Earl (12-05-2019), gfm7175 (12-05-2019), Truth Detector (12-05-2019)
The Supreme Court unanimously rejected the left's "make up whatever you feel like" definition of bribery being used to pretend there was a crime where none ever existed.
Observe:
Misconduct is not impeachable. Contorting bribery to mean literally anything as Democrats are doing (never mind their own, actual, provable bribery, of course) does not make it impeachable (and no, Trump investigating Biden's corruption is not worse than Biden BEING corrupt). Feelings, conjecture, or third party opinions about hypothetical corruption...still not impeachable. Now the McCarthyist left even wants to include RACISM, somehow, as a charge. Guess what? Racism (real or imaginary) isn't impeachable either.
It's simply embarrassing at this point.
The Founders warned at great length against what Democrats are doing...weaponizing impeachment to treasonously overthrow duly-elected presidents they simply dislike. In the Federalist Papers No. 65. Hamilton warned against "danger that the [impeachment] decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt." The Founders also specifically rejected the left's argument on this. According to the Founders, you cannot base an impeachment on "corruption, obtaining office by improper means, betraying the trust to a foreign power, negligence, perfidy, peculation [or] oppression," as Turley put it. That's a matter of record. The left's case is PROVABLY ERRONEOUS.
Obama would have been impeached a dozen times over by the legal standards Democrats are suddenly inventing (especially for ordering the fraudulent exoneration of Hillary and the framing of Trump...far worse than anything Trump is even being ACCUSED OF). Utterly dishonest power-abusing scam-artists to the bitter end. Meanwhile, the propaganda wing of the DNC—the news media—has taken to the McCarthy-style tactic of accusing anyone who notices the gaping holes in this rigged show trial of being a secret Russian agent...literally, Chuck Todd just did this to Sen. John Kennedy.
It's like living in 1984.
Attachment 13084
And the left's hand-picked lunatic fringe "legal experts" (openly biased, hate-filled Democrat campaign donors who were repeatedly caught misstating the facts and being dishonest) are the same partisan hacks who hilariously defended Obama's blatantly illegal enacting of laws without Congress, his obstruction of justice, and every other openly criminal abuse of power he committed.
It is a laughable farce.
Attachment 13083
Democrats have literally become too governed by unhinged rage, hypocrisy, and lunatic conspiracy theories to be reasoned with.
Last edited by artichoke; 12-05-2019 at 08:13 AM.
Earl (12-05-2019), gfm7175 (12-05-2019), Truth Detector (12-05-2019)
Earl (12-05-2019)
CharacterAssassin (12-05-2019), evince (12-05-2019), jimmymccready (12-05-2019), Trumpet (12-06-2019)
I keep telling you, the small handful of Democrats on here who are so uniquely low-IQ (40 or below) that they cannot carry on even the most basic adult conversations (you, Nomad, domer76)...are officially on ignore. Sorry about your missing chromosome.
Attachment 13085
Last edited by artichoke; 12-05-2019 at 08:33 AM.
Earl (12-05-2019), Truth Detector (12-05-2019)
evince (12-05-2019), jimmymccready (12-05-2019), katzgar (12-05-2019), Trumpet (12-06-2019)
It's evident that Trump is totally guilty. The question is whether the Trumpers are going to destroy their much-spoken-of Constitution.
Earl (12-07-2019)
CharacterAssassin (12-05-2019), evince (12-05-2019), jimmymccready (12-05-2019), Trumpet (12-06-2019)
evince (12-05-2019), Iolo/Penderyn (12-05-2019), jimmymccready (12-05-2019), Trumpet (12-06-2019)
Roberts will be the Judge in the Senate trial
he doesn't need trump in office to keep his position
He doesn't need the republican party to stay in his position
lets hope he makes it a real case instead of allowing the republicans to create a clown show that pretends its a trial on the Bidens and Ukraine
I guess it depends on if Roberts is Putin owned too
... of what crime, exactly?
Inversion Fallacy. LIBERALS are the ones destroying the Constitution, not "Trumpers". Those who like centralized power and control (aka Liberals) are those who desire to DESTROY the Constitution. It gets in the way of their Marxist pipe dream. Liberals already openly reject the whole document, as I will outline below. This is NOT an all inclusive list by any means, but merely offers up a few examples:
** They reject the limits on the legislative powers of Congress. (thus rejecting Article I)
** They reject the executive powers of the President if they happen to not like the President, and they reject the Electoral College. They reject the proper method and reasoning for removing a President from office. They reject the enumerated duties of a President, especially the duties of preserving/defending/protecting the US Constitution. (thus rejecting Article II)
** They reject the scope and role of SCOTUS and other inferior courts. They believe that SCOTUS are the sole interpreters of the US Constitution. They believe that SCOTUS are oligarchs. (thus rejecting Article III)
** They reject the Republican form of government that is guaranteed to the States. They reject protecting the States from invasions and domestic violence (especially when relating to immigration). (thus rejecting Article IV)
** They reject the formal amendment process, and instead regularly misuse the court system as a "work-around" to that. They wish to transform the USA into the SOA (Socialist Oligarchy of America). (thus rejecting Article V)
** They reject legislating in pursuance of the US Constitution. (thus rejecting Article VI)
** They reject that the States (collectively) are the owners of the US Constitution. (thus rejecting Article VII)
** They also reject many of the Amendments to the Constitution, and actively fight against people's inherent rights (such as the right to have and express an opinion, freedom of religion, right to keep and bear arms, due process, etc...)
So, as you can see, liberals reject the whole works. It gets in their way. They hate the document.
artichoke (12-05-2019), Earl (12-07-2019), Truth Detector (12-05-2019)
Clearly, the President used the whole apparatus of foreign policy not to defend America but to support his own personal interest by bribery. It seems to me much more flagrant than anything Nixon did, and he was a total scoundrel. How to describe this one except as the village idiot stealing knickers off the washing lines?
Earl (12-07-2019)
evince (12-05-2019), jimmymccready (12-05-2019), Micawber (12-05-2019), Trumpet (12-06-2019)
Arminius is a Russian troll.
Turley is not a member of spokesperson for SCOTUS.
evince (12-05-2019), Iolo/Penderyn (12-05-2019), Trumpet (12-06-2019)
the trumpy and team announced they did it publicly
its a LOCK
they told us to GET OVER IT
anyone who claims they cant see a crime is a traitor to this nation
the new RETrumpAGAIN party is seeking a dictatorship
they know they cant really win elections in a democracy
Trumpet (12-06-2019)
Guilty of things that are not impeachable? Sure, and even THAT much is not actually clear.
And newsflash: Simply saying things that contradict all the evidence doesn't magically make it all disappear and transform reality into whatever you want it to be. Sorry. It just doesn't work that way. Facts matter.
Attachment 13086
And no, resisting Democrat attempts to shred the Constitution is not "Trumpers" destroying anything...other than the left's triggered feelings.
Earl (12-07-2019), Truth Detector (12-05-2019)
cancel2 2022 (12-06-2019), Earl (12-07-2019)
canceled.2021.2 (12-05-2019), Truth Detector (12-05-2019)
cancel2 2022 (12-06-2019)
Trumpet (12-06-2019)
Bookmarks