Members banned from this thread: evince, domer76, ThatOwlWoman, Jade Dragon and Crocodile


Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 25

Thread: Can Nancy hold them all together?

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Gone to the mattresses
    Posts
    16,909
    Thanks
    889
    Thanked 8,274 Times in 5,862 Posts
    Groans
    528
    Groaned 555 Times in 537 Posts

    Default Can Nancy hold them all together?

    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...-shut-it-down/

    She doesn't have the votes. She can't do this thing with just 218. The optics will be horrible.

    Let's do the math shall we?

    She needs 218 to impeach President Trump. She won't get a single Republican vote as things stand today.

    There are 31 democrats from districts overwhelmingly won by Trump in 2016 that democrats flipped in 2018.

    The numbers just aren't in Nancy's favor. I am confident that my prediction that they will not vote on articles of impeachment before the end of this session will come true. They just don't have the time or the numbers. If Nancy had the numbers, she would vote.

    Nancy has allowed Adam Schiff to fuck her over big time. He probably told her he had the goods on Trump and had Trump boxed in. But then Trump released the transcript and the dems got fucked. They have had no choice but to try to play out a losing hand

  2. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Teflon Don For This Post:

    Bigdog (12-10-2019), Earl (12-10-2019), Stretch (12-09-2019), Truth Detector (12-10-2019)

  3. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    60,230
    Thanks
    4,257
    Thanked 16,872 Times in 11,232 Posts
    Groans
    245
    Groaned 2,457 Times in 2,244 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Oops
    4,487

    *IMPEACHED

  4. The Following User Groans At Jarod For This Awful Post:

    Havana Moon (12-10-2019)

  5. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    land-locked in Ocala,FL
    Posts
    19,094
    Thanks
    21,106
    Thanked 11,933 Times in 8,227 Posts
    Groans
    288
    Groaned 766 Times in 727 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Teflon Don View Post
    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...-shut-it-down/

    She doesn't have the votes. She can't do this thing with just 218. The optics will be horrible.

    Let's do the math shall we?

    She needs 218 to impeach President Trump. She won't get a single Republican vote as things stand today.

    There are 31 democrats from districts overwhelmingly won by Trump in 2016 that democrats flipped in 2018.

    The numbers just aren't in Nancy's favor. I am confident that my prediction that they will not vote on articles of impeachment before the end of this session will come true. They just don't have the time or the numbers. If Nancy had the numbers, she would vote.

    Nancy has allowed Adam Schiff to fuck her over big time. He probably told her he had the goods on Trump and had Trump boxed in. But then Trump released the transcript and the dems got fucked. They have had no choice but to try to play out a losing hand
    I think she just wants this over with. I noticed something about her a couple weeks ago. All of a sudden when media asks her about impeachment, she is saying things like, "We need to stop talking about impeachment. There are so many other things we have to get on with and focus on", etc.
    She's many things, but stupid she's not. Votes or no votes she wanted this thing to move fast and be done with it. She knows that they've got to start focusing on the election.
    Abortion rights dogma can obscure human reason & harden the human heart so much that the same person who feels
    empathy for animal suffering can lack compassion for unborn children who experience lethal violence and excruciating
    pain in abortion.

    Unborn animals are protected in their nesting places, humans are not. To abort something is to end something
    which has begun. To abort life is to end it.



  6. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Stretch For This Post:

    Bigdog (12-10-2019), Eagle-Eye (12-10-2019), Earl (12-10-2019), Truth Detector (12-10-2019)

  7. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    England
    Posts
    78,017
    Thanks
    33,532
    Thanked 22,400 Times in 17,299 Posts
    Groans
    24,728
    Groaned 3,689 Times in 3,509 Posts
    Blog Entries
    29

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    Oops
    Give it up Jarhead, you're beating a dying donkey to death.
    In rejecting their view [Spinoza, Leibnitz and Hegel], as I shall contend that we must, we are committing ourselves to the opinion that “truth” in empirical material has a meaning different from that which it bears in logic and mathematics.”

    Bertrand Russell, “An Inquiry Into Meaning & Truth” (1940)

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to Havana Moon For This Post:

    Truth Detector (12-10-2019)

  9. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    20,713
    Thanks
    9,229
    Thanked 5,885 Times in 4,572 Posts
    Groans
    328
    Groaned 1,018 Times in 949 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Teflon Don View Post
    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...-shut-it-down/

    She doesn't have the votes. She can't do this thing with just 218. The optics will be horrible.

    Let's do the math shall we?

    She needs 218 to impeach President Trump. She won't get a single Republican vote as things stand today.

    There are 31 democrats from districts overwhelmingly won by Trump in 2016 that democrats flipped in 2018.

    The numbers just aren't in Nancy's favor. I am confident that my prediction that they will not vote on articles of impeachment before the end of this session will come true. They just don't have the time or the numbers. If Nancy had the numbers, she would vote.

    Nancy has allowed Adam Schiff to fuck her over big time. He probably told her he had the goods on Trump and had Trump boxed in. But then Trump released the transcript and the dems got fucked. They have had no choice but to try to play out a losing hand
    Oh good. ANOTHER prediction.

    "I am confident that my prediction that they will not vote on articles of impeachment before the end of this session will come true." Teflon Don.

  10. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    29,865
    Thanks
    8,231
    Thanked 18,785 Times in 12,560 Posts
    Groans
    5
    Groaned 996 Times in 955 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stretch View Post
    I think she just wants this over with. I noticed something about her a couple weeks ago. All of a sudden when media asks her about impeachment, she is saying things like, "We need to stop talking about impeachment. There are so many other things we have to get on with and focus on", etc.
    She's many things, but stupid she's not. Votes or no votes she wanted this thing to move fast and be done with it. She knows that they've got to start focusing on the election.
    But they are focusing on the election lol.

    This is about the election. Period. Democrats aren’t trying to ‘preserve democracy’. If they were, they’d censure Trump and move on. No, this is about impeaching and removing the Bad Orange Man BEFORE he gets elected again and the clock is running out.

    In other words, time and democracy are their enemies.

    San Fran Nan is likely having misgivings about it, now, but it’s too late. The ‘impeachment inquiry’ was a gamble and I figure she knew it going in. Trump wasn’t supposed to release the transcript that mentions absolutely nothing of a quid pro quo. She probably knew it was going to be a slow motion train wreck after that—but what choice did she have but to press on with it?

    So here we are and here they are. Democrats are prepared [I think lol?] to vote on articles of impeachment *the day after* the release of the IG report.

    If you’re a political junkie, it doesn’t get any better than this.
    Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017

  11. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Darth Omar For This Post:

    Bigdog (12-10-2019), Stretch (12-10-2019), Truth Detector (12-10-2019)

  12. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    60,230
    Thanks
    4,257
    Thanked 16,872 Times in 11,232 Posts
    Groans
    245
    Groaned 2,457 Times in 2,244 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Havana Moon View Post
    Give it up Jarhead, you're beating a dying donkey to death.
    I love how triggered you are by my posts.
    4,487

    *IMPEACHED

  13. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    life
    Posts
    34,637
    Thanks
    9,014
    Thanked 12,830 Times in 9,174 Posts
    Groans
    189
    Groaned 1,516 Times in 1,441 Posts

    Default

    no bribery, no quid pro quo, on "extortion" in the Articles.. they are reduced to "Abuse of power"which is not a crime
    ( an impeachable offense)

  14. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to anatta For This Post:

    Bigdog (12-10-2019), Truth Detector (12-10-2019)

  15. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Gone to the mattresses
    Posts
    16,909
    Thanks
    889
    Thanked 8,274 Times in 5,862 Posts
    Groans
    528
    Groaned 555 Times in 537 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack View Post
    Oh good. ANOTHER prediction.

    "I am confident that my prediction that they will not vote on articles of impeachment before the end of this session will come true." Teflon Don.
    Are they voting on them?

    Will every democrat in the House vote yes to impeach?

  16. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Teflon Don For This Post:

    Bigdog (12-10-2019), Truth Detector (12-10-2019)

  17. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    19,648
    Thanks
    2,854
    Thanked 8,798 Times in 6,080 Posts
    Groans
    93
    Groaned 1,726 Times in 1,596 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Fighting your treason and saving Democracy is our glue.

  18. The Following User Says Thank You to Micawber For This Post:

    evince (12-10-2019)

  19. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    46,077
    Thanks
    288
    Thanked 7,024 Times in 6,103 Posts
    Groans
    18
    Groaned 429 Times in 418 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Micawber View Post
    Fighting your treason and saving Democracy is our glue.
    Whipping Hillary's ass in an election isn't treason but it damn sure saved Democracy.

  20. The Following User Says Thank You to CFM For This Post:

    Truth Detector (12-10-2019)

  21. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    land-locked in Ocala,FL
    Posts
    19,094
    Thanks
    21,106
    Thanked 11,933 Times in 8,227 Posts
    Groans
    288
    Groaned 766 Times in 727 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darth Omar View Post
    But they are focusing on the election lol.

    This is about the election. Period. Democrats aren’t trying to ‘preserve democracy’. If they were, they’d censure Trump and move on. No, this is about impeaching and removing the Bad Orange Man BEFORE he gets elected again and the clock is running out.

    In other words, time and democracy are their enemies.

    San Fran Nan is likely having misgivings about it, now, but it’s too late. The ‘impeachment inquiry’ was a gamble and I figure she knew it going in. Trump wasn’t supposed to release the transcript that mentions absolutely nothing of a quid pro quo. She probably knew it was going to be a slow motion train wreck after that—but what choice did she have but to press on with it?

    So here we are and here they are. Democrats are prepared [I think lol?] to vote on articles of impeachment *the day after* the release of the IG report.

    If you’re a political junkie, it doesn’t get any better than this.
    Agree. I should have added the word 'campaign'. As in getting more spotlight on her candidates and at trying to
    get the attention moving off this to other matters.....even though it's phony. It may be about optics for the majority
    of the more moderate Dem party base rather than the minority of far left fringe.

    Look how fast she she turned on the fringe kooks to help pass MCA. That just proves to the left fringe idiots that all
    she's done is throw them a bone.

    So, now it will go the Senate where it will die and rot and become a stain and stench on the immature minority who
    don't like Presidential elections occurring every 4 years. I think they wish we had never left England and having a
    Parliament where one change leaders you don't like by simply voting for "no confidence."
    Abortion rights dogma can obscure human reason & harden the human heart so much that the same person who feels
    empathy for animal suffering can lack compassion for unborn children who experience lethal violence and excruciating
    pain in abortion.

    Unborn animals are protected in their nesting places, humans are not. To abort something is to end something
    which has begun. To abort life is to end it.



  22. The Following User Says Thank You to Stretch For This Post:

    Truth Detector (12-10-2019)

  23. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Ventura CA
    Posts
    74,288
    Thanks
    88,166
    Thanked 16,497 Times in 13,866 Posts
    Groans
    3,768
    Groaned 2,890 Times in 2,632 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Teflon Don View Post
    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...-shut-it-down/

    She doesn't have the votes. She can't do this thing with just 218. The optics will be horrible.

    Let's do the math shall we?

    She needs 218 to impeach President Trump. She won't get a single Republican vote as things stand today.

    There are 31 democrats from districts overwhelmingly won by Trump in 2016 that democrats flipped in 2018.

    The numbers just aren't in Nancy's favor. I am confident that my prediction that they will not vote on articles of impeachment before the end of this session will come true. They just don't have the time or the numbers. If Nancy had the numbers, she would vote.

    Nancy has allowed Adam Schiff to fuck her over big time. He probably told her he had the goods on Trump and had Trump boxed in. But then Trump released the transcript and the dems got fucked. They have had no choice but to try to play out a losing hand
    Page 173 V I: Ultimately, the investigation did not establish that the Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities.


    Eric Holder: “I’m still enjoying what I’m doing, there’s still work to be done,” I’m still the President’s wing-man, so I’m there with my boy.”

  24. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Ventura CA
    Posts
    74,288
    Thanks
    88,166
    Thanked 16,497 Times in 13,866 Posts
    Groans
    3,768
    Groaned 2,890 Times in 2,632 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    Oops
    ??
    Page 173 V I: Ultimately, the investigation did not establish that the Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities.


    Eric Holder: “I’m still enjoying what I’m doing, there’s still work to be done,” I’m still the President’s wing-man, so I’m there with my boy.”

  25. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Ventura CA
    Posts
    74,288
    Thanks
    88,166
    Thanked 16,497 Times in 13,866 Posts
    Groans
    3,768
    Groaned 2,890 Times in 2,632 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    I love how triggered you are by my posts.
    No one gets triggered by them; we point and laugh at them. Your typical response when your lies are exposed in your dumb threads is......
    Page 173 V I: Ultimately, the investigation did not establish that the Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities.


    Eric Holder: “I’m still enjoying what I’m doing, there’s still work to be done,” I’m still the President’s wing-man, so I’m there with my boy.”

Similar Threads

  1. $39.35 to hold your own child
    By evince in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 10-05-2016, 08:47 PM
  2. Buy/Sell/Hold
    By Phantasmal in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-11-2015, 03:02 PM
  3. hold on to the night
    By Do Si Dos in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 06-02-2010, 06:29 AM
  4. We Still Hold These Truths
    By TuTu Monroe in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 11-02-2009, 02:03 PM
  5. texas hold em
    By Cancel 2018. 3 in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 10-28-2009, 01:03 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •