Page 1 of 7 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 105

Thread: SCOTUS already unanimously rejected the left's dishonest, invalid impeachment case

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    10,720
    Thanks
    1,623
    Thanked 4,770 Times in 3,312 Posts
    Groans
    10
    Groaned 166 Times in 157 Posts

    Default SCOTUS already unanimously rejected the left's dishonest, invalid impeachment case

    The Supreme Court unanimously rejected the left's "make up whatever you feel like" definition of bribery being used to pretend there was a crime where none ever existed.

    Observe:



    Misconduct is not impeachable. Contorting bribery to mean literally anything as Democrats are doing (never mind their own, actual, provable bribery, of course) does not make it impeachable (and no, Trump investigating Biden's corruption is not worse than Biden BEING corrupt). Feelings, conjecture, or third party opinions about hypothetical corruption...still not impeachable. Now the McCarthyist left even wants to include RACISM, somehow, as a charge. Guess what? Racism (real or imaginary) isn't impeachable either.

    It's simply embarrassing at this point.

    The Founders warned at great length against what Democrats are doing...weaponizing impeachment to treasonously overthrow duly-elected presidents they simply dislike. In the Federalist Papers No. 65. Hamilton warned against "danger that the [impeachment] decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt." The Founders also specifically rejected the left's argument on this. According to the Founders, you cannot base an impeachment on "corruption, obtaining office by improper means, betraying the trust to a foreign power, negligence, perfidy, peculation [or] oppression," as Turley put it. That's a matter of record. The left's case is PROVABLY ERRONEOUS.

    Obama would have been impeached a dozen times over by the legal standards Democrats are suddenly inventing (especially for ordering the fraudulent exoneration of Hillary and the framing of Trump...far worse than anything Trump is even being ACCUSED OF). Utterly dishonest power-abusing scam-artists to the bitter end. Meanwhile, the propaganda wing of the DNC—the news media—has taken to the McCarthy-style tactic of accusing anyone who notices the gaping holes in this rigged show trial of being a secret Russian agent...literally, Chuck Todd just did this to Sen. John Kennedy.

    It's like living in 1984.

    Attachment 13084

    And the left's hand-picked lunatic fringe "legal experts" (openly biased, hate-filled Democrat campaign donors who were repeatedly caught misstating the facts and being dishonest) are the same partisan hacks who hilariously defended Obama's blatantly illegal enacting of laws without Congress, his obstruction of justice, and every other openly criminal abuse of power he committed.

    It is a laughable farce.

    Attachment 13083

    Democrats have literally become too governed by unhinged rage, hypocrisy, and lunatic conspiracy theories to be reasoned with.

    Last edited by artichoke; 12-05-2019 at 08:13 AM.

  2. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to artichoke For This Post:

    Earl (12-05-2019), gfm7175 (12-05-2019), Truth Detector (12-05-2019)

  3. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Prairieville
    Posts
    27,356
    Thanks
    2,896
    Thanked 10,626 Times in 7,127 Posts
    Groans
    331
    Groaned 2,985 Times in 2,707 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Arminius View Post
    The Supreme Court unanimously rejected the left's "make up whatever you feel like" definition of bribery being used to pretend there was a crime where none ever existed.

    Observe:



    Misconduct is not impeachable. Contorting bribery to mean literally anything as Democrats are doing (never mind their own, actual, provable bribery, of course) does not make it impeachable (and no, Trump investigating Biden's corruption is not worse than Biden BEING corrupt). Feelings, conjecture, or third party opinions about hypothetical corruption...still not impeachable. Now the McCarthyist left even wants to include RACISM, somehow, as a charge. Guess what? Racism (real or imaginary) isn't impeachable either.

    It's simply embarrassing at this point.

    The Founders warned at great length against what Democrats are doing...weaponizing impeachment to treasonously overthrow duly-elected presidents they simply dislike. In the Federalist Papers No. 65. Hamilton warned against "danger that the [impeachment] decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt." The Founders also specifically rejected the left's argument on this. According to the Founders, in their own words, you cannot base an impeachment on "corruption, obtaining office by improper means, betraying the trust to a foreign power, negligence, perfidy, peculation [or] oppression," as Turley put it. That's a matter of record. The left's case is PROVABLY ERRONEOUS.

    Obama would have been impeached a dozen times over by the legal standards Democrats are suddenly inventing (especially for ordering the fraudulent exoneration of Hillary and the framing of Trump...far worse than anything Trump is even being ACCUSED OF). Utterly dishonest power-abusing scam-artists to the bitter end. Meanwhile, the propaganda wing of the DNC—the news media—has taken to the McCarthy-style tactic of accusing anyone who notices the gaping holes in this rigged show trial of being a secret Russian agent...literally, Chuck Todd just did this to Sen. John Kennedy.

    It's like living in 1984.

    Attachment 13084

    And the left's hand-picked lunatic fringe "legal experts" (openly biased, hate-filled Democrat campaign donors who were repeatedly caught misstating the facts and being dishonest) are the same partisan hacks who hilariously defended Obama's blatantly illegal enacting of laws without Congress, his obstruction of justice, and every other openly criminal abuse of power he committed.

    It is a laughable farce.

    Attachment 13083

    Democrats have literally become too governed by unhinged rage and triggered snowflake hate to be reasoned with at this point.



    Putin needs to hire a better class of trolls, you are a moron. Scotus has nothing to do with impeachment.

  4. The Following User Groans At katzgar For This Awful Post:

    Earl (12-05-2019)

  5. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to katzgar For This Post:

    CharacterAssassin (12-05-2019), evince (12-05-2019), jimmymccready (12-05-2019), Trumpet (12-06-2019)

  6. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    10,720
    Thanks
    1,623
    Thanked 4,770 Times in 3,312 Posts
    Groans
    10
    Groaned 166 Times in 157 Posts

    Default

    I keep telling you, the small handful of Democrats on here who are so uniquely low-IQ (40 or below) that they cannot carry on even the most basic adult conversations (you, Nomad, domer76)...are officially on ignore. Sorry about your missing chromosome.

    Attachment 13085
    Last edited by artichoke; 12-05-2019 at 08:33 AM.

  7. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to artichoke For This Post:

    Earl (12-05-2019), Truth Detector (12-05-2019)

  8. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    26,547
    Thanks
    9,552
    Thanked 11,900 Times in 7,961 Posts
    Groans
    2,333
    Groaned 1,669 Times in 1,547 Posts

    Default SCOTUS already unanimously rejected the left's dishonest, invalid impeachment case

    Quote Originally Posted by Arminius View Post
    The Supreme Court unanimously rejected the left's "make up whatever you feel like" definition of bribery being used to pretend there was a crime where none ever existed.

    Observe:


    Soooo..... when did Jonathan Turley get appointed to the SCOTUS or even as the official spokesman for decisions they haven't rendered yet?
    https://i.postimg.cc/PqVCnGks/gojoe1.jpg
    C'MON MAN!!!!

  9. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Nomad For This Post:

    evince (12-05-2019), jimmymccready (12-05-2019), katzgar (12-05-2019), Trumpet (12-06-2019)

  10. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Location
    Cymru/ Wails
    Posts
    6,356
    Thanks
    3,525
    Thanked 2,507 Times in 1,787 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 1,738 Times in 1,599 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    It's evident that Trump is totally guilty. The question is whether the Trumpers are going to destroy their much-spoken-of Constitution.

  11. The Following User Groans At Iolo/Penderyn For This Awful Post:

    Earl (12-07-2019)

  12. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Iolo/Penderyn For This Post:

    CharacterAssassin (12-05-2019), evince (12-05-2019), jimmymccready (12-05-2019), Trumpet (12-06-2019)

  13. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    34,576
    Thanks
    5,715
    Thanked 15,145 Times in 10,539 Posts
    Groans
    100
    Groaned 2,987 Times in 2,752 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Penderyn View Post
    It's evident that Trump is totally guilty. The question is whether the Trumpers are going to destroy their much-spoken-of Constitution.

    Yes and yes.

    Scotus has never decided an impeachment. The OP is a fucking tool.

  14. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Micawber For This Post:

    evince (12-05-2019), Iolo/Penderyn (12-05-2019), jimmymccready (12-05-2019), Trumpet (12-06-2019)

  15. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    183,528
    Thanks
    71,923
    Thanked 35,503 Times in 27,049 Posts
    Groans
    53
    Groaned 19,565 Times in 18,156 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default

    Roberts will be the Judge in the Senate trial


    he doesn't need trump in office to keep his position

    He doesn't need the republican party to stay in his position



    lets hope he makes it a real case instead of allowing the republicans to create a clown show that pretends its a trial on the Bidens and Ukraine


    I guess it depends on if Roberts is Putin owned too

  16. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Posts
    10,835
    Thanks
    6,474
    Thanked 3,778 Times in 3,065 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 124 Times in 122 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Penderyn View Post
    It's evident that Trump is totally guilty.
    ... of what crime, exactly?

    Quote Originally Posted by Penderyn View Post
    The question is whether the Trumpers are going to destroy their much-spoken-of Constitution.
    Inversion Fallacy. LIBERALS are the ones destroying the Constitution, not "Trumpers". Those who like centralized power and control (aka Liberals) are those who desire to DESTROY the Constitution. It gets in the way of their Marxist pipe dream. Liberals already openly reject the whole document, as I will outline below. This is NOT an all inclusive list by any means, but merely offers up a few examples:


    ** They reject the limits on the legislative powers of Congress. (thus rejecting Article I)

    ** They reject the executive powers of the President if they happen to not like the President, and they reject the Electoral College. They reject the proper method and reasoning for removing a President from office. They reject the enumerated duties of a President, especially the duties of preserving/defending/protecting the US Constitution. (thus rejecting Article II)

    ** They reject the scope and role of SCOTUS and other inferior courts. They believe that SCOTUS are the sole interpreters of the US Constitution. They believe that SCOTUS are oligarchs. (thus rejecting Article III)

    ** They reject the Republican form of government that is guaranteed to the States. They reject protecting the States from invasions and domestic violence (especially when relating to immigration). (thus rejecting Article IV)

    ** They reject the formal amendment process, and instead regularly misuse the court system as a "work-around" to that. They wish to transform the USA into the SOA (Socialist Oligarchy of America). (thus rejecting Article V)

    ** They reject legislating in pursuance of the US Constitution. (thus rejecting Article VI)

    ** They reject that the States (collectively) are the owners of the US Constitution. (thus rejecting Article VII)

    ** They also reject many of the Amendments to the Constitution, and actively fight against people's inherent rights (such as the right to have and express an opinion, freedom of religion, right to keep and bear arms, due process, etc...)


    So, as you can see, liberals reject the whole works. It gets in their way. They hate the document.

  17. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to gfm7175 For This Post:

    artichoke (12-05-2019), Earl (12-07-2019), Truth Detector (12-05-2019)

  18. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Location
    Cymru/ Wails
    Posts
    6,356
    Thanks
    3,525
    Thanked 2,507 Times in 1,787 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 1,738 Times in 1,599 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Clearly, the President used the whole apparatus of foreign policy not to defend America but to support his own personal interest by bribery. It seems to me much more flagrant than anything Nixon did, and he was a total scoundrel. How to describe this one except as the village idiot stealing knickers off the washing lines?

  19. The Following User Groans At Iolo/Penderyn For This Awful Post:

    Earl (12-07-2019)

  20. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Iolo/Penderyn For This Post:

    evince (12-05-2019), jimmymccready (12-05-2019), Micawber (12-05-2019), Trumpet (12-06-2019)

  21. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    9,090
    Thanks
    3,487
    Thanked 3,433 Times in 2,367 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 888 Times in 802 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Arminius is a Russian troll.

    Turley is not a member of spokesperson for SCOTUS.

  22. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to jimmymccready For This Post:

    evince (12-05-2019), Iolo/Penderyn (12-05-2019), Trumpet (12-06-2019)

  23. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    183,528
    Thanks
    71,923
    Thanked 35,503 Times in 27,049 Posts
    Groans
    53
    Groaned 19,565 Times in 18,156 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default

    the trumpy and team announced they did it publicly

    its a LOCK

    they told us to GET OVER IT


    anyone who claims they cant see a crime is a traitor to this nation


    the new RETrumpAGAIN party is seeking a dictatorship


    they know they cant really win elections in a democracy

  24. The Following User Says Thank You to evince For This Post:

    Trumpet (12-06-2019)

  25. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    10,720
    Thanks
    1,623
    Thanked 4,770 Times in 3,312 Posts
    Groans
    10
    Groaned 166 Times in 157 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Penderyn View Post
    It's evident that Trump is totally guilty. The question is whether the Trumpers are going to destroy their much-spoken-of Constitution.
    Guilty of things that are not impeachable? Sure, and even THAT much is not actually clear.

    And newsflash: Simply saying things that contradict all the evidence doesn't magically make it all disappear and transform reality into whatever you want it to be. Sorry. It just doesn't work that way. Facts matter.

    Attachment 13086
    And no, resisting Democrat attempts to shred the Constitution is not "Trumpers" destroying anything...other than the left's triggered feelings.

  26. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to artichoke For This Post:

    Earl (12-07-2019), Truth Detector (12-05-2019)

  27. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Location
    Cymru/ Wails
    Posts
    6,356
    Thanks
    3,525
    Thanked 2,507 Times in 1,787 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 1,738 Times in 1,599 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Arminius View Post
    Guilty of things that are not impeachable? Sure, and even THAT much is not actually clear.

    And newsflash: Simply saying things that contradict all the evidence doesn't magically make it all disappear and transform reality into whatever you want it to be. Sorry. It just doesn't work that way. Facts matter.
    And no, resisting Democrat attempts to shred the Constitution is not "Trumpers" destroying anything but the left's triggered feelings.
    If this is not impeachable, what is? Clinton's sex life hardly compares, and you made enough fuss about that, as I recollect. I doubt if your present poor old bugger is up to sex with piglets, but might that do it, do you think?

  28. The Following 2 Users Groan At Iolo/Penderyn For This Awful Post:

    cancel2 2022 (12-06-2019), Earl (12-07-2019)

  29. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    10,720
    Thanks
    1,623
    Thanked 4,770 Times in 3,312 Posts
    Groans
    10
    Groaned 166 Times in 157 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Micawber View Post
    Yes and yes.

    Scotus has never decided an impeachment. The OP is a fucking tool.
    No one is saying they did, Captain Literacy. The person failing to comprehend what is being argued (you) is an ACTUAL fucking tool.

  30. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to artichoke For This Post:

    canceled.2021.2 (12-05-2019), Truth Detector (12-05-2019)

  31. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Prairieville
    Posts
    27,356
    Thanks
    2,896
    Thanked 10,626 Times in 7,127 Posts
    Groans
    331
    Groaned 2,985 Times in 2,707 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Arminius View Post
    No one is saying they did, Captain Literacy. The person failing to comprehend what is being argued (you) is an ACTUAL fucking tool.

    We know you are a Russian troll and all you do is keep proving it...Why havent you been reprogrammed so you are marginally believable?

  32. The Following User Groans At katzgar For This Awful Post:

    cancel2 2022 (12-06-2019)

  33. The Following User Says Thank You to katzgar For This Post:

    Trumpet (12-06-2019)

Similar Threads

  1. Trump threatening to order SCOTUS to block Impeachment by Congress
    By reagansghost in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-25-2019, 12:05 AM
  2. trump thinks the SCOTUS cpuld stop impeachment
    By evince in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 04-24-2019, 01:24 PM
  3. SCOTUS Says No to Fake Right Wing Case.
    By katzgar in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 12-11-2018, 02:20 PM
  4. REJECTED- rump's spiteful family travel ban REJECTED!!!!!
    By Bill in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-08-2017, 08:58 AM
  5. Another dishonest ad by the left
    By TuTu Monroe in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 06-18-2009, 06:16 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •