Pelosi announcement: Its official. Articles of impeachment being drafted.

[PostmodernProphet]

Only for your kind.

yes......its a mark of superiority.......

[floridafan]

A basis for the courts to determine in this case

Nothing to determine, a lawful congressional subpoena cannot be ignored. One court has just recently confirmed that.

[PoliTalker]

Hello Southern Chicken,

Not when they are potentially crossing the powers given to the other branches of government. The courts will be needed in this case. Separation of powers is what you need to research.

No dispute. We are saying the same thing.

[floridafan]

In this case they don't. Their power is being challenged.

Would you prove that to us?

[PostmodernProphet]

They have the power to incarcerate.

????no they don't.....they have the "power" to ask the courts to incarcerate.....

[Getin the ring]

I can't wait for the Senate trial,

the witnesses forced to testify will be like watching rats hide under a rug

[Southern Chicken]

They have the power to incarcerate.

Nothing to determine, a lawful congressional subpoena cannot be ignored. One court has just recently confirmed that.

Where is the supreme court's ruling in this specific case? Care to post it?

[Southern Chicken]

They have the power to incarcerate.

????no they don't.....they have the "power" to ask the courts to incarcerate.....

Indeed

[PoliTalker]

Hello Southern Chicken,

A basis for the courts to determine in this case

It is only that if the President can show that his work is so crucial that it will be materially impacted by compliance with the subpoena.

I would think that if somebody has the time to fire off 50 tweets a day (while not sworn to tell the truth) that he can come answer a few questions under oath.

[floridafan]

????no they don't.....they have the "power" to ask the courts to incarcerate.....

prove it.

[PoliTalker]

Hello Southern Chicken,

In this case they don't. Their power is being challenged.

Your first statement was negated with the first two words of your second.

You essentially admitted that yes, Congress does have that power.

[Getin the ring]

Hello Southern Chicken,



It is only that if the President can show that his work is so crucial that it will be materially impacted by compliance with the subpoena.

I would think that if somebody has the time to fire off 50 tweets a day (while not sworn to tell the truth) that he can come answer a few questions under oath.

your lack of knowledge on almost every topic is astonishing

[floridafan]

Where is the supreme court's ruling in this specific case? Care to post it?

No idea what you are talking about.

[Southern Chicken]

They have the power to incarcerate.

Would you prove that to us?

Sure
https://www.lawfareblog.com/congress...tween-branches

[PostmodernProphet]

Your President did not receive a subpoena, however he has illegally directed his staff to ignore any subpoenas they have received. That is the basis for a Contempt of Congress charge.

lol....thanks for proving your illiteracy........I did not ask if there was ever president that didn't ignore at least one congressional subpoena..........I said has there ever been a presidency........I am specifically referring to an administration.......during the four or eight years of the terms of every president that I can remember congress has attempted to subpoena someone in the administration and the president has directed that person to refuses.......

if that is the basis for impeachment every president at least since the beginning of the 20th Century should have been impeached......