Page 3 of 8 FirstFirst 1234567 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 111

Thread: Andrew Nepolitano would vote to impeach Trump

  1. #31 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    41,961
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,041 Times in 13,848 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,042 Times in 2,838 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Southern Chicken View Post
    He hasn't committed any crimes. Executive privilege isn't a crime.
    So now asking a foreign nation to help you in your reelection is covered under Executive Privilege? Abuse of power is covered under Executive Privilage?

    You people got to start turning off Sean and read, primary sources would be a good start

  2. The Following User Groans At archives For This Awful Post:

    Earl (12-04-2019)

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to archives For This Post:

    domer76 (12-04-2019)

  4. #32 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    25,590
    Thanks
    79
    Thanked 9,916 Times in 6,548 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 1,882 Times in 1,756 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CFM View Post
    You mean like Brian Pagliano did when when served a subpoena in the Hillary email investigation?
    Yes, exactly. Mr. Pagliano was held in contempt of Congress, just as those who refuse to testify in this administration, as well as the man who directed them not to testify. Thanks for helping us out, and clarifying the matter.

  5. #33 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    57,638
    Thanks
    563
    Thanked 10,010 Times in 8,569 Posts
    Groans
    29
    Groaned 498 Times in 487 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by floridafan View Post
    Yes, exactly. Mr. Pagliano was held in contempt of Congress, just as those who refuse to testify in this administration, as well as the man who directed them not to testify. Thanks for helping us out, and clarifying the matter.
    Did Pagliano testify?

  6. #34 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    25,590
    Thanks
    79
    Thanked 9,916 Times in 6,548 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 1,882 Times in 1,756 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    I don't thinks so, but he was ready to.
    You were kind enough to show us all why not testifying , and not obeying a subpoena is not an option. That is why Mr. trump will be charged with contempt of Congress.

  7. #35 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    49,883
    Thanks
    14,463
    Thanked 32,101 Times in 21,165 Posts
    Groans
    6
    Groaned 1,307 Times in 1,235 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    He'll be gone from FOX soon, not following the White House script
    It’s one thing to have contrasting opinions/biases on board but Nappy has become a knee-jerk anti-Trumper.

    A predictable one at that.
    Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017

  8. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Darth Omar For This Post:

    dukkha (12-04-2019), Earl (12-04-2019)

  9. #36 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    26,116
    Thanks
    694
    Thanked 5,043 Times in 3,907 Posts
    Groans
    85
    Groaned 1,697 Times in 1,555 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by floridafan View Post
    Fox News senior judicial analyst Judge Andrew Napolitano revealed on Wednesday that he would vote to impeach President Donald Trump if he were a member of the House of Representatives.

    “You believe the president has committed impeachable offenses?” Fox News host Bill Hemmer asked Napolitano minutes before a House impeachment hearing.

    “I believe that the Democrats have credibly argued that he committed impeachable offenses,” Napolitano explained. “The easiest one — it exists in Andrew Johnson, Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton — was obstruction of Congress.”

    “By directing his subordinates to refuse to comply with lawfully issued subpoenas,” he continued, “whether it’s for testimony or for documents, that’s an impeachable offense. We know that from history. Every time the House has looked at that with respect to the president, they have found that to be impeachable.”

    “On that, reasonable minds cannot disagree,” Napolitano added, “without rejecting history and without rejecting constitutional norms.”
    “If you were in the House, would you vote for impeachment?” Hemmer wondered.

    “I certainly would,” Napolitano replied. “I would on that count.”

    Watch the video below from Fox News.
    Nepolitano is a throwback to Conservatives who were more loyal to America than to the Republican party.

  10. #37 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    52,291
    Thanks
    77,752
    Thanked 23,568 Times in 17,849 Posts
    Groans
    38,677
    Groaned 3,238 Times in 3,042 Posts
    Blog Entries
    8

    Default

    Nap is auditioning for a gig on CNN...or MSNBC.

    Sold...to the highest bidder.

  11. #38 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,815
    Thanks
    301
    Thanked 943 Times in 675 Posts
    Groans
    20
    Groaned 10 Times in 10 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    So now asking a foreign nation to help you in your reelection is covered under Executive Privilege? Abuse of power is covered under Executive Privilage?

    You people got to start turning off Sean and read, primary sources would be a good start
    "*Just the fact that he will not allow his people to testify after receiving a congressional subpoena is a crime in itself."

    Is what we were speaking on. Please feel free to join OUR conversation.

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to Southern Chicken For This Post:

    dukkha (12-04-2019)

  13. #39 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    41,961
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,041 Times in 13,848 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,042 Times in 2,838 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Southern Chicken View Post
    "*Just the fact that he will not allow his people to testify after receiving a congressional subpoena is a crime in itself."

    Is what we were speaking on. Please feel free to join OUR conversation.
    How is it not obstruction? How does Executive Privilage cover everyone who ever worked at any time in the White House? Any member of the Cabinet or a Cabinet member's staff past or present? Any and all documents which normally would be open for public review? Actions of the President before he was even elected President?

