Earl (12-13-2019), Truth Detector (12-13-2019)
Power-abusing partisan hack and collusion hoax manufacturer Lisa Page admitted under oath that Obama ordered them to falsely exonerate Hillary while framing Trump. How hilarious is it that the "post-partisan" president is the one who ended up being the sleaziest, most divisive, corrupt, and lawless tyrant in our entire lifetimes...still irreparably dividing the country even three years after leaving office?
Attachment 13323
Earl (12-13-2019), Truth Detector (12-13-2019)
Indeed.
Funny how we're told that Democrats losing their minds and falling over each other to crucify Trump for jaywalking is "Trump being divisive" while Obama's unprecedented and deliberate success in dividing America is him being the "post-partisan" president.
Attachment 13331
Truth Detector (12-13-2019)
Bourdeaux Nights (12-14-2019), christiefan915 (12-13-2019), Guno צְבִי (12-14-2019)
Did you even read the link? They were told to take "gross negligence" off the table, not to take all charges off the table.
And please spare us your hyperbole about Obama. We know you're all up in trump's business but can only justify his perfidy by dishonestly dragging in Democrats.
"Page also testified that the DOJ and FBI had "multiple conversations ... about charging gross negligence," and the DOJ decided that the term was "constitutionally vague" and "had either never been done or had only been done once like 99 years ago," and so "they did not feel they could sustain a charge."
Gross Negligence
A lack of care that demonstrates reckless disregard for the safety or lives of others, which is so great it appears to be a conscious violation of other people's rights to safety. It is more than simple inadvertence, and can affect the amount of damages.
“What greater gift than the love of a cat.”
― Charles Dickens
"But when you say advice you got from the Department, you’re making it sound like it was the Department that told you: You’re not going to charge gross negligence because we’re the prosecutors and we’re telling you we’re not going to —"
Page interrupted: "That is correct," as
Ratcliffe finished his sentence, " -- bring a case based on that."
"When government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."
A lie doesn't become the truth, wrong doesn't become right, and evil doesn't become good just because it is accepted by a majority.
Author: Booker T. Washington
Earl (12-13-2019)
"When government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."
A lie doesn't become the truth, wrong doesn't become right, and evil doesn't become good just because it is accepted by a majority.
Author: Booker T. Washington
"When government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."
A lie doesn't become the truth, wrong doesn't become right, and evil doesn't become good just because it is accepted by a majority.
Author: Booker T. Washington
Nobody divided a nation like this puppet.
Lincoln killed far more of course but BO undid 60 years of race relations.
"Those who vote decide nothing. Those who count the vote decide everything." Joseph Stalin
The USA has lost WWIV to China with no other weapons but China Virus and some cash to buy democrats.
Democrats...the people STILL insisting that President Trump is a secret Russian agent...are warning those who AREN'T peddling any conspiracy theories...against the dangers of conspiracy theories...over Democrat activists at the FBI testifying under oath that the hoax they staged was ordered by Obama.
Nice logic.
Attachment 13354
“If we have to have a choice between being dead and pitied, and being alive with a bad image, we’d rather be alive and have the bad image.”
— Golda Meir
Zionism is the movement for the self-determination and statehood for the Jewish people in their ancestral homeland, the land of Israel.
ברוך השם
Did you? Removing the language that was straight out of the regulation Hillary should have been charged with violating was a blatant attempt to protect her from prosecution based on nothing.
What hyperbole? All I said was he ordered them to do it. The IG report proves they did it. Lisa Page admitted under oath that Obama ordered them to do it. Literally nothing else about Obama was said. Have you ever considered looking up the definitions of words like hyperbole before embarrassing yourself by misusing them.
Attachment 13357
But...the IG report proves they did it. And Lisa Page admitted under oath that Obama ordered them to do it. You don't just get to make up whatever you feel like and contradict all the facts.
Attachment 13358
This is provably dishonest spin. Comey's findings were altered three times, all to remove critical phrases that implicated Hillary in crimes. ALL THREE deliberately went out of their way to make her look less guilty.
"Gross negligence" is exactly what Hillary's textbook violations demonstrated...to the letter. After signing multiple statements affirming that she knew it was a major federal crime to remove classified documents or store them in unauthorized or unsecured locations or systems, she then deliberately set up a private unsecured server and stored tens of thousands of government documents on it. Her utterly reckless and intentional disregard for the law caused classified secrets to get accessed by Russian and Chinese hackers. This is a matter of record. If that's not "gross negligence," then nothing is and the law has no meaning whatsoever. And no, there is ZERO indication in the law that intent must be established. The entire point of criminalizing negligence is to specify that intent is NOT necessary.
1) They removed "gross negligence" and replaced it with "extremely careless." The law she violated uses the verbiage "gross negligence." "Extremely careless" matches nothing (even though it means the same thing) and deliberately WEAKENS their case, dumb-ass.
2) They also removed the part where Comey cited the specific part of 18 U.S.C. 1924 that she violated, which clearly criminalizes storing documents in unauthorized locations.
3) They also removed the part where Comey cited the "sheer volume" of documents properly classified as Secret at the time of Hillary emailing them proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that she knew what she was doing and was simply, willfully "grossly negligent."
Three different ways they changed the findings to make a provably guilty person look innocent. But you want people to believe that the partisan FBI hacks who viciously smeared Trump and his supporters ('Drumpf,' 'idiot,' 'stupid,' 'crazies,' 'loathsome,' etc.) while pledging their loyalty to Hillary ('I'm with her,' 'screw you Trump,' 'Viva le resistance,' Hillary should win 'a million to zero,' etc.) and vowing to "stop him" with their "insurance policy"...deceptively edited all these things in ways that JUST HAPPENED to make her look less guilty...all because they didn't think they could convict her (even though they were provably looking to exonerate, not convict her) by using language straight out of the law she had broken...as if directly linking the violation to the law that had been violated (standard practice at the FBI) somehow weakened, rather than strengthened, their case. This completely defies common sense.
Idiotic propaganda fail.
Attachment 13359
Truth.
Attachment 13360
Celticguy (12-14-2019)
Um...okay.
Attachment 13362
No one is discussing anything like this. Try to pay attention.
Attachment 13361
You're lying when you say it was Obama himself, not Obama's DOJ, that made the decision to drop gross negligence charges, dummy. If you don't want to continue looking like an idiot, cite the specific verbiage of Obama telling the DOJ to drop the charges.
. "But when you say advice you got from the Department, you’re making it sound like it was the Department that told you: You’re not going to charge gross negligence because we’re the prosecutors and we’re telling you we’re not going to —"
Page interrupted: "That is correct," as Ratcliffe finished his sentence, " -- bring a case based on that."
If I had said Page was innocent of the accusations you'd have a point. But I didn't, so you don't. And Page did NOT admit under oath that Obama ordered them, she testified it was the DOJ who made the decision. You don't get to put your spin on my words, or even on Lisa Page's words for that matter.But...the IG report proves they did it. And Lisa Page admitted under oath that Obama ordered them to do it. You don't just get to make up whatever you feel like and contradict all the facts.
It looks like you have an issue with the people at the DOJ, not Obama. I understand you're deep into every conspiracy theory out there, and think that the entire world and its brother are gunning to get trump out of office, no matter how many people, both Dems and repubs, testify otherwise.This is provably dishonest spin. Comey's findings were altered three times, all to remove critical phrases that implicated Hillary in crimes. ALL THREE deliberately went out of their way to make her look less guilty.
"Gross negligence" is exactly what Hillary's textbook violations demonstrated...to the letter. After signing multiple statements affirming that she knew it was a major federal crime to remove classified documents or store them in unauthorized or unsecured locations or systems, she then deliberately set up a private unsecured server and stored tens of thousands of government documents on it. Her utterly reckless and intentional disregard for the law caused classified secrets to get accessed by Russian and Chinese hackers. This is a matter of record. If that's not "gross negligence," then nothing is and the law has no meaning whatsoever. And no, there is ZERO indication in the law that intent must be established. The entire point of criminalizing negligence is to specify that intent is NOT necessary.
1) They removed "gross negligence" and replaced it with "extremely careless." The law she violated uses the verbiage "gross negligence." "Extremely careless" matches nothing (even though it means the same thing) and deliberately WEAKENS their case, dumb-ass.
2) They also removed the part where Comey cited the specific part of 18 U.S.C. 1924 that she violated, which clearly criminalizes storing documents in unauthorized locations.
3) They also removed the part where Comey cited the "sheer volume" of documents properly classified as Secret at the time of Hillary emailing them proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that she knew what she was doing and was simply, willfully "grossly negligent."
Three different ways they changed the findings to make a provably guilty person look innocent. But you want people to believe that the partisan FBI hacks who viciously smeared Trump and his supporters ('Drumpf,' 'idiot,' 'stupid,' 'crazies,' 'loathsome,' etc.) while pledging their loyalty to Hillary ('I'm with her,' 'screw you Trump,' 'Viva le resistance,' Hillary should win 'a million to zero,' etc.) and vowing to "stop him" with their "insurance policy"...deceptively edited all these things in ways that JUST HAPPENED to make her look less guilty...all because they didn't think they could convict her (even though they were provably looking to exonerate, not convict her) by using language straight out of the law she had broken...as if directly linking the violation to the law that had been violated (standard practice at the FBI) somehow weakened, rather than strengthened, their case. This completely defies common sense.
Have some pride, man. You're sinking to ridiculous levels, trying to change the narrative from trump's perfidy to accusing everyone else of wrongdoing. Even taking out partisan bias you cons are defying logic with your delusions.
“What greater gift than the love of a cat.”
― Charles Dickens
Bookmarks