cancel2 2022 (12-14-2019)
Members banned from this thread: evince |
Your right-wing manners are showing. I accept the info given by over 90 percent of the environmental scientists. you echo Fox and Infowars. You just show your lack of resistance to right-wing blabber. Have you always eschewed science or did that start when you went all right-wing , all the time?
cancel2 2022 (12-14-2019)
I honestly don't care to argue a point you already understand. I don't believe you're too stupid to understand how the tweet was insulting.
I am glad he did it, though. It's always fun seeing a sexist man-child get owned by a teenage girl.
Like I said before, the media should have ignored them because they're just kids. However, saying they weren't doing anything is just wrong.And wearing a MAGA hat is “looking for trouble” now. Is your party like muslimes now? People have to worry about angering them? Seems kinda fascist to me. And you seem to be supportive of it.
If a bunch of teens walk around wearing swastikas, I would say the same thing. They're just stupid kids, the media should ignore them and hope they mature as they age. However, I also wouldn't say that they were doing nothing.
Look if you can't state what was so insulting about it, just say so. Don't hide.
I accept your concession
I think that little cunt Greta should be ignored. And for the most part I do. She is being abused by her elders. They think she is above criticism because she is a child. Leftists always abuse kids. If it is not sexually it is mentally
You're too much of a pussy to admit that you don't mind what Trump did, so you're denying what he did, and you're using #whataboutism about "Leftists."
Say what you will about Neo-Nazis, but at least they admit that they support genocide. They're monsters, like you, but at least they have balls.
I think I have been very clear that I have no problem with Trumps tweet. You are proving what I said. She is being used by the left because they think she is immune from criticism because she is a kid. Fuck that
Now that being said, there was nothing insulting bout his tweet. He didn’t insult her. Maybe your on your period and extra sensitive today?
Of course they are. Big hairy deal.
Argument from randU fallacies. Not a definition of either 'pollution' or 'climate change'. Define them.
[QUOTE=Nordberg;3394428]
you echo Fox and Infowars.
RDCF.
You can have a theory of science about what you can't define.
Yeah, and your left-wing schiff-for-brains are showing... So?
In other words, you do not think for yourself nor do you form your own arguments. Got it.
False Authority Fallacy. "Environmental scientists" are not science, nor are the pretty looking charts/graphs that they peddle.
RandU Fallacy. You are pulling numbers out of your ass.
I obviously can't answer this for ITN, but as for myself, I do not watch/listen to Fox News nor Info Wars.
You just show your lack of resistance to the liberal pathogen.
Inversion Fallacy. YOU are the one eschewing science.
You have yet to define your terms, nor discuss any theory of science. It is not possible to have a theory of science about undefined terminology.
Bookmarks