Originally Posted by
Nomad
I figured by "the hag era", you meant the cumulative years you've been married.
But you're right about conservative women being ugly hags.
Originally Posted by
Nomad
Here ya go, Sarah....
...sorry I left you out.
Originally Posted by
Adolf_Twitler
Would you just look at these horsey faced bitches!
To Nomad & Adolf_Twitler: Hags are hags because of what they stand for. With the exception of Nikki Haley your selections do not qualify.
Originally Posted by
christiefan915
Here's one for the collection... Jan Brewer.
To Christiefan915: RINO is the kindest thing a conservative can say about then-Arizona Governor Jan Brewer. In fact, she belongs in your collection. She vetoed the First Amendment when she put a political definition of discrimination above these 16 words:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; . . .
Result: Homosexuals would get what they wanted, while the rest of us would lose another chunk of religious freedom. Brewer was either a fool, or she was lying like a Democrat.
A federal lawsuit, Diaz v. Brewer, formerly Collins v. Brewer, challenging Brewer's action is being heard in federal court. The plaintiffs, represented by Lambda Legal, a LGBT rights advocacy group, asked for summary judgment based on due process and equal protection claims. On July 23, 2010, U.S. District Judge John W. Sedwick denied the due process claim, but based on the equal protection claim he issued a temporary injunction blocking enforcement of the law pending a trial. Brewer appealed the decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which sided with Sedwick and ruled against her. The state appealed to the Supreme Court, which denied the appeal, letting the Ninth Circuit ruling stand.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jan_Br...ic_partnership
Bookmarks