Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 79

Thread: Long Awaited Much Anticipated Big Day For Republicans: Hunter Is Guilty!

  1. #16 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    183,528
    Thanks
    71,923
    Thanked 35,503 Times in 27,049 Posts
    Groans
    53
    Groaned 19,565 Times in 18,156 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default

    Court Case
    DNC v. RNC Consent Decree
    Facebook

    Twitter

    Share

    In 1982, after caging in predominantly African-American and Latino neighborhoods, the Republican National Committee and New Jersey Republican State Committee entered into a consent decree with their Democratic party counterparts.

    Published: November 5, 2016

    Gerrymandering & Fair Representation
    Redistricting
    In 1982, after caging in predominantly African-American and Latino neighborhoods, the Republican National Committee and New Jersey Republican State Committee entered into a consent decree with their Democratic party counterparts. Under that decree and its 1987 successor, the Republican party organizations agreed to allow a federal court to review proposed “ballot security” programs, including any proposed voter caging.
    The consent decree has been invoked several times, by the parties to the decree and by others. In late 2008, the Democratic National Committee and Obama for America sought to enforce the consent decree, claiming that the RNC had not submitted alleged ballot security operations for review. After the election, the RNC asked the federal court to vacate or substantially modify the decree. The court denied the RNC's motion to vacate the consent decree and ordered the decree remain in effect until December 2017. The RNC then appealed to the Third Circuit, which unanimously rejected the appeal and affirmed the District Court's decision. A subsequent petition for rehearing en banc by the full Third Circuit, and a certiorari petition to U.S. Supreme Court, were denied.
    On October 26, 2016, the DNC filed a motion asking that the court find the RNC had violated the decree. On November 5, after abbreviated discovery, the district court denied the DNC’s request, ruling that the DNC had not provided sufficient evidence of coordination between the Trump campaign and the RNC on ballot-security operations, but will allow the DNC to offer further evidence after the election.
    Click here to learn more about voter caging.
    Click here to learn more about ballot security programs.
    Related Court Documents
    2016
    Order Denying Request to Extend Decree (November 5, 2016)
    RNC's Memorandum in Opposition to Order to Show Cause (October 31, 2016)
    DNC's Memorandum in Support of Order to Show Cause (October 26, 2016)
    2012
    Petition for Rehearing (March 22, 2012)
    Third Circuit Opinion (March 8, 2012)
    2009
    Debevoise Order (December 1, 2009)
    Debevoise Opinion (December 1, 2009)
    RNC Post-Hearing Brief (June 26, 2009)
    DNC Post-Hearing Brief (June 26, 2009)
    RNC Reply Brief (February 19, 2009)
    DNC Brief Opposing Motion to Vacate (January 19, 2009)
    RNC Brief in Support of Motion (November 3, 2008)
    2008 (several states)
    DNC Brief (November 3, 2008)
    DNC Brief Atty. Certification of Exhibits (November 3, 2008)
    OFA Intervention Memo (November 3, 2008)
    Minute Entry (November 3, 2008)
    2004 (Ohio)
    Malone Dismissal (February 3, 2005)
    Malone en banc Decision (November 9, 2004)
    Malone Appellate Decision (November 1, 2004)
    Malone Order (November 1, 2004)
    Malone Intervenor PI brief (November 1, 2004)
    Malone Intervenor Complaint (October 31, 2004)
    Malone Memo in Support of Intervention (October 28, 2004)
    Malone Motion to Intervene (October 28, 2004)
    2004 (South Dakota)
    Daschle Temporary Restraining Order (November 2, 2004)
    Daschle SD Complaint (November 1, 2004)
    2002 (New Jersey)
    Order (October 31, 2002)
    1990 (North Carolina)
    Order (November 5, 1990)
    1987 (several states)
    Consent Decree (July 27, 1987)
    Original 1981 case (New Jersey)
    Consent Decree (November 1, 1982)
    Complaint (February 11, 1982)

  2. #17 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    34,430
    Thanks
    23,941
    Thanked 19,095 Times in 13,072 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 5,908 Times in 5,169 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Hello evince,

    Quote Originally Posted by evince View Post
    Donald Trump fined $2m for misusing charity for political ends
    New York judge also signed off on agreement to close the Trump Foundation and distribute $1.7m remaining funds to not-for-profits



    Donald Trump admitted to personally misusing Trump Foundation funds and agreed to pay back $11,525 he spent on sports memorabilia and champagne.

    Donald Trump has been ordered by a judge to pay $2m in damages for illegally using funds intended for charity to boost his 2016 presidential election campaign.


    The US president admitted to personally misusing the money, according to New York’s attorney general, despite having previously denied any wrongdoing.
    The humiliating fine adds to Trump’s woes that include several investigations into allegations that he is using public office for self-enrichment, as well as an impeachment inquiry by the House of Representatives.
    The attorney general in New York filed a lawsuit last year alleging Trump and his three eldest children - Don Jr, Ivanka and Eric - broke campaign finance laws in 2016 by using the Donald J Trump Foundation’s tax-exempt status “as little more than a checkbook to serve Mr Trump’s business and political interests”.

    Trump couldn't be prosecuted if he shot someone on Fifth Avenue, lawyer claims
    Read more

    There was “a shocking pattern of illegality involving the Trump Foundation – including unlawful coordination with the Trump presidential campaign, repeated and willful self-dealing, and much more,” the suit argued.
    What a conman!
    Personal Ignore Policy PIP: I like civil discourse. I will give you all the respect in the world if you respect me. Mouth off to me, or express overt racism, you will be PERMANENTLY Ignore Listed. Zero tolerance. No exceptions. I'll never read a word you write, even if quoted by another, nor respond to you, nor participate in your threads. ... Ignore the shallow. Cherish the thoughtful. Long Live Civil Discourse, Mutual Respect, and Good Debate! ps: Feel free to adopt my PIP. It works well.

  3. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to PoliTalker For This Post:

    evince (12-05-2019), ThatOwlWoman (12-05-2019)

  4. #18 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    34,430
    Thanks
    23,941
    Thanked 19,095 Times in 13,072 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 5,908 Times in 5,169 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Hello evince,

    Quote Originally Posted by evince View Post
    Imagine any other American president being fined for spending "charity money" on booze and personal toys as well as His campaign


    and Not getting removed for that alone
    If it was a Dem they would be sharpening the pitchforks.
    Personal Ignore Policy PIP: I like civil discourse. I will give you all the respect in the world if you respect me. Mouth off to me, or express overt racism, you will be PERMANENTLY Ignore Listed. Zero tolerance. No exceptions. I'll never read a word you write, even if quoted by another, nor respond to you, nor participate in your threads. ... Ignore the shallow. Cherish the thoughtful. Long Live Civil Discourse, Mutual Respect, and Good Debate! ps: Feel free to adopt my PIP. It works well.

  5. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to PoliTalker For This Post:

    evince (12-05-2019), ThatOwlWoman (12-05-2019)

  6. #19 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    183,528
    Thanks
    71,923
    Thanked 35,503 Times in 27,049 Posts
    Groans
    53
    Groaned 19,565 Times in 18,156 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default

    DECADES!



    there is no like record in our court system for the Democratic party

    the vast majority of these cases are against republicans and their party


    this long case after case history I posted ONLY involved the cases where the republicans worked to KICK BLACK VOTERS OFF THE VOTING ROLES ILLEGALLY


    THOSE VOTERS WERE LEGAL VOTERS THEY CHEATED OUT OF THEIR RIGHTS TO VOTE



    republicans have INSISTED that black voters hate them

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to evince For This Post:

    ThatOwlWoman (12-05-2019)

  8. #20 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    183,528
    Thanks
    71,923
    Thanked 35,503 Times in 27,049 Posts
    Groans
    53
    Groaned 19,565 Times in 18,156 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

  9. #21 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    183,528
    Thanks
    71,923
    Thanked 35,503 Times in 27,049 Posts
    Groans
    53
    Groaned 19,565 Times in 18,156 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default

    The 2002 New Hampshire Senate election phone jamming scandal involved the use of a telemarketing firm hired by that state's Republican Party (NHGOP) for election tampering. The tampering involved using a call center to jam the phone lines of a get out the vote (GOTV) operation. In the end, 900 calls were made for 45 minutes of disruption to the Democratic-leaning call centers.
    During that state's 2002 election for the United States Senate seat being vacated by Republican Bob Smith, the NHGOP hired GOP Marketplace, based in northern Virginia, to jam another phone bank being used by the state Democratic Party and the firefighters' union for efforts to turn out voters on behalf of then-Governor of New Hampshire Jeanne Shaheen on Election Day. John E. Sununu, the Republican nominee, won a narrow victory. In addition to criminal prosecutions, disclosures in the case have come from a civil suit filed by the state's Democratic Party against the state's Republican Party (now settled).
    Four men were convicted of, or pleaded guilty to, federal crimes and sentenced to prison for their involvement. One conviction was reversed by an appeals court, a decision prosecutors are appealing. James Tobin, freed on appeal, was later indicted on charges of lying to the FBI during the original investigation.

  10. #22 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    183,528
    Thanks
    71,923
    Thanked 35,503 Times in 27,049 Posts
    Groans
    53
    Groaned 19,565 Times in 18,156 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

  11. #23 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    183,528
    Thanks
    71,923
    Thanked 35,503 Times in 27,049 Posts
    Groans
    53
    Groaned 19,565 Times in 18,156 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default

    On December 7, 2006, the George W. Bush administration's Department of Justice ordered the unprecedented[1] midterm dismissal of seven United States Attorneys. Congressional investigations focused on whether the Department of Justice and the White House were using the U.S. Attorney positions for political advantage. Allegations were that some of the attorneys were targeted for dismissal to impede investigations of Republican politicians or that some were targeted for their failure to initiate investigations that would damage Democratic politicians or hamper Democratic-leaning voters.[2][3] The U.S. attorneys were replaced with interim appointees, under provisions in the 2005 USA PATRIOT Act reauthorization.[4][5][6][7][8]
    A subsequent report by the Justice Department Inspector General in October 2008 found that the process used to fire the first seven attorneys and two others dismissed around the same time was "arbitrary", "fundamentally flawed", and "raised doubts about the integrity of Department prosecution decisions".[9] In July 2010, the Department of Justice prosecutors closed the two-year investigation without filing charges after determining that the firing was inappropriately political, but not criminal, saying "Evidence did not demonstrate that any prosecutable criminal offense was committed with regard to the removal of David Iglesias. The investigative team also determined that the evidence did not warrant expanding the scope of the investigation beyond the removal of Iglesias."[10]

  12. #24 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    183,528
    Thanks
    71,923
    Thanked 35,503 Times in 27,049 Posts
    Groans
    53
    Groaned 19,565 Times in 18,156 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default

    Dismissed attorneys and elections[edit]
    See also: Pete Domenici, Heather Wilson, and Bradley Schlozman
    The controversy surrounding the U.S. Attorneys dismissals was often linked to elections or voter-fraud issues. Allegations were that some of the U.S. Attorneys were dismissed for failing to instigate investigations damaging to Democratic politicians, or for failing to more aggressively pursue voter-fraud cases.[3][35] Such allegations were made by some of the dismissed U.S. Attorneys themselves to suggest reasons they may have been dismissed.[36] The background to the allegations is the recent tendency for elections in parts of the United States to be very close; an election outcome can be affected by an announced investigation of a politician. It is explicit policy of the Department of Justice to avoid bringing voter-related cases during an election for this reason.[37] In September 2008, the Inspector General for the Department of Justice concluded that some of the dismissals were motivated by the refusal of some of the U.S. Attorneys to prosecute voter fraud cases during the 2006 election cycle.[9]

  13. #25 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    34,430
    Thanks
    23,941
    Thanked 19,095 Times in 13,072 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 5,908 Times in 5,169 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Sorry about this long post. There was no way to fit this one into a smaller post:

    A List of Lawsuits Involving President Trump:

    Lawsuits around United States Constitution

    Lawsuit alleging violations of the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
    Knight First Amendment Institute v. Trump[1]
    PEN America v. Trump
    CNN v. Trump
    Lawsuit alleging violations of the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
    New York v. Trump (the DACA lawsuit)
    Lawsuit alleging violations of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
    Stone v. Trump
    Lawsuits alleging violations of the Foreign Emoluments Clause of the United States Constitution
    CREW v. Trump
    D.C. and Maryland v. Trump[2][3][4]
    Blumenthal v. Trump

    Lawsuits around Executive Orders

    Legal challenges to Executive Order 13768, regarding sanctuary cities
    City and County of San Francisco v. Trump
    City of Chelsea v. Trump[5]
    Legal challenges to Executive Order 13769, regarding temporary immigration restrictions
    Aziz v. Trump
    Darweesh v. Trump
    Doe v. Trump
    Louhghalam v. Trump
    Mohammed v. United States
    Sarsour v. Trump
    Washington v. Trump
    Legal challenges to Executive Order 13780, a revised order on temporary immigration restrictions
    Hawaii v. Trump
    International Refugee Assistance Project v. Trump
    Washington v. Trump

    Lawsuit around Presidential Proclamations

    Legal challenge to Presidential Proclamation "Addressing Mass Migration Through the Southern Border of the United States" ("Proclamation") 83 Fed. Reg. 57,661, which expressly invokes 8 U.S.C. § 1182
    East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Trump[6]

    Lawsuits around Presidential Memorandums

    Lawsuits regarding Presidential Memorandum on Military Service by Transgender Individuals by Donald Trump (August 25, 2017)
    Jane Doe v. Trump[7]
    Stone v. Trump
    Karnoski v. Trump
    Stockman v. Trump[8]

    Lawsuits around potential legal violations


    Lawsuit alleging violations of the Presidential Records Act of 1978, 44 U.S.C. §§ 2201–2207
    CREW and National Security Archive v. Trump and EOP
    Lawsuits challenging Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity alleging violations of the Federal Advisory Committee Act
    ACLU v. Trump and Pence
    Joyner v. Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity
    NAACP v. Trump
    Lawsuit alleging violation of 12 U.S.C. § 5491(b)(5)(B), a component of the Dodd–Frank Act of 2010
    English v. Trump

    Lawsuits around the United States Census

    Regarding the 2020 United States Census[9][10]
    Department of Commerce v. New York
    New York Immigration Coalition v. United States Department of Commerce

    Lawsuits around Trump political campaigns

    Lawsuit alleging that the Trump Campaign used mass, unsolicited communication of promotional messages that the plaintiffs did not consent to receive[11]
    Thorne v. Donald J Trump for President Inc.
    Lawsuit alleging Russian interference in the 2016 Federal Elections, the Trump campaign was accused of engaging in a racketeering enterprise in conjunction with Russia and WikiLeaks
    Democratic National Committee v. Russian Federation (dismissed)

    Lawsuit regarding a pattern of persistent illegal conduct, occurring over more than a decade, that includes extensive unlawful political coordination with the Trump presidential campaign, repeated and willful self-dealing transactions to benefit Mr. Trump’s personal and business interests, and violations of basic legal obligations for non-profit foundations
    State of NY v. The Trump Foundation[12]

    Lawsuit in which plaintiffs alleged Trump's security team assaulted them during a 2015 peaceful protest based around Trump's campaign comments about Black Lives Matter and Mexican immigrants
    Galicia v. Trump[13]
    Lawsuit alleging Trump encouraged an atmosphere of violence and anti-Trump protesters were subjected to attacks and racial slurs being led out of a campaign rally in 2016
    Nwanguma v. Trump[14]

    Lawsuits around potential sexual misconduct and assault
    Further information: Donald Trump sexual misconduct allegations


    Lawsuit by Katie Johnson which alleges that Trump and Jeffrey Epstein sexually and physically abused her under threats to physically harm her and her family while a 13-year-old minor from June–September 1994
    Katie Johnson v. Donald J Trump and Jeffrey E Epstein[15] (dismissed)
    Lawsuit by Jane Doe which alleges Trump and Epstein engaged in forcible rape, imprisonment and assault while she was 13-year-old minor and another 12-year-old girl in 1994
    Jane Doe v. Donald Trump & Jeffrey E Epstein[16] (dismissed by Doe)[17][18]
    Lawsuit by former campaign staffer, Alva Johnson, who claims that Trump forcibly kissed her at a rally in Florida in August 2016, the lawsuit also alleges unequal pay standards for her an African-American woman compared to others on the team
    Johnson v. Trump[19]
    Defamation lawsuit raised by Summer Zervos which arose from Trump's statement that she lied about sexual assault allegations against him
    Zervos v. Trump[20]
    Defamation lawsuit raised by E. Jean Carroll which arose from Trump's denials of her accusation that he sexually assaulted her more than 20 years ago damaged her reputation
    Carroll v. Trump[21]

    Lawsuits around financial manipulation and employee payment

    Lawsuit alleging violations of employee payment regarding not paying him for "thousands of hours of overtime" to which he was legally entitled during his more than two decades of service
    Cintron v. Trump Organization[22][23]

    Lawsuit alleging that Trump and his adult children had made a large amount of money by encouraging unsophisticated investors to join fraudulent schemes
    Doe et al. v. Trump Corp. et al.[24]

    Lawsuits around Trumps financial and tax information

    Appeal lawsuit against the Mazars accounting firm, in an effort to have Trump's financial information kept private
    Trump et al v. Mazars et al[25]
    Appeal lawsuit against the Deutsche Bank and Capital One Bank from fulfilling the subpoenas issued to the company by the House Financial Services and Intelligence committees for Trumps, his adult children, and his businesses financial records
    Trump et al v. Deutsche Bank et al[26]
    Case in D.C. court challenging the New York TRUST Act, which gives Congress the right to obtain tax information on New York residents. Case dismissed November 11, 2019.
    Donald J. Trump v. Committee on Ways and Means, et al.[27]

    Lawsuits around environmental concerns

    Lawsuit brought by Our Children's Trust using the public trust doctrine to address the effects of global warming.[28][29]
    Juliana v. United States

    All current pending prosecution

    Pending prosecution of Roger Stone (Roger J. Stone Jr.) by the United States Attorney for the District of Columbia, expected November 2019[30]
    Pending prosecution of former Paul Manafort associate Gregory B. Craig for lying to the Justice Department about work he did for the government of Ukraine by the United States Attorney for the District of Columbia[30]
    Pending criminal prosecution of Paul Manafort on state mortgage fraud charges by the New York County District Attorney[30]
    Orestes Fintiklis, majority owner of former-Trump International Hotel & Tower Panama regarding tax evasion.[31][32][33][34][35]
    ACN Inc. (American Communications Network)[36]


    Great candidate ya got there, Republicans. Did you clean your tool after scraping the bottom of the barrel?
    Personal Ignore Policy PIP: I like civil discourse. I will give you all the respect in the world if you respect me. Mouth off to me, or express overt racism, you will be PERMANENTLY Ignore Listed. Zero tolerance. No exceptions. I'll never read a word you write, even if quoted by another, nor respond to you, nor participate in your threads. ... Ignore the shallow. Cherish the thoughtful. Long Live Civil Discourse, Mutual Respect, and Good Debate! ps: Feel free to adopt my PIP. It works well.

  14. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to PoliTalker For This Post:

    evince (12-05-2019), ThatOwlWoman (12-05-2019), Trumpet (12-05-2019)

  15. #26 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Posts
    28,403
    Thanks
    26,104
    Thanked 11,856 Times in 8,415 Posts
    Groans
    18
    Groaned 2,290 Times in 2,172 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by evince View Post
    Donald Trump fined $2m for misusing charity for political ends
    New York judge also signed off on agreement to close the Trump Foundation and distribute $1.7m remaining funds to not-for-profits



    Donald Trump admitted to personally misusing Trump Foundation funds and agreed to pay back $11,525 he spent on sports memorabilia and champagne.

    Donald Trump has been ordered by a judge to pay $2m in damages for illegally using funds intended for charity to boost his 2016 presidential election campaign.


    The US president admitted to personally misusing the money, according to New York’s attorney general, despite having previously denied any wrongdoing.
    The humiliating fine adds to Trump’s woes that include several investigations into allegations that he is using public office for self-enrichment, as well as an impeachment inquiry by the House of Representatives.
    The attorney general in New York filed a lawsuit last year alleging Trump and his three eldest children - Don Jr, Ivanka and Eric - broke campaign finance laws in 2016 by using the Donald J Trump Foundation’s tax-exempt status “as little more than a checkbook to serve Mr Trump’s business and political interests”.

    Trump couldn't be prosecuted if he shot someone on Fifth Avenue, lawyer claims
    Read more

    There was “a shocking pattern of illegality involving the Trump Foundation – including unlawful coordination with the Trump presidential campaign, repeated and willful self-dealing, and much more,” the suit argued.
    And to think, on how much noise that the GOP House Republicans made about the Clinton Foundation, which turned into nothing.

  16. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Trumpet For This Post:

    evince (12-05-2019), PoliTalker (12-05-2019), ThatOwlWoman (12-05-2019)

  17. #27 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Posts
    28,403
    Thanks
    26,104
    Thanked 11,856 Times in 8,415 Posts
    Groans
    18
    Groaned 2,290 Times in 2,172 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PoliTalker View Post
    Sorry about this long post. There was no way to fit this one into a smaller post:

    A List of Lawsuits Involving Donald Trump:

    Lawsuits around United States Constitution

    Lawsuit alleging violations of the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
    Knight First Amendment Institute v. Trump[1]
    PEN America v. Trump
    CNN v. Trump
    Lawsuit alleging violations of the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
    New York v. Trump (the DACA lawsuit)
    Lawsuit alleging violations of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
    Stone v. Trump
    Lawsuits alleging violations of the Foreign Emoluments Clause of the United States Constitution
    CREW v. Trump
    D.C. and Maryland v. Trump[2][3][4]
    Blumenthal v. Trump

    Lawsuits around Executive Orders

    Legal challenges to Executive Order 13768, regarding sanctuary cities
    City and County of San Francisco v. Trump
    City of Chelsea v. Trump[5]
    Legal challenges to Executive Order 13769, regarding temporary immigration restrictions
    Aziz v. Trump
    Darweesh v. Trump
    Doe v. Trump
    Louhghalam v. Trump
    Mohammed v. United States
    Sarsour v. Trump
    Washington v. Trump
    Legal challenges to Executive Order 13780, a revised order on temporary immigration restrictions
    Hawaii v. Trump
    International Refugee Assistance Project v. Trump
    Washington v. Trump

    Lawsuit around Presidential Proclamations

    Legal challenge to Presidential Proclamation "Addressing Mass Migration Through the Southern Border of the United States" ("Proclamation") 83 Fed. Reg. 57,661, which expressly invokes 8 U.S.C. § 1182
    East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Trump[6]

    Lawsuits around Presidential Memorandums

    Lawsuits regarding Presidential Memorandum on Military Service by Transgender Individuals by Donald Trump (August 25, 2017)
    Jane Doe v. Trump[7]
    Stone v. Trump
    Karnoski v. Trump
    Stockman v. Trump[8]

    Lawsuits around potential legal violations

    Lawsuit alleging violations of the Presidential Records Act of 1978, 44 U.S.C. §§ 2201–2207
    CREW and National Security Archive v. Trump and EOP
    Lawsuits challenging Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity alleging violations of the Federal Advisory Committee Act
    ACLU v. Trump and Pence
    Joyner v. Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity
    NAACP v. Trump
    Lawsuit alleging violation of 12 U.S.C. § 5491(b)(5)(B), a component of the Dodd–Frank Act of 2010
    English v. Trump

    Lawsuits around the United States Census

    Regarding the 2020 United States Census[9][10]
    Department of Commerce v. New York
    New York Immigration Coalition v. United States Department of Commerce

    Lawsuits around Trump political campaigns

    Lawsuit alleging that the Trump Campaign used mass, unsolicited communication of promotional messages that the plaintiffs did not consent to receive[11]
    Thorne v. Donald J Trump for President Inc.
    Lawsuit alleging Russian interference in the 2016 Federal Elections, the Trump campaign was accused of engaging in a racketeering enterprise in conjunction with Russia and WikiLeaks
    Democratic National Committee v. Russian Federation (dismissed)

    Lawsuit regarding a pattern of persistent illegal conduct, occurring over more than a decade, that includes extensive unlawful political coordination with the Trump presidential campaign, repeated and willful self-dealing transactions to benefit Mr. Trump’s personal and business interests, and violations of basic legal obligations for non-profit foundations
    State of NY v. The Trump Foundation[12]

    Lawsuit in which plaintiffs alleged Trump's security team assaulted them during a 2015 peaceful protest based around Trump's campaign comments about Black Lives Matter and Mexican immigrants
    Galicia v. Trump[13]
    Lawsuit alleging Trump encouraged an atmosphere of violence and anti-Trump protesters were subjected to attacks and racial slurs being led out of a campaign rally in 2016
    Nwanguma v. Trump[14]

