Pelosi announcement: Its official. Articles of impeachment being drafted.

[Truth Detector]

Perhaps the “lawyer” can explain the difference between “here” and “hear.”

[Truth Detector]

Hello Jarod,



Yes. If we really want to get to the bottom of the story, which Republicans do not, we need to subpoena:

Trump
Bolton
Giuliani
Mulvaney
McGahn
Pompeo
Barr
Parnas
OMB
State
WH Staff
Perry
Pence
Nunes
Defense Dept

That's where it needs to go next. Enough of this BS about hearsay witnesses.

Then, after we've heard from all of those first hand witnesses, there will probably be some more names that come up.

So we need to hear from them, too, in another round.

And I see no reason to wait until it goes to the Senate. I don't like the rush. The House needs to just slow down and keep this thing popping, keep it in the news. You know how Republicans are. They believe anything if they hear it enough. All we have to do is sell them the truth at the price of their party power. They don't like the deal but we have to guilt them into it because it's the right thing to do. We can not back down. This is about the Constitution. It's serious. We have to get through to them. It took a while for Nixon, too. Stay the course. He's guilty and we know it. We've got him and we can't let him up.

There has got to be so much more dirt. We need to dig and get it. WE already have more than enough but Republicans still are not convinced. So slow down and dig up more. You know it's there. Get the financials. Now is the time. He's on the ropes. It's time for the knock-out punch. This is no time to release control of it. That needle has got to move.

What we really need to do is institutionalize morons like you and keep them away from our kids.

[Phantasmal]

Hello Jarod,



Yes. If we really want to get to the bottom of the story, which Republicans do not, we need to subpoena:

Trump
Bolton
Giuliani
Mulvaney
McGahn
Pompeo
Barr
Parnas
OMB
State
WH Staff
Perry
Pence
Nuneso
Defense Dept

That's where it needs to go next. Enough of this BS about hearsay witnesses.

Then, after we've heard from all of those first hand witnesses, there will probably be some more names that come up.

So we need to hear from them, too, in another round.

And I see no reason to wait until it goes to the Senate. I don't like the rush. The House needs to just slow down and keep this thing popping, keep it in the news. You know how Republicans are. They believe anything if they hear it enough. All we have to do is sell them the truth at the price of their party power. They don't like the deal but we have to guilt them into it because it's the right thing to do. We can not back down. This is about the Constitution. It's serious. We have to get through to them. It took a while for Nixon, too. Stay the course. He's guilty and we know it. We've got him and we can't let him up.

There has got to be so much more dirt. We need to dig and get it. WE already have more than enough but Republicans still are not convinced. So slow down and dig up more. You know it's there. Get the financials. Now is the time. He's on the ropes. It's time for the knock-out punch. This is no time to release control of it. That needle has got to move.

Sean Hannity, too

[PoliTalker]

Hi Jarod,

swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in!

Yes.

!!! Swear Him In !!!

[PoliTalker]

Hi Jarod,

swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in! swear him in!

OK, we know Trump fans are never going to yell for that.

Let's get realistic, here.

OK, here's two much more realistic chants, for Trump fans:

LET HIM LIE!!!

WE LOVE LIES!!!

[ziggy]

Democrats had to do something to distract from the IG report on Monday.

[gfm7175]

https://apnews.com/5ff1520d5e5e4159b85172bb635d46e9

https://www.washingtonpost.com/graph...strated/about/

False Authority Fallacy. AP News is not the US Constitution. Neither is the Washington Post. Learn how to form your own arguments.

[gfm7175]

Is that all you can do post stupid questions, being the moron that you are??????

Inversion Fallacy. Insult Fallacy.

[Phantasmal]

False Authority Fallacy. AP News is not the US Constitution. Neither is the Washington Post. Learn how to form your own arguments.

Lol, you’re hilarious. Just admit you can’t comprehend the articles.

[gfm7175]

Lol, you’re hilarious. Just admit you can’t comprehend the articles.

Just admit you can't form your own arguments.

[Loving91390]

you Russians cant understand this conversation

to you there are no real laws

Why don’t you just go and suck Putin’s dick ! BITCH !

[floridafan]

When did Trump "invoke" executive privilege? If they ignore the subpoena, what is the House's remedy?

I am amused by morons and fools who think that Trumps inner circle would give them anything that supports their lie filled narrative. It's almost as stupid and naive as thinking that Trumps tax returns have never been audited.

A person who ignores a lawful subpoena can be jailed by the House.

[floridafan]

Yes. WHAT contempt of congress?? You need to be specific in your examples. At this point, you are merely blurting out words...

Failure to honor a congressional subpoena is grounds for contempt of congress

[Truth Detector]

A person who ignores a lawful subpoena can be jailed by the House.

So why didn't Adam Schiff have them picked up and jailed?

[floridafan]

Yea twit I do. 75% of us hold congress in contempt. Think about it if you have any brain cells left.

But you continue to re elect the same garbage year after year. Doesn't say much for your kind of trash.