Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 70

Thread: Do Republicans want to have voted against removal, more evidence before election day.

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    94,088
    Thanks
    9,829
    Thanked 33,870 Times in 21,642 Posts
    Groans
    290
    Groaned 5,675 Times in 5,179 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default Do Republicans want to have voted against removal, more evidence before election day.

    Here is the interesting wrinkle:

    There is very likely a lot more evidence to come out in the year before election day....


    The Courts will rule on the subpoenas to testify that are outstanding..

    Rudy's two friends will likely sing.

    And Rudy will likely be indicted.

    The S.Ct. will soon rule on Rumps tax returns being turned over.


    I would not want to be a Republican up for election, having voted to not remove Trump once the dam breaks. THere will likely be hell to pay, kinda like when the dam broke on W.
    4,487

    18 U.S. Code § 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
    44 U.S.C. 2202 - The United States shall reserve and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records; and such records shall be administered in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.


    LOCK HIM UP!

  2. The Following 3 Users Groan At Jarod For This Awful Post:

    cancel2 2022 (12-10-2019), Earl (12-10-2019), Grokmaster (12-10-2019)

  3. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Jarod For This Post:

    evince (12-11-2019), Frank Apisa (12-12-2019), Guno צְבִי (12-10-2019), Micawber (12-10-2019), PoliTalker (12-10-2019), ThatOwlWoman (12-10-2019), Trumpet (12-10-2019)

  4. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    7,318
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2,883 Times in 2,239 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 124 Times in 120 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    Here is the interesting wrinkle:

    There is very likely a lot more evidence to come out in the year before election day....


    The Courts will rule on the subpoenas to testify that are outstanding..

    Rudy's two friends will likely sing.

    And Rudy will likely be indicted.

    The S.Ct. will soon rule on Rumps tax returns being turned over.


    I would not want to be a Republican up for election, having voted to not remove Trump once the dam breaks. THere will likely be hell to pay, kinda like when the dam broke on W.
    What...….afraid of Double Jeopardy? LMAO

    Reality check: "IF".....the most used word in a liberal vocabulary...….there will be future indictments that will result in impeachable facts....WHY THE BUMS RUSH to impeach? The facts are: The soviet style impeachment by only 1 gulag party......is declaring that the use of the court system to defend against the overreach of off the rails congress....is OBSTRUCTION of JUSTICE, they simply don't have time to fight in an extended court battle. Again: Why the bums rush? Nadler went on record in front of Chuck (dumbass) Todd and said if we don't impeach....the 2020 election will be corrupted like the 2016 election. The lefts excuse? We need to impeach before we lose again to a corrupt system?

    www.youtube.com/watch?v=mRZS-w36lvQ

    A complete 180 from the message delivered by the left wing Messiah (BHO)…..who said that anyone that bitches about a corrupt election before the first vote is cast is a big political crybaby, as its impossible to corrupt a US election (of course he said this expecting it would be Mr. Trump refusing to accept a good old fashion political asskicking).

  5. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Ralph For This Post:

    Callinectes (12-10-2019), Earl (12-10-2019), Grokmaster (12-10-2019), Truth Detector (12-10-2019)

  6. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    94,088
    Thanks
    9,829
    Thanked 33,870 Times in 21,642 Posts
    Groans
    290
    Groaned 5,675 Times in 5,179 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ralph View Post
    What...….afraid of Double Jeopardy? LMAO

    Reality check: "IF".....the most used word in a liberal vocabulary...….there will be future indictments that will result in impeachable facts....WHY THE BUMS RUSH to impeach? The facts are: The soviet style impeachment by only 1 gulag party......is declaring that the use of the court system to defend against the overreach of off the rails congress....is OBSTRUCTION of JUSTICE, they simply don't have time to fight in an extended court battle. Again: Why the bums rush? Nadler went on record in front of Chuck (dumbass) Todd and said if we don't impeach....the 2020 election will be corrupted like the 2016 election. The lefts excuse? We need to impeach before we lose again to a corrupt system?

    www.youtube.com/watch?v=mRZS-w36lvQ

    A complete 180 from the message delivered by the left wing Messiah (BHO)…..who said that anyone that bitches about a corrupt election before the first vote is cast is a big political crybaby, as its impossible to corrupt a US election (of course he said this expecting it would be Mr. Trump refusing to accept a good old fashion political asskicking).
    You fools keep trying to equate things like "double jeopardy" and the "5th Amendment" to a House impeachment and Senate Removal hearing. They do not apply.

    This is not about the election, it is about Constitutionally approved impeachment. You see, if Trump were to be removed, Hillary would not become president, Pence would.
    4,487

    18 U.S. Code § 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
    44 U.S.C. 2202 - The United States shall reserve and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records; and such records shall be administered in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.


    LOCK HIM UP!

  7. The Following User Groans At Jarod For This Awful Post:

    Earl (12-10-2019)

  8. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Jarod For This Post:

    evince (12-11-2019), Guno צְבִי (12-10-2019), Trumpet (12-10-2019)

  9. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Gone to the mattresses
    Posts
    22,458
    Thanks
    1,135
    Thanked 11,622 Times in 8,086 Posts
    Groans
    874
    Groaned 639 Times in 618 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    Here is the interesting wrinkle:

    There is very likely a lot more evidence to come out in the year before election day....


    The Courts will rule on the subpoenas to testify that are outstanding..

    Rudy's two friends will likely sing.

    And Rudy will likely be indicted.

    The S.Ct. will soon rule on Rumps tax returns being turned over.


    I would not want to be a Republican up for election, having voted to not remove Trump once the dam breaks. THere will likely be hell to pay, kinda like when the dam broke on W.
    Jarod why are you spinning so early.

    Do you think Nancy is going to get EVERY democrat to vote with her to impeach?

    Why aren’t you talking about your own caucus?

  10. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to canceled.2021.2 For This Post:

    Callinectes (12-10-2019), Earl (12-10-2019), Truth Detector (12-10-2019)

  11. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    52,456
    Thanks
    78,112
    Thanked 23,654 Times in 17,915 Posts
    Groans
    38,830
    Groaned 3,248 Times in 3,052 Posts
    Blog Entries
    8

    Default

    Exoneration in the Senate, innocent. Nothing changes. President Trump remains in office for five more years.

    Democrats fail to remove a sitting president that the American people elected.

    Disaster for the Democrats in 2020

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to Earl For This Post:

    Truth Detector (12-10-2019)

  13. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    12,526
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 8,341 Times in 5,714 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 374 Times in 355 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    Here is the interesting wrinkle:

    There is very likely a lot more evidence to come out in the year before election day....


    The Courts will rule on the subpoenas to testify that are outstanding..

    Rudy's two friends will likely sing.

    And Rudy will likely be indicted.

    The S.Ct. will soon rule on Rumps tax returns being turned over.


    I would not want to be a Republican up for election, having voted to not remove Trump once the dam breaks. THere will likely be hell to pay, kinda like when the dam broke on W.
    more evidence?
    what, are the Democrats going to start another investigation?

    here's a wrinkle for you tiny,

    the Democrats blew their wad, it's over, hand played, finite

    polls are already tilted Trump in the battleground states,
    AND

    We havnt heard from Durham and Barr

    so nice try, GOP will vote down party line in the Senate,
    AND You really have no idea what that Senate trial is going to look like do you?
    Hunter and Joe Biden are going to be brought in for public testimony, Adam Schiff and his lies about his communici with the whistleblower are going to be brought in to testify

    go study up, come back, I'll wait
    This just In::: Trump indicted for living in liberals heads and not paying RENT

    C̶N̶N̶ SNN.... Shithole News Network

    Trump Is Coming back to a White House Near you

  14. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Getin the ring For This Post:

    Earl (12-10-2019), Truth Detector (12-10-2019)

  15. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    34,447
    Thanks
    23,965
    Thanked 19,108 Times in 13,083 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 5,908 Times in 5,169 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Hello Jarod,

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    Here is the interesting wrinkle:

    There is very likely a lot more evidence to come out in the year before election day....


    The Courts will rule on the subpoenas to testify that are outstanding..

    Rudy's two friends will likely sing.

    And Rudy will likely be indicted.

    The S.Ct. will soon rule on Rumps tax returns being turned over.


    I would not want to be a Republican up for election, having voted to not remove Trump once the dam breaks. THere will likely be hell to pay, kinda like when the dam broke on W.
    No problem. Save it all for the next impeachment.

    Impeach now and impeach often, I say!

    History will paint this as the next greatest mass hypnosis since Hitler.

    Let the reimpeachments FLY!

    It's the ONLY right thing to do.
    Personal Ignore Policy PIP: I like civil discourse. I will give you all the respect in the world if you respect me. Mouth off to me, or express overt racism, you will be PERMANENTLY Ignore Listed. Zero tolerance. No exceptions. I'll never read a word you write, even if quoted by another, nor respond to you, nor participate in your threads. ... Ignore the shallow. Cherish the thoughtful. Long Live Civil Discourse, Mutual Respect, and Good Debate! ps: Feel free to adopt my PIP. It works well.

  16. The Following User Groans At PoliTalker For This Awful Post:

    Earl (12-10-2019)

  17. The Following User Says Thank You to PoliTalker For This Post:

    Guno צְבִי (12-10-2019)

  18. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    94,088
    Thanks
    9,829
    Thanked 33,870 Times in 21,642 Posts
    Groans
    290
    Groaned 5,675 Times in 5,179 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Teflon Don View Post
    Jarod why are you spinning so early.

    Do you think Nancy is going to get EVERY democrat to vote with her to impeach?

    Why aren’t you talking about your own caucus?
    1) I am not spinning.
    2) I doubt Nancy will get every Democrat, they do not walk in lock step like the Cowardly Republicans.
    3) I have nothing bad to say, about impeachment, about the Democrats, except I think this should have happened after the Mueller report.

    Here is the hole in the argument that Democrats are too quick to impeach and desperate to impeach... If they were going to impeach and make anything they could find impeachable, why did they not act the first time when Mueller reported the evidence of Obstruction of Justice?
    4,487

    18 U.S. Code § 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
    44 U.S.C. 2202 - The United States shall reserve and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records; and such records shall be administered in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.


    LOCK HIM UP!

  19. The Following User Says Thank You to Jarod For This Post:

    Guno צְבִי (12-10-2019)

  20. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    94,088
    Thanks
    9,829
    Thanked 33,870 Times in 21,642 Posts
    Groans
    290
    Groaned 5,675 Times in 5,179 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PoliTalker View Post
    Hello Jarod,



    No problem. Save it all for the next impeachment.

    Impeach now and impeach often, I say!

    History will paint this as the next greatest mass hypnosis since Hitler.

    Let the reimpeachments FLY!

    It's the ONLY right thing to do.
    I think they have enough for an impeachment of the month club. After next years election, the Democrats may have enough Senators to remove.
    4,487

    18 U.S. Code § 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
    44 U.S.C. 2202 - The United States shall reserve and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records; and such records shall be administered in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.


    LOCK HIM UP!

  21. The Following User Says Thank You to Jarod For This Post:

    PoliTalker (12-10-2019)

  22. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    94,088
    Thanks
    9,829
    Thanked 33,870 Times in 21,642 Posts
    Groans
    290
    Groaned 5,675 Times in 5,179 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Getin the ring View Post
    more evidence?
    what, are the Democrats going to start another investigation?

    here's a wrinkle for you tiny,

    the Democrats blew their wad, it's over, hand played, finite

    polls are already tilted Trump in the battleground states,
    AND

    We havnt heard from Durham and Barr

    so nice try, GOP will vote down party line in the Senate,
    AND You really have no idea what that Senate trial is going to look like do you?
    Hunter and Joe Biden are going to be brought in for public testimony, Adam Schiff and his lies about his communici with the whistleblower are going to be brought in to testify

    go study up, come back, I'll wait
    The investigations are not over, they are still pursuing court orders to force testimony from some and SDNY is still waiting for the S. Ct. to accept or reject cert. next week. If they reject, the Taxes will be turned over ASAP.
    4,487

    18 U.S. Code § 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
    44 U.S.C. 2202 - The United States shall reserve and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records; and such records shall be administered in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.


    LOCK HIM UP!

  23. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    52,456
    Thanks
    78,112
    Thanked 23,654 Times in 17,915 Posts
    Groans
    38,830
    Groaned 3,248 Times in 3,052 Posts
    Blog Entries
    8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PoliTalker View Post
    Hello Jarod,



    No problem. Save it all for the next impeachment.

    Impeach now and impeach often, I say!

    History will paint this as the next greatest mass hypnosis since Hitler.

    Let the reimpeachments FLY!

    It's the ONLY right thing to do.
    “Impeach often.”

    That’s not what the Founding Fathers said, Snowflake.

  24. The Following User Says Thank You to Earl For This Post:

    Truth Detector (12-10-2019)

  25. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Gone to the mattresses
    Posts
    22,458
    Thanks
    1,135
    Thanked 11,622 Times in 8,086 Posts
    Groans
    874
    Groaned 639 Times in 618 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    1) I am not spinning.
    2) I doubt Nancy will get every Democrat, they do not walk in lock step like the Cowardly Republicans.
    3) I have nothing bad to say, about impeachment, about the Democrats, except I think this should have happened after the Mueller report.

    Here is the hole in the argument that Democrats are too quick to impeach and desperate to impeach... If they were going to impeach and make anything they could find impeachable, why did they not act the first time when Mueller reported the evidence of Obstruction of Justice?
    I didn’t make the argument you are defending in your last paragraph

    What do you think that says about democrats who don’t vote to impeach?

    Are they traitors? Do they not believe the evidence you claim is a slam dunk? Are they putting their own electoral chances over principle?

  26. The Following User Says Thank You to canceled.2021.2 For This Post:

    Truth Detector (12-10-2019)

  27. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Posts
    30,639
    Thanks
    18,222
    Thanked 15,646 Times in 10,702 Posts
    Groans
    202
    Groaned 618 Times in 607 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    Here is the interesting wrinkle:

    There is very likely a lot more evidence to come out in the year before election day....


    The Courts will rule on the subpoenas to testify that are outstanding..

    Rudy's two friends will likely sing.

    And Rudy will likely be indicted.

    The S.Ct. will soon rule on Rumps tax returns being turned over.


    I would not want to be a Republican up for election, having voted to not remove Trump once the dam breaks. THere will likely be hell to pay, kinda like when the dam broke on W.
    TOO LATE...the STALIN-O-CRATS have CUT THEIR OWN THROATS....
    TRUMP WILL TAKE FORTY STATES...UNLESS THE SAME IDIOTS WHO BROUGHT US THE 2020 DUNCE-O-CRAT IOWA CLUSTERFUCK CONTINUE THEIR SEDITIOUS ACTIVITIES...THEN HE WILL WIN EVEN MORE ..UNLESS THE RED CHINESE AND DNC COLLUDE, USE A PANDEMIC, AND THEN THE DEMOCRATS VIOLATE ARTICLE II OF THE CONSTITUTION, TO FACILLITATE MILLIONS OF ILLEGAL, UNVETTED, MAIL IN BALLOTS IN THE DARK OF NIGHT..


    De Oppresso Liber

  28. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Grokmaster For This Post:

    Callinectes (12-10-2019), Truth Detector (12-10-2019)

  29. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Delray Beach FL
    Posts
    115,590
    Thanks
    125,219
    Thanked 27,477 Times in 22,782 Posts
    Groans
    3,768
    Groaned 3,245 Times in 2,985 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    Here is the interesting wrinkle:
    There is very likely a lot more evidence to come out in the year before election day....
    So far there has been ZERO evidence of any wrong doing. There can be no "witnesses" because a crime hasn't been committed. I am not even sure that ALL the Democrats in the House will vote for this flimsiest of impeachment attempts.

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    The Courts will rule on the subpoenas to testify that are outstanding..
    Yes, and they will be either thrown out or challenged. You see, the sad, pathetic, whiny assholes in the Party of the Jackass can't find a case of high crimes and misdemeanors. Throwing mud on the wall doesn't cut it in a court of law snowflake.

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    Rudy's two friends will likely sing.
    Sing about what? Did Rudy commit a crime? If so, what crime did he commit?

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    And Rudy will likely be indicted.
    For what? What crime did he commit?

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    The S.Ct. will soon rule on Rumps tax returns being turned over.
    Why would Trump be compelled to turn over his tax records? What tax fraud did he commit?

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    I would not want to be a Republican up for election, having voted to not remove Trump once the dam breaks. THere will likely be hell to pay, kinda like when the dam broke on W.
    Well, you will find out in November 2020 how many disagree with you and the Democratic Party of the Jackass. I am saving this post.
    "When government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."


    A lie doesn't become the truth, wrong doesn't become right, and evil doesn't become good just because it is accepted by a majority.
    Author: Booker T. Washington



    Quote Originally Posted by Nomad View Post
    Unless you just can't stand the idea of "ni**ers" teaching white kids.


    Quote Originally Posted by AProudLefty View Post
    Address the topic, not other posters.

  30. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,815
    Thanks
    301
    Thanked 943 Times in 675 Posts
    Groans
    20
    Groaned 10 Times in 10 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Earl View Post
    “Impeach often.”

    That’s not what the Founding Fathers said, Snowflake.
    They don't realize the precedent that they are setting up for future presidents. One party will constantly attempt to impeach no matter what the evidence shows.

  31. The Following User Says Thank You to Southern Chicken For This Post:

    Truth Detector (12-10-2019)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 21
    Last Post: 01-24-2019, 04:17 PM
  2. Would Republicans have voted for Trump
    By Micawber in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 08-14-2018, 07:51 AM
  3. 28% Of Fla. Republicans Have Early Voted For Clinton
    By Althea in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 112
    Last Post: 11-03-2016, 06:06 PM
  4. Replies: 57
    Last Post: 09-19-2013, 05:16 PM
  5. Replies: 38
    Last Post: 12-14-2010, 06:17 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •