Do Republicans want to have voted against removal, more evidence before election day.

[canceled.2021.2]

They wont, they are pussies. They never really wanted them to testify, you will see, that was just a show that you fell for.

Just wait until more democrats vote against Nancy than Republicans vote with her. Can’t wait for you to spin that

She says she isn’t whipping the vote. Do you believe her?

[Superfreak]

Yes, I have heard lots of evidence of a huge campaign to bully Ukraine into helping Trump with the 2020 election. He sent Rudy and Sonoland to lay the groundwork, then the phone call that was made public showed Trump making the ask.

you are a lawyer that has no clue what evidence means. You are simply making this shit up.

Let's recap:

1) the US and most of the EU complained about all the corruption in the Ukraine

2) They tried to get Shokin fired for 'not investigating enough' (though he was investigating the corruption by Burisma)

3) Biden threatens to withhold US funding of $1B if he wasn't fired (claims had nothing to do with the fact his son was on the board of Burisma)

4) Ukraine's new President fired Shokin

5) Trump suggests looking deeper into corruption (same thing Obama and EU wanted) at Burisma etc..., whether there was interference in 2016 election by Ukraine and to whether it was appropriate of Biden to threaten withholding aide

6) Democrats then pretend that suggesting investigating Ukraine for interference somehow is impossible because we know Russia interfered.

7) Democrats then pretend that looking into what went on in 2016 is for 'political gain' because 1 of 20 Democrats running for the Dem nomination was involved. Apparently investigating the president is ok, but any Dem running is not to be investigated at all.

8) Democrats then pretend that because they are investigating impeachment merits that the Executive branch no longer has the ability to check the power of Congress. Despite the fact that Obama admin did the same thing over and over again.

9) Ukrainian President says he didn't feel any pressure. Democrats immediately call him a liar. Say he is just trying to suck up to Trump.

[Superfreak]

They wont, they are pussies. They never really wanted them to testify, you will see, that was just a show that you fell for.

what are you rambling about? Who didn't want the whistleblower to testify?

[Jarod]

what are you rambling about? Who didn't want the whistleblower to testify?

ReTrumplicans

[Superfreak]

ReTrumplicans

Thanks for proving yet again that you are a fucking moron.

[CFM]

If that were true, they would have done it two years ago.

Not when you don't have the numbers. However, there was talk about it two years ago and longer.

[Blackwater Lunchbreak]

what are you rambling about? Who didn't want the whistleblower to testify?

shifty schiff.

[Jarod]

Thanks for proving yet again that you are a fucking moron.

Well, now they’ll have their chance, the Republicans could call him in a Senate trial, but I’m promising you they won’t, because they never Wanted to in the first place. I just wanted something to complain about.

[Superfreak]

Well, now they’ll have their chance, the Republicans could call him in a Senate trial, but I’m promising you they won’t, because they never Wanted to in the first place. I just wanted something to complain about.

Yes, I know you did. You are making shit up.

[Grokmaster]

Yes, I have heard lots of evidence of a huge campaign to bully Ukraine into helping Trump with the 2020 election. He sent Rudy and Sonoland to lay the groundwork, then the phone call that was made public showed Trump making the ask.

"HEARSAY" + "OPINIONS" =/= "EVIDENCE".

You'd think a LAWYER WOULD KNOW THAT....

[PostmodernProphet]

Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
Here is the interesting wrinkle:

There is very likely a lot more evidence to come out in the year before election day....

that would be logical, since there couldn't possibly be less evidence........if you actually find some, you should draft articles of impeachment........

[Truth Detector]

Do Republicans want to have voted against removal, more evidence before election day.

I wonder how the 31 Democrats sitting in districts carried by President Trump in 2016 are going to vote. We only need 20 of them to make this Jackass HOAX a complete failure.

[Truth Detector]

you are a lawyer that has no clue what evidence means. You are simply making this shit up.

Let's recap:

1) the US and most of the EU complained about all the corruption in the Ukraine

2) They tried to get Shokin fired for 'not investigating enough' (though he was investigating the corruption by Burisma)

3) Biden threatens to withhold US funding of $1B if he wasn't fired (claims had nothing to do with the fact his son was on the board of Burisma)

4) Ukraine's new President fired Shokin

5) Trump suggests looking deeper into corruption (same thing Obama and EU wanted) at Burisma etc..., whether there was interference in 2016 election by Ukraine and to whether it was appropriate of Biden to threaten withholding aide

6) Democrats then pretend that suggesting investigating Ukraine for interference somehow is impossible because we know Russia interfered.

7) Democrats then pretend that looking into what went on in 2016 is for 'political gain' because 1 of 20 Democrats running for the Dem nomination was involved. Apparently investigating the president is ok, but any Dem running is not to be investigated at all.

8) Democrats then pretend that because they are investigating impeachment merits that the Executive branch no longer has the ability to check the power of Congress. Despite the fact that Obama admin did the same thing over and over again.

9) Ukrainian President says he didn't feel any pressure. Democrats immediately call him a liar. Say he is just trying to suck up to Trump.

[Truth Detector]

Thanks for proving yet again that you are a fucking moron.

A dishonest one.

[Truth Detector]

Well, now they’ll have their chance, the Republicans could call him in a Senate trial, but I’m promising you they won’t, because they never Wanted to in the first place. I just wanted something to complain about.

What a dunce.