    Lawsuits around potential sexual misconduct and assault
    Further information: Donald Trump sexual misconduct allegations

    Lawsuit by Katie Johnson which alleges that Trump and Jeffrey Epstein sexually and physically abused her under threats to physically harm her and her family while a 13-year-old minor from June–September 1994
    Katie Johnson v. Donald J Trump and Jeffrey E Epstein[15] (dismissed)
    Lawsuit by Jane Doe which alleges Trump and Epstein engaged in forcible rape, imprisonment and assault while she was 13-year-old minor and another 12-year-old girl in 1994
    Jane Doe v. Donald Trump & Jeffrey E Epstein[16] (dismissed by Doe)[17][18]
    Lawsuit by former campaign staffer, Alva Johnson, who claims that Trump forcibly kissed her at a rally in Florida in August 2016, the lawsuit also alleges unequal pay standards for her an African-American woman compared to others on the team
    Johnson v. Trump[19]
    Defamation lawsuit raised by Summer Zervos which arose from Trump's statement that she lied about sexual assault allegations against him
    Zervos v. Trump[20]
    Defamation lawsuit raised by E. Jean Carroll which arose from Trump's denials of her accusation that he sexually assaulted her more than 20 years ago damaged her reputation
    Carroll v. Trump[21]

    Lawsuits around financial manipulation and employee payment

    Lawsuit alleging violations of employee payment regarding not paying him for "thousands of hours of overtime" to which he was legally entitled during his more than two decades of service
    Cintron v. Trump Organization[22][23]

    Lawsuit alleging that Trump and his adult children had made a large amount of money by encouraging unsophisticated investors to join fraudulent schemes
    Doe et al. v. Trump Corp. et al.[24]

    Lawsuits around Trumps financial and tax information

    Appeal lawsuit against the Mazars accounting firm, in an effort to have Trump's financial information kept private
    Trump et al v. Mazars et al[25]
    Appeal lawsuit against the Deutsche Bank and Capital One Bank from fulfilling the subpoenas issued to the company by the House Financial Services and Intelligence committees for Trumps, his adult children, and his businesses financial records
    Trump et al v. Deutsche Bank et al[26]
    Case in D.C. court challenging the New York TRUST Act, which gives Congress the right to obtain tax information on New York residents. Case dismissed November 11, 2019.
    Donald J. Trump v. Committee on Ways and Means, et al.[27]

    Lawsuits around environmental concerns

    Lawsuit brought by Our Children's Trust using the public trust doctrine to address the effects of global warming.[28][29]
    Juliana v. United States

    All current pending prosecution

    Pending prosecution of Roger Stone (Roger J. Stone Jr.) by the United States Attorney for the District of Columbia, expected November 2019[30]
    Pending prosecution of former Paul Manafort associate Gregory B. Craig for lying to the Justice Department about work he did for the government of Ukraine by the United States Attorney for the District of Columbia[30]
    Pending criminal prosecution of Paul Manafort on state mortgage fraud charges by the New York County District Attorney[30]
    Orestes Fintiklis, majority owner of former-Trump International Hotel & Tower Panama regarding tax evasion.[31][32][33][34][35]
    ACN Inc. (American Communications Network)[36]
    All of this speaks loudly of Donald Trump and Family's characters.

  18. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Trumpet For This Post:

    evince (12-05-2019), PoliTalker (12-05-2019), ThatOwlWoman (12-05-2019)

  19. #28 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    183,528
    Thanks
    71,923
    Thanked 35,503 Times in 27,049 Posts
    Groans
    53
    Groaned 19,565 Times in 18,156 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default

    Congressional report clears ACORN of wrongdoing — after ...
    https://www.rawstory.com/2010/06/pre...t-clears-acorn

    Congressional report clears ACORN of wrongdoing — after group forced to disband – Raw Story When a duo of right-wing provocateurs posing as a pimp …
    Brooklyn Prosecutors Clear ACORN of Wrongdoing
    https://www.outsidethebeltway.com/br..._of_wrongdoing

    Mar 02, 2010 · The District Attorney’s office in Brooklyn has concluded a four-month investigation into ACORN based on the infamous tapes by James O’Keefe and has cleared the organization of wrongdoing.
    B'klyn ACORN cleared over giving illegal advice on how to ...
    https://www.nydailynews.com/news/cri...al-advice-hide...

    Brooklyn prosecutors on Monday cleared ACORN of criminal wrongdoing after a four-month probe that began when undercover conservative activists filmed workers giving what appeared to be illegal...
    Author: SCOTT SHIFREL

    Right-wing boogieman ACORN cleared of wrong doing in ...
    https://liberalmedianot.blogspot.com...leared-of.html

    Right-wing boogieman ACORN cleared of wrong doing ... Petition drive to put the Fair Affordable Insuranc... Rogers continues to deny the fact that global warm... Opponents of workplace smoking ban rolling out deb... Workplace smoking ban could move this week: only a... A love of the law and public service leads Whitmer...
    ACORN cleared of wrongdoing, O'Keefe pimp tapes were a ...
    https://www.shroomery.org/forums/sho...umber/12351556

    Feb 11, 2004 · ACORN cleared of wrongdoing, O'Keefe pimp tapes were a hoax. - Political Discussion - Shroomery Message Board Link Quote: Immediately following release of the ACORN tapes conservative media (most notably Fox News) promoted the videos as proof that ACORN was engaging in conduct to aid the sex trafficking Shroomery - Magic Mushrooms Demystified
    ACORN 2009 undercover videos controversy - Wikipedia
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ACORN_...os_controversy

    In 2009, workers at offices of the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN), a non-profit organization that had been involved for nearly 40 years in voter registration, community organizing and advocacy for low- and moderate-income people, were secretly recorded by conservative activists Hannah Giles and James O'Keefe – and the videos "heavily edited" to create a misleading …
    Fox Failed to Vet O'Keefe's Deceptively Edited Video and ...
    https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/co...es_deceptively...

    Apr 08, 2010 · ACORN was not "cleared of wrongdoing". The authorities simply decided that the video was not sufficient evidence to pursue a lega case against it. The video itself shows "wrongdoing", although perhaps not of the illegal variety.
    ACORN cleared in Brooklyn: 'No criminality' - POLITICO
    https://www.politico.com/blogs/ben-s...in-brooklyn-no...

    ACORN cleared in Brooklyn: 'No criminality'. The three had been secretly videotaped by two people posing as a pimp and prostitute, who came to ACORN’S Brooklyn office, seeking advice about how to purchase a house with money generated by their ‘business.’ The ‘couple’ later made the recording public. That investigation is now concluded and no criminality has been found.
    ACORN plans to shut down - CNN.com

  20. The Following User Says Thank You to evince For This Post:

    ThatOwlWoman (12-05-2019)

  21. #29 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    183,528
    Thanks
    71,923
    Thanked 35,503 Times in 27,049 Posts
    Groans
    53
    Groaned 19,565 Times in 18,156 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default

    The republican party SMEARED and MURDERED ACORN because they registered black, latino and poor whites to vote

    ACORN was cleared of ANY wrong doing

  22. The Following User Says Thank You to evince For This Post:

    PoliTalker (12-05-2019)

  23. #30 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    183,528
    Thanks
    71,923
    Thanked 35,503 Times in 27,049 Posts
    Groans
    53
    Groaned 19,565 Times in 18,156 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default

    THERE IS NO LIKE RECORD IN THE COURTS FOR THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY FOLKS


    tiny little cases of some local shit bird being caught taking money or the like is all you will find



    The republicans have cheated for decades to win elections

  24. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to evince For This Post:

    ThatOwlWoman (12-05-2019), Trumpet (12-05-2019)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-06-2019, 11:18 AM
  2. APP - ****My long awaited Mueller predictions and analysis****
    By canceled.2021.1 in forum Above Plain Politics Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-25-2019, 07:41 AM
  3. Republicans going low and long on this Kav deal.
    By Micawber in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-27-2018, 12:43 PM
  4. Release of long-awaited Clinton probe review set
    By hvilleherb in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 06-08-2018, 07:45 AM
  5. Sebelius: no more delay anticipated
    By Big Money in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-31-2013, 03:42 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •