Members banned from this thread: evince


Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 46 to 55 of 55

Thread: my first criticism of trump

  1. #46 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    53,515
    Thanks
    252
    Thanked 24,563 Times in 17,090 Posts
    Groans
    5,280
    Groaned 4,575 Times in 4,254 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Into the Night View Post
    Define 'pollution'. Define 'climate change'. Stuff your Marxism where the Sun don't shine.
    Your right-wing manners are showing. I accept the info given by over 90 percent of the environmental scientists. you echo Fox and Infowars. You just show your lack of resistance to right-wing blabber. Have you always eschewed science or did that start when you went all right-wing , all the time?

  2. The Following User Groans At Nordberg For This Awful Post:

    cancel2 2022 (12-14-2019)

  3. #47 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    26,116
    Thanks
    694
    Thanked 5,043 Times in 3,907 Posts
    Groans
    85
    Groaned 1,697 Times in 1,555 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Teflon Don View Post
    What exactly in the tweet was insulting to you?
    I honestly don't care to argue a point you already understand. I don't believe you're too stupid to understand how the tweet was insulting.
    I am glad he did it, though. It's always fun seeing a sexist man-child get owned by a teenage girl.

    And wearing a MAGA hat is “looking for trouble” now. Is your party like muslimes now? People have to worry about angering them? Seems kinda fascist to me. And you seem to be supportive of it.
    Like I said before, the media should have ignored them because they're just kids. However, saying they weren't doing anything is just wrong.
    If a bunch of teens walk around wearing swastikas, I would say the same thing. They're just stupid kids, the media should ignore them and hope they mature as they age. However, I also wouldn't say that they were doing nothing.

  4. #48 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Gone to the mattresses
    Posts
    22,458
    Thanks
    1,135
    Thanked 11,622 Times in 8,086 Posts
    Groans
    874
    Groaned 639 Times in 618 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by StoneByStone View Post
    I honestly don't care to argue a point you already understand. I don't believe you're too stupid to understand how the tweet was insulting.
    I am glad he did it, though. It's always fun seeing a sexist man-child get owned by a teenage girl.



    Like I said before, the media should have ignored them because they're just kids. However, saying they weren't doing anything is just wrong.
    If a bunch of teens walk around wearing swastikas, I would say the same thing. They're just stupid kids, the media should ignore them and hope they mature as they age. However, I also wouldn't say that they were doing nothing.
    Look if you can't state what was so insulting about it, just say so. Don't hide.

    I accept your concession

    I think that little cunt Greta should be ignored. And for the most part I do. She is being abused by her elders. They think she is above criticism because she is a child. Leftists always abuse kids. If it is not sexually it is mentally

  5. #49 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    26,116
    Thanks
    694
    Thanked 5,043 Times in 3,907 Posts
    Groans
    85
    Groaned 1,697 Times in 1,555 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Teflon Don View Post
    Look if you can't state what was so insulting about it, just say so. Don't hide.

    I accept your concession

    I think that little cunt Greta should be ignored. And for the most part I do. She is being abused by her elders. They think she is above criticism because she is a child. Leftists always abuse kids. If it is not sexually it is mentally

    You're too much of a pussy to admit that you don't mind what Trump did, so you're denying what he did, and you're using #whataboutism about "Leftists."
    Say what you will about Neo-Nazis, but at least they admit that they support genocide. They're monsters, like you, but at least they have balls.

  6. #50 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Gone to the mattresses
    Posts
    22,458
    Thanks
    1,135
    Thanked 11,622 Times in 8,086 Posts
    Groans
    874
    Groaned 639 Times in 618 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by StoneByStone View Post
    You're too much of a pussy to admit that you don't mind what Trump did, so you're denying what he did, and you're using #whataboutism about "Leftists."
    Say what you will about Neo-Nazis, but at least they admit that they support genocide. They're monsters, like you, but at least they have balls.
    I think I have been very clear that I have no problem with Trumps tweet. You are proving what I said. She is being used by the left because they think she is immune from criticism because she is a kid. Fuck that

    Now that being said, there was nothing insulting bout his tweet. He didn’t insult her. Maybe your on your period and extra sensitive today?

  7. #51 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    26,116
    Thanks
    694
    Thanked 5,043 Times in 3,907 Posts
    Groans
    85
    Groaned 1,697 Times in 1,555 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Teflon Don View Post
    I think I have been very clear that I have no problem with Trumps tweet. You are proving what I said. She is being used by the left because they think she is immune from criticism because she is a kid. Fuck that

    Now that being said, there was nothing insulting bout his tweet. He didn’t insult her. Maybe your on your period and extra sensitive today?
    Oh, I know you don't have a problem with his tweet, but you're too much of a pussy to admit that he was insulting her. And you're resorting to #whataboutism now because you're obsessed with the "Leftists."
    How old are you?

  8. #52 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Location
    Anchorage, AK. Waikoloa, HI
    Posts
    18,754
    Thanks
    6,477
    Thanked 11,418 Times in 7,537 Posts
    Groans
    17
    Groaned 270 Times in 253 Posts
    Blog Entries
    25

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nordberg View Post
    They are not hoaxers.
    Thanks. Ill be sure and get my affairs in order since we only have 12 yrs left. Also one of my condos in Hawaii is a block from the beach. I’ll definitely list it since it’ll be underwater soon with the rising sea level.

  9. #53 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    76,784
    Thanks
    30,519
    Thanked 12,927 Times in 11,514 Posts
    Groans
    11
    Groaned 1,361 Times in 1,347 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nordberg View Post
    Your right-wing manners are showing.
    Of course they are. Big hairy deal.
    Quote Originally Posted by Nordberg View Post
    I accept the info given by over 90 percent of the environmental scientists.
    Argument from randU fallacies. Not a definition of either 'pollution' or 'climate change'. Define them.
    [QUOTE=Nordberg;3394428]
    you echo Fox and Infowars.
    Quote Originally Posted by Nordberg View Post
    You just show your lack of resistance to right-wing blabber.
    RDCF.
    Quote Originally Posted by Nordberg View Post
    Have you always eschewed science
    You can have a theory of science about what you can't define.

  10. #54 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Posts
    10,839
    Thanks
    6,476
    Thanked 3,778 Times in 3,065 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 124 Times in 122 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by StoneByStone View Post
    So I guess that means you're quite disappointed in the man-child in his seventies who had to bad mouth a 16 year old girl on Twitter.
    Redirection.

    Define "climate change".

  11. #55 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Posts
    10,839
    Thanks
    6,476
    Thanked 3,778 Times in 3,065 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 124 Times in 122 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nordberg View Post
    Your right-wing manners are showing.
    Yeah, and your left-wing schiff-for-brains are showing... So?

    Quote Originally Posted by Nordberg View Post
    I accept the info given by over 90 percent of the environmental scientists.
    In other words, you do not think for yourself nor do you form your own arguments. Got it.

    False Authority Fallacy. "Environmental scientists" are not science, nor are the pretty looking charts/graphs that they peddle.
    RandU Fallacy. You are pulling numbers out of your ass.

    Quote Originally Posted by Nordberg View Post
    you echo Fox and Infowars.
    I obviously can't answer this for ITN, but as for myself, I do not watch/listen to Fox News nor Info Wars.

    Quote Originally Posted by Nordberg View Post
    You just show your lack of resistance to right-wing blabber.
    You just show your lack of resistance to the liberal pathogen.

    Quote Originally Posted by Nordberg View Post
    Have you always eschewed science or did that start when you went all right-wing , all the time?
    Inversion Fallacy. YOU are the one eschewing science.

    You have yet to define your terms, nor discuss any theory of science. It is not possible to have a theory of science about undefined terminology.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 8
    Last Post: 10-17-2019, 10:47 PM
  2. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-09-2019, 02:11 AM
  3. APP - Let's rationally discuss criticism of Donald Trump
    By canceled.2021.1 in forum Above Plain Politics Forum
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 05-17-2017, 11:15 AM
  4. Trump facing criticism over Intel briefings.
    By Brain Food in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 12-14-2016, 10:42 PM
  5. Trump team stands by embrace of Putin despite harsh criticism
    By christiefan915 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-09-2016, 08:47 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •