How much Mueller report should be in the impeachment articles and trial?

[floridafan]

There is nothing in your post that says anything about ignoring valid Congressional subpoenas, therefor lets pick an afternoon for your round of blow jobs. I really want to view this spectical.
I would suggest you leave your dentures home that day.

[Micawber]

The collusion with Russia should definitely be included because it shows this is a pattern of behavior.

Lawrence Tribe agrees with you. Good company. It could, however, be averted to and not charged.

[StoneByStone]

Lawrence Tribe agrees with you. Good company. It could, however, be averted to and not charged.

I think he should be charged for both, but it might be better to just use it as evidence, while focusing on the Ukraine bribery as the reason for impeachment.

[Grokmaster]

So now the STALIN-O-CRAT POLTIBURO is GOING TO OVER RIDE ITS OWN SPECIAL COUNSEL, WHO RECOMMENDED ZERO CHARGES?


It will be a hilarious spectacle watching the IDIOTS GET RIPPED TO SHREDS IN THE SENATE, WITH ACTUAL TRIAL RULES IN EFFECT....

[Getin the ring]

How much Mueller report should be in the impeachment articles and trial?
?

as much of it as you want it to be there tiny,

hurry up and get it over to the senate

trump has outplayed you... AGAIN

[StoneByStone]

They found no collusion, so I don't think you want to show a pattern of non-illegal behavior.

[Getin the ring]

Schiff humiliates McCain

as if he could humiliate anyone, he's a pencil neck

[Truth Detector]

I would prefer it if you would bend over and I will just kick the stupidity out of you.

The Constitution does not specifically enumerate the president's right to executive privilege; rather, the concept has evolved over the years as presidents have claimed it. As the courts have ruled on these claims, their decisions have refined the notion of executive privilege and have clarified the instances in which it can be invoked. The courts have ruled that it is implicit in the constitutional Separation of Powers, which assigns discrete powers and rights to the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of government. In reality, however, the three branches enjoy not separate but shared powers, and thus are occasionally in conflict. When the president's wish to keep certain information confidential causes such a conflict, the president might claim the right of executive privilege.
https://legal-dictionary.thefreedict...tive+privilege

Now; fuck off and just kill yourself. You're a nobody. You'll always be a nobody. You're a moron. You will always be a moron. No one will miss you. No one would care. The worlds collective IQ would increase and it would save the valuable oxygen you waste with every breath.

There is nothing in your post that says anything about ignoring valid Congressional subpoenas, therefor lets pick an afternoon for your round of blow jobs. I really want to view this spectical.
I would suggest you leave your dentures home that day.

That is only because there is nothing between your ears to comprehend the obvious. I cannot say I am surprised you're this fucking stupid.

[floridafan]

That is only because there is nothing between your ears to comprehend the obvious. I cannot say I am surprised you're this fucking stupid.

The little ignoramus doesn't even know that a judge recently ruled that a person MUST answer a Congressional subpoena. Once questioned they can then assert executive privilege on those questions pertaining.

[Truth Detector]

The little ignoramus doesn't even know that a judge recently ruled that a person MUST answer a Congressional subpoena. Once questioned they can then assert executive privilege on those questions pertaining.

The gigantic ignoramus doesn't know that a Congressional subpoena without a legal cause can be ignored.

When Obama did it, you morons cheered. STFU< seriously.

[Micawber]

The little ignoramus doesn't even know that a judge recently ruled that a person MUST answer a Congressional subpoena. Once questioned they can then assert executive privilege on those questions pertaining.

But in my legal appreciation class towards my basket weaving degree I received from Trump University I was told to intake Congressional subpoenas by stuffing them in the deep left drawer
next to my whisky flask and never look again. What, is that wrong?

[floridafan]

The gigantic ignoramus doesn't know that a Congressional subpoena without a legal cause can be ignored.

When Obama did it, you morons cheered. STFU< seriously.

Thats total bullshit my dear. Please don't pretend to have any legal knowledge. You will embarrass the profession.

[Sailor]

Thats total bullshit my dear. Please don't pretend to have any legal knowledge. You will embarrass the profession.

As if you know anything about this. Please, wannabe lawyer/politician, tell the board what the penalties are for ignoring a Congressional subpoena. Be specific. It is laughably unenforceable. Once again Congress shows what little power they actually have.

[floridafan]

As if you know anything about this. Please, wannabe lawyer/politician, tell the board what the penalties are for ignoring a Congressional subpoena. Be specific. It is laughably unenforceable. Once again Congress shows what little power they actually have.

Impeachment for contempt of congress. Is that unenforceable? Does this show congress has little power?

[CharacterAssassin]

They found no collusion, so I don't think you want to show a pattern of non-illegal behavior.

The Mueller Report demonstrates and established arkloads of collusion.

You wouldn't know. You haven't read it.