SCOTUS already unanimously rejected the left's dishonest, invalid impeachment case

[NiftyNiblick]

Anybody who defends the vile behavior of our criminal president is himself or herself a vile criminal as well.
All 63,000,000 cretins who voted for the diseased orangutan may be accurately described as mutants well below normal human beings in terms of evolved status.

We don't need a so-called "moderate" or "centrist" Democratic President. Beating Trump isn't nearly enough. We want to notice the difference once he's gone.
For that we need a true Social Democrat that will, two decades late, drag us kicking and screaming into the 21st Century. It's got to be Liz or Bernie, and it's got to be a Social Democratic Congress that puts intelligent bills onto her or his desk.

Otherwise, our Republic will continue its journey swirling down history's toilet.

.

[artichoke]

lets hope he makes it a real case

That would be refreshing. I'm still waiting for any part of this openly fraudulent show trial to venture anywhere NEAR reality.

instead of allowing the republicans to create a clown show

This would be like Democrats preaching against the dangers of taking conspiracy theories seriously. That ship has already sailed...at THEIR HANDS. This ALREADY IS a rage-filled clown show of unprecedented hypocrisy, demagoguery, and butchery of the law. There's nothing left for Republicans to do to it.

that pretends its a trial on the Bidens and Ukraine

Of course. That would remind people that Biden and Obama's crimes are what launched this entire series of hoaxes, and that investigating their crimes isn't worse than them COMMITTING said crimes. We can't have that now.

I guess it depends on if Roberts is Putin owned too

And we're back to parroting Russian misinformation.

Attachment 13088

[artichoke]

... of what crime, exactly?


Inversion Fallacy. LIBERALS are the ones destroying the Constitution, not "Trumpers". Those who like centralized power and control (aka Liberals) are those who desire to DESTROY the Constitution. It gets in the way of their Marxist pipe dream. Liberals already openly reject the whole document, as I will outline below. This is NOT an all inclusive list by any means, but merely offers up a few examples:


** They reject the limits on the legislative powers of Congress. (thus rejecting Article I)

** They reject the executive powers of the President if they happen to not like the President, and they reject the Electoral College. They reject the proper method and reasoning for removing a President from office. They reject the enumerated duties of a President, especially the duties of preserving/defending/protecting the US Constitution. (thus rejecting Article II)

** They reject the scope and role of SCOTUS and other inferior courts. They believe that SCOTUS are the sole interpreters of the US Constitution. They believe that SCOTUS are oligarchs. (thus rejecting Article III)

** They reject the Republican form of government that is guaranteed to the States. They reject protecting the States from invasions and domestic violence (especially when relating to immigration). (thus rejecting Article IV)

** They reject the formal amendment process, and instead regularly misuse the court system as a "work-around" to that. They wish to transform the USA into the SOA (Socialist Oligarchy of America). (thus rejecting Article V)

** They reject legislating in pursuance of the US Constitution. (thus rejecting Article VI)

** They reject that the States (collectively) are the owners of the US Constitution. (thus rejecting Article VII)

** They also reject many of the Amendments to the Constitution, and actively fight against people's inherent rights (such as the right to have and express an opinion, freedom of religion, right to keep and bear arms, due process, etc...)


So, as you can see, liberals reject the whole works. It gets in their way. They hate the document.

They hate it and oppose every part of it (especially the entire Bill of Rights)...until it can be used to pretend they are "saving the republic" from someone they want to smear.

Attachment 13089

[artichoke]

Clearly, the President used the whole apparatus of foreign policy not to defend America but to support his own personal interest by bribery.

And SCOTUS already UNANIMOUSLY rejected that hilariously illiterate butchery of the definition of bribery. This definition would make every president for the last 50 years guilty, especially Biden, who publicly bragged about blackmailing and bribing the Ukraine with taxpayer funds for personal gain. Try again.

It seems to me much more flagrant than anything Nixon did, and he was a total scoundrel.

What Nixon did was JAYWALKING compared to colluding with Russia to invent a fake dossier to illegally spy on an opponent during a major national election and invent scandal after scandal against him like this. What Democrats have done to the Constitution, to "our democracy," and to the rule of law here is literally an unprecedented abuse of power. And no, being framed in no way makes Trump guilty of Nixon's jaywalking-level offenses (compared to Obama, Biden, and Hillary).

[evince]

just spewing lies


the bottery designers are getting really desperate

[artichoke]

Arminius is a Russian troll.

And we're back to detecting secret Russian agents behind every shadow. Because arguing with gullible Democrat hacks on debate pages is all part of the diabolical plan to take over the world.

Again, Democrats are prone to conspiracy theories because they are all emotion and no IQ. Thanks for demonstrating for approximately the billionth time.

Turley is not a member of spokesperson for SCOTUS.

Nobody said he was. No one said anything like that. Him citing their unanimous rejection of the Democrats' bribery claims in no way implies that he is a spokesperson or member of SCOTUS.

Attachment 13090

[jimmymccready]

Arminius, you russian troll, quit lying.

[artichoke]

the trumpy and team announced they did it publicly

its a LOCK

they told us to GET OVER IT

Yes, they TOLD us (gasp!)...that they wanted to investigate Biden's corruption...which is still not a crime, still not impeachable, and still not worse than Biden BEING corrupt. But they TOLD us! They ADMITTED to the non-controversy in public!

What a fucking idiot.

anyone who claims they cant see a crime is a traitor to this nation

Or just a sane, thinking adult RESISTING traitors to this nation (you).

the new RETrumpAGAIN party is seeking a dictatorship

Now you're just getting desperate and lame.

Attachment 13091

they know they cant really win elections in a democracy

Says the ACORN party that opposes voter ID laws, helps illegal immigrants vote, and is currently trying to overthrow the rigged 2016 election that they still managed to lose.

[evince]

do you ever get tired of Putin sperm on your teeth?

[CFM]

Yes and yes.

Scotus has never decided an impeachment. The OP is a fucking tool.

The only thing evident is you pussies on the left being mad about getting your asses kicked.

[NiftyNiblick]

SCOTUS?

Gorsuch and Kavanaugh alone are sufficient reason for 63,000,000 Trump voters to be regarded as irredeemable "deplorables."

I personally place them on a much lower level than that, of course.

[CFM]

do you ever get tired of Putin sperm on your teeth?

Do you ever get tired of nigger shit on your lips? You can do better if you're willing to try. To this point, you've refused to do so.

[evince]

The only thing evident is you pussies on the left being mad about getting your asses kicked.

cheating is not winning

[CFM]

SCOTUS?

Gorsuch and Kavanaugh alone are sufficient reason for 63,000,000 Trump voters to be regarded as irredeemable "deplorables."

I personally place them on a much lower level than that, of course.

What you personally think doesn't come to the level of shit in a nigger's back yard and we both know that the shit is worth more than the kind whose back yard it's in.

Pucker up, n-l.

[artichoke]

If this is not impeachable, what is?

Actual crimes. Try to keep up.

Clinton's sex life hardly compares,

Which isn't what he was impeached for, brainwashed imbecile. He was impeached for PERJURY, and a slew of other ACTUAL crimes. Way to think it through, as usual.