How much Mueller report should be in the impeachment articles and trial?

[reagansghost]

simple and direct, don't toss any additional and unnecessary red meat out there for Trump and the right wing echo chamber

Mueller's report listed at least 10 counts of obstruction, true, but that report has been thoroughly tainted by Barr and the rw echo chamber, and has unfortunately become a rallying point - guaranteed to give the chamber even more fuel


Abuse Of Power (the Trump/Zelensky quid pro quo/bribe/extortion)

Obstruction Of Congress (volumes of fresh evidence exist, recently documented and seen at the public hearings)

...….let the other charge of Obstruction Of Justice wait for another time, chop chop keep it clean

[Centerleftfl]

They are intrinsically connected. Not all but most. And it's all about RUSSIA.

[christiefan915]

Throw EVERYTHING there is at the POS!

There are many other issues/articles that should be introduced as well and I am waiting for a list that is being compiled by author and activist Thom Hartman in order to post it here. We owe it to history to formally name all of the high crimes.

"We owe it to history", perfect.

[Cypress]

I say one single count-one mass throwaway count of obstruction of justice lumped together. Here's why:

If we had a two year impeachment plan I'd be for a thorough kitchen sink strategy to hold him to account for every fucking crime
Trump has committed. I don't, however, think that because the Mueller report invited Congress to do more with his report. It appears to me that
Dems would simply be rubber stamping the report when it was likely expected that we would develop and expound on those facts that
are obstruction which Mueller found when he said "had it been determined that Trump did not commit a crime, we would have so stated"
Unless Dems are prepared (and obviously Repukes are not going to cooperate in doing their duty at all) in developing the 5 acts
of obstruction Mueller studied, we should really let that be or just call all that one count added to the Ukraine clean and obvious crimes.

Opinions?

I leave it to the lawyers and decision makers

I just want a president who will not be laughed out of NATO meetings

I do not think Pence will be laughed out of Europe

[Cinnabar]

I leave it to the lawyers and decision makers

I just want a president who will not be laughed out of NATO meetings

I do not think Pence will be laughed out of Europe

Pence is equally as bad and guilty. Don't sanitize this SOB.

[CFM]

I say one single count-one mass throwaway count of obstruction of justice lumped together. Here's why:

If we had a two year impeachment plan I'd be for a thorough kitchen sink strategy to hold him to account for every fucking crime
Trump has committed. I don't, however, think that because the Mueller report invited Congress to do more with his report. It appears to me that
Dems would simply be rubber stamping the report when it was likely expected that we would develop and expound on those facts that
are obstruction which Mueller found when he said "had it been determined that Trump did not commit a crime, we would have so stated"
Unless Dems are prepared (and obviously Repukes are not going to cooperate in doing their duty at all) in developing the 5 acts
of obstruction Mueller studied, we should really let that be or just call all that one count added to the Ukraine clean and obvious crimes.

Opinions?

He hasn't committed any crimes, boy. That's you dreaming in order to make yourself feel better about getting your ass kicked in 2016.

[CFM]

I leave it to the lawyers and decision makers

I just want a president who will not be laughed out of NATO meetings

I do not think Pence will be laughed out of Europe

What you wanted, and what you got with your black POS, was a President that kissed the asses of NATO members.

[Truth Detector]

Mueller Conclusion

“Because we determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgment, we did not draw ultimate conclusions about the President's conduct. The evidence we obtained about the President's actions and intent presents difficult issues that would need to be resolved if we were making a traditional prosecutorial judgment. At the same time, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state. Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, we are unable to reach that judgment. Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.”

Mueller Report; Page 173 V I: Ultimately, the investigation did not establish that the Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities.

Mueller Report; Page 182 V II:
I. CONCLUSION

Accordingly, ….. this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime…...

[Truth Detector]

I think the obstruction of justice, it shows a pattern.

There has been ZERO obstruction to anything. Yes, the President has executive privilege and he and his staff cannot be compelled to say anything before the House unless, this is the BIG one, a CRIME has been committed. It is called separation of powers. The CONSTITUTION; read it.

[Truth Detector]

simple and direct, don't toss any additional and unnecessary red meat out there for Trump and the right wing echo chamber

Mueller's report listed at least 10 counts of obstruction, true, but that report has been thoroughly tainted by Barr and the rw echo chamber, and has unfortunately become a rallying point - guaranteed to give the chamber even more fuel


Abuse Of Power (the Trump/Zelensky quid pro quo/bribe/extortion)

Obstruction Of Congress (volumes of fresh evidence exist, recently documented and seen at the public hearings)

...….let the other charge of Obstruction Of Justice wait for another time, chop chop keep it clean

Mueller report didn't list anything regarding obstruction. Here is the relevant testimony from Mueller himself:

Representative Doug Collins to Mueller: "at anytime during the investigation was your investigation curtailed, or stopped, or hindered?"

Muller: "no".

CASE CLOSED!

[floridafan]

There has been ZERO obstruction to anything. Yes, the President has executive privilege and he and his staff cannot be compelled to say anything before the House unless, this is the BIG one, a CRIME has been committed. It is called separation of powers. The CONSTITUTION; read it.

Once again you are a lying piece of dog shit

[Truth Detector]

They are intrinsically connected. Not all but most. And it's all about RUSSIA.

Funny how it wasn't about Russia during Obama's reign of error.

Putin and Obama share a laugh at G-20 “thumbs up”

[Truth Detector]

Once again you are a lying piece of dog shit

Once again you need to look into the mirror when you say stupid things like this....and seek out a mental health professional for that mental illness that is causing your TDS.

[floridafan]

Once again you need to look into the mirror when you say stupid things like this....and seek out a mental health professional for that mental illness that is causing your TDS.

I am more than willing to apologize and kiss your ring finger so long as you post the section of the constitution that's backs up your statement.
However, If you cannot I want you to spend a full afternoon giving blow jobs to anyone and everyone.
Fair enough?

[Truth Detector]

I am more than willing to apologize and kiss your ring finger so long as you post the section of the constitution that's backs up your statement.
However, If you cannot I want you to spend a full afternoon giving blow jobs to anyone and everyone.
Fair enough?

I would prefer it if you would bend over and I will just kick the stupidity out of you.

The Constitution does not specifically enumerate the president's right to executive privilege; rather, the concept has evolved over the years as presidents have claimed it. As the courts have ruled on these claims, their decisions have refined the notion of executive privilege and have clarified the instances in which it can be invoked. The courts have ruled that it is implicit in the constitutional Separation of Powers, which assigns discrete powers and rights to the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of government. In reality, however, the three branches enjoy not separate but shared powers, and thus are occasionally in conflict. When the president's wish to keep certain information confidential causes such a conflict, the president might claim the right of executive privilege.
https://legal-dictionary.thefreedict...tive+privilege

Now; fuck off and just kill yourself. You're a nobody. You'll always be a nobody. You're a moron. You will always be a moron. No one will miss you. No one would care. The worlds collective IQ would increase and it would save the valuable oxygen you waste with every breath.