Barr thinks FBI may have acted in bad faith linking Trump campaign's to Russia

[Minister of Truth]

The funny thing about the IG report is that it proves all of the more complex stuff happened. The fact of political animus is the most obvious part about the whole affair, of which there is so much evidence already in the public eye. Now we just sit-back and wait on Durham, who, apparently, feels that he has even more evidence than is already known in his possession.

[Darth Omar]

The funny thing about the IG report is that it proves all of the more complex stuff happened. The fact of political animus is the most obvious part about the whole affair, of which there is so much evidence already in the public eye. Now we just sit-back and wait on Durham, who, apparently, feels that he has even more evidence than is already known in his possession.

That’s the most plausible conclusion—it explains why Durham felt compelled to weigh in.

Time will tell. In the meantime, withholding exculpatory evidence in a FISA application is clearly a crime. The only ‘out’ would be lack of criminal intent. IOW, a clerical error: someone ‘accidentally’ omitted the fact Carter Page actually worked for the CIA at one point—or whatever.

The way I look at it, Durham will either charge someone for that or he won’t. If he doesn’t, he needs to come before congress and explain why he didn’t.

[jimmymccready]

Horowitz, Durham, and Wray have cred, while Barr has none.

[Darth Omar]

Horowitz, Durham, and Wray have cred, while Barr has none.

If someone lied to the FISA court should they be charged?

[Earl]

"I think our nation was turned on its head for three years, I think, based on a completely bogus narrative that was largely fanned and hyped by an irresponsible press, and I think that there were gross abuses of FISA and inexplicable behavior that isn't tolerable in the FBI," Barr told NBC News.

Oh hell yes.

[Getin the ring]

Horowitz, Durham, and Wray have cred, while Barr has none.

you're the one with no cred tiny, but keep trying

Barr and Durham are about to rain down some pain on the whole out to get Trump charade.
they can't kick Trump out of office they don't have the Senate, so all that matters is public perception.

The Demos have already been painted as whiny partisan hacks, a little more fuel for that fire from the frigging Attorney General and Durham will solidify that branding.

November 2020 is going to result in a GOP house, Senate, WH, and in all likelihood another Supreme court Justice. patience

[Phantasmal]

That’s the most plausible conclusion—it explains why Durham felt compelled to weigh in.

Time will tell. In the meantime, withholding exculpatory evidence in a FISA application is clearly a crime. The only ‘out’ would be lack of criminal intent. IOW, a clerical error: someone ‘accidentally’ omitted the fact Carter Page actually worked for the CIA at one point—or whatever.

The way I look at it, Durham will either charge someone for that or he won’t. If he doesn’t, he needs to come before congress and explain why he didn’t.

Barr made him, I hope he ends up embarrassing Barr.

[Darth Omar]

Barr made him, I hope he ends up embarrassing Barr.

Hope and a quarter gets you a cup of coffee lol.

If someone omitted exculpatory evidence in a FISA application should they be charged?

[Trumpet]

Bill Barr is a moral weakling who dances to whatever tune scum-bucket Trump dictates.

[Trumpet]

The funny thing about the IG report is that it proves all of the more complex stuff happened. The fact of political animus is the most obvious part about the whole affair, of which there is so much evidence already in the public eye. Now we just sit-back and wait on Durham, who, apparently, feels that he has even more evidence than is already known in his possession.

Only a feeble minded Trumperoo will believe what you posted.

[jimmymccready]

you're the one with no cred tiny, but keep trying

Barr and Durham are about to rain down some pain on the whole out to get Trump charade.
they can't kick Trump out of office they don't have the Senate, so all that matters is public perception.

The Demos have already been painted as whiny partisan hacks, a little more fuel for that fire from the frigging Attorney General and Durham will solidify that branding.

November 2020 is going to result in a GOP house, Senate, WH, and in all likelihood another Supreme court Justice. patience

Says no cred Getin the ring. Durham will rain on Barr not the FBI, sweet cheeks. Your Whininess is a hoot.

November 2020 is going to be a very bad election for the GoP.

[reagansghost]

if Trump hadn't been working with the Russians for dirt on Hillary Barr wouldn't need to lie his fat ass off now

[Minister of Truth]

if Trump hadn't been working with the Russians for dirt on Hillary Barr wouldn't need to lie his fat ass off now

How many convictions/evidence will Durham need to land in order for you to wake the fuck up? My guess is nothing will satisfy you, but, you aren't exactly the target audience.

[Micawber]

….and Cabana Poon's customers said they think Poon has the prettiest eyes of all the male hookers in Cuba.

Barr doesn't believe a word he says. He is pro presidential power and has hitched his wagon to a falling star.
He will regret this.

[artichoke]

Barr thinks FBI may have acted in bad faith linking Trump campaign's to Russia

This is like saying someone thinks Bill Clinton might be a little disloyal to his wife. The evidence is kind of overwhelming.

Attachment 13307