    Your understanding of Executive Privilage is actually Executive absolutism, one of the very things the Founding Fathers warned us against

  14. #40 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    43,479
    Thanks
    12,574
    Thanked 23,756 Times in 16,563 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,622 Times in 1,532 Posts

    Default

    Nappy has been wrong about everything, including Mueller

  15. #41 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    43,479
    Thanks
    12,574
    Thanked 23,756 Times in 16,563 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,622 Times in 1,532 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    How is it not obstruction? How does Executive Privilage cover everyone who ever worked at any time in the White House? Any member of the Cabinet or a Cabinet member's staff past or present? Any and all documents which normally would be open for public review? Actions of the President before he was even elected President?
    surely his advisors and aides are covered -don't like it? take it to court.
    But you can't not take it to court and then yell obstruction - Trump is making the claim.
    it's up to Schiff to get a court order otherwise..then you can yell obstruction

  16. #42 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    43,479
    Thanks
    12,574
    Thanked 23,756 Times in 16,563 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,622 Times in 1,532 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darth Omar View Post
    It’s one thing to have contrasting opinions/biases on board but Nappy has become a knee-jerk anti-Trumper.

    A predictable one at that.
    Napolitano Has Been Wrong About Basically Everything
    https://www.redstate.com/bonchie/201...ly-everything/
    ......At some point, all of Napolitano’s opinions start to seem more like excuses to bash the President than actual legal analysis.

    Napolitano also predicted that Donald Trump Jr. would be indicted.

    When asked if he expects anyone in the president’s inner circle to be charged, Napolitano said, “Yes. I don’t know who, but I do know that Donald Jr. has told friends he expects to be indicted.”

    “Do you expect he’d be indicted?” Abrams asked.

    “Yes,” Napolitano said.

    Wrong again, as Napolitano found himself in the company of such great predictive minds as John Brennan and Chris Matthews.

    But forget Trump for a second, because his bad takes go back to Hillary Clinton as well. Who can forget his proclamations that indictments were coming in the email scandal?

    So we know already the FBI is interacting with the Justice Department, the FBI has already made some recommendations to the Justice Department, the Justice Department has accepted those recommendations seriously, has convened a grand jury, and has begun or will soon begin to present evidence to the grand jury, and they need Mr. Pagliano’s testimony immunized, which means he no longer has the privilege against self-incrimination because they can’t use against him whatever he says. It also means — this is profound — they intend to indict someone. It’s not Bryan Pagliano; he can only be indicted if he commits perjury if he lies under oath. But, they intend to indict someone in this chain north of him.

    That’s a big nope. In the end, no one was indicted in the Hillary email case, much less Clinton herself.

    Allow me to reiterate what I said earlier. This guy has been wrong about literally everything he’s commented on in regards to high profile, political-legal cases in the last four years. I’m sure if I went back further, I could find more examples outside of Trump and Hillary as well. He continually falls into dramatic proclamations over factual analysis. His hatred of Donald Trump has only driven him further over the edge, where he’s whiffed again and again regarding the President.

    The same thing is happening now with his statements on Ukraine. At what point does Fox News stop paying this guy to be wrong? I don’t know, but I do know that no one should be taking him seriously.

  17. The Following User Says Thank You to dukkha For This Post:

    Darth Omar (12-04-2019)

  18. #43 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    49,883
    Thanks
    14,463
    Thanked 32,101 Times in 21,165 Posts
    Groans
    6
    Groaned 1,307 Times in 1,235 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    So now asking a foreign nation to help you in your reelection is covered under Executive Privilege? Abuse of power is covered under Executive Privilage?

    You people got to start turning off Sean and read, primary sources would be a good start
    Where did Trump say he needed help with the election?
    Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017

  19. #44 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    47,509
    Thanks
    17,005
    Thanked 13,151 Times in 10,077 Posts
    Groans
    452
    Groaned 2,450 Times in 2,265 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AssHatZombie View Post
    lol. damn you stoopid
    If the President ISN'T subject to Oversight, who is he responsible to?

  20. #45 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    49,883
    Thanks
    14,463
    Thanked 32,101 Times in 21,165 Posts
    Groans
    6
    Groaned 1,307 Times in 1,235 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack View Post
    If the President ISN'T subject to Oversight, who is he responsible to?
    Voters lol?

    Why don’t House Democrats listen to them?
    Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017

Similar Threads

  1. So Libs when is the impeach vote
    By volsrock in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 10-16-2019, 04:32 PM
  2. APP - The democrat party will not vote to impeach President Trump
    By canceled.2021.2 in forum Above Plain Politics Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-08-2019, 12:08 PM
  3. Impeach Clinton? Impeach Trump? What lawmakers said then, what they say now
    By Truth Detector in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 10-04-2019, 01:43 PM
  4. '30 REPUBLICAN SENATORS WOULD VOTE TO IMPEACH TRUMP'
    By Jack in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 09-26-2019, 07:16 AM
  5. Legislators vote to impeach Obama over transgender rights
    By Legion Troll in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 05-20-2016, 09:07 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •