Schmidt: Trump will dump Pence for Nikki Haley in failed 2020 reelection bid

[evince]

How sweet that leftists are concerned about Trumps re-election while their own shit show is taking place in real time

then why has the republican party had to cheat in elections for decades ?

your shits cant win without CHEATING the American people

[canceled.2021.2]

then why has the republican party had to cheat in elections for decades ?

your shits cant win without CHEATING the American people

Why do you always lie? You never tell the truth. Ever

[evince]

Why do you always lie? You never tell the truth. Ever

Ill go get the COLD HARD COURT DOCUMENTED PROOF

[jimmymccready]

Haley is a step too short too late.

[evince]

https://www.brennancenter.org/our-wo...consent-decree



Court Case
DNC v. RNC Consent Decree
Facebook

Twitter

Share

In 1982, after caging in predominantly African-American and Latino neighborhoods, the Republican National Committee and New Jersey Republican State Committee entered into a consent decree with their Democratic party counterparts.

Published: November 5, 2016

Gerrymandering & Fair Representation
Redistricting
In 1982, after caging in predominantly African-American and Latino neighborhoods, the Republican National Committee and New Jersey Republican State Committee entered into a consent decree with their Democratic party counterparts. Under that decree and its 1987 successor, the Republican party organizations agreed to allow a federal court to review proposed “ballot security” programs, including any proposed voter caging.
The consent decree has been invoked several times, by the parties to the decree and by others. In late 2008, the Democratic National Committee and Obama for America sought to enforce the consent decree, claiming that the RNC had not submitted alleged ballot security operations for review. After the election, the RNC asked the federal court to vacate or substantially modify the decree. The court denied the RNC's motion to vacate the consent decree and ordered the decree remain in effect until December 2017. The RNC then appealed to the Third Circuit, which unanimously rejected the appeal and affirmed the District Court's decision. A subsequent petition for rehearing en banc by the full Third Circuit, and a certiorari petition to U.S. Supreme Court, were denied.
On October 26, 2016, the DNC filed a motion asking that the court find the RNC had violated the decree. On November 5, after abbreviated discovery, the district court denied the DNC’s request, ruling that the DNC had not provided sufficient evidence of coordination between the Trump campaign and the RNC on ballot-security operations, but will allow the DNC to offer further evidence after the election.
Click here to learn more about voter caging.
Click here to learn more about ballot security programs.
Related Court Documents
2016
Order Denying Request to Extend Decree (November 5, 2016)
RNC's Memorandum in Opposition to Order to Show Cause (October 31, 2016)
DNC's Memorandum in Support of Order to Show Cause (October 26, 2016)
2012
Petition for Rehearing (March 22, 2012)
Third Circuit Opinion (March 8, 2012)
2009
Debevoise Order (December 1, 2009)
Debevoise Opinion (December 1, 2009)
RNC Post-Hearing Brief (June 26, 2009)
DNC Post-Hearing Brief (June 26, 2009)
RNC Reply Brief (February 19, 2009)
DNC Brief Opposing Motion to Vacate (January 19, 2009)
RNC Brief in Support of Motion (November 3, 2008)
2008 (several states)
DNC Brief (November 3, 2008)
DNC Brief Atty. Certification of Exhibits (November 3, 2008)
OFA Intervention Memo (November 3, 2008)
Minute Entry (November 3, 2008)
2004 (Ohio)
Malone Dismissal (February 3, 2005)
Malone en banc Decision (November 9, 2004)
Malone Appellate Decision (November 1, 2004)
Malone Order (November 1, 2004)
Malone Intervenor PI brief (November 1, 2004)
Malone Intervenor Complaint (October 31, 2004)
Malone Memo in Support of Intervention (October 28, 2004)
Malone Motion to Intervene (October 28, 2004)
2004 (South Dakota)
Daschle Temporary Restraining Order (November 2, 2004)
Daschle SD Complaint (November 1, 2004)
2002 (New Jersey)
Order (October 31, 2002)
1990 (North Carolina)
Order (November 5, 1990)
1987 (several states)
Consent Decree (July 27, 1987)
Original 1981 case (New Jersey)
Consent Decree (November 1, 1982)
Complaint (February 11, 1982)

[evince]

this is ONE CONTINUING CASE


the republican party kept getting caught BREAKING THE CONSENT DECREE AND CHEATING NEW VOTERS EVERY ELECTION


so they kept being punished by the courts

[Cinnabar]

but it wont be that long and Trumps ass will no longer be lickable ( he old and fat and eats turds for lunch)


they need a new brand

pence wont garner the dupes they need

Haley is young, pretty and smart compared to trump


they need a NEW idol to keep this going

Haley is as phony, self-serving and disingenuous as the rest. Pretty? lol

haley.jpg

[evince]

https://www.brennancenter.org/our-wo...consent-decree



Court Case
DNC v. RNC Consent Decree
Facebook

Twitter

Share

In 1982, after caging in predominantly African-American and Latino neighborhoods, the Republican National Committee and New Jersey Republican State Committee entered into a consent decree with their Democratic party counterparts.

Published: November 5, 2016

Gerrymandering & Fair Representation
Redistricting
In 1982, after caging in predominantly African-American and Latino neighborhoods, the Republican National Committee and New Jersey Republican State Committee entered into a consent decree with their Democratic party counterparts. Under that decree and its 1987 successor, the Republican party organizations agreed to allow a federal court to review proposed “ballot security” programs, including any proposed voter caging.
The consent decree has been invoked several times, by the parties to the decree and by others. In late 2008, the Democratic National Committee and Obama for America sought to enforce the consent decree, claiming that the RNC had not submitted alleged ballot security operations for review. After the election, the RNC asked the federal court to vacate or substantially modify the decree. The court denied the RNC's motion to vacate the consent decree and ordered the decree remain in effect until December 2017. The RNC then appealed to the Third Circuit, which unanimously rejected the appeal and affirmed the District Court's decision. A subsequent petition for rehearing en banc by the full Third Circuit, and a certiorari petition to U.S. Supreme Court, were denied.
On October 26, 2016, the DNC filed a motion asking that the court find the RNC had violated the decree. On November 5, after abbreviated discovery, the district court denied the DNC’s request, ruling that the DNC had not provided sufficient evidence of coordination between the Trump campaign and the RNC on ballot-security operations, but will allow the DNC to offer further evidence after the election.
Click here to learn more about voter caging.
Click here to learn more about ballot security programs.
Related Court Documents
2016
Order Denying Request to Extend Decree (November 5, 2016)
RNC's Memorandum in Opposition to Order to Show Cause (October 31, 2016)
DNC's Memorandum in Support of Order to Show Cause (October 26, 2016)
2012
Petition for Rehearing (March 22, 2012)
Third Circuit Opinion (March 8, 2012)
2009
Debevoise Order (December 1, 2009)
Debevoise Opinion (December 1, 2009)
RNC Post-Hearing Brief (June 26, 2009)
DNC Post-Hearing Brief (June 26, 2009)
RNC Reply Brief (February 19, 2009)
DNC Brief Opposing Motion to Vacate (January 19, 2009)
RNC Brief in Support of Motion (November 3, 2008)
2008 (several states)
DNC Brief (November 3, 2008)
DNC Brief Atty. Certification of Exhibits (November 3, 2008)
OFA Intervention Memo (November 3, 2008)
Minute Entry (November 3, 2008)
2004 (Ohio)
Malone Dismissal (February 3, 2005)
Malone en banc Decision (November 9, 2004)
Malone Appellate Decision (November 1, 2004)
Malone Order (November 1, 2004)
Malone Intervenor PI brief (November 1, 2004)
Malone Intervenor Complaint (October 31, 2004)
Malone Memo in Support of Intervention (October 28, 2004)
Malone Motion to Intervene (October 28, 2004)
2004 (South Dakota)
Daschle Temporary Restraining Order (November 2, 2004)
Daschle SD Complaint (November 1, 2004)
2002 (New Jersey)
Order (October 31, 2002)
1990 (North Carolina)
Order (November 5, 1990)
1987 (several states)
Consent Decree (July 27, 1987)
Original 1981 case (New Jersey)
Consent Decree (November 1, 1982)
Complaint (February 11, 1982)

if you go to the site ( Brennan was a past SCOTUS member and this university named this elections site packed with our election history after him) you can click on everyone of the line items and get the COURT DOCUMENTS and outlines of the particular republican election CRIMES

[evince]

Haley is as phony, self-serving and disingenuous as the rest. Pretty? lol

haley.jpg

yes she is evil


anyone who gets HIGH in the republican party leadership is evil


for one thing they KNOW the republican party cheats AMERICANS to win power

[CharacterAssassin]

What self respecting woman would work for the porn star adulterer in chief?

Whores like Sarah Huckabee and Kelly Anne 'fluffer' Conway.

[cancel2 2022]

can Don run for reelection from his prison cell?

https://video.foxnews.com/v/6113976320001#sp=show-clips

I relish the prospect of all you Calicunts swinging from the rafters on the end of a rope when Trump is re-elected next year. Maybe you, Desh and McSquawker can arrange a necktie party!

[Cinnabar]

Whores like Sarah Huckabee and Kelly Anne 'fluffer' Conway.

And they are clearly not "self-respecting" and certainly do not respect the USA or the American people.

[Loving91390]

then why has the republican party had to cheat in elections for decades ?

your shits cant win without CHEATING the American people

YOU and those like you .... are the reason the Republican Party wins !

So STFU you twat !

[cancel2 2022]

Haley won't last. Nobody gives head like Pence. It's kinda creepy how he always stares adoringly at trump, when trump is lying to the crowd that's assembled. Pence will never speak out against any trump policy, as opposed to Haley.

And she's much smarter than he is.

Nobody knows about morning wood like you, are you pining for Shrillary?

[cancel2 2022]

YOU and those like you .... are the reason the Republican Party wins !

So STFU you twat !

En pointe! I predicted two years ago that he'd go for Nicky Haley. The Dems are absolutely terrified of that, as well they might be.