Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 64

Thread: Republican witness Call Trump out.

  1. #16 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    94,206
    Thanks
    9,841
    Thanked 33,906 Times in 21,667 Posts
    Groans
    290
    Groaned 5,696 Times in 5,198 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sailor View Post
    Feel free to do that. It would probably be the first time you have ever backed up your bullshit. I will wait.
    Are you denying it?
    4,487

    18 U.S. Code § 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
    44 U.S.C. 2202 - The United States shall reserve and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records; and such records shall be administered in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.


    LOCK HIM UP!

  2. #17 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2019
    Posts
    2,188
    Thanks
    54
    Thanked 1,168 Times in 831 Posts
    Groans
    27
    Groaned 47 Times in 43 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    I saw that part, I was talking about how astonishing it is that his own witness contradicts Trumps claim of perfection.

    I understand why you want to change the subject.
    So what? Is Turley for or against impeachment?

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to OG Yurt For This Post:

    Truth Detector (12-04-2019)

  4. #18 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    40,213
    Thanks
    14,475
    Thanked 23,679 Times in 16,485 Posts
    Groans
    23
    Groaned 585 Times in 561 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    Are you denying it?
    Feel free to post it and do not play games Jarod. You made the claim, back it up.

  5. #19 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    94,206
    Thanks
    9,841
    Thanked 33,906 Times in 21,667 Posts
    Groans
    290
    Groaned 5,696 Times in 5,198 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OG Yurt View Post
    So what? Is Turley for or against impeachment?
    Against it at this point, but even he knows the call was a clusterfuck.
    4,487

    18 U.S. Code § 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
    44 U.S.C. 2202 - The United States shall reserve and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records; and such records shall be administered in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.


    LOCK HIM UP!

  6. #20 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    34,576
    Thanks
    5,715
    Thanked 15,145 Times in 10,539 Posts
    Groans
    100
    Groaned 2,987 Times in 2,752 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sailor View Post
    What impeachment hearings are you listening to? Better yet, through what left wing loony opinion pieces? Turley is slapping around Democrats like they are his bitch.
    You must be in the cheap seats, cuz not from where I sat he didn't. What I saw in Turley was a man who was 3/4th a sellout but still straddled the fence enough to save his credibility
    later because he knows life exists after Trump and he didn't want to look like a complete clown. He only looked like 3/4th of a clown.
    He must have practiced in the mirror for hours not smirking as he mouthed things like "paucity of evidence" and "need for judicial review of all subpoenas"

    If you watched, you learned, and that is good. What Trump did is EXACTLY why impeachment and removal exists.

  7. The Following User Groans At Micawber For This Awful Post:

    Earl (12-04-2019)

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to Micawber For This Post:

    Jarod (12-04-2019)

  9. #21 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    8,274
    Thanks
    372
    Thanked 3,039 Times in 2,191 Posts
    Groans
    168
    Groaned 603 Times in 570 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    Call Trump out.

    The Republicans brought George Washington university professor Jonathan Turley in to be a witness today.

    Are you watching, he said the phone call was anything but perfect.
    Turley can't have it both ways.

    He recently had an OPed in in New York Times and said, "Trump has committed impeachable offenses, and other High Crimes", and yet come to the Congress floor and say, "Donald Trump has not done anything that I consider as impeachable"!

    What the fuck kind of a flip-flop is that?

    LOOKS LIKE PURE POLITICAL BIAS TO ME!

  10. #22 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    94,206
    Thanks
    9,841
    Thanked 33,906 Times in 21,667 Posts
    Groans
    290
    Groaned 5,696 Times in 5,198 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    If this is not impeachable, then we have an imperial presidency.
    4,487

    18 U.S. Code § 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
    44 U.S.C. 2202 - The United States shall reserve and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records; and such records shall be administered in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.


    LOCK HIM UP!

  11. #23 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    40,213
    Thanks
    14,475
    Thanked 23,679 Times in 16,485 Posts
    Groans
    23
    Groaned 585 Times in 561 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Micawber View Post
    You must be in the cheap seats, cuz not from where I sat he didn't. What I saw in Turley was a man who was 3/4th a sellout but still straddled the fence enough to save his credibility
    later because he knows life exists after Trump and he didn't want to look like a complete clown. He only looked like 3/4th of a clown.
    He must have practiced in the mirror for hours not smirking as he mouthed things like "paucity of evidence" and "need for judicial review of all subpoenas"

    If you watched, you learned, and that is good. What Trump did is EXACTLY why impeachment and removal exists.
    Hmmm. Still waiting on the proof for Jarods statements. Perhaps you have them?

  12. #24 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    25,590
    Thanks
    79
    Thanked 9,916 Times in 6,548 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 1,882 Times in 1,756 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grokmaster View Post
    And ALSO THAT THERE WAS NO CRIME/IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE.


    You MISS THAT PART?? DER....


    BTW..Turley is s LONGTIME DEMOCRAT...
    We have multiple witnesses that see the crimes trump committed, and one lonely dissenter . Does that make you feel better that finally someone has sided with trump?

  13. #25 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    34,576
    Thanks
    5,715
    Thanked 15,145 Times in 10,539 Posts
    Groans
    100
    Groaned 2,987 Times in 2,752 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jimmymccready View Post
    Impeachment does not require a crime.
    But he did explain that if the crime were bribery he thought the congress should use the definition adopted by scotus
    for bribery allegedly committed in some other context. Then he went on to distinguish the instant case from the one at bar he cited.
    I thought it an odd argument to make for someone whose audience is the original intent of the framers crowd. If this is going over anyone's heads
    I apologize in advance. It gets even chewier than that but I'll not go there.

  14. #26 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    14,055
    Thanks
    2,436
    Thanked 8,812 Times in 6,202 Posts
    Groans
    568
    Groaned 493 Times in 469 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    Republican witness Call Trump out.
    Is English your first language? You sound Russian. Hey, wait a minute, are you a russo-bothole? evince, call your office.
    Every life matters

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to countryboy For This Post:

    Truth Detector (12-04-2019)

  16. #27 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    34,576
    Thanks
    5,715
    Thanked 15,145 Times in 10,539 Posts
    Groans
    100
    Groaned 2,987 Times in 2,752 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by floridafan View Post
    We have multiple witnesses that see the crimes trump committed, and one lonely dissenter . Does that make you feel better that finally someone has sided with trump?
    Considering Turley was vetted with the express purpose in mind it's hardly a surprise they found one.

  17. The Following User Says Thank You to Micawber For This Post:

    jimmymccready (12-04-2019)

  18. #28 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    34,576
    Thanks
    5,715
    Thanked 15,145 Times in 10,539 Posts
    Groans
    100
    Groaned 2,987 Times in 2,752 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sailor View Post
    Hmmm. Still waiting on the proof for Jarods statements. Perhaps you have them?
    I reviewed your exchange with Jarod and I am still unsure which of the two claims he seemingly made you are disputing.

  19. #29 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    25,590
    Thanks
    79
    Thanked 9,916 Times in 6,548 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 1,882 Times in 1,756 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Micawber View Post
    Considering Turley was vetted with the express purpose in mind it's hardly a surprise they found one.
    This is the same guy who said he is a good friend of Bill Barr. Whoa!!!

  20. The Following User Says Thank You to floridafan For This Post:

    jimmymccready (12-04-2019)

  21. #30 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    40,213
    Thanks
    14,475
    Thanked 23,679 Times in 16,485 Posts
    Groans
    23
    Groaned 585 Times in 561 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Micawber View Post
    I reviewed your exchange with Jarod and I am still unsure which of the two claims he seemingly made you are disputing.
    Take the time to read it again. Jarod seems to be avoiding it.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 146
    Last Post: 11-01-2019, 04:11 PM
  2. Replies: 69
    Last Post: 10-01-2019, 02:30 PM
  3. Replies: 26
    Last Post: 06-04-2019, 11:25 PM
  4. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 01-28-2019, 05:04 AM
  5. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-19-2016, 04:19 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •