Earl (12-04-2019)
Earl (12-04-2019)
domer76 (12-04-2019)
I don't thinks so, but he was ready to.
You were kind enough to show us all why not testifying , and not obeying a subpoena is not an option. That is why Mr. trump will be charged with contempt of Congress.
Nap is auditioning for a gig on CNN...or MSNBC.
Sold...to the highest bidder.
dukkha (12-04-2019)
How is it not obstruction? How does Executive Privilage cover everyone who ever worked at any time in the White House? Any member of the Cabinet or a Cabinet member's staff past or present? Any and all documents which normally would be open for public review? Actions of the President before he was even elected President?
Your understanding of Executive Privilage is actually Executive absolutism, one of the very things the Founding Fathers warned us against
Nappy has been wrong about everything, including Mueller
Napolitano Has Been Wrong About Basically Everything
https://www.redstate.com/bonchie/201...ly-everything/
......At some point, all of Napolitano’s opinions start to seem more like excuses to bash the President than actual legal analysis.
Napolitano also predicted that Donald Trump Jr. would be indicted.
When asked if he expects anyone in the president’s inner circle to be charged, Napolitano said, “Yes. I don’t know who, but I do know that Donald Jr. has told friends he expects to be indicted.”
“Do you expect he’d be indicted?” Abrams asked.
“Yes,” Napolitano said.
Wrong again, as Napolitano found himself in the company of such great predictive minds as John Brennan and Chris Matthews.
But forget Trump for a second, because his bad takes go back to Hillary Clinton as well. Who can forget his proclamations that indictments were coming in the email scandal?
So we know already the FBI is interacting with the Justice Department, the FBI has already made some recommendations to the Justice Department, the Justice Department has accepted those recommendations seriously, has convened a grand jury, and has begun or will soon begin to present evidence to the grand jury, and they need Mr. Pagliano’s testimony immunized, which means he no longer has the privilege against self-incrimination because they can’t use against him whatever he says. It also means — this is profound — they intend to indict someone. It’s not Bryan Pagliano; he can only be indicted if he commits perjury if he lies under oath. But, they intend to indict someone in this chain north of him.
That’s a big nope. In the end, no one was indicted in the Hillary email case, much less Clinton herself.
Allow me to reiterate what I said earlier. This guy has been wrong about literally everything he’s commented on in regards to high profile, political-legal cases in the last four years. I’m sure if I went back further, I could find more examples outside of Trump and Hillary as well. He continually falls into dramatic proclamations over factual analysis. His hatred of Donald Trump has only driven him further over the edge, where he’s whiffed again and again regarding the President.
The same thing is happening now with his statements on Ukraine. At what point does Fox News stop paying this guy to be wrong? I don’t know, but I do know that no one should be taking him seriously.
Darth Omar (12-04-2019)
Bookmarks