Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Global warming is real

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    127,334
    Thanks
    36,164
    Thanked 20,843 Times in 16,234 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 18,558 Times in 17,176 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default Global warming is real

    OH MY GOD!!!!!


    when the likes of grindy face science that means the right wing gig is up

  2. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    127,334
    Thanks
    36,164
    Thanked 20,843 Times in 16,234 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 18,558 Times in 17,176 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Thread: “Bewildered” Climate Scientists: Aussie Politicians are Still Not Listening
    Thread Tools
    Search Thread

    Rate This Thread
    Display
    Today, 12:32 AM
    #1 | Top

    Havana Moon
    CAGW Alarmist Arsekicker

    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    England
    Posts
    76,193
    Thanks
    32,056
    Thanked 21,298 Times in 16,546 Posts
    Groans
    22,909
    Groaned 3,651 Times in 3,471 Posts
    Blog Entries
    25

    “Bewildered” Climate Scientists: Aussie Politicians are Still Not Listening
    Good because it's bullshit hyped up by opportunistic climate hysterics. It's the same reason as in California years of forest mismanagement and bullshit from eco-loonys. Naturally the Guardian is in the forefront of the bullshit spouting, the sooner that news organ closes the better.



    The reason, of course, is just like in the USA the Aussie bushfires are a forest mismanagement issue, not a climate change issue.

    Government hostility towards back burning and harsh treatment of farmers who try to manage fire risk has led to a catastrophic buildup of fuel load in the Aussie bush, and now that accumulated fuel load is burning. Big surprise.

    In my opinion Climate scientists who try to take advantage of a problem which is obviously not climate related are simply exposing their activism and lack of objectivity.
    https://wattsupwiththat.com/2019/12/...not-listening/
    In rejecting their view [Spinoza, Leibnitz and Hegel], as I shall contend that we must, we are committing ourselves to the opinion that “truth” in empirical material has a meaning different from that which it bears in logic and mathematics.”

    Bertrand Russell, “An Inquiry Into Meaning & Truth” (1940)
    Reply Reply With Quote
    Thanks Groans Blog this Post
    Today, 02:46 AM
    #2 | Top

    Do Si Dos
    -
    JPP Contributor
    JPP Staff

    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    internet
    Posts
    38,033
    Thanks
    6,854
    Thanked 16,174 Times in 9,760 Posts
    Groans
    1,013
    Groaned 1,443 Times in 1,295 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5


    you are a retard. climate change is real, retard. stop being retarded
    Biography:

    Grind is one of the internets most beloved and influential political thinkers and deep-level theorists in the modern era. He rose to prominence in early 2015 when he alleged, contrary to the dominant theory of christiefanism of the time, that Bill Clintons wife was indeed running for president and wasn't considering settling down to be a grandmother. In 2016, Grind was one of the key figures in proposing the new revolutionary theory of "30% is not a rare occurrence" which shook up the JPP political landscape like no other theory ever had before. His academic prowess, deep-level analysis and remarkable insight into human nature and psychology will undoubtedly result in further complexities being untangled and laid bare. He currently resides in boston, his hobbies include #rekking libs, vaping, and patriotism. You can find him in a thread near you.

    Testimonials about my patented system:


    Originally Posted by Mott the Hoople
    Grind is basically right

    Originally Posted by Phantasmal
    Grind’s got you beat by miles. He is very intelligent.
    Reply Reply With Quote
    Thanks Groans Blog this Post
    Today, 03:53 AM
    #3 | Top

    Havana Moon
    CAGW Alarmist Arsekicker

    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    England
    Posts
    76,193
    Thanks
    32,056
    Thanked 21,298 Times in 16,546 Posts
    Groans
    22,909
    Groaned 3,651 Times in 3,471 Posts
    Blog Entries
    25



    Originally Posted by Do Si Dos
    you are a retard. climate change is real, retard. stop being retarded
    Let's see you say that when you're shivering your tits off this winter. Let's hope the Russians will be able to get through to supply you with gas!
    In rejecting their view [Spinoza, Leibnitz and Hegel], as I shall contend that we must, we are committing ourselves to the opinion that “truth” in empirical material has a meaning different from that which it bears in logic and mathematics.”

    Bertrand Russell, “An Inquiry Into Meaning & Truth” (1940)
    Reply Reply With Quote
    Thanks Groans Blog this Post

  3. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    127,334
    Thanks
    36,164
    Thanked 20,843 Times in 16,234 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 18,558 Times in 17,176 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

  4. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    127,334
    Thanks
    36,164
    Thanked 20,843 Times in 16,234 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 18,558 Times in 17,176 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

  5. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Posts
    11,147
    Thanks
    6,798
    Thanked 6,876 Times in 4,638 Posts
    Groans
    168
    Groaned 254 Times in 252 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    REAL BULLSHIT. The UNALTERED, EMPIRICAL DATA DOES NOT SHOW MASSIVE WARMING...NOT EVEN CLOSE to THAT OF 12,000-20,000 YEARS AGO.


    LET US KNOW WHEN ANOTHER SET OF GREAT LAKES IS BEING CREATED FROM ICE MELTING, please
    .
    TRUMP WILL TAKE FORTY STATES...UNLESS THE SAME IDIOTS WHO BROUGHT US THE 2020 DUNCE-O-CRAT IOWA CLUSTERFUCK CONTINUE THEIR SEDITIOUS ACTIVITIES...THEN HE WILL WIN EVEN MORE .


    De Oppresso Liber

  6. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    51,404
    Thanks
    67,689
    Thanked 30,394 Times in 19,886 Posts
    Groans
    2,190
    Groaned 3,641 Times in 3,377 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grokmaster View Post
    REAL BULLSHIT. The UNALTERED, EMPIRICAL DATA DOES NOT SHOW MASSIVE WARMING...NOT EVEN CLOSE to THAT OF 12,000-20,000 YEARS AGO.


    LET US KNOW WHEN ANOTHER SET OF GREAT LAKES IS BEING CREATED FROM ICE MELTING, please
    .
    https://www.climaterealityproject.or...climate-action

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to Phantasmal For This Post:

    Cypress (12-07-2019)

  8. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Location
    Cymru/ Wails
    Posts
    3,637
    Thanks
    1,730
    Thanked 1,380 Times in 999 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 1,262 Times in 1,158 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grokmaster View Post
    REAL BULLSHIT. The UNALTERED, EMPIRICAL DATA DOES NOT SHOW MASSIVE WARMING...NOT EVEN CLOSE to THAT OF 12,000-20,000 YEARS AGO.


    LET US KNOW WHEN ANOTHER SET OF GREAT LAKES IS BEING CREATED FROM ICE MELTING, please
    .
    You must have a mental blockage, kid. You think this bloody weird weather is normal? Perhaps your fatman is doing it with his belly?

  9. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    13,831
    Thanks
    2,391
    Thanked 8,700 Times in 6,126 Posts
    Groans
    568
    Groaned 491 Times in 467 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Penderyn View Post
    You must have a mental blockage, kid. You think this bloody weird weather is normal? Perhaps your fatman is doing it with his belly?
    What weird weather is that, sheep hurter?
    Every life matters

  10. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    29,553
    Thanks
    13,024
    Thanked 17,178 Times in 8,859 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 1,859 Times in 1,684 Posts

    Default

    Every sentient poster on this board knows emitting billions of tons of heat-trapping greenhouse gases into the atmosphere year after year, decade after decade will have consequences and is not sustainable

    It has been demonstrated the oil and coal companies knew this half a century ago

    Any poster still clinging to Climate Denial is the type of person not only willing to lie to others, but to lie to themselves

  11. The Following User Groans At Cypress For This Awful Post:

    Grajonca (12-15-2019)

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to Cypress For This Post:

    Penderyn (12-09-2019)

  13. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    internet
    Posts
    38,815
    Thanks
    7,017
    Thanked 16,994 Times in 10,200 Posts
    Groans
    1,024
    Groaned 1,480 Times in 1,327 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by evince View Post
    OH MY GOD!!!!!


    when the likes of grindy face science that means the right wing gig is up
    if you actually paid attention, retard, to what I actually say on here, rather than always making shit up or thinking I am different people, you would have noticed I have never once denied global climate change ever. Not here, not on fullpolitics, not on politics.com. literally never. Nor have I taken the stance of "it's happening but we don't know how much humans are to blame" - humans are entirely to blame. Nor have I ever taken the stance it's not important - it's very important, and we need to seriously address the issue.

    I have always believed this, for almost 2 decades now, and have never once deviated from these beliefs.
    Biography:

    Grind is one of the internets most beloved and influential political thinkers and deep-level theorists in the modern era. He rose to prominence in early 2015 when he alleged, contrary to the dominant theory of christiefanism of the time, that Bill Clintons wife was indeed running for president and wasn't considering settling down to be a grandmother. In 2016, Grind was one of the key figures in proposing the new revolutionary theory of "30% is not a rare occurrence" which shook up the JPP political landscape like no other theory ever had before. His academic prowess, deep-level analysis and remarkable insight into human nature and psychology will undoubtedly result in further complexities being untangled and laid bare. He currently resides in boston, his hobbies include #rekking libs, vaping, and patriotism. You can find him in a thread near you.

    Testimonials about my patented system:

    Quote Originally Posted by Mott the Hoople View Post
    Grind is basically right
    Quote Originally Posted by Phantasmal View Post
    Grind’s got you beat by miles. He is very intelligent.

  14. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    85,669
    Thanks
    39,199
    Thanked 26,191 Times in 20,011 Posts
    Groans
    31,224
    Groaned 3,931 Times in 3,749 Posts
    Blog Entries
    39

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cypress View Post
    Every sentient poster on this board knows emitting billions of tons of heat-trapping greenhouse gases into the atmosphere year after year, decade after decade will have consequences and is not sustainable

    It has been demonstrated the oil and coal companies knew this half a century ago

    Any poster still clinging to Climate Denial is the type of person not only willing to lie to others, but to lie to themselves
    Stupid cunt, ever heard of Svante Arrhenius? This bullshit about oil companies is just risible!! Even if they knew only fifty years ago, what the fuck could you do about it? Renewables aren't really up to the job now and they definitely weren't fifty years ago. You arseholes truly make me vomit with your bullshit!!


    Greenhouse effect

    In developing a theory to explain the ice ages, Arrhenius, in 1896, was the first to use basic principles of physical chemistry to calculate estimates of the extent to which increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) will increase Earth's surface temperature through the greenhouse effect.[3][22][23] These calculations led him to conclude that human-caused CO2 emissions, from fossil-fuel burning and other combustion processes, are large enough to cause global warming. This conclusion has been extensively tested, winning a place at the core of modern climate science.[24][25] Arrhenius, in this work, built upon the prior work of other famous scientists, including Joseph Fourier, John Tyndall and Claude Pouillet. Arrhenius wanted to determine whether greenhouse gases could contribute to the explanation of the temperature variation between glacial and inter-glacial periods.[26] Arrhenius used infrared observations of the moon – by Frank Washington Very and Samuel Pierpont Langley at the Allegheny Observatory in Pittsburgh — to calculate how much of infrared (heat) radiation is captured by CO2 and water (H2O) vapour in Earth's atmosphere. Using 'Stefan's law' (better known as the Stefan–Boltzmann law), he formulated what he referred to as a 'rule'. In its original form, Arrhenius's rule reads as follows:

    if the quantity of carbonic acid increases in geometric progression, the augmentation of the temperature will increase nearly in arithmetic progression.

    Here, Arrhenius refers to CO2 as carbonic acid (which refers only to the aqueous form H2CO3 in modern usage). The following formulation of Arrhenius's rule is still in use today:[27]



    where is the concentration of CO2 at the beginning (time-zero) of the period being studied (if the same concentration unit is used for both , then it doesn't matter which concentration unit is used); is the CO2 concentration at end of the period being studied; ln is the natural logarithm (= log base e (loge)); and is the augmentation of the temperature, in other words the change in the rate of heating Earth's surface (radiative forcing), which is measured in Watts per square meter.[27] Derivations from atmospheric radiative transfer models have found that for CO2 is 5.35 (± 10%) W/m2 for Earth's atmosphere.[28]

    Based on information from his colleague Arvid Högbom, Arrhenius was the first person to predict that emissions of carbon dioxide from the burning of fossil fuels and other combustion processes were large enough to cause global warming. In his calculation Arrhenius included the feedback from changes in water vapor as well as latitudinal effects, but he omitted clouds, convection of heat upward in the atmosphere, and other essential factors. His work is currently seen less as an accurate quantification of global warming than as the first demonstration that increases in atmospheric CO2 will cause global warming, everything else being equal.
    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Svante_Arrhenius
    Last edited by Grajonca; 12-15-2019 at 05:25 AM.
    .

    80,000 Americans died and 900,000 were hospitalised just two years ago from flu including the most virulent Type A version of H3N2, so why didn't you arseholes call for the total destruction of the world's economic system then? I hope you have plenty of time to ponder over that when you all lose your houses, jobs and relationships!

Similar Threads

  1. Global warming is real people!
    By Yurt in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-21-2019, 02:40 PM
  2. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-15-2018, 10:15 AM
  3. Wow, that global warming thang is a real bitch!
    By Grajonca in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 252
    Last Post: 03-25-2018, 09:00 AM
  4. Global Warming is real, but not primarily man-made
    By Ahala in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 10-25-2010, 10:05 AM
  5. Global warming concerns hit coastal real estate
    By uscitizen in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 02-26-2007, 11:16 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •