Earl (12-11-2019)
Isaiah 6:5
“Woe to me!” I cried. “I am ruined! For I am a man of unclean lips, and I live among a people of unclean lips, and my eyes have seen the King, the Lord Almighty.”
Earl (12-11-2019)
Isaiah 6:5
“Woe to me!” I cried. “I am ruined! For I am a man of unclean lips, and I live among a people of unclean lips, and my eyes have seen the King, the Lord Almighty.”
Earl (12-11-2019)
Facts by a witness without first hand knowledge of facts are “presumptions, fantasies, or third hand information.”
In other words, gossip.
Personal Ignore Policy PIP: I like civil discourse. I will give you all the respect in the world if you respect me. Mouth off to me, or express overt racism, you will be PERMANENTLY Ignore Listed. Zero tolerance. No exceptions. I'll never read a word you write, even if quoted by another, nor respond to you, nor participate in your threads. ... Ignore the shallow. Cherish the thoughtful. Long Live Civil Discourse, Mutual Respect, and Good Debate! ps: Feel free to adopt my PIP. It works well.
Earl (12-11-2019)
Earl (12-11-2019)
Hi Frank,
It is unprecedented. Every previous President who was impeached has furnished materials and allowed testimony. Trump is the first in history to totally stonewall Congress on this. He can only do that because of the power of his cult. Cult members simply can not see the evidence against him. It's there, but their minds won't allow them to observe it because that destroys everything they believe in. They would be left without any of the beliefs they feel their lives are built upon. It's terrifying, unimaginable.
It doesn't matter how plain and obvious the evidence is, they have been given 'alternative facts' by the Republican House members who, instead of do their Constitutional duty to scrutinize the President's misconduct, they came to his defense in a shamelessly partisan matter. No matter what the glaring and extremely abusive troubling evidence may be, Republicans have been given their BS counter talking point as an 'easy-out' way of dismissing or 'negating' the evidence. Often that sadly amounts to no more than whataboutism.
This is clearly a situation which calls upon Congressional Republicans to forget which party they are in and just do their job, actually fulfill the oath of office they took when THEY were sworn in. Be brave. Brave enough to do your duty to Country, even if it may not be the most politically advantageous thing for YOU. Do your duty. They SWORE they would protect and defend the Constitution, but instead they are weakening it. They are now saying that any President who is within the time period by which a court battle over evidence might be drawn out in the courts, of the end of his term, that he is above the law, answers to no one, and cannot be impeached. And it doesn't matter if it's a Republican President or Democrat, or any other party. Doesn't matter, he CAN NOT BE REMOVED. Above the law.
That's what they are saying. They just don't know it. The Cult thing again, They can't see it. It's there, they just can't see it. Scary. What an effective con man. Greatest ever.
Personal Ignore Policy PIP: I like civil discourse. I will give you all the respect in the world if you respect me. Mouth off to me, or express overt racism, you will be PERMANENTLY Ignore Listed. Zero tolerance. No exceptions. I'll never read a word you write, even if quoted by another, nor respond to you, nor participate in your threads. ... Ignore the shallow. Cherish the thoughtful. Long Live Civil Discourse, Mutual Respect, and Good Debate! ps: Feel free to adopt my PIP. It works well.
Earl (12-11-2019)
Frank Apisa (12-11-2019)
Facts by a witness without first hand knowledge of facts are “presumptions, fantasies, or third hand information.”
In other words, gossip.
There was no obstruction.
'It's your abuse of power': Impeachment witness rips Congress ...
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com › news › its-your-abuse-of-power-i...
7 days ago - Professor Jonathan Turley criticized Congress for implying that President Trump was obstructing justice by going to the Supreme Court for rulings about impeachment. Turley was asked about the recent court ruling where White House counsel Don McGahn was ordered to testify after ...
No obstruction...except by the House Democrats.
Right, Professor Turley.
Earl (12-11-2019)
PoliTalker (12-11-2019)
PoliTalker (12-11-2019)
Yes, indeed, the radical Democrat Socialists are urinating on this Constitutional Republic.
Indeed.
Hi Frank,
We need to change our Constitution.
"All legal challenges to the power of Congress to subpoena the Executive branch, including the President, must be made to and will be heard by the SCOTUS immediately upon receipt and are final, with no chance for appeal."
Personal Ignore Policy PIP: I like civil discourse. I will give you all the respect in the world if you respect me. Mouth off to me, or express overt racism, you will be PERMANENTLY Ignore Listed. Zero tolerance. No exceptions. I'll never read a word you write, even if quoted by another, nor respond to you, nor participate in your threads. ... Ignore the shallow. Cherish the thoughtful. Long Live Civil Discourse, Mutual Respect, and Good Debate! ps: Feel free to adopt my PIP. It works well.
PoliTalker (12-11-2019)
Bookmarks