Russia's ONLY aircraft carrier Burning

[Superfreak]

its sitting in a port burning up


Russia doesn't really have much of a military anymore


they don't have the money

But Bots are nearly costless



and the republican party is allowing them to destroy America with bot holes that spread lies

Desh still sucking Putin's cock

[Superfreak]

russia doesn't even NEED its ONE and only aircraft carrier so they let it burn


all they need is russo bot holes to capture the entire republican party

This is why people state you are an idiot.

Republicans were already likely voting for the Republican.

If the bots actually tricked anyone... it was weak minded Democrats.

[evince]

so you deny all the 8 USA intel groups that all agree what Russia did ?


the Bi Partisan senate investigation too


oh and all the other western worlds intel groups too


but you take Putins word for it


do you ever get tired of Putins cock in your mouth?

[canceled.2021.2]

so you deny all the 8 USA intel groups that all agree what Russia did ?


the Bi Partisan senate investigation too


oh and all the other western worlds intel groups too


but you take Putins word for it


do you ever get tired of Putins cock in your mouth?

Unless they all examined the DNC server then yes I doubt it. Without a forensic analysis of the server nobody can say with certainty who allegedly hacked the DNC server.

That’s a fact jack.

[Controlled Opposition]

They hardly need a military anymore. Unlike us, they prefer to keep their fighting forces home. Plus they've already defeated us without wasting a single bullet or life. Just look at their comsymps here on JPP, plus the bozo in our WH.

We are agreed, for the most part. Russia is not an expansionist nation. Pound for pound, the Russian soldier is tougher than our own because Americans would not tolerate their training methods. Anecdotally, I have known a few Russian conscripts. The slightest infractions or failures resulted in beatings.

Additionally, their weapons work. Russia would never put up with programs like the F-35 fiasco. Russia's GDP is equal to Italy's.

[Cypress]

our moral authority gets us nowhere -try using that against China - a much more serious violator of human rights then Russia
China is running INTERMENT CAMPS FOR MILLIONS OF Muslim Uighers
so where is all this human right posturing for China? It doesn't exit because we understand US/China relations are much more important then even interment camps ( realpolitik)

it's fine to advocate human rights, the problems come when that metric drives foreign policy.
It's artificial and does not accurately reflect what are our interests
more important is getting along with them in terms of no NATO expansion and US militarism in Ukraine

And don't forget the "China card" which we threw away that served us for 40 years

Our posture, as a presumptive global leader in liberal democracy and civil rights, should be as advocate for human rights whether it is in China, Russia, Africa, or elsewhere.

Obviously, we also need to have a serious conversation about the civil rights abuses in the United States, if our credibility is supposed to mean anything.

I do not think anyone ever suggested that there are only two polar opposites - human rights or realpolitik- and there is nothing, no gradation, in between them.

I consider realpolitik a word that is entirely nebulous, ill-defined, and too quickly thrown around. There would need to be a Socratic dialogue on what that word actually means; what its essence really is. Nebulous words are an impediment to knowledge and action.

As a practical matter, I do not see why it is impossible to both be an advocate for human rights, and to pursue the national geopolitical interests of the United States. I personally think there is a lot of overlap between them.