored artists.

    In addition to the above, the so-called interpretative art community was brought onboard through the National Endowment for the Arts. The entertainment industry is considered the most important component of both the artistic community and the propaganda apparatus. In plain English the people that counted the most, and played ball from a Socialist/Communist point of view, are taken care of with enormous amounts of tax dollars.

    Being forced to fund the National Endowment for the Arts is just as offensive as is being forced to fund an alien religion. Aside from the political aspects, I doubt if any American (other than the folks who benefit financially from the Endowment) would choose to fund toe dancers, finger painters, and assorted con “artists.” The NEA is the one bureaucracy that most Americans find really offensive. Rather than me trying to convince anybody why the National Endowment for the Arts should be shutdown lets hear liberals tell us why the NEA is necessary government.

    https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...83#post2809383

    Quote Originally Posted by Cypress View Post
    Somalia
    Angola
    Syria
    Bangledesh
    Pakistan
    Haiti
    To Cypress: The countries you cite will be worse off if and when their governments tax the people to establish welfare programs. Such countries will be dirt poor as long as they receive tax dollars from productive member states in United Nations; i.e., the U.S. and a few other prosperous nations. The tragedy is that productive nations feeding foreign parasites are on their own road to poverty.
    The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do. It is the freedom to refrain, withdraw and abstain which makes a totalitarian regime impossible. Eric Hoffer

  5. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Location
    Anchorage, AK. Waikoloa, HI
    Posts
    18,754
    Thanks
    6,477
    Thanked 11,418 Times in 7,537 Posts
    Groans
    17
    Groaned 270 Times in 253 Posts
    Blog Entries
    25

    Default

    I have no problems with NPR. They lean left but they give the right their share. Like Fox News leans right, they give the left a voice. Both are far more fair and balanced than most of the media.
    But that Ari Shapiro guy - yech! Could he at least not sound so blatantly queer?

  6. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    57,780
    Thanks
    35,460
    Thanked 50,280 Times in 27,091 Posts
    Groans
    22
    Groaned 2,975 Times in 2,692 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flanders View Post
    To Cypress: Get real.

    A United Nations INTERNATIONAL COALITION in the Gulf War stopped Bush the Elder from going all the way to Bagdad. Had Bush toppled Saddam Hussein in 1990 there would have been no need to invade Iraq after 9-11-2001.

    Parenthetically, media mouths applauded Bush the Elder’s Desert Storm because the U.N. was in charge from start to finish. Desert Storm —— like Korea —— was a Peace Without Victory war. Total Victory was secondary. Total defeat in the Vietnam War was primary because the United Nations opposed victory.

    https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...10#post3148410




    To Cypress: This country was doing fine before the XVI Amendment began funding the welfare state. Perhaps you should consider moving to a Communist country.

    NOTE: American parasites like you never moved to the Soviet Union so they could enjoy the benefits of Communist art, education and science. Unfortunately, I doubt if you will leave when the welfare state implodes!


    For the life of me, I cannot see how any politician can justify supporting government artists. That is what art was all about in the defunct Soviet Union, and I do not see any museums being voluntarily built to house the output of Communist-sponsored artists.

    In addition to the above, the so-called interpretative art community was brought onboard through the National Endowment for the Arts. The entertainment industry is considered the most important component of both the artistic community and the propaganda apparatus. In plain English the people that counted the most, and played ball from a Socialist/Communist point of view, are taken care of with enormous amounts of tax dollars.

    Being forced to fund the National Endowment for the Arts is just as offensive as is being forced to fund an alien religion. Aside from the political aspects, I doubt if any American (other than the folks who benefit financially from the Endowment) would choose to fund toe dancers, finger painters, and assorted con “artists.” The NEA is the one bureaucracy that most Americans find really offensive. Rather than me trying to convince anybody why the National Endowment for the Arts should be shutdown lets hear liberals tell us why the NEA is necessary government.

    https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...83#post2809383



    To Cypress: The countries you cite will be worse off if and when their governments tax the people to establish welfare programs. Such countries will be dirt poor as long as they receive tax dollars from productive member states in United Nations; i.e., the U.S. and a few other prosperous nations. The tragedy is that productive nations feeding foreign parasites are on their own road to poverty.
    You demanded we invade Iraq and you insisted American taxpayers shell out trillions $$$ for a war that did not need to be fought.

    You will never, under any circumstances, have any credibility to complain about how tax money is spent

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to Cypress For This Post:

    Charoite (12-13-2019)

  8. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Posts
    5,757
    Thanks
    3,941
    Thanked 3,338 Times in 2,286 Posts
    Groans
    827
    Groaned 633 Times in 549 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anonymoose View Post
    I have no problems with NPR. They lean left but they give the right their share. Like Fox News leans right, they give the left a voice. Both are far more fair and balanced than most of the media.
    But that Ari Shapiro guy - yech! Could he at least not sound so blatantly queer?
    NPR was always something I saw the older generations listening to. My Mom listens to them along with her Catholic radio station. Now even Fox can have a leg to stand on if you avoid its punditry. Problem is that many just watch it as more of the news. The punditry stuff you are best to avoid on both Fox and MSNBC. Better yet, you could just avoid it altogether.

  9. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    3,668
    Thanks
    1,022
    Thanked 445 Times in 401 Posts
    Groans
    51
    Groaned 102 Times in 89 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anonymoose View Post
    I have no problems with NPR. They lean left but they give the right their share. Like Fox News leans right, they give the left a voice. Both are far more fair and balanced than most of the media.
    But that Ari Shapiro guy - yech! Could he at least not sound so blatantly queer?
    To anonymoose: Every variation of the Fairness Doctrine is funded by tax dollars. In short: Socialism’s theology preached on the public airwaves is paid for with tax dollars:


    Quote Originally Posted by Flanders View Post
    To compel a man to furnish funds for the propagation of ideas he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical. Thomas Jefferson


    The fairness doctrine of the United States Federal Communications Commission (FCC), introduced in 1949, was a policy that required the holders of broadcast licenses both to present controversial issues of public importance and to do so in a manner that was—in the FCC's view—honest, equitable, and balanced. The FCC eliminated the policy in 1987 and removed the rule that implemented the policy from the Federal Register in August 2011.


    Having Socialist/Communist messages heard on TV was the sole purpose for the Fairness Doctrine when it was introduced in television’s infancy.

    NOTE: Democrats never demanded a captive radio audience in the decades before television.

    https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...58#post2958958

    President Reagan abolished the Fairness Doctrine in 1987, but:


    FOX executives always enforced their own version of the Fairness Doctrine by supplying more conservative ears to liberal talking points than does the alphabet networks combined.

    FOX’s rating are high because liberals also watch FOX, while conservatives do not watch overtly liberal networks. FOX fools a substantial audience into believing it is the voice of conservative values. If you listen closely you will see that FOX’s conservative values always come down on the side of the New World Order’s agenda; big government, global government, the United Nations, and every other policy that true conservatives oppose.

    TV viewing public offered a choice between conservative networks, and liberal networks is the last thing Democrat scum want. They know that TV networks promoting one or the other will go the way of talk radio where conservative shows thrive, while liberal talk radio tanks every time. Liberalism’s garbage would disappear altogether from the airwaves without tax deductible advertising support.

    Incidentally, FOX does what it does for the money. High ratings bring in the most TAX DEDUCTIBLE advertising dollars.

    FOX was always a network dominated by off-camera liberals, while on-camera FOX phonies hide behind “Fair & Balanced.”

    https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...06#post2802906
    The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do. It is the freedom to refrain, withdraw and abstain which makes a totalitarian regime impossible. Eric Hoffer

  10. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    3,668
    Thanks
    1,022
    Thanked 445 Times in 401 Posts
    Groans
    51
    Groaned 102 Times in 89 Posts

    Default

    SEE VIDEO

    https://video.foxnews.com/v/61157775...#sp=show-clips

    Laura’s Christmas Special reminded me that talking heads on the Alphabet Networks have been ordered to say things that make certified idiots sound like theoretical physicists. As soon as I asked myself WHY? the answer struck me like a bolt of lightning. Regardless of the audience size the Alphabets are taking in the same amount of advertising dollars they took in before they checked in to the nearest insane asylum. It finally made sense.

    There is a method behind the Democrat Party’s psychological warfare strategy —— GO STARK, RAVING MAD. Democrats have everything to gain. Liberal talking HEADS on FOX are reaching as many conservatives that liberals reached in the Golden Era of Walter Cronkite.




    NOTE: FOX liberal talking heads are very careful to appear sane even though they use different words to defend everything insane Alphabet talking heads advocate in their rubber rooms.

    Bottom line: Give FOX liberals a helping hand for as long as TV viewers believe FOX is a conservative network.
    The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do. It is the freedom to refrain, withdraw and abstain which makes a totalitarian regime impossible. Eric Hoffer

Similar Threads

  1. Parasite Energy & Parasite Art
    By Flanders in forum Conspiracies and Conspiracy Theories Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-09-2019, 06:39 AM
  2. The ED Is The Parasite Class
    By Flanders in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 04-30-2019, 04:47 AM
  3. Pragmatic or Parasite?
    By NiftyNiblick in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-31-2018, 11:21 AM
  4. PSA - parasite identification
    By Русский агент in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-16-2017, 05:09 PM
  5. Bush has a parasite ?
    By uscitizen in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-27-2006, 10:54 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •