Horowitz devastated the left and deep state today

[Getin the ring]

optics

Lying to a FISA court about sums this whole 3 years of Democrat whining up in a nutshell

[countryboy]

Then you didn't read the report. But we knew that. Horowitz said that no laws were broken.

he did? Please cite from the report verbatim, or from Horowitz's testimony yesterday.

[Truth Detector]

Nunes is vindicated. Schiff lied

If Schiff's lips are moving, he is lying.

[Truth Detector]

Can't make this stuff up. The House is in session tonight, right? Just heard Nadless
say "We cannot rely on an election to solve our problems."

It is stunning to hear these morons in the Party of the Jackass erupt with such stupidity.

[Truth Detector]

Basically, Horowitz was unable to conclude bias.

Here's why:

Horowitz: Was your investigation based on bias?

Peter Paul Strzok II: No.

Horowitz: Okay.

[Stretch]

Here's why:

Horowitz: Was your investigation based on bias?

Peter Paul Strzok II: No.

Horowitz: Okay.

Notice how every single time that Horowitz was asked about bias, he very strategically inserted 2 adjectives..."documentary & testimonial".
He never allowed the Dems to get away with using the simple word 'bias'. He clarified that all day long. Smart man.
When he questioned people and asked them if they were politically biased...
if they answered in written form (documents) or verbal form (testimony) he simply recorded their response.

[Althea]

he did? Please cite from the report verbatim, or from Horowitz's testimony yesterday.

It's on the record. Shouldn't be hard to find.

[countryboy]

It's on the record. Shouldn't be hard to find.

Haha, that's what I thought. Liar.

Tell me, was Comey vindicated by Horowitz, as he claims?

[StoneByStone]

In this brief exchange, Cruz focuses on the report of an attorney who altered documents in order to support the FBI’s FISA warrant application renewal. Did an FBI attorney really create “fraudulent evidence” to ensure the renewal of Page’s surveillance, Cruz wondered — and Horowitz confirmed it:

Cruz: “A lawyer at the FBI creates fraudulent evidence, alters an email that is in turn used as the basis for a sworn statement for the court that the court relies on. Am I stating that accurately?"

IG HOROWITZ: “That is correct. That is what occurred.”

You know that doesn't invalidate the entire investigation, right? And it doesn't mean the Deep State is after Saint Trump.

[Truth Detector]

Notice how every single time that Horowitz was asked about bias, he very strategically inserted 2 adjectives..."documentary & testimonial".
He never allowed the Dems to get away with using the simple word 'bias'. He clarified that all day long. Smart man.
When he questioned people and asked them if they were politically biased...
if they answered in written form (documents) or verbal form (testimony) he simply recorded their response.

Yep; that is the key. It indicates to me a level of dishonesty from him.

[Truth Detector]

It's on the record. Shouldn't be hard to find.

Find it asshole; you're the one doing the fucking lying.

[Truth Detector]

You know that doesn't invalidate the entire investigation, right? And it doesn't mean the Deep State is after Saint Trump.

[StoneByStone]

You know I'm right, so you have nothing to say.

[Truth Detector]

You know I'm right, so you have nothing to say.

Wrong; we know you are full of shit so we point at you and laugh.

[StoneByStone]

Wrong; we know you are full of shit so we point at you and laugh.

Very transparent. Whenever you lose a debate here, which is literally every day, you try to change the subject by starting a fight. Typical Unhinged Right tactic.