Page 2 of 10 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 145

Thread: For you stupid fucks, refusal to remove does not.....

  1. #16 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    land-locked in Ocala,FL
    Posts
    19,094
    Thanks
    21,106
    Thanked 11,933 Times in 8,227 Posts
    Groans
    288
    Groaned 766 Times in 727 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PostmodernProphet View Post
    barren Jarot....
    damn......I hope so.
    Abortion rights dogma can obscure human reason & harden the human heart so much that the same person who feels
    empathy for animal suffering can lack compassion for unborn children who experience lethal violence and excruciating
    pain in abortion.

    Unborn animals are protected in their nesting places, humans are not. To abort something is to end something
    which has begun. To abort life is to end it.



  2. #17 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    land-locked in Ocala,FL
    Posts
    19,094
    Thanks
    21,106
    Thanked 11,933 Times in 8,227 Posts
    Groans
    288
    Groaned 766 Times in 727 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    Untrue, please show me some support for that claim? He most certainly could still be prosecuted in criminal court once he is done being president.

    You are the exact dumb fuck I was talking about.
    speaking of criminal.......Horowitz made 8 referrals to the FBI for criminal investigation
    Abortion rights dogma can obscure human reason & harden the human heart so much that the same person who feels
    empathy for animal suffering can lack compassion for unborn children who experience lethal violence and excruciating
    pain in abortion.

    Unborn animals are protected in their nesting places, humans are not. To abort something is to end something
    which has begun. To abort life is to end it.



  3. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Stretch For This Post:

    Callinectes (12-09-2019), Earl (12-09-2019)

  4. #18 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Posts
    4,699
    Thanks
    2,166
    Thanked 3,792 Times in 2,336 Posts
    Groans
    88
    Groaned 737 Times in 651 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    For you stupid fucks, refusal to remove does not equal exoneration.


    That is the dumbest argument I’ve heard yet!


    BTW “Baron”
    Which idiot claimed that? Trump?
    Last edited by Cinnabar; 12-08-2019 at 08:41 PM.
    BLUEXIT
    A Modest Proposal For Separating Blue States From Red

    Dear Red-State Trump Voter,
    Let’s face it, guys: We’re done.


    It is a tragedy that so much of the work that so many men and women toiled at for so long to make this a better country, and a better world, has been thrown away, leaving us all in such needless peril.

    This is why our separation in all but name is necessary.


    https://newrepublic.com/article/1409...mp-red-america

  5. The Following 2 Users Groan At Cinnabar For This Awful Post:

    Earl (12-09-2019), Havana Moon (12-08-2019)

  6. #19 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    7,789
    Thanks
    280
    Thanked 1,899 Times in 1,551 Posts
    Groans
    97
    Groaned 67 Times in 66 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    For you stupid fucks, refusal to remove does not equal exoneration.


    That is the dumbest argument I’ve heard yet!


    BTW “Baron”
    Since Trump has not been charged with anything there is nothing to be exonerated from.

  7. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Flash For This Post:

    Earl (12-09-2019), Havana Moon (12-08-2019), Stretch (12-08-2019), USFREEDOM911 (12-08-2019)

  8. #20 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    England
    Posts
    78,017
    Thanks
    33,532
    Thanked 22,400 Times in 17,299 Posts
    Groans
    24,728
    Groaned 3,689 Times in 3,509 Posts
    Blog Entries
    29

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    Careful they will get triggered!
    Dumb twat can't even spell Barron correctly!!
    In rejecting their view [Spinoza, Leibnitz and Hegel], as I shall contend that we must, we are committing ourselves to the opinion that “truth” in empirical material has a meaning different from that which it bears in logic and mathematics.”

    Bertrand Russell, “An Inquiry Into Meaning & Truth” (1940)

  9. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Havana Moon For This Post:

    Earl (12-09-2019), Stretch (12-08-2019)

  10. #21 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    England
    Posts
    78,017
    Thanks
    33,532
    Thanked 22,400 Times in 17,299 Posts
    Groans
    24,728
    Groaned 3,689 Times in 3,509 Posts
    Blog Entries
    29

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stretch View Post
    damn......I hope so.
    No sadly, he has spawned little Jarheads.
    In rejecting their view [Spinoza, Leibnitz and Hegel], as I shall contend that we must, we are committing ourselves to the opinion that “truth” in empirical material has a meaning different from that which it bears in logic and mathematics.”

    Bertrand Russell, “An Inquiry Into Meaning & Truth” (1940)

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to Havana Moon For This Post:

    Stretch (12-08-2019)

  12. #22 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Gone to the mattresses
    Posts
    16,909
    Thanks
    889
    Thanked 8,274 Times in 5,862 Posts
    Groans
    528
    Groaned 555 Times in 537 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    Untrue, please show me some support for that claim? He most certainly could still be prosecuted in criminal court once he is done being president.

    You are the exact dumb fuck I was talking about.

    For what crime?

    You are spinning GayRod. You have gone completely off the rails. Trump has broke you.

  13. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Teflon Don For This Post:

    Callinectes (12-09-2019), Earl (12-09-2019), Havana Moon (12-09-2019)

  14. #23 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Posts
    5,797
    Thanks
    3,350
    Thanked 4,207 Times in 2,802 Posts
    Groans
    118
    Groaned 154 Times in 152 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    For you stupid fucks, refusal to remove does not equal exoneration.


    That is the dumbest argument I’ve heard yet!


    BTW “Baron”

    Synonyms for Not guilty:
    •adj.


    blameless (adjective) faultless,
    unimpeachable,
    immaculate,
    above suspicion,
    clear,
    good,
    irreproachable,
    stainless,
    clean,
    upright,
    untarnished,
    unsullied,
    Irreprehensible,
    impeccable,
    unblemished,
    pure.
    •unblamable (adjective) lily-white.
    •uncorrupted (adjective) un-corrupted,
    un corrupted.
    •untainted (adjective) un tainted,
    un-tainted.







    Synonyms for exonerated


    absolved,
    acquitted,
    cleared,
    exculpated,
    vindicated




    https://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus/exonerated




    Synonyms for acquitted




    absolved,
    cleared,
    exculpated,
    exonerated,
    vindicated



    https://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus/acquitted.




    STUPID FUCKING DUNCE.....AND YOUR LIESPEAK BULLSHIT....
    De Oppresso Liber

  15. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Grokmaster For This Post:

    Callinectes (12-09-2019), Earl (12-09-2019), Stretch (12-09-2019), USFREEDOM911 (12-08-2019)

  16. #24 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    46,077
    Thanks
    288
    Thanked 7,024 Times in 6,103 Posts
    Groans
    18
    Groaned 429 Times in 418 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    For you stupid fucks, refusal to remove does not equal exoneration.


    That is the dumbest argument I’ve heard yet!


    BTW “Baron”
    Yes it does. To say otherwise, is the dumbest thing yet.

  17. The Following User Says Thank You to CFM For This Post:

    Earl (12-09-2019)

  18. #25 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    46,077
    Thanks
    288
    Thanked 7,024 Times in 6,103 Posts
    Groans
    18
    Groaned 429 Times in 418 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cinnabar View Post
    Which idiot claimed that? Trump?
    It meant that to you lefties when Clinton was not removed. Why do things change when a Republican is in office?

    You took the same attitude with Supreme Court nominations. When a Republican was in office, the nomination shouldn't take place during an election year, however, when the black (POS) Democrat was in office and a vacancy came up during an election year, you no longer thought it applied.

  19. #26 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    60,230
    Thanks
    4,257
    Thanked 16,872 Times in 11,232 Posts
    Groans
    245
    Groaned 2,457 Times in 2,244 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CFM View Post
    Yes it does. To say otherwise, is the dumbest thing yet.
    Are you saying that if the Senate does not remove him, he could not be arrested when he is no longer President?
    4,487

    *IMPEACHED

  20. #27 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    60,230
    Thanks
    4,257
    Thanked 16,872 Times in 11,232 Posts
    Groans
    245
    Groaned 2,457 Times in 2,244 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Havana Moon View Post
    Dumb twat can't even spell Barron correctly!!
    You mentioned his name... May the wrath of God descend upon you.
    4,487

    *IMPEACHED

  21. #28 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    29,865
    Thanks
    8,231
    Thanked 18,785 Times in 12,560 Posts
    Groans
    5
    Groaned 996 Times in 955 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    For you stupid fucks, refusal to remove does not equal exoneration.


    That is the dumbest argument I’ve heard yet!


    BTW “Baron”
    Barron has two ‘r’s in it lol.

    Refusal to remove means democrats failed to bring a convincing argument to the table. I think that would make twice in the space of a year they failed to remove a duly elected President.

    The exoneration question is stupid, frankly. If the Senate rejects the articles passed by the House there’s nothing to be exonerated *from*.

    The interesting question is whether Democrats will try and pull the Trifecta lol. Do you think they will or will they throw in the towel, finally? Or cry uncle? Or tap-out?
    Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017

  22. The Following User Says Thank You to Darth Omar For This Post:

    Earl (12-09-2019)

  23. #29 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    11,829
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 7,755 Times in 5,354 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 358 Times in 342 Posts

    Default

    Democrats, and you sheep that follow them have been led down this trail to nowhere, so don't complain now that you are at the end and theres nothing here
    I VOTED FOR THE WHITE GUY THIS TIME

    C̶N̶N̶ SNN.... Shithole News Network

    WHERES RUTH

  24. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Getin the ring For This Post:

    Callinectes (12-09-2019), Earl (12-09-2019)

  25. #30 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    60,230
    Thanks
    4,257
    Thanked 16,872 Times in 11,232 Posts
    Groans
    245
    Groaned 2,457 Times in 2,244 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darth Omar View Post
    Barron has two ‘r’s in it lol.

    Refusal to remove means democrats failed to bring a convincing argument to the table. I think that would make twice in the space of a year they failed to remove a duly elected President.

    The exoneration question is stupid, frankly. If the Senate rejects the articles passed by the House there’s nothing to be exonerated *from*.

    The interesting question is whether Democrats will try and pull the Trifecta lol. Do you think they will or will they throw in the towel, finally? Or cry uncle? Or tap-out?
    NO, it means Republican senators claim that there was not convincing evidence. Trump will be impeached before Christmas. Still interested in a bet? ( I doubt it)
    4,487

    *IMPEACHED

Similar Threads

  1. DUI checkpoints and 'no refusal' weekends
    By SmarterthanYou in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 1049
    Last Post: 12-30-2019, 12:14 PM
  2. NBC fucks up again.
    By USFREEDOM911 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 12-09-2019, 01:14 PM
  3. Silencing Free Speech = Attempting To Remove The Right To Remove Rubbish Forced Into
    By David Jeffrey Spetch in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 12-09-2019, 01:10 PM
  4. APP - Texas MediCaid refusal affecting Veterans
    By tekkychick in forum Above Plain Politics Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 11-03-2013, 10:11 AM
  5. Republican refusal to reveal details
    By Guns Guns Guns in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-12-2012, 04:17 